Loading…
Sensorial Assemblages: Affect, Memory and Temporality in Assemblage Thinking
Archaeologists are familiar with the concept of assemblage, but in more recent years they have started problematizing it in interesting and innovative ways, beyond its common connotations of aggregation. Sociologists such as Manuel DeLanda and political philosophers such as Jane Bennett have been ke...
Saved in:
Published in: | Cambridge archaeological journal 2017-02, Vol.27 (1), p.169-182 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-8dcb43866a52353d5b27512ce0e5dbe321a94dba0c956801d88bca61fb7225e23 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 182 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 169 |
container_title | Cambridge archaeological journal |
container_volume | 27 |
creator | Hamilakis, Yannis |
description | Archaeologists are familiar with the concept of assemblage, but in more recent years they have started problematizing it in interesting and innovative ways, beyond its common connotations of aggregation. Sociologists such as Manuel DeLanda and political philosophers such as Jane Bennett have been key influences in this move. These authors had adapted and modified the assemblage thinking of Deleuze and Guattari. In this article, an assemblage of sorts itself, I propose that we need to return to that original Deleuzian body of thinking and explore its richness further. Assemblages, temporary and deliberate heterogeneous arrangements of material and immaterial elements, are about the relationship of in-betweenness. I further suggest that sensoriality and affectivity, memory and multi-temporality are key features of assemblage thinking, and that assemblages also imply certain political effects. The omission of these features in the archaeological treatments of the concept may lead to mechanistic reincarnations of systems thinking, thus depriving the concept of its potential. Finally, I explore these ideas by considering communal eating and feasting events as powerful sensorial assemblages. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S0959774316000676 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1880392518</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0959774316000676</cupid><sourcerecordid>4298186791</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-8dcb43866a52353d5b27512ce0e5dbe321a94dba0c956801d88bca61fb7225e23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kDtPwzAUhS0EEqXwA9gisTAQuLbj2GGrqvKQihha5sh2bopLHsVOh_57ErVDBWK6w_m-o6tDyDWFewpUPiwgE5mUCacpAKQyPSEjmsgkBpHAKRkNcTzk5-QihDUA5SD5iMwX2ITWO11FkxCwNpVeYXiMJmWJtruL3rBu_S7STREtsd60Xleu20WuOcKj5adrvlyzuiRnpa4CXh3umHw8zZbTl3j-_vw6ncxjyzPexaqwJuEqTbVgXPBCGCYFZRYBRWGQM6qzpDAabCZSBbRQylid0tJIxgQyPia3-96Nb7-3GLq8dsFiVekG223IqVLAMyao6tGbX-i63fqm_66nhOQJE3Kg6J6yvg3BY5lvvKu13-UU8mHf_M--vcMPjq6Nd8UKj6r_tX4A3F57NQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1857342578</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sensorial Assemblages: Affect, Memory and Temporality in Assemblage Thinking</title><source>Cambridge University Press</source><source>Humanities Index</source><source>Art, Design & Architecture Collection</source><creator>Hamilakis, Yannis</creator><creatorcontrib>Hamilakis, Yannis</creatorcontrib><description>Archaeologists are familiar with the concept of assemblage, but in more recent years they have started problematizing it in interesting and innovative ways, beyond its common connotations of aggregation. Sociologists such as Manuel DeLanda and political philosophers such as Jane Bennett have been key influences in this move. These authors had adapted and modified the assemblage thinking of Deleuze and Guattari. In this article, an assemblage of sorts itself, I propose that we need to return to that original Deleuzian body of thinking and explore its richness further. Assemblages, temporary and deliberate heterogeneous arrangements of material and immaterial elements, are about the relationship of in-betweenness. I further suggest that sensoriality and affectivity, memory and multi-temporality are key features of assemblage thinking, and that assemblages also imply certain political effects. The omission of these features in the archaeological treatments of the concept may lead to mechanistic reincarnations of systems thinking, thus depriving the concept of its potential. Finally, I explore these ideas by considering communal eating and feasting events as powerful sensorial assemblages.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0959-7743</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1474-0540</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0959774316000676</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Archaeology ; Historic artifacts ; Philosophy ; Politics ; Special Section: Archaeology and Assemblage</subject><ispartof>Cambridge archaeological journal, 2017-02, Vol.27 (1), p.169-182</ispartof><rights>Copyright © McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-8dcb43866a52353d5b27512ce0e5dbe321a94dba0c956801d88bca61fb7225e23</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1857342578?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,12128,12841,27903,27904,33828,33829,34754,34755,44179,72706</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hamilakis, Yannis</creatorcontrib><title>Sensorial Assemblages: Affect, Memory and Temporality in Assemblage Thinking</title><title>Cambridge archaeological journal</title><addtitle>CAJ</addtitle><description>Archaeologists are familiar with the concept of assemblage, but in more recent years they have started problematizing it in interesting and innovative ways, beyond its common connotations of aggregation. Sociologists such as Manuel DeLanda and political philosophers such as Jane Bennett have been key influences in this move. These authors had adapted and modified the assemblage thinking of Deleuze and Guattari. In this article, an assemblage of sorts itself, I propose that we need to return to that original Deleuzian body of thinking and explore its richness further. Assemblages, temporary and deliberate heterogeneous arrangements of material and immaterial elements, are about the relationship of in-betweenness. I further suggest that sensoriality and affectivity, memory and multi-temporality are key features of assemblage thinking, and that assemblages also imply certain political effects. The omission of these features in the archaeological treatments of the concept may lead to mechanistic reincarnations of systems thinking, thus depriving the concept of its potential. Finally, I explore these ideas by considering communal eating and feasting events as powerful sensorial assemblages.