Loading…
Soldier-relevant body borne loads increase knee joint contact force during a run-to-stop maneuver
Abstract The purpose of this study was to understand the effects of load carriage on human performance, specifically during a run-to-stop (RTS) task. Using OpenSim analysis tools, knee joint contact force, grounds reaction force, leg stiffness and lower extremity joint angles and moments were determ...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of biomechanics 2016-12, Vol.49 (16), p.3868-3874 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c565t-c06be2619fc24f705c078fd3b721440db013a6075ddae66c78a3376869a2bc133 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c565t-c06be2619fc24f705c078fd3b721440db013a6075ddae66c78a3376869a2bc133 |
container_end_page | 3874 |
container_issue | 16 |
container_start_page | 3868 |
container_title | Journal of biomechanics |
container_volume | 49 |
creator | Ramsay, John W Hancock, Clifford L O’Donovan, Meghan P Brown, Tyler N |
description | Abstract The purpose of this study was to understand the effects of load carriage on human performance, specifically during a run-to-stop (RTS) task. Using OpenSim analysis tools, knee joint contact force, grounds reaction force, leg stiffness and lower extremity joint angles and moments were determined for nine male military personnel performing a RTS under three load configurations (light, ~6 kg, medium, ~20 kg, and heavy, ~40 kg). Subject-based means for each biomechanical variable were submitted to repeated measures ANOVA to test the effects of load. During the RTS, body borne load significantly increased peak knee joint contact force by 1.2 BW ( p |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2016.10.022 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1880033449</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0021929016311204</els_id><sourcerecordid>1880033449</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c565t-c06be2619fc24f705c078fd3b721440db013a6075ddae66c78a3376869a2bc133</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkk1v1DAQhiMEokvhL1SRuHDJMv6IHV8QqOJLqsShcLYcewJOs_ZiJyvtv6_DtiD1Qi8eefTM6xm_U1UXBLYEiHg7bsfexx3aX1ta7iW5BUqfVBvSSdZQ1sHTagNASaOogrPqRc4jAEgu1fPqjErZKWB8U5nrODmPqUk44cGEue6jO5YjBaynaFyufbAJTcb6JiDWY_QFsjHMxs71EJPF2i3Jh5-1qdMSmjk2eY77emcCLgdML6tng5kyvrqL59WPTx-_X35prr59_nr54aqxrWjnxoLokQqiBkv5IKG1ILvBsV5Swjm4HggzAmTrnEEhrOwMY1J0QhnaW8LYefXmpLtP8feCedY7ny1OU-kjLlmTrgNgjHP1CLRVvKMtpY9AWSsUadmq-voBOsYlhTJzoaSUSnHBCyVOlE0x54SD3ie_M-moCejVWj3qe2v1au2ahz-dXNzJL_0O3d-yey8L8P4EYPnlQ_FUZ-sxWHQ-oZ21i_7_b7x7IGEnH7w10w0eMf-bR2eqQV-vC7buFxGMEAqc3QL7cMty</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1877799464</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Soldier-relevant body borne loads increase knee joint contact force during a run-to-stop maneuver</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Ramsay, John W ; Hancock, Clifford L ; O’Donovan, Meghan P ; Brown, Tyler N</creator><creatorcontrib>Ramsay, John W ; Hancock, Clifford L ; O’Donovan, Meghan P ; Brown, Tyler N</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract The purpose of this study was to understand the effects of load carriage on human performance, specifically during a run-to-stop (RTS) task. Using OpenSim analysis tools, knee joint contact force, grounds reaction force, leg stiffness and lower extremity joint angles and moments were determined for nine male military personnel performing a RTS under three load configurations (light, ~6 kg, medium, ~20 kg, and heavy, ~40 kg). Subject-based means for each biomechanical variable were submitted to repeated measures ANOVA to test the effects of load. During the RTS, body borne load significantly increased peak knee joint contact force by 1.2 BW ( p <0.001) and peak vertical ( p <0.001) and anterior-posterior ( p =0.002) ground reaction forces by 0.6 BW and 0.3 BW, respectively. Body borne load also had a significant effect on hip ( p =0.026) posture with the medium load and knee ( p =0.046) posture with the heavy load. With the heavy load, participants exhibited a substantial, albeit non-significant increase in leg stiffness ( p =0.073 and d =0.615). Increases in joint contact force exhibited during the RTS were primarily due to greater GRFs that impact the soldier with each incremental addition of body borne load. The stiff leg, extended knee and large braking force the soldiers exhibited with the heavy load suggests their injury risk may be greatest with that specific load configuration. Further work is needed to determine if the biomechanical profile exhibited with the heavy load configuration translates to unsafe shear forces at the knee joint and consequently, a higher likelihood of injury.