Loading…

Price Fixing Hits Home: An Empirical Study of US Price-Fixing Conspiracies

This paper analyzes a sample of Section 1, Sherman Act price fixing cases brought by the US Department of Justice between 1961 and 2013. Over 500 cartels were prosecuted during this period. The determinants of cartel formation and cartel breakup are estimated, including analysis of the impact of the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Review of industrial organization 2016-06, Vol.48 (4), p.361-379
Main Authors: Levenstein, Margaret C., Suslow, Valerie Y.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c478t-1dc727836ef2f4b6ed43af0c1606f0ae9fd40756e0a7804da822e17c8ef34e9f3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c478t-1dc727836ef2f4b6ed43af0c1606f0ae9fd40756e0a7804da822e17c8ef34e9f3
container_end_page 379
container_issue 4
container_start_page 361
container_title Review of industrial organization
container_volume 48
creator Levenstein, Margaret C.
Suslow, Valerie Y.
description This paper analyzes a sample of Section 1, Sherman Act price fixing cases brought by the US Department of Justice between 1961 and 2013. Over 500 cartels were prosecuted during this period. The determinants of cartel formation and cartel breakup are estimated, including analysis of the impact of the discount rate, business cycles, and antitrust policy. We find that cartels are more likely to break up during periods of high real interest rates, presumably because higher interest rates are associated with greater impatience. The adoption of a stronger amnesty policy has no significant impact on cartel breakup over this period, although the results suggest some association with lower cartel formation rates.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11151-016-9520-5
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1878794235</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>44735145</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>44735145</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c478t-1dc727836ef2f4b6ed43af0c1606f0ae9fd40756e0a7804da822e17c8ef34e9f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMFKAzEURYMoWKsf4EIIuHETTSbJJOOulNYqBYVacBdiJilTppOazID9e1OniLhw9RbvnPseF4BLgm8JxuIuEkI4QZjkqOAZRvwIDAgXFAmS42MwwFIWqKDy7RScxbjGOFmcDcDTS6iMhdPqs2pWcFa1Ec78xt7DUQMnm22VtrqGi7Yrd9A7uFzAbwEdhLFvYoK0qWw8BydO19FeHOYQLKeT1_EMzZ8fHsejOTJMyBaR0ohMSJpblzn2ntuSUe2wSX_mDmtbuJJhwXOLtZCYlVpmmSXCSOsoS1s6BDd97jb4j87GVm2qaGxd68b6LioihRQFyyhP6PUfdO270KTvFBGSF7wohEgU6SkTfIzBOrUN1UaHnSJY7dtVfbsqtav27ap9ctY7MbHNyoZfyf9IV720jq0PP1cYE5QTxukXg06EdA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1785959977</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Price Fixing Hits Home: An Empirical Study of US Price-Fixing Conspiracies</title><source>EconLit s plnými texty</source><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Business Source Ultimate【Trial: -2024/12/31】【Remote access available】</source><source>ABI/INFORM global</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection</source><source>Politics Collection</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Levenstein, Margaret C. ; Suslow, Valerie Y.</creator><creatorcontrib>Levenstein, Margaret C. ; Suslow, Valerie Y.</creatorcontrib><description>This paper analyzes a sample of Section 1, Sherman Act price fixing cases brought by the US Department of Justice between 1961 and 2013. Over 500 cartels were prosecuted during this period. The determinants of cartel formation and cartel breakup are estimated, including analysis of the impact of the discount rate, business cycles, and antitrust policy. We find that cartels are more likely to break up during periods of high real interest rates, presumably because higher interest rates are associated with greater impatience. The adoption of a stronger amnesty policy has no significant impact on cartel breakup over this period, although the results suggest some association with lower cartel formation rates.