Loading…

Enhanced Pest Ant Control With Hydrophobic Bait

The red imported fire ant, Solenopsis invicta (Buren), left most of its natural enemies behind in South America when it arrived in Mobile, AL, in the 1930s and spread rapidly throughout the southeastern United States, reaching population levels up to 10 times those found in South America. The large...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of economic entomology 2017-04, Vol.110 (2), p.567-574
Main Authors: Meer, R. K. Vander, Milne, D. E
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b378t-7bf845198104589731b5a105e583e3769d2cb29b506b2c3e4328ea9225b171fc3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b378t-7bf845198104589731b5a105e583e3769d2cb29b506b2c3e4328ea9225b171fc3
container_end_page 574
container_issue 2
container_start_page 567
container_title Journal of economic entomology
container_volume 110
creator Meer, R. K. Vander
Milne, D. E
description The red imported fire ant, Solenopsis invicta (Buren), left most of its natural enemies behind in South America when it arrived in Mobile, AL, in the 1930s and spread rapidly throughout the southeastern United States, reaching population levels up to 10 times those found in South America. The large population densities and propensity for disturbed habitats led to direct conflict with human activities. Bait control methods were first developed for fire ants in the early 1960s and little has changed in the subsequent decades, despite the drawback that the bait carrier rapidly breaks down when wet. The southeast United States is wet; thus, bait labels have various guidance-restricting applications based on potential wet conditions. Here we compare a hydrophobic fire ant bait to the equivalent standard bait formulation and demonstrate in a paired-mound field experiment under natural wet conditions in Florida (heavy dew on ground), a significant advantage for the hydrophobic bait. An effective hydrophobic ant bait would extend the utility of current bait insecticides to wet conditions and also fill an important gap in our ability to control invasive pest ant species that thrive in wet tropical and subtropical habitats, e.g., Wasmannia auropunctata (Roger), the little fire ant.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/jee/tow300
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1881263203</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/jee/tow300</oup_id><sourcerecordid>2190493163</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b378t-7bf845198104589731b5a105e583e3769d2cb29b506b2c3e4328ea9225b171fc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90M1Kw0AUBeBBFFurGx9AAiKIEDv3Tn5mljVUKxR0oehuyCQTmpJm4kyC9O1NSXXhoqu7-Ticewi5BHoPVLDpWutpa74ZpUdkDIJxHwV8HpMxpYg-DQQbkTPn1pRChEBPyQg5YwEijMl0Xq_SOtO596pd683q1ktM3VpTeR9lu_IW29yaZmVUmXkPadmek5MirZy-2N8JeX-cvyULf_ny9JzMlr5iMW_9WBU8CEFwoEHIRcxAhSnQUIecaRZHIsdMoVAhjRRmTAcMuU4FYqgghiJjE3I75DbWfHV9NbkpXaarKq216ZwEzgEjhpT19PofXZvO1n07iSB270O0U3eDyqxxzupCNrbcpHYrgcrdjLKfUQ4z9vhqH9mpjc7_6O9uPbgZgOmaw0H7N1RpTK0P0R-jh4Th</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2190493163</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Enhanced Pest Ant Control With Hydrophobic Bait</title><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><creator>Meer, R. K. Vander ; Milne, D. E</creator><creatorcontrib>Meer, R. K. Vander ; Milne, D. E</creatorcontrib><description>The red imported fire ant, Solenopsis invicta (Buren), left most of its natural enemies behind in South America when it arrived in Mobile, AL, in the 1930s and spread rapidly throughout the southeastern United States, reaching population levels up to 10 times those found in South America. The large population densities and propensity for disturbed habitats led to direct conflict with human activities. Bait control methods were first developed for fire ants in the early 1960s and little has changed in the subsequent decades, despite the drawback that the bait carrier rapidly breaks down when wet. The southeast United States is wet; thus, bait labels have various guidance-restricting applications based on potential wet conditions. Here we compare a hydrophobic fire ant bait to the equivalent standard bait formulation and demonstrate in a paired-mound field experiment under natural wet conditions in Florida (heavy dew on ground), a significant advantage for the hydrophobic bait. An effective hydrophobic ant bait would extend the utility of current bait insecticides to wet conditions and also fill an important gap in our ability to control invasive pest ant species that thrive in wet tropical and subtropical habitats, e.g., Wasmannia auropunctata (Roger), the little fire ant.