Loading…

Cementless versus cemented Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: early results of a non-designer user group

Purpose Although fewer tibial radiolucent lines are observed in cementless Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) compared with cemented Oxford UKA, an independent comparative study on this topic is lacking. Methods In this multicentre retrospective study, a cohort of 60 consecutive cases o...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2017-03, Vol.25 (3), p.703-709
Main Authors: Kerens, B., Schotanus, M. G. M., Boonen, B., Boog, P., Emans, P. J., Lacroix, H., Kort, N. P.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-591eb66e809b84b195149e55a68cb12387f72a2741954048593a39c54a99b9d93
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-591eb66e809b84b195149e55a68cb12387f72a2741954048593a39c54a99b9d93
container_end_page 709
container_issue 3
container_start_page 703
container_title Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA
container_volume 25
creator Kerens, B.
Schotanus, M. G. M.
Boonen, B.
Boog, P.
Emans, P. J.
Lacroix, H.
Kort, N. P.
description Purpose Although fewer tibial radiolucent lines are observed in cementless Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) compared with cemented Oxford UKA, an independent comparative study on this topic is lacking. Methods In this multicentre retrospective study, a cohort of 60 consecutive cases of cementless Oxford UKA is compared with a cohort of 60 consecutive cases of cemented Oxford UKA. Radiolucent lines, survival, perioperative data and clinical results were compared. Results No complete tibial radiolucent lines were observed in either group. Seventeen per cent of partial tibial radiolucent lines were observed in the cementless group versus 21 % in the cemented group (n.s.). The percentage of tibial radiolucent zones was 4 versus 9 %, respectively ( p  = 0.036). Survival rates were 90 % at 34 months for the cementless group and 84 % at 54 months for the cemented group (n.s.). Mean operation time was 10 min shorter in the cementless group ( p  
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00167-016-4149-3
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1877847278</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1877847278</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-591eb66e809b84b195149e55a68cb12387f72a2741954048593a39c54a99b9d93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU2LFDEQhoMo7jj6A7xIwIuXaD47iTcZdBUW9qLnkO6uHmft7rSpzrLz7804q4ggeKmkqp56Q-Ul5LngrwXn9g1yLhrLamBaaM_UA7IRWilmlbYPyYZ7LZnkprkgTxBvOK9X7R-TC2lFI4S3G7LsYIJ5HQGR3kLGgrT7WYGeXt8NKfe0zIcuTUvM66keR_ptBqA1_ZrTMkZcj28pxDweaQYs44o0DTTSOc2sBzzsZ8i0YA37nMrylDwa4ojw7P7cki8f3n_efWRX15efdu-uWKe5WZnxAtqmAcd963QrvKkLgjGxcV0rpHJ2sDJKq2tHc-2MV1H5zujofet7r7bk1Vl3yel7AVzDdMAOxjHOkAoG4ax12krr_gOVTWO9rF-7JS__Qm9SyXNd5CSopDPKm0qJM9XlhJhhCEs-TDEfg-Dh5Fw4OxdqCCfngqozL-6VSztB_3vil1UVkGcAa2veQ_7j6X-q_gBmkaMu</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1873285395</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cementless versus cemented Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: early results of a non-designer user group</title><source>EBSCOhost SPORTDiscus with Full Text</source><source>Springer Nature</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Kerens, B. ; Schotanus, M. G. M. ; Boonen, B. ; Boog, P. ; Emans, P. J. ; Lacroix, H. ; Kort, N. P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kerens, B. ; Schotanus, M. G. M. ; Boonen, B. ; Boog, P. ; Emans, P. J. ; Lacroix, H. ; Kort, N. P.</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose Although fewer tibial radiolucent lines are observed in cementless Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) compared with cemented Oxford UKA, an independent comparative study on this topic is lacking. Methods In this multicentre retrospective study, a cohort of 60 consecutive cases of cementless Oxford UKA is compared with a cohort of 60 consecutive cases of cemented Oxford UKA. Radiolucent lines, survival, perioperative data and clinical results were compared. Results No complete tibial radiolucent lines were observed in either group. Seventeen per cent of partial tibial radiolucent lines were observed in the cementless group versus 21 % in the cemented group (n.s.). The percentage of tibial radiolucent zones was 4 versus 9 %, respectively ( p  = 0.036). Survival rates were 90 % at 34 months for the cementless group and 84 % at 54 months for the cemented group (n.s.). Mean operation time was 10 min shorter in the cementless group ( p  &lt; 0.001), and clinical results were not significantly different. Conclusions Although no significant differences in radiolucent lines were found between both groups, they appear to be more common in the cemented group. This confirms previous results from reports by prosthesis designers. The presence of radiolucent lines after cemented Oxford UKA does not correlate with clinical outcome or survival. Level of evidence III.