Loading…
Price Fixing Hits Home: An Empirical Study of US Price-Fixing Conspiracies
This paper analyzes a sample of Section 1, Sherman Act price fixing cases brought by the US Department of Justice between 1961 and 2013. Over 500 cartels were prosecuted during this period. The determinants of cartel formation and cartel breakup are estimated, including analysis of the impact of the...
Saved in:
Published in: | Review of industrial organization 2016-06, Vol.48 (4), p.361-379 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c478t-1dc727836ef2f4b6ed43af0c1606f0ae9fd40756e0a7804da822e17c8ef34e9f3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c478t-1dc727836ef2f4b6ed43af0c1606f0ae9fd40756e0a7804da822e17c8ef34e9f3 |
container_end_page | 379 |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 361 |
container_title | Review of industrial organization |
container_volume | 48 |
creator | Levenstein, Margaret C. Suslow, Valerie Y. |
description | This paper analyzes a sample of Section 1, Sherman Act price fixing cases brought by the US Department of Justice between 1961 and 2013. Over 500 cartels were prosecuted during this period. The determinants of cartel formation and cartel breakup are estimated, including analysis of the impact of the discount rate, business cycles, and antitrust policy. We find that cartels are more likely to break up during periods of high real interest rates, presumably because higher interest rates are associated with greater impatience. The adoption of a stronger amnesty policy has no significant impact on cartel breakup over this period, although the results suggest some association with lower cartel formation rates. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11151-016-9520-5 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1878794235</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>44735145</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>44735145</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c478t-1dc727836ef2f4b6ed43af0c1606f0ae9fd40756e0a7804da822e17c8ef34e9f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMFKAzEURYMoWKsf4EIIuHETTSbJJOOulNYqBYVacBdiJilTppOazID9e1OniLhw9RbvnPseF4BLgm8JxuIuEkI4QZjkqOAZRvwIDAgXFAmS42MwwFIWqKDy7RScxbjGOFmcDcDTS6iMhdPqs2pWcFa1Ec78xt7DUQMnm22VtrqGi7Yrd9A7uFzAbwEdhLFvYoK0qWw8BydO19FeHOYQLKeT1_EMzZ8fHsejOTJMyBaR0ohMSJpblzn2ntuSUe2wSX_mDmtbuJJhwXOLtZCYlVpmmSXCSOsoS1s6BDd97jb4j87GVm2qaGxd68b6LioihRQFyyhP6PUfdO270KTvFBGSF7wohEgU6SkTfIzBOrUN1UaHnSJY7dtVfbsqtav27ap9ctY7MbHNyoZfyf9IV720jq0PP1cYE5QTxukXg06EdA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1785959977</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Price Fixing Hits Home: An Empirical Study of US Price-Fixing Conspiracies</title><source>EconLit s plnými texty</source><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Business Source Ultimate【Trial: -2024/12/31】【Remote access available】</source><source>ABI/INFORM global</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection</source><source>Politics Collection</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Levenstein, Margaret C. ; Suslow, Valerie Y.</creator><creatorcontrib>Levenstein, Margaret C. ; Suslow, Valerie Y.</creatorcontrib><description>This paper analyzes a sample of Section 1, Sherman Act price fixing cases brought by the US Department of Justice between 1961 and 2013. Over 500 cartels were prosecuted during this period. The determinants of cartel formation and cartel breakup are estimated, including analysis of the impact of the discount rate, business cycles, and antitrust policy. We find that cartels are more likely to break up during periods of high real interest rates, presumably because higher interest rates are associated with greater impatience. The adoption of a stronger amnesty policy has no significant impact on cartel breakup over this period, although the results suggest some association with lower cartel formation rates.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0889-938X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-7160</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11151-016-9520-5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer</publisher><subject>Amnesties ; Anti-trust legislation ; Antitrust ; Bid rigging ; Business cycles ; Cartels ; Collusion ; Competition ; Competition policy ; Criminal prosecution ; Discount rates ; Economic fluctuations ; Economic recessions ; Economics ; Economics and Finance ; Financial leverage ; Industrial Organization ; Interest rates ; Justice ; Microeconomics ; Observational studies ; Poisson distribution ; Price fixing ; Prices ; Prosecutions ; Recessions ; Stability ; Statistical analysis ; United States</subject><ispartof>Review of industrial organization, 2016-06, Vol.48 (4), p.361-379</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media 2016</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c478t-1dc727836ef2f4b6ed43af0c1606f0ae9fd40756e0a7804da822e17c8ef34e9f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c478t-1dc727836ef2f4b6ed43af0c1606f0ae9fd40756e0a7804da822e17c8ef34e9f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1785959977/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1785959977?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,11688,12847,21387,21394,27866,27924,27925,33223,33224,33611,33612,33985,33986,36060,36061,43733,43948,44363,58238,58471,74221,74468,74895</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Levenstein, Margaret C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suslow, Valerie Y.</creatorcontrib><title>Price Fixing Hits Home: An Empirical Study of US Price-Fixing Conspiracies</title><title>Review of industrial organization</title><addtitle>Rev Ind Organ</addtitle><description>This paper analyzes a sample of Section 1, Sherman Act price fixing cases brought by the US Department of Justice between 1961 and 2013. Over 500 cartels were prosecuted during this period. The determinants of cartel formation and cartel breakup are estimated, including analysis of the impact of the discount rate, business cycles, and antitrust policy. We find that cartels are more likely to break up during periods of high real interest rates, presumably because higher interest rates are associated with greater impatience. The adoption of a stronger amnesty policy has no significant impact on cartel breakup over this period, although the results suggest some association with lower cartel formation rates.