Loading…

Dry matter allocation and nitrogen productivity explain growth responses to photoperiod and temperature in forage grasses

The mechanisms responsible for fluctuations in species composition of semi-natural grassland are not well understood. To identify plant traits that determine the poor competitive ability of Festuca pratensis compared to Dactylis glomerata especially during summer, the growth of both grasses was moni...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Oecologia 1999-12, Vol.121 (4), p.441-446
Main Authors: Carlen, C, Kolliker, R, Nosberger, J
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-a0a85e380c707f9e8f4712c3d0f048be0bb0e085a7754d230c1c05d58ec526e13
cites
container_end_page 446
container_issue 4
container_start_page 441
container_title Oecologia
container_volume 121
creator Carlen, C
Kolliker, R
Nosberger, J
description The mechanisms responsible for fluctuations in species composition of semi-natural grassland are not well understood. To identify plant traits that determine the poor competitive ability of Festuca pratensis compared to Dactylis glomerata especially during summer, the growth of both grasses was monitored over time and at different temperatures and photoperiods. Plants of both grasses were grown from seed with non-limiting nutrient supply at three day/night temperatures (11/6, 18/13 and 25/20°C) and two photoperiods (16 and 12 h). F. pratensis had a significantly lower relative growth rate than D. glomerata, mainly due to its lower specific leaf area and reduced nitrogen productivity. At high temperature, F. pratensis had a considerably lower root weight ratio than D. glomerata leading to substantially slower root growth. F. pratensis responded to a shorter photoperiod with an increase in the net assimilation rate, whereas D. glomerata responded with an increase in specific leaf area. The low competitive ability of F. pratensis compared to D. glomerata was mainly associated with its lower specific leaf area and nitrogen productivity. The stronger decline of its competitive ability during summer was probably related to the decreased allocation of dry matter to the roots at higher temperatures which leads to slower root growth compared to D. glomerata.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s004420050950
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1878831072</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>4222491</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>4222491</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-a0a85e380c707f9e8f4712c3d0f048be0bb0e085a7754d230c1c05d58ec526e13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kk1v1DAQhi1ERbeFIzcEPlSIS2D8VTtHVL4qVeIAPUezzmSbKomD7QD77-tllyIuPVnWPO9jjV4z9lzAWwFg3yUArSWAgdrAI7YSWslK1Kp-zFYAsq6c0fUxO0npFkBoYcwTdiydAqeMWrHth7jlI-ZMkeMwBI-5DxPHqeVTn2PY0MTnGNrF5_5nn7ecfs8D9hPfxPAr3_BIaQ5TosRz4PNNyGGm2If2jyHTWG6Yl0i8RLoQcUMliakEnrKjDodEzw7nKbv-9PH7xZfq6uvny4v3V5XX5zJXCOgMKQfegu1qcp22QnrVQgfarQnWayBwBq01upUKvPBgWuPIG3lOQp2yN3tvWePHQik3Y588DQNOFJbUCGedUwKsLOjrh9HyhBCwA6s96GNIKVLXzLEfMW4bAc2ulua_Wgr_8iBe1iO19_TfHgpwdgAweRy6iJPv0z-rVLWVumAv9thtyiHej7WUUte7VV_txx2GBjexGK6_SRCq_AMltXDqDsEaqMU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>17541102</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Dry matter allocation and nitrogen productivity explain growth responses to photoperiod and temperature in forage grasses</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Carlen, C ; Kolliker, R ; Nosberger, J</creator><creatorcontrib>Carlen, C ; Kolliker, R ; Nosberger, J</creatorcontrib><description>The mechanisms responsible for fluctuations in species composition of semi-natural grassland are not well understood. To identify plant traits that determine the poor competitive ability of Festuca pratensis compared to Dactylis glomerata especially during summer, the growth of both grasses was monitored over time and at different temperatures and photoperiods. Plants of both grasses were grown from seed with non-limiting nutrient supply at three day/night temperatures (11/6, 18/13 and 25/20°C) and two photoperiods (16 and 12 h). F. pratensis had a significantly lower relative growth rate than D. glomerata, mainly due to its lower specific leaf area and reduced nitrogen productivity. At high temperature, F. pratensis had a considerably lower root weight ratio than D. glomerata leading to substantially slower root growth. F. pratensis responded to a shorter photoperiod with an increase in the net assimilation rate, whereas D. glomerata responded with an increase in specific leaf area. The low competitive ability of F. pratensis compared to D. glomerata was mainly associated with its lower specific leaf area and nitrogen productivity. The stronger decline of its competitive ability during summer was probably related to the decreased allocation of dry matter to the roots at higher temperatures which leads to slower root growth compared to D. glomerata.