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-0493</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-291X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/jee/tow300</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28334221</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Entomological Society of America</publisher><subject>Animals ; Ants - drug effects ; Baits ; HOUSEHOLD AND STRUCTURAL INSECTS ; Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Interactions ; hydrophobic bait ; Hydrophobicity ; Insect Control - methods ; Insecticides ; Insecticides - chemistry ; Insecticides - pharmacology ; Introduced Species ; little fire ant ; Natural enemies ; Olfactometry - methods ; Pest control ; Pests ; Population density ; Population levels ; Predation ; Pyridines - chemistry ; Pyridines - pharmacology ; red imported fire ant ; Solenopsis invicta</subject><ispartof>Journal of economic entomology, 2017-04, Vol.110 (2), p.567-574</ispartof><rights>Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Entomological Society of America 2017. This work is written by US Government employees and is in the public domain in the US.</rights><rights>Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Entomological Society of America 2017. This work is written by US Government employees and is in the public domain in the US. 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b378t-7bf845198104589731b5a105e583e3769d2cb29b506b2c3e4328ea9225b171fc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b378t-7bf845198104589731b5a105e583e3769d2cb29b506b2c3e4328ea9225b171fc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28334221$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Meer, R. K. Vander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Milne, D. E</creatorcontrib><title>Enhanced Pest Ant Control With Hydrophobic Bait</title><title>Journal of economic entomology</title><addtitle>J Econ Entomol</addtitle><description>The red imported fire ant, Solenopsis invicta (Buren), left most of its natural enemies behind in South America when it arrived in Mobile, AL, in the 1930s and spread rapidly throughout the southeastern United States, reaching population levels up to 10 times those found in South America. The large population densities and propensity for disturbed habitats led to direct conflict with human activities. Bait control methods were first developed for fire ants in the early 1960s and little has changed in the subsequent decades, despite the drawback that the bait carrier rapidly breaks down when wet. The southeast United States is wet; thus, bait labels have various guidance-restricting applications based on potential wet conditions. Here we compare a hydrophobic fire ant bait to the equivalent standard bait formulation and demonstrate in a paired-mound field experiment under natural wet conditions in Florida (heavy dew on ground), a significant advantage for the hydrophobic bait. An effective hydrophobic ant bait would extend the utility of current bait insecticides to wet conditions and also fill an important gap in our ability to control invasive pest ant species that thrive in wet tropical and subtropical habitats, e.g., Wasmannia auropunctata (Roger), the little fire ant.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Ants - drug effects</subject><subject>Baits</subject><subject>HOUSEHOLD AND STRUCTURAL INSECTS</subject><subject>Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Interactions</subject><subject>hydrophobic bait</subject><subject>Hydrophobicity</subject><subject>Insect Control - methods</subject><subject>Insecticides</subject><subject>Insecticides - chemistry</subject><subject>Insecticides - pharmacology</subject><subject>Introduced Species</subject><subject>little fire ant</subject><subject>Natural enemies</subject><subject>Olfactometry - methods</subject><subject>Pest control</subject><subject>Pests</subject><subject>Population density</subject><subject>Population levels</subject><subject>Predation</subject><subject>Pyridines - chemistry</subject><subject>Pyridines - pharmacology</subject><subject>red imported fire ant</subject><subject>Solenopsis invicta</subject><issn>0022-0493</issn><issn>1938-291X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp90M1Kw0AUBeBBFFurGx9AAiKIEDv3Tn5mljVUKxR0oehuyCQTmpJm4kyC9O1NSXXhoqu7-Ticewi5BHoPVLDpWutpa74ZpUdkDIJxHwV8HpMxpYg-DQQbkTPn1pRChEBPyQg5YwEijMl0Xq_SOtO596pd683q1ktM3VpTeR9lu_IW29yaZmVUmXkPadmek5MirZy-2N8JeX-cvyULf_ny9JzMlr5iMW_9WBU8CEFwoEHIRcxAhSnQUIecaRZHIsdMoVAhjRRmTAcMuU4FYqgghiJjE3I75DbWfHV9NbkpXaarKq216ZwEzgEjhpT19PofXZvO1n07iSB270O0U3eDyqxxzupCNrbcpHYrgcrdjLKfUQ4z9vhqH9mpjc7_6O9uPbgZgOmaw0H7N1RpTK0P0R-jh4Th</recordid><startdate>20170401</startdate><enddate>20170401</enddate><creator>Meer, R. K. Vander</creator><creator>Milne, D. E</creator><general>Entomological Society of America</general><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170401</creationdate><title>Enhanced