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9290</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2380</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2016.10.022</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27789034</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Analysis of variance ; Armed forces ; Biomechanical Phenomena ; Biomechanics ; Conflicts of interest ; Contact force ; Grounds ; Humans ; Injuries ; Knee ; Knee contact force ; Knee Injuries - prevention & control ; Knee Joint - physiopathology ; Knees ; Leg stiffness ; Load ; Load carriage ; Loads (forces) ; Male ; Military Personnel ; Military training ; OpenSim ; Optimization techniques ; Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation ; Posture ; Run to stop ; Running - physiology ; Soldiers ; Vertebrae ; Weight-Bearing ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Journal of biomechanics, 2016-12, Vol.49 (16), p.3868-3874</ispartof><rights>2016</rights><rights>Published by Elsevier Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c565t-c06be2619fc24f705c078fd3b721440db013a6075ddae66c78a3376869a2bc133</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c565t-c06be2619fc24f705c078fd3b721440db013a6075ddae66c78a3376869a2bc133</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27789034$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ramsay, John W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hancock, Clifford L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O’Donovan, Meghan P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, Tyler N</creatorcontrib><title>Soldier-relevant body borne loads increase knee joint contact force during a run-to-stop maneuver</title><title>Journal of biomechanics</title><addtitle>J Biomech</addtitle><description>Abstract The purpose of this study was to understand the effects of load carriage on human performance, specifically during a run-to-stop (RTS) task. Using OpenSim analysis tools, knee joint contact force, grounds reaction force, leg stiffness and lower extremity joint angles and moments were determined for nine male military personnel performing a RTS under three load configurations (light, ~6 kg, medium, ~20 kg, and heavy, ~40 kg). Subject-based means for each biomechanical variable were submitted to repeated measures ANOVA to test the effects of load. During the RTS, body borne load significantly increased peak knee joint contact force by 1.2 BW ( p <0.001) and peak vertical ( p <0.001) and anterior-posterior ( p =0.002) ground reaction forces by 0.6 BW and 0.3 BW, respectively. Body borne load also had a significant effect on hip ( p =0.026) posture with the medium load and knee ( p =0.046) posture with the heavy load. With the heavy load, participants exhibited a substantial, albeit non-significant increase in leg stiffness ( p =0.073 and d =0.615). Increases in joint contact force exhibited during the RTS were primarily due to greater GRFs that impact the soldier with each incremental addition of body borne load. The stiff leg, extended knee and large braking force the soldiers exhibited with the heavy load suggests their injury risk may be greatest with that specific load configuration. Further work is needed to determine if the biomechanical profile exhibited with the heavy load configuration translates to unsafe shear forces at the knee joint and consequently, a higher likelihood of injury.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Analysis of variance</subject><subject>Armed forces</subject><subject>Biomechanical Phenomena</subject><subject>Biomechanics</subject><subject>Conflicts of interest</subject><subject>Contact force</subject><subject>Grounds</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Injuries</subject><subject>Knee</subject><subject>Knee contact force</subject><subject>Knee Injuries - prevention & control</subject><subject>Knee Joint - physiopathology</subject><subject>Knees</subject><subject>Leg stiffness</subject><subject>Load</subject><subject>Load carriage</subject><subject>Loads (forces)</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Military Personnel</subject><subject>Military training</subject><subject>OpenSim</subject><subject>Optimization techniques</subject><subject>Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Posture</subject><subject>Run to stop</subject><subject>Running - physiology</subject><subject>Soldiers</subject><subject>Vertebrae</subject><subject>Weight-Bearing</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0021-9290</issn><issn>1873-2380</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkk1v1DAQhiMEokvhL1SRuHDJMv6IHV8QqOJLqsShcLYcewJOs_ZiJyvtv6_DtiD1Qi8eefTM6xm_U1UXBLYEiHg7bsfexx3aX1ta7iW5BUqfVBvSSdZQ1sHTagNASaOogrPqRc4jAEgu1fPqjErZKWB8U5nrODmPqUk44cGEue6jO5YjBaynaFyufbAJTcb6JiDWY_QFsjHMxs71EJPF2i3Jh5-1qdMSmjk2eY77emcCLgdML6tng5kyvrqL59WPTx-_X35prr59_nr54aqxrWjnxoLokQqiBkv5IKG1ILvBsV5Swjm4HggzAmTrnEEhrOwMY1J0QhnaW8LYefXmpLtP8feCedY7ny1OU-kjLlmTrgNgjHP1CLRVvKMtpY9AWSsUadmq-voBOsYlhTJzoaSUSnHBCyVOlE0x54SD3ie_M-moCejVWj3qe2v1au2ahz-dXNzJL_0O3d-yey8L8P4EYPnlQ_FUZ-sxWHQ-oZ21i_7_b7x7IGEnH7w10w0eMf-bR2eqQV-vC7buFxGMEAqc3QL7cMty</recordid><startdate>20161208</startdate><enddate>20161208</enddate><creator>Ramsay, John W</creator><creator>Hancock, Clifford L</creator><creator>O’Donovan, Meghan P</creator><creator>Brown, Tyler N</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20161208</creationdate><title>Soldier-relevant body borne loads increase knee joint contact force during a run-to-stop maneuver</title><author>Ramsay, John W ; Hancock, Clifford L ; O’Donovan, Meghan P ; Brown, Tyler N</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c565t-c06be2619fc24f705c078fd3b721440db013a6075ddae66c78a3376869a2bc133</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Analysis of variance</topic><topic>Armed forces</topic><topic>Biomechanical Phenomena</topic><topic>Biomechanics</topic><topic>Conflicts