Evaluating liquefaction potential and lateral spreading in a probabilistic ground motion environment

Liquefaction potential and lateral spreading are generally evaluated in engineering practice using deterministic procedures based on a design magnitude, M, and an associated Peak Ground Acceleration, PGA. In a probabilistic ground motion environment, a wide range of magnitudes contribute to the PGA....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Soil dynamics and earthquake engineering (1984) 2016-12, Vol.91, p.202-208
Main Authors: Finn, W.D. Liam, Dowling, J., Ventura, Carlos E.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Acceleration
Building codes
Case histories
Design analysis
Design engineering
Empirical equations
Environment
Ground motion
Lateral spreading
Liquefaction
Probabilistic ground motions
Probabilistic methods
Probability
Probability theory
Seismic phenomena
Spreading
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Liquefaction potential and lateral spreading are generally evaluated in engineering practice using deterministic procedures based on a design magnitude, M, and an associated Peak Ground Acceleration, PGA. In a probabilistic ground motion environment, a wide range of magnitudes contribute to the PGA. A common solution adopted to cope with the problems this poses for the deterministic approach is to select a single magnitude somewhat close to the maximum magnitude to represent the combined effects of all the magnitudes contributing to the hazard. However there is no measure of whether this approach is appropriate. Finn and Wightman (2007) [6] introduced a magnitude deaggregation method for evaluating liquefaction potential and showed that practice at that time was overly conservative for the code ground motions. This paper evaluates the performance of current practice for the proposed National Building Code for Canada, NBCC 2015 ground motions and extends the deaggregation method to the calculation of lateral spreading based on Youd's empirical equation (Youd et al., 2002) [11]. Some case histories of recent applications in school retrofit projects of the conventional approach and the deaggregation method are presented to highlight the difference in results. •Estimation of liquefaction potential using probablisitic ground motions.•Estimation of lateral spreading due liquefaction using probablisitic ground motions.•Average magnitude method is shown to give similar results, recommended for practice.•Average acceleration method is shown to give similar results for lateral spreading estimation.
ISSN:0267-7261
1879-341X
DOI:10.1016/j.soildyn.2016.09.050