Pest Ant Control With Hydrophobic Bait</title><author>Meer, R. K. Vander ; Milne, D. E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b378t-7bf845198104589731b5a105e583e3769d2cb29b506b2c3e4328ea9225b171fc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Ants - drug effects</topic><topic>Baits</topic><topic>HOUSEHOLD AND STRUCTURAL INSECTS</topic><topic>Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Interactions</topic><topic>hydrophobic bait</topic><topic>Hydrophobicity</topic><topic>Insect Control - methods</topic><topic>Insecticides</topic><topic>Insecticides - chemistry</topic><topic>Insecticides - pharmacology</topic><topic>Introduced Species</topic><topic>little fire ant</topic><topic>Natural enemies</topic><topic>Olfactometry - methods</topic><topic>Pest control</topic><topic>Pests</topic><topic>Population density</topic><topic>Population levels</topic><topic>Predation</topic><topic>Pyridines - chemistry</topic><topic>Pyridines - pharmacology</topic><topic>red imported fire ant</topic><topic>Solenopsis invicta</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Meer, R. K. Vander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Milne, D. E</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of economic entomology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Meer, R. K. Vander</au><au>Milne, D. E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Enhanced Pest Ant Control With Hydrophobic Bait</atitle><jtitle>Journal of economic entomology</jtitle><addtitle>J Econ Entomol</addtitle><date>2017-04-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>110</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>567</spage><epage>574</epage><pages>567-574</pages><issn>0022-0493</issn><eissn>1938-291X</eissn><abstract>The red imported fire ant, Solenopsis invicta (Buren), left most of its natural enemies behind in South America when it arrived in Mobile, AL, in the 1930s and spread rapidly throughout the southeastern United States, reaching population levels up to 10 times those found in South America. The large population densities and propensity for disturbed habitats led to direct conflict with human activities. Bait control methods were first developed for fire ants in the early 1960s and little has changed in the subsequent decades, despite the drawback that the bait carrier rapidly breaks down when wet. The southeast United States is wet; thus, bait labels have various guidance-restricting applications based on potential wet conditions. Here we compare a hydrophobic fire ant bait to the equivalent standard bait formulation and demonstrate in a paired-mound field experiment under natural wet conditions in Florida (heavy dew on ground), a significant advantage for the hydrophobic bait. An effective hydrophobic ant bait would extend the utility of current bait insecticides to wet conditions and also fill an important gap in our ability to control invasive pest ant species that thrive in wet tropical and subtropical habitats, e.g., Wasmannia auropunctata (Roger), the little fire ant.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Entomological Society of America</pub><pmid>28334221</pmid><doi>10.1093/jee/tow300</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-0493
ispartof Journal of economic entomology, 2017-04, Vol.110 (2), p.567-574
issn 0022-0493
1938-291X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1881263203
source Oxford Journals Online
subjects Animals
Ants - drug effects
Baits
HOUSEHOLD AND STRUCTURAL INSECTS
Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Interactions
hydrophobic bait
Hydrophobicity
Insect Control - methods
Insecticides
Insecticides - chemistry
Insecticides - pharmacology
Introduced Species
little fire ant
Natural enemies
Olfactometry - methods
Pest control
Pests
Population density
Population levels
Predation
Pyridines - chemistry
Pyridines - pharmacology
red imported fire ant
Solenopsis invicta
title Enhanced Pest Ant Control With Hydrophobic Bait
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T23%3A49%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Enhanced%20Pest%20Ant%20Control%20With%20Hydrophobic%20Bait&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20economic%20entomology&rft.au=Meer,%20R.%20K.%20Vander&rft.date=2017-04-01&rft.volume=110&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=567&rft.epage=574&rft.pages=567-574&rft.issn=0022-0493&rft.eissn=1938-291X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/jee/tow300&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2190493163%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b378t-7bf845198104589731b5a105e583e3769d2cb29b506b2c3e4328ea9225b171fc3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2190493163&rft_id=info:pmid/28334221&rft_oup_id=10.1093/jee/tow300&rfr_iscdi=true