of interest</topic><topic>Contact force</topic><topic>Grounds</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Injuries</topic><topic>Knee</topic><topic>Knee contact force</topic><topic>Knee Injuries - prevention & control</topic><topic>Knee Joint - physiopathology</topic><topic>Knees</topic><topic>Leg stiffness</topic><topic>Load</topic><topic>Load carriage</topic><topic>Loads (forces)</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Military Personnel</topic><topic>Military training</topic><topic>OpenSim</topic><topic>Optimization techniques</topic><topic>Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Posture</topic><topic>Run to stop</topic><topic>Running - physiology</topic><topic>Soldiers</topic><topic>Vertebrae</topic><topic>Weight-Bearing</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ramsay, John W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hancock, Clifford L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O’Donovan, Meghan P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, Tyler N</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>ProQuest_Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest_Research Library</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of biomechanics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ramsay, John W</au><au>Hancock, Clifford L</au><au>O’Donovan, Meghan P</au><au>Brown, Tyler N</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Soldier-relevant body borne loads increase knee joint contact force during a run-to-stop maneuver</atitle><jtitle>Journal of biomechanics</jtitle><addtitle>J Biomech</addtitle><date>2016-12-08</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>49</volume><issue>16</issue><spage>3868</spage><epage>3874</epage><pages>3868-3874</pages><issn>0021-9290</issn><eissn>1873-2380</eissn><abstract>Abstract The purpose of this study was to understand the effects of load carriage on human performance, specifically during a run-to-stop (RTS) task. Using OpenSim analysis tools, knee joint contact force, grounds reaction force, leg stiffness and lower extremity joint angles and moments were determined for nine male military personnel performing a RTS under three load configurations (light, ~6 kg, medium, ~20 kg, and heavy, ~40 kg). Subject-based means for each biomechanical variable were submitted to repeated measures ANOVA to test the effects of load. During the RTS, body borne load significantly increased peak knee joint contact force by 1.2 BW ( p <0.001) and peak vertical ( p <0.001) and anterior-posterior ( p =0.002) ground reaction forces by 0.6 BW and 0.3 BW, respectively. Body borne load also had a significant effect on hip ( p =0.026) posture with the medium load and knee ( p =0.046) posture with the heavy load. With the heavy load, participants exhibited a substantial, albeit non-significant increase in leg stiffness ( p =0.073 and d =0.615). Increases in joint contact force exhibited during the RTS were primarily due to greater GRFs that impact the soldier with each incremental addition of body borne load. The stiff leg, extended knee and large braking force the soldiers exhibited with the heavy load suggests their injury risk may be greatest with that specific load configuration. Further work is needed to determine if the biomechanical profile exhibited with the heavy load configuration translates to unsafe shear forces at the knee joint and consequently, a higher likelihood of injury.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>27789034</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jbiomech.2016.10.022</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0021-9290 |
ispartof | Journal of biomechanics, 2016-12, Vol.49 (16), p.3868-3874 |
issn | 0021-9290 1873-2380 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1880033449 |
source | ScienceDirect Freedom Collection |
subjects | Adolescent Adult Analysis of variance Armed forces Biomechanical Phenomena Biomechanics Conflicts of interest Contact force Grounds Humans Injuries Knee Knee contact force Knee Injuries - prevention & control Knee Joint - physiopathology Knees Leg stiffness Load Load carriage Loads (forces) Male Military Personnel Military training OpenSim Optimization techniques Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Posture Run to stop Running - physiology Soldiers Vertebrae Weight-Bearing Young Adult |
title | Soldier-relevant body borne loads increase knee joint contact force during a run-to-stop maneuver |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T14%3A40%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Soldier-relevant%20body%20borne%20loads%20increase%20knee%20joint%20contact%20force%20during%20a%20run-to-stop%20maneuver&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20biomechanics&rft.au=Ramsay,%20John%20W&rft.date=2016-12-08&rft.volume=49&rft.issue=16&rft.spage=3868&rft.epage=3874&rft.pages=3868-3874&rft.issn=0021-9290&rft.eissn=1873-2380&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2016.10.022&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1880033449%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c565t-c06be2619fc24f705c078fd3b721440db013a6075ddae66c78a3376869a2bc133%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1877799464&rft_id=info:pmid/27789034&rfr_iscdi=true |