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0029-8549</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1939</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s004420050950</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28308353</identifier><identifier>CODEN: OECOBX</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Animal and plant ecology ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Biological and medical sciences ; competitive ability ; Crop harvesting ; Dactylis glomerata ; Ecophysiology ; Festuca pratensis ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Grasses ; growth rate ; Leaf area ; Nitrogen ; Photons ; Photoperiod ; Plant growth ; Plants ; roots ; seasonal variation ; Sowing ; Species ; Synecology ; temperature ; Terrestrial ecosystems ; weight</subject><ispartof>Oecologia, 1999-12, Vol.121 (4), p.441-446</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1999 Springer-Verlag</rights><rights>2000 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-a0a85e380c707f9e8f4712c3d0f048be0bb0e085a7754d230c1c05d58ec526e13</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/4222491$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/4222491$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,58238,58471</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=1239724$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28308353$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Carlen, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kolliker, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nosberger, J</creatorcontrib><title>Dry matter allocation and nitrogen productivity explain growth responses to photoperiod and temperature in forage grasses</title><title>Oecologia</title><addtitle>Oecologia</addtitle><description>The mechanisms responsible for fluctuations in species composition of semi-natural grassland are not well understood. To identify plant traits that determine the poor competitive ability of Festuca pratensis compared to Dactylis glomerata especially during summer, the growth of both grasses was monitored over time and at different temperatures and photoperiods. Plants of both grasses were grown from seed with non-limiting nutrient supply at three day/night temperatures (11/6, 18/13 and 25/20°C) and two photoperiods (16 and 12 h). F. pratensis had a significantly lower relative growth rate than D. glomerata, mainly due to its lower specific leaf area and reduced nitrogen productivity. At high temperature, F. pratensis had a considerably lower root weight ratio than D. glomerata leading to substantially slower root growth. F. pratensis responded to a shorter photoperiod with an increase in the net assimilation rate, whereas D. glomerata responded with an increase in specific leaf area. The low competitive ability of F. pratensis compared to D. glomerata was mainly associated with its lower specific leaf area and nitrogen productivity. The stronger decline of its competitive ability during summer was probably related to the decreased allocation of dry matter to the roots at higher temperatures which leads to slower root growth compared to D. glomerata.</description><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>competitive ability</subject><subject>Crop harvesting</subject><subject>Dactylis glomerata</subject><subject>Ecophysiology</subject><subject>Festuca pratensis</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Grasses</subject><subject>growth rate</subject><subject>Leaf area</subject><subject>Nitrogen</subject><subject>Photons</subject><subject>Photoperiod</subject><subject>Plant growth</subject><subject>Plants</subject><subject>roots</subject><subject>seasonal variation</subject><subject>Sowing</subject><subject>Species</subject><subject>Synecology</subject><subject>temperature</subject><subject>Terrestrial ecosystems</subject><subject>weight</subject><issn>0029-8549</issn><issn>1432-1939</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kk1v1DAQhi1ERbeFIzcEPlSIS2D8VTtHVL4qVeIAPUezzmSbKomD7QD77-tllyIuPVnWPO9jjV4z9lzAWwFg3yUArSWAgdrAI7YSWslK1Kp-zFYAsq6c0fUxO0npFkBoYcwTdiydAqeMWrHth7jlI-ZMkeMwBI-5DxPHqeVTn2PY0MTnGNrF5_5nn7ecfs8D9hPfxPAr3_BIaQ5TosRz4PNNyGGm2If2jyHTWG6Yl0i8RLoQcUMliakEnrKjDodEzw7nKbv-9PH7xZfq6uvny4v3V5XX5zJXCOgMKQfegu1qcp22QnrVQgfarQnWayBwBq01upUKvPBgWuPIG3lOQp2yN3tvWePHQik3Y588DQNOFJbUCGedUwKsLOjrh9HyhBCwA6s96GNIKVLXzLEfMW4bAc2ulua_Wgr_8iBe1iO19_TfHgpwdgAweRy6iJPv0z-rVLWVumAv9thtyiHej7WUUte7VV_txx2GBjexGK6_SRCq_AMltXDqDsEaqMU</recordid><startdate>19991201</startdate><enddate>19991201</enddate><creator>Carlen, C</creator><creator>Kolliker, R</creator><creator>Nosberger, J</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19991201</creationdate><title>Dry matter allocation and nitrogen productivity explain growth