</description><subject>Archaeology</subject><subject>Historic artifacts</subject><subject>Philosophy</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Special Section: Archaeology and Assemblage</subject><issn>0959-7743</issn><issn>1474-0540</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C18</sourceid><sourceid>K50</sourceid><sourceid>M1D</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kDtPwzAUhS0EEqXwA9gisTAQuLbj2GGrqvKQihha5sh2bopLHsVOh_57ErVDBWK6w_m-o6tDyDWFewpUPiwgE5mUCacpAKQyPSEjmsgkBpHAKRkNcTzk5-QihDUA5SD5iMwX2ITWO11FkxCwNpVeYXiMJmWJtruL3rBu_S7STREtsd60Xleu20WuOcKj5adrvlyzuiRnpa4CXh3umHw8zZbTl3j-_vw6ncxjyzPexaqwJuEqTbVgXPBCGCYFZRYBRWGQM6qzpDAabCZSBbRQylid0tJIxgQyPia3-96Nb7-3GLq8dsFiVekG223IqVLAMyao6tGbX-i63fqm_66nhOQJE3Kg6J6yvg3BY5lvvKu13-UU8mHf_M--vcMPjq6Nd8UKj6r_tX4A3F57NQ</recordid><startdate>201702</startdate><enddate>201702</enddate><creator>Hamilakis, Yannis</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AVQMV</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>C18</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K50</scope><scope>M1D</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201702</creationdate><title>Sensorial Assemblages: Affect, Memory and Temporality in Assemblage Thinking</title><author>Hamilakis, Yannis</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-8dcb43866a52353d5b27512ce0e5dbe321a94dba0c956801d88bca61fb7225e23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Archaeology</topic><topic>Historic artifacts</topic><topic>Philosophy</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Special Section: Archaeology and Assemblage</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hamilakis, Yannis</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Arts Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Humanities Index</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Art, Design & Architecture Collection</collection><collection>Arts & Humanities Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Cambridge archaeological journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hamilakis, Yannis</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sensorial Assemblages: Affect, Memory and Temporality in Assemblage Thinking</atitle><jtitle>Cambridge archaeological journal</jtitle><addtitle>CAJ</addtitle><date>2017-02</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>169</spage><epage>182</epage><pages>169-182</pages><issn>0959-7743</issn><eissn>1474-0540</eissn><abstract>Archaeologists are familiar with the concept of assemblage, but in more recent years they have started problematizing it in interesting and innovative ways, beyond its common connotations of aggregation. Sociologists such as Manuel DeLanda and political philosophers such as Jane Bennett have been key influences in this move. These authors had adapted and modified the assemblage thinking of Deleuze and Guattari. In this article, an assemblage of sorts itself, I propose that we need to return to that original Deleuzian body of thinking and explore its richness further. Assemblages, temporary and deliberate heterogeneous arrangements of material and immaterial elements, are about the relationship of in-betweenness. I further suggest that sensoriality and affectivity, memory and multi-temporality are key features of assemblage thinking, and that assemblages also imply certain political effects. The omission of these features in the archaeological treatments of the concept may lead to mechanistic reincarnations of systems thinking, thus depriving the concept of its potential. Finally, I explore these ideas by considering communal eating and feasting events as powerful sensorial assemblages.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S0959774316000676</doi><tpages>14</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0959-7743 |
ispartof | Cambridge archaeological journal, 2017-02, Vol.27 (1), p.169-182 |
issn | 0959-7743 1474-0540 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1880392518 |
source | Cambridge University Press; Humanities Index; Art, Design & Architecture Collection |
subjects | Archaeology Historic artifacts Philosophy Politics Special Section: Archaeology and Assemblage |
title | Sensorial Assemblages: Affect, Memory and Temporality in Assemblage Thinking |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T23%3A29%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sensorial%20Assemblages:%20Affect,%20Memory%20and%20Temporality%20in%20Assemblage%20Thinking&rft.jtitle=Cambridge%20archaeological%20journal&rft.au=Hamilakis,%20Yannis&rft.date=2017-02&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=169&rft.epage=182&rft.pages=169-182&rft.issn=0959-7743&rft.eissn=1474-0540&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0959774316000676&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4298186791%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-8dcb43866a52353d5b27512ce0e5dbe321a94dba0c956801d88bca61fb7225e23%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1857342578&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0959774316000676&rfr_iscdi=true |