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0942-2056</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1433-7347</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00167-016-4149-3</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27161197</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Arthritis ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - methods ; Bone Cements ; Case-Control Studies ; Designers ; Female ; Humans ; Hydroxyapatite ; Interfaces ; Joint replacement surgery ; Kaplan-Meier Estimate ; Knee ; Knee Prosthesis ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Middle Aged ; Orthopedics ; Osteoarthritis, Knee - surgery ; Patients ; Polymethyl methacrylate ; Postoperative Complications - diagnostic imaging ; Prostheses ; Prosthesis Design ; Retrospective Studies ; Tibia - diagnostic imaging ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2017-03, Vol.25 (3), p.703-709</ispartof><rights>European Society of Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery, Arthroscopy (ESSKA) 2016</rights><rights>Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy is a copyright of Springer, 2017.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-591eb66e809b84b195149e55a68cb12387f72a2741954048593a39c54a99b9d93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-591eb66e809b84b195149e55a68cb12387f72a2741954048593a39c54a99b9d93</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1269-6909</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27161197$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kerens, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schotanus, M. G. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boonen, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boog, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Emans, P. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lacroix, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kort, N. P.</creatorcontrib><title>Cementless versus cemented Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: early results of a non-designer user group</title><title>Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA</title><addtitle>Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc</addtitle><addtitle>Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc</addtitle><description>Purpose Although fewer tibial radiolucent lines are observed in cementless Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) compared with cemented Oxford UKA, an independent comparative study on this topic is lacking. Methods In this multicentre retrospective study, a cohort of 60 consecutive cases of cementless Oxford UKA is compared with a cohort of 60 consecutive cases of cemented Oxford UKA. Radiolucent lines, survival, perioperative data and clinical results were compared. Results No complete tibial radiolucent lines were observed in either group. Seventeen per cent of partial tibial radiolucent lines were observed in the cementless group versus 21 % in the cemented group (n.s.). The percentage of tibial radiolucent zones was 4 versus 9 %, respectively ( p  = 0.036). Survival rates were 90 % at 34 months for the cementless group and 84 % at 54 months for the cemented group (n.s.). Mean operation time was 10 min shorter in the cementless group ( p  &lt; 0.001), and clinical results were not significantly different. Conclusions Although no significant differences in radiolucent lines were found between both groups, they appear to be more common in the cemented group. This confirms previous results from reports by prosthesis designers. The presence of radiolucent lines after cemented Oxford UKA does not correlate with clinical outcome or survival. Level of evidence III.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Arthritis</subject><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - methods</subject><subject>Bone Cements</subject><subject>Case-Control Studies</subject><subject>Designers</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hydroxyapatite</subject><subject>Interfaces</subject><subject>Joint replacement surgery</subject><subject>Kaplan-Meier Estimate</subject><subject>Knee</subject><subject>Knee Prosthesis</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><subject>Osteoarthritis, Knee - surgery</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Polymethyl methacrylate</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Prostheses</subject><subject>Prosthesis Design</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Tibia - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0942-2056</issn><issn>1433-7347</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkU2LFDEQhoMo7jj6A7xIwIuXaD47iTcZdBUW9qLnkO6uHmft7rSpzrLz7804q4ggeKmkqp56Q-Ul5LngrwXn9g1yLhrLamBaaM_UA7IRWilmlbYPyYZ7LZnkprkgTxBvOK9X7R-TC2lFI4S3G7LsYIJ5HQGR3kLGgrT7WYGeXt8NKfe0zIcuTUvM66keR_ptBqA1_ZrTMkZcj28pxDweaQYs44o0DTTSOc2sBzzsZ8i0YA37nMrylDwa4ojw7P7cki8f3n_efWRX15efdu-uWKe5WZnxAtqmAcd963QrvKkLgjGxcV0rpHJ2sDJKq2tHc-2MV1H5zujofet7r7bk1Vl3yel7AVzDdMAOxjHOkAoG4ax12krr_gOVTWO9rF-7JS__Qm9SyXNd5CSopDPKm0qJM9XlhJhhCEs-TDEfg-Dh5Fw4OxdqCCfngqozL-6VSztB_3vil1UVkGcAa2veQ_7j6X-q_gBmkaMu</recordid><startdate>20170301</startdate><enddate>20170301</enddate><creator>Kerens, B.</creator><creator>Schotanus, M. G. M.</creator><creator>Boonen, B.</creator><creator>Boog, P.</creator><creator>Emans, P. J.</creator><creator>Lacroix, H.</creator><creator>Kort, N. P.