Did export promotion help firms weather the crisis?

In the global recession of 2009, exports declined precipitously in many countries. We illustrate with firm-level data for Belgium and Peru that the decline was very sudden and almost entirely due to lower export sales by existing exporters. After the recession, exports rebounded almost equally quick...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Economic policy 2016-10, Vol.31 (88), p.653-702
Main Authors: Van Biesebroeck, Johannes, Konings, Jozef, Martincus, Christian Volpe, di Giovanni, Julian, Krahnen, Jan Pieter
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Belgium
Companies
Economic crisis
Economic policy
Economic recovery
Export promotion
Exports
Financial performance
Peru
Recessions
Sales
Trade promotion
Weather
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:In the global recession of 2009, exports declined precipitously in many countries. We illustrate with firm-level data for Belgium and Peru that the decline was very sudden and almost entirely due to lower export sales by existing exporters. After the recession, exports rebounded almost equally quickly and we evaluate whether export promotion programs were an effective tool aiding this recovery. We show that firms taking advantage of this type of support did better during the crisis, controlling flexibly for systematic differences between supported and control firms. The primary mechanism we identify is that supported firms are generally more likely to survive on the export market and, in particular, are more likely to continue exporting to countries hit by the financial crisis. In terms of absolute magnitudes, the mid-point of the range of estimates suggest a 6% to 11%, respectively for Belgium and Peru, higher probability of survival on the export market for supported firms and approximately 20% to 10% higher exports for surviving exporters.
ISSN:0266-4658
1468-0327
DOI:10.1093/epolic/eiw014