Development of a buried bag technique to study biochars incorporated in a compost or composting medium

• Published in: Journal of soils and sediments 2017-03, Vol.17 (3), p.656-664
• Main Authors: Khan, Naser, Clark, Ian, Bolan, Nanthi, Meier, Sebastian, Saint, Christopher P., Sánchez-Monedero, Miguel A., Shea, Syd, Lehmann, Johannes, Qiu, Rongliang
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Biochar for a Sustainable Environment; Biomass; Charcoal; Chickens; Composting; Composts; Containers; Earth and Environmental Science; Environment; Environmental Physics; Litter; Macadamia; Physicochemical analysis; Polypropylene; Poultry; Poultry manure; Sawdust; Soil Science & Conservation
• ISSN: 1439-0108; 1614-7480
• DOI: 10.1007/s11368-016-1359-8

Purpose The purpose was to develop a netbag technique suitable for burying biochar in a compost or composting medium, followed by its collection in a clean state (i.e., free of compost debris) without loss or damage, for physicochemical analyses. Collection in a clean state is required to ensure that the analytical data of various biochars are representative and comparable. Five criteria were identified to evaluate the suitability of netbag. Materials and methods A small netbag (3.5 × 3.5 cm) was developed using nylon fabric (30-μm mesh) to contain ∼1 g of biochar. A production system was developed to make 15 netbags per batch. Unlike commonly used litterbags, polypropylene was used to seal netbags. Two experiments were conducted in which three biochars, made from macadamia nutshell, hardwood shaving, and chicken litter, were co-composted with chicken manure and sawdust and also incubated with a chicken litter-based commercial compost. Biochars were added at the rates of 5 or 10 % in the co-composting and 10 or 20 % in the incubation experiments. The biochar-containing netbags were buried in the co-composting and incubation mediums for 133 days. Various physicochemical analyses were conducted with netbag-biochars and their compost mediums. Results and discussion The netbags collected after both experiments showed no visible sign of degradation. The weight of netbag-biochars from co-composting and incubation systems did not reduce significantly over the experimental period, thereby indicating no loss of biochar. No visible evidence of entry of solid particles from compost medium was found on the netbag-biochars. Pretests indicated that the netbag and biochars absorbed pore solution from the medium. Findings showed that elements translocated between the netbag-biochar and compost medium. A colony of coccus bacteria was found on the surface of composted chicken litter biochar, denoting probable entry of bacteria from compost medium. Unlike conventional litterbags, the netbags were suitable for burying and extracting biochar in compost/composting mediums due to smaller size, smaller mesh, and strong sealing with polypropylene. Conclusions The netbags addressed all the five criteria. Therefore, it was concluded that, in the co-compost or incubated-compost medium, the biochar retained in the netbag and the biochar mixed with the medium were exposed to a similar bio-oxidative environment, and netbag-biochar represents the biochar in the medium. This means that th