</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1269-6909</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20170301</creationdate><title>Cementless versus cemented Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: early results of a non-designer user group</title><author>Kerens, B. ; Schotanus, M. G. M. ; Boonen, B. ; Boog, P. ; Emans, P. J. ; Lacroix, H. ; Kort, N. P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-591eb66e809b84b195149e55a68cb12387f72a2741954048593a39c54a99b9d93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Arthritis</topic><topic>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - methods</topic><topic>Bone Cements</topic><topic>Case-Control Studies</topic><topic>Designers</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hydroxyapatite</topic><topic>Interfaces</topic><topic>Joint replacement surgery</topic><topic>Kaplan-Meier Estimate</topic><topic>Knee</topic><topic>Knee Prosthesis</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><topic>Osteoarthritis, Knee - surgery</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Polymethyl methacrylate</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Prostheses</topic><topic>Prosthesis Design</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Tibia - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kerens, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schotanus, M. G. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boonen, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boog, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Emans, P. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lacroix, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kort, N. P.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health and Medical</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kerens, B.</au><au>Schotanus, M. G. M.</au><au>Boonen, B.</au><au>Boog, P.</au><au>Emans, P. J.</au><au>Lacroix, H.</au><au>Kort, N. P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cementless versus cemented Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: early results of a non-designer user group</atitle><jtitle>Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA</jtitle><stitle>Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc</stitle><addtitle>Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc</addtitle><date>2017-03-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>703</spage><epage>709</epage><pages>703-709</pages><issn>0942-2056</issn><eissn>1433-7347</eissn><abstract>Purpose Although fewer tibial radiolucent lines are observed in cementless Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) compared with cemented Oxford UKA, an independent comparative study on this topic is lacking. Methods In this multicentre retrospective study, a cohort of 60 consecutive cases of cementless Oxford UKA is compared with a cohort of 60 consecutive cases of cemented Oxford UKA. Radiolucent lines, survival, perioperative data and clinical results were compared. Results No complete tibial radiolucent lines were observed in either group. Seventeen per cent of partial tibial radiolucent lines were observed in the cementless group versus 21 % in the cemented group (n.s.). The percentage of tibial radiolucent zones was 4 versus 9 %, respectively ( p  = 0.036). Survival rates were 90 % at 34 months for the cementless group and 84 % at 54 months for the cemented group (n.s.). Mean operation time was 10 min shorter in the cementless group ( p  &lt; 0.001), and clinical results were not significantly different. Conclusions Although no significant differences in radiolucent lines were found between both groups, they appear to be more common in the cemented group. This confirms previous results from reports by prosthesis designers. The presence of radiolucent lines after cemented Oxford UKA does not correlate with clinical outcome or survival. Level of evidence III.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>27161197</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00167-016-4149-3</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1269-6909</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0942-2056
ispartof Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2017-03, Vol.25 (3), p.703-709
issn 0942-2056
1433-7347
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1877847278
source EBSCOhost SPORTDiscus with Full Text; Springer Nature; Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Arthritis
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - methods
Bone Cements
Case-Control Studies
Designers
Female
Humans
Hydroxyapatite
Interfaces
Joint replacement surgery
Kaplan-Meier Estimate
Knee
Knee Prosthesis
Male
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Middle Aged
Orthopedics
Osteoarthritis, Knee - surgery
Patients
Polymethyl methacrylate
Postoperative Complications - diagnostic imaging
Prostheses
Prosthesis Design
Retrospective Studies
Tibia - diagnostic imaging
Treatment Outcome
title Cementless versus cemented Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: early results of a non-designer user group
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T04%3A11%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cementless%20versus%20cemented%20Oxford%20unicompartmental%20knee%20arthroplasty:%20early%20results%20of%20a%20non-designer%20user%20group&rft.jtitle=Knee%20surgery,%20sports%20traumatology,%20arthroscopy%20:%20official%20journal%20of%20the%20ESSKA&rft.au=Kerens,%20B.&rft.date=2017-03-01&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=703&rft.epage=709&rft.pages=703-709&rft.issn=0942-2056&rft.eissn=1433-7347&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00167-016-4149-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1877847278%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-591eb66e809b84b195149e55a68cb12387f72a2741954048593a39c54a99b9d93%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1873285395&rft_id=info:pmid/27161197&rfr_iscdi=true