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0889-938X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-7160</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11151-016-9520-5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer</publisher><subject>Amnesties ; Anti-trust legislation ; Antitrust ; Bid rigging ; Business cycles ; Cartels ; Collusion ; Competition ; Competition policy ; Criminal prosecution ; Discount rates ; Economic fluctuations ; Economic recessions ; Economics ; Economics and Finance ; Financial leverage ; Industrial Organization ; Interest rates ; Justice ; Microeconomics ; Observational studies ; Poisson distribution ; Price fixing ; Prices ; Prosecutions ; Recessions ; Stability ; Statistical analysis ; United States</subject><ispartof>Review of industrial organization, 2016-06, Vol.48 (4), p.361-379</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media 2016</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c478t-1dc727836ef2f4b6ed43af0c1606f0ae9fd40756e0a7804da822e17c8ef34e9f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c478t-1dc727836ef2f4b6ed43af0c1606f0ae9fd40756e0a7804da822e17c8ef34e9f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1785959977/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1785959977?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,11688,12847,21387,21394,27866,27924,27925,33223,33224,33611,33612,33985,33986,36060,36061,43733,43948,44363,58238,58471,74221,74468,74895</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Levenstein, Margaret C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suslow, Valerie Y.</creatorcontrib><title>Price Fixing Hits Home: An Empirical Study of US Price-Fixing Conspiracies</title><title>Review of industrial organization</title><addtitle>Rev Ind Organ</addtitle><description>This paper analyzes a sample of Section 1, Sherman Act price fixing cases brought by the US Department of Justice between 1961 and 2013. Over 500 cartels were prosecuted during this period. The determinants of cartel formation and cartel breakup are estimated, including analysis of the impact of the discount rate, business cycles, and antitrust policy. We find that cartels are more likely to break up during periods of high real interest rates, presumably because higher interest rates are associated with greater impatience. The adoption of a stronger amnesty policy has no significant impact on cartel breakup over this period, although the results suggest some association with lower cartel formation rates.</description><subject>Amnesties</subject><subject>Anti-trust legislation</subject><subject>Antitrust</subject><subject>Bid rigging</subject><subject>Business cycles</subject><subject>Cartels</subject><subject>Collusion</subject><subject>Competition</subject><subject>Competition policy</subject><subject>Criminal prosecution</subject><subject>Discount rates</subject><subject>Economic fluctuations</subject><subject>Economic recessions</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Economics and Finance</subject><subject>Financial leverage</subject><subject>Industrial Organization</subject><subject>Interest rates</subject><subject>Justice</subject><subject>Microeconomics</subject><subject>Observational studies</subject><subject>Poisson distribution</subject><subject>Price fixing</subject><subject>Prices</subject><subject>Prosecutions</subject><subject>Recessions</subject><subject>Stability</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>0889-938X</issn><issn>1573-7160</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>DPSOV</sourceid><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><sourceid>M2L</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMFKAzEURYMoWKsf4EIIuHETTSbJJOOulNYqBYVacBdiJilTppOazID9e1OniLhw9RbvnPseF4BLgm8JxuIuEkI4QZjkqOAZRvwIDAgXFAmS42MwwFIWqKDy7RScxbjGOFmcDcDTS6iMhdPqs2pWcFa1Ec78xt7DUQMnm22VtrqGi7Yrd9A7uFzAbwEdhLFvYoK0qWw8BydO19FeHOYQLKeT1_EMzZ8fHsejOTJMyBaR0ohMSJpblzn2ntuSUe2wSX_mDmtbuJJhwXOLtZCYlVpmmSXCSOsoS1s6BDd97jb4j87GVm2qaGxd68b6LioihRQFyyhP6PUfdO270KTvFBGSF7wohEgU6SkTfIzBOrUN1UaHnSJY7dtVfbsqtav27ap9ctY7MbHNyoZfyf9IV720jq0PP1cYE5QTxukXg06EdA</recordid><startdate>20160601</startdate><enddate>20160601</enddate><creator>Levenstein, Margaret C.</creator><creator>Suslow, Valerie Y.</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160601</creationdate><title>Price Fixing Hits Home: An Empirical Study of US Price-Fixing Conspiracies</title><author>Levenstein, Margaret C. ; Suslow, Valerie Y.