responses to photoperiod and temperature in forage grasses</title><author>Carlen, C ; Kolliker, R ; Nosberger, J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-a0a85e380c707f9e8f4712c3d0f048be0bb0e085a7754d230c1c05d58ec526e13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>competitive ability</topic><topic>Crop harvesting</topic><topic>Dactylis glomerata</topic><topic>Ecophysiology</topic><topic>Festuca pratensis</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Grasses</topic><topic>growth rate</topic><topic>Leaf area</topic><topic>Nitrogen</topic><topic>Photons</topic><topic>Photoperiod</topic><topic>Plant growth</topic><topic>Plants</topic><topic>roots</topic><topic>seasonal variation</topic><topic>Sowing</topic><topic>Species</topic><topic>Synecology</topic><topic>temperature</topic><topic>Terrestrial ecosystems</topic><topic>weight</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Carlen, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kolliker, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nosberger, J</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Oecologia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Carlen, C</au><au>Kolliker, R</au><au>Nosberger, J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Dry matter allocation and nitrogen productivity explain growth responses to photoperiod and temperature in forage grasses</atitle><jtitle>Oecologia</jtitle><addtitle>Oecologia</addtitle><date>1999-12-01</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>121</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>441</spage><epage>446</epage><pages>441-446</pages><issn>0029-8549</issn><eissn>1432-1939</eissn><coden>OECOBX</coden><abstract>The mechanisms responsible for fluctuations in species composition of semi-natural grassland are not well understood. To identify plant traits that determine the poor competitive ability of Festuca pratensis compared to Dactylis glomerata especially during summer, the growth of both grasses was monitored over time and at different temperatures and photoperiods. Plants of both grasses were grown from seed with non-limiting nutrient supply at three day/night temperatures (11/6, 18/13 and 25/20°C) and two photoperiods (16 and 12 h). F. pratensis had a significantly lower relative growth rate than D. glomerata, mainly due to its lower specific leaf area and reduced nitrogen productivity. At high temperature, F. pratensis had a considerably lower root weight ratio than D. glomerata leading to substantially slower root growth. F. pratensis responded to a shorter photoperiod with an increase in the net assimilation rate, whereas D. glomerata responded with an increase in specific leaf area. The low competitive ability of F. pratensis compared to D. glomerata was mainly associated with its lower specific leaf area and nitrogen productivity. The stronger decline of its competitive ability during summer was probably related to the decreased allocation of dry matter to the roots at higher temperatures which leads to slower root growth compared to D. glomerata.</abstract><cop>Berlin</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><pmid>28308353</pmid><doi>10.1007/s004420050950</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0029-8549
ispartof Oecologia, 1999-12, Vol.121 (4), p.441-446
issn 0029-8549
1432-1939
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1878831072
source JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; Springer Nature
subjects Animal and plant ecology
Animal, plant and microbial ecology
Biological and medical sciences
competitive ability
Crop harvesting
Dactylis glomerata
Ecophysiology
Festuca pratensis
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Grasses
growth rate
Leaf area
Nitrogen
Photons
Photoperiod
Plant growth
Plants
roots
seasonal variation
Sowing
Species
Synecology
temperature
Terrestrial ecosystems
weight
title Dry matter allocation and nitrogen productivity explain growth responses to photoperiod and temperature in forage grasses
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T18%3A29%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Dry%20matter%20allocation%20and%20nitrogen%20productivity%20explain%20growth%20responses%20to%20photoperiod%20and%20temperature%20in%20forage%20grasses&rft.jtitle=Oecologia&rft.au=Carlen,%20C&rft.date=1999-12-01&rft.volume=121&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=441&rft.epage=446&rft.pages=441-446&rft.issn=0029-8549&rft.eissn=1432-1939&rft.coden=OECOBX&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s004420050950&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E4222491%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-a0a85e380c707f9e8f4712c3d0f048be0bb0e085a7754d230c1c05d58ec526e13%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=17541102&rft_id=info:pmid/28308353&rft_jstor_id=4222491&rfr_iscdi=true