Loading…
Body mass index, PAM50 subtype, recurrence, and survival among patients with nonmetastatic breast cancer
BACKGROUND Studies of obesity and survival among patients with breast cancer produce conflicting results, possibly because of heterogeneity by molecular subtype. METHODS This study examined whether the association of body mass index (BMI) at diagnosis with breast cancer recurrence and survival varie...
Saved in:
Published in: | Cancer 2017-07, Vol.123 (13), p.2535-2542 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | BACKGROUND
Studies of obesity and survival among patients with breast cancer produce conflicting results, possibly because of heterogeneity by molecular subtype.
METHODS
This study examined whether the association of body mass index (BMI) at diagnosis with breast cancer recurrence and survival varied across subtypes defined by PAM50 (Prediction Analysis of Microarray 50) gene expression. Included were 1559 Kaiser Permanente Northern California members ages 18 to 79 years who had PAM50 assays and were diagnosed with American Joint Committee on Cancer stage I through III breast cancer from 1996 to 2013. Patients reported weight and height. Cox regression models were adjusted for age, menopause, race/ethnicity, stage, and chemotherapy.
RESULTS
Over a median of 9 years (maximum, 19 years), 378 women developed recurrent disease, and 312 died from breast cancer. Overall, BMI was not associated with breast cancer recurrence or survival when controlling for subtype (eg, the hazard ratio per 5 kg/m2 of BMI was 1.05 [95% confidence interval, 0.95‐1.15] for breast cancer‐specific death). However, associations varied by subtype. Among women with luminal A cancers, those who had class II/III obesity, but not class I obesity or overweight, had worse outcomes. When women who had a BMI ≥35 kg/m2 were compared with those who had a BMI from 18.5 to |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0008-543X 1097-0142 |
DOI: | 10.1002/cncr.30637 |