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c478t-1dc727836ef2f4b6ed43af0c1606f0ae9fd40756e0a7804da822e17c8ef34e9f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Amnesties</topic><topic>Anti-trust legislation</topic><topic>Antitrust</topic><topic>Bid rigging</topic><topic>Business cycles</topic><topic>Cartels</topic><topic>Collusion</topic><topic>Competition</topic><topic>Competition policy</topic><topic>Criminal prosecution</topic><topic>Discount rates</topic><topic>Economic fluctuations</topic><topic>Economic recessions</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Economics and Finance</topic><topic>Financial leverage</topic><topic>Industrial Organization</topic><topic>Interest rates</topic><topic>Justice</topic><topic>Microeconomics</topic><topic>Observational studies</topic><topic>Poisson distribution</topic><topic>Price fixing</topic><topic>Prices</topic><topic>Prosecutions</topic><topic>Recessions</topic><topic>Stability</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Levenstein, Margaret C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suslow, Valerie Y.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>Global News &amp; ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM global</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Review of industrial organization</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Levenstein, Margaret C.</au><au>Suslow, Valerie Y.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Price Fixing Hits Home: An Empirical Study of US Price-Fixing Conspiracies</atitle><jtitle>Review of industrial organization</jtitle><stitle>Rev Ind Organ</stitle><date>2016-06-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>48</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>361</spage><epage>379</epage><pages>361-379</pages><issn>0889-938X</issn><eissn>1573-7160</eissn><abstract>This paper analyzes a sample of Section 1, Sherman Act price fixing cases brought by the US Department of Justice between 1961 and 2013. Over 500 cartels were prosecuted during this period. The determinants of cartel formation and cartel breakup are estimated, including analysis of the impact of the discount rate, business cycles, and antitrust policy. We find that cartels are more likely to break up during periods of high real interest rates, presumably because higher interest rates are associated with greater impatience. The adoption of a stronger amnesty policy has no significant impact on cartel breakup over this period, although the results suggest some association with lower cartel formation rates.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer</pub><doi>10.1007/s11151-016-9520-5</doi><tpages>19</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0889-938X
ispartof Review of industrial organization, 2016-06, Vol.48 (4), p.361-379
issn 0889-938X
1573-7160
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1878794235
source EconLit s plnými texty; International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Business Source Ultimate【Trial: -2024/12/31】【Remote access available】; ABI/INFORM global; JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; Social Science Premium Collection; Politics Collection; PAIS Index; Springer Link
subjects Amnesties
Anti-trust legislation
Antitrust
Bid rigging
Business cycles
Cartels
Collusion
Competition
Competition policy
Criminal prosecution
Discount rates
Economic fluctuations
Economic recessions
Economics
Economics and Finance
Financial leverage
Industrial Organization
Interest rates
Justice
Microeconomics
Observational studies
Poisson distribution
Price fixing
Prices
Prosecutions
Recessions
Stability
Statistical analysis
United States
title Price Fixing Hits Home: An Empirical Study of US Price-Fixing Conspiracies
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T07%3A41%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Price%20Fixing%20Hits%20Home:%20An%20Empirical%20Study%20of%20US%20Price-Fixing%20Conspiracies&rft.jtitle=Review%20of%20industrial%20organization&rft.au=Levenstein,%20Margaret%20C.&rft.date=2016-06-01&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=361&rft.epage=379&rft.pages=361-379&rft.issn=0889-938X&rft.eissn=1573-7160&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11151-016-9520-5&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E44735145%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c478t-1dc727836ef2f4b6ed43af0c1606f0ae9fd40756e0a7804da822e17c8ef34e9f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1785959977&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=44735145&rfr_iscdi=true