</description><subject>Amnesties</subject><subject>Anti-trust legislation</subject><subject>Antitrust</subject><subject>Bid rigging</subject><subject>Business cycles</subject><subject>Cartels</subject><subject>Collusion</subject><subject>Competition</subject><subject>Competition policy</subject><subject>Criminal prosecution</subject><subject>Discount rates</subject><subject>Economic fluctuations</subject><subject>Economic recessions</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Economics and Finance</subject><subject>Financial leverage</subject><subject>Industrial Organization</subject><subject>Interest rates</subject><subject>Justice</subject><subject>Microeconomics</subject><subject>Observational studies</subject><subject>Poisson distribution</subject><subject>Price fixing</subject><subject>Prices</subject><subject>Prosecutions</subject><subject>Recessions</subject><subject>Stability</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>0889-938X</issn><issn>1573-7160</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>DPSOV</sourceid><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><sourceid>M2L</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMFKAzEURYMoWKsf4EIIuHETTSbJJOOulNYqBYVacBdiJilTppOazID9e1OniLhw9RbvnPseF4BLgm8JxuIuEkI4QZjkqOAZRvwIDAgXFAmS42MwwFIWqKDy7RScxbjGOFmcDcDTS6iMhdPqs2pWcFa1Ec78xt7DUQMnm22VtrqGi7Yrd9A7uFzAbwEdhLFvYoK0qWw8BydO19FeHOYQLKeT1_EMzZ8fHsejOTJMyBaR0ohMSJpblzn2ntuSUe2wSX_mDmtbuJJhwXOLtZCYlVpmmSXCSOsoS1s6BDd97jb4j87GVm2qaGxd68b6LioihRQFyyhP6PUfdO270KTvFBGSF7wohEgU6SkTfIzBOrUN1UaHnSJY7dtVfbsqtav27ap9ctY7MbHNyoZfyf9IV720jq0PP1cYE5QTxukXg06EdA</recordid><startdate>20160601</startdate><enddate>20160601</enddate><creator>Levenstein, Margaret C.</creator><creator>Suslow, Valerie Y.</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160601</creationdate><title>Price Fixing Hits Home: An Empirical Study of US Price-Fixing Conspiracies</title><author>Levenstein, Margaret C. ; Suslow, Valerie Y.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c478t-1dc727836ef2f4b6ed43af0c1606f0ae9fd40756e0a7804da822e17c8ef34e9f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Amnesties</topic><topic>Anti-trust legislation</topic><topic>Antitrust</topic><topic>Bid rigging</topic><topic>Business cycles</topic><topic>Cartels</topic><topic>Collusion</topic><topic>Competition</topic><topic>Competition policy</topic><topic>Criminal prosecution</topic><topic>Discount rates</topic><topic>Economic fluctuations</topic><topic>Economic recessions</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Economics and Finance</topic><topic>Financial leverage</topic><topic>Industrial Organization</topic><topic>Interest rates</topic><topic>Justice</topic><topic>Microeconomics</topic><topic>Observational studies</topic><topic>Poisson distribution</topic><topic>Price fixing</topic><topic>Prices</topic><topic>Prosecutions</topic><topic>Recessions</topic><topic>Stability</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Levenstein, Margaret C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suslow, Valerie Y.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM global</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Review of industrial organization</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Levenstein, Margaret C.</au><au>Suslow, Valerie Y.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Price Fixing Hits Home: An Empirical Study of US Price-Fixing Conspiracies</atitle><jtitle>Review of industrial organization</jtitle><stitle>Rev Ind Organ</stitle><date>2016-06-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>48</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>361</spage><epage>379</epage><pages>361-379</pages><issn>0889-938X</issn><eissn>1573-7160</eissn><abstract>This paper analyzes a sample of Section 1, Sherman Act price fixing cases brought by the US Department of Justice between 1961 and 2013. Over 500 cartels were prosecuted during this period. The determinants of cartel formation and cartel breakup are estimated, including analysis of the impact of the discount rate, business cycles, and antitrust policy. We find that cartels are more likely to break up during periods of high real interest rates, presumably because higher interest rates are associated with greater impatience. The adoption of a stronger amnesty policy has no significant impact on cartel breakup over this period, although the results suggest some association with lower cartel formation rates.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer</pub><doi>10.1007/s11151-016-9520-5</doi><tpages>19</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0889-938X |
ispartof | Review of industrial organization, 2016-06, Vol.48 (4), p.361-379 |
issn | 0889-938X 1573-7160 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1878794235 |
source | EconLit s plnými texty; International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Business Source Ultimate【Trial: -2024/12/31】【Remote access available】; ABI/INFORM global; JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; Social Science Premium Collection; Politics Collection; PAIS Index; Springer Link |
subjects | Amnesties Anti-trust legislation Antitrust Bid rigging Business cycles Cartels Collusion Competition Competition policy Criminal prosecution Discount rates Economic fluctuations Economic recessions Economics Economics and Finance Financial leverage Industrial Organization Interest rates Justice Microeconomics Observational studies Poisson distribution Price fixing Prices Prosecutions Recessions Stability Statistical analysis United States |
title | Price Fixing Hits Home: An Empirical Study of US Price-Fixing Conspiracies |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T07%3A41%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Price%20Fixing%20Hits%20Home:%20An%20Empirical%20Study%20of%20US%20Price-Fixing%20Conspiracies&rft.jtitle=Review%20of%20industrial%20organization&rft.au=Levenstein,%20Margaret%20C.&rft.date=2016-06-01&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=361&rft.epage=379&rft.pages=361-379&rft.issn=0889-938X&rft.eissn=1573-7160&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11151-016-9520-5&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E44735145%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c478t-1dc727836ef2f4b6ed43af0c1606f0ae9fd40756e0a7804da822e17c8ef34e9f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1785959977&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=44735145&rfr_iscdi=true |