Loading…

Improved understanding of environment-induced cracking (EIC) of sensitized 5XXX series aluminium alloys

Two mechanistically different modes of EIC have been identified using high-resolution X-ray computed tomography and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) in sensitized AA5083-H131 that had been pre-exposed to 0.6M NaCl prior to interrupted slow strain rate testing (SSRT) in the short transverse directi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Materials science & engineering. A, Structural materials : properties, microstructure and processing Structural materials : properties, microstructure and processing, 2017-01, Vol.682, p.613-621
Main Authors: Holroyd, N.J.H., Burnett, T.L., Seifi, M., Lewandowski, J.J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Two mechanistically different modes of EIC have been identified using high-resolution X-ray computed tomography and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) in sensitized AA5083-H131 that had been pre-exposed to 0.6M NaCl prior to interrupted slow strain rate testing (SSRT) in the short transverse direction while exposed to laboratory air (50% RH). One mode, shown to propagate when local stress intensity factors are in the range of 4–12MNm‐3/2, is the well-known ‘classic’ form of intergranular stress corrosion cracking, Type-1 cracking, which would not initiate and propagate in dry air, irrespective of pre-exposure or sensitization. The second mode of cracking, identified presently as Type-2 cracking, is associated with sudden load-drops occurring after the UTS during SSRT. Type-2 cracking propagates at higher local stress intensity factors (above 12–15MNm-3/2) with significantly higher average growth rates than Type-1 cracking, involves the sudden simultaneous mechanical linkage of multiple fully-isolated regions of damage, pre-determined during pre-exposure to NaCl solution and generated during straining in laboratory air. Differences in the extent of Type-2 cracking for pre-exposed samples tested in ‘dry’ air compared to laboratory air (50% RH) were marked, with that in dry air being limited to isolated patches. High-resolution 3D tomography and detailed SEM has been used to distinguish these two mechanistically different modes of EIC. Implications for a role of hydrogen embrittlement during EIC are discussed.
ISSN:0921-5093
1873-4936
DOI:10.1016/j.msea.2016.11.088