Loading…
Pre-pregnancy BMI, gestational weight gain and postpartum weight retention: a meta-analysis of observational studies
To determine the association of gestational weight gain (GWG) or pre-pregnancy BMI with postpartum weight retention (PPWR). Meta-analysis. PubMed, Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, EMBASE, Science Citation Index Expanded, Current Contents Connects and Biosis Previews were used to search articles....
Saved in:
Published in: | Public health nutrition 2015-08, Vol.18 (12), p.2172-2182 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c515t-9ca38dde04a0b906aaacaa6b6d3d48f24b0cb1c9878f3d2c98e48fa7859f0b993 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c515t-9ca38dde04a0b906aaacaa6b6d3d48f24b0cb1c9878f3d2c98e48fa7859f0b993 |
container_end_page | 2182 |
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | 2172 |
container_title | Public health nutrition |
container_volume | 18 |
creator | Rong, Ke Yu, Kai Han, Xiaolong Szeto, Ignatius MY Qin, Xueying Wang, Junkuan Ning, Yibing Wang, Peiyu Ma, Defu |
description | To determine the association of gestational weight gain (GWG) or pre-pregnancy BMI with postpartum weight retention (PPWR).
Meta-analysis.
PubMed, Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, EMBASE, Science Citation Index Expanded, Current Contents Connects and Biosis Previews were used to search articles.
Publications that described the influence of pre-pregnancy BMI or GWG on PPWR.
Seventeen studies that satisfied the eligibility criteria were included in the analyses. Women with inadequate and excessive GWG had significantly lower mean PPWR of -2·14 kg (95 % CI -2·43, -1·85 kg) and higher PPWR of 3·21 kg (95 % CI 2·79, 3·62 kg), respectively, than women with adequate GWG. When postpartum time spans were stratified into 1-3 months, 3-6 months, 6-12 months, 12-36 months and ≥15 years, the association between inadequate GWG and PPWR faded over time and became insignificant (-1·42 kg; 95 % CI -3·08, 0·24 kg) after ≥15 years. However, PPWR in women with excess GWG exhibited a U-shaped trend; that is, a decline during the early postpartum time span (year 1) and then an increase in the following period. Meta-analysis of qualitative studies showed a significant relationship between excessive GWG and higher PPWR risk (OR=2·08; 95 % CI 1·60, 2·70). Moreover, meta-analysis of pre-pregnancy BMI on PPWR indicated that mean PPWR decreased with increasing BMI group.
These findings suggest that GWG, rather than pre-pregnancy BMI, determines the shorter- or longer-term PPWR. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S1368980014002523 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1881756458</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S1368980014002523</cupid><sourcerecordid>3776214891</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c515t-9ca38dde04a0b906aaacaa6b6d3d48f24b0cb1c9878f3d2c98e48fa7859f0b993</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUtv1TAQhS1ERR_wA9ggS2y6IHQmiWOHHVQUKrUqUss6msSTkOrmUduhuv--vuq9CFFVrDzy-c4ZjY4QbxE-IqA-ucasMKUBwBwgVWn2QhxgrlWS6lS_jHOUk42-Lw69vwUApbV-JfZTlSNqAwci_HCczI67kcZmLb9cnn-QHftAoZ9GWsl77rtfQXbUj5JGK-fJh5lcWIad5DjwuKE_SZIDB0ooGte-93Jq5VR7dr93aT4stmf_Wuy1tPL8ZvseiZ9nX29OvycXV9_OTz9fJI1CFZKyocxYy5AT1CUURNQQFXVhM5ubNs1raGpsSqNNm9k0Dhy_SRtVttFQZkfi-DF3dtPdEq-qht43vFrRyNPiKzQGtSpyZf6PFmVRGFSAEX3_D3o7LS6eFykNmTIpgooUPlKNm7x33Faz6wdy6wqh2rRXPWkvet5tk5d6YPvHsasrAtk2lIba9bbjv3Y_G_sAwP-k7A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1703582105</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Pre-pregnancy BMI, gestational weight gain and postpartum weight retention: a meta-analysis of observational studies</title><source>Cambridge University Press</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Rong, Ke ; Yu, Kai ; Han, Xiaolong ; Szeto, Ignatius MY ; Qin, Xueying ; Wang, Junkuan ; Ning, Yibing ; Wang, Peiyu ; Ma, Defu</creator><creatorcontrib>Rong, Ke ; Yu, Kai ; Han, Xiaolong ; Szeto, Ignatius MY ; Qin, Xueying ; Wang, Junkuan ; Ning, Yibing ; Wang, Peiyu ; Ma, Defu</creatorcontrib><description>To determine the association of gestational weight gain (GWG) or pre-pregnancy BMI with postpartum weight retention (PPWR).
Meta-analysis.
PubMed, Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, EMBASE, Science Citation Index Expanded, Current Contents Connects and Biosis Previews were used to search articles.
Publications that described the influence of pre-pregnancy BMI or GWG on PPWR.
Seventeen studies that satisfied the eligibility criteria were included in the analyses. Women with inadequate and excessive GWG had significantly lower mean PPWR of -2·14 kg (95 % CI -2·43, -1·85 kg) and higher PPWR of 3·21 kg (95 % CI 2·79, 3·62 kg), respectively, than women with adequate GWG. When postpartum time spans were stratified into 1-3 months, 3-6 months, 6-12 months, 12-36 months and ≥15 years, the association between inadequate GWG and PPWR faded over time and became insignificant (-1·42 kg; 95 % CI -3·08, 0·24 kg) after ≥15 years. However, PPWR in women with excess GWG exhibited a U-shaped trend; that is, a decline during the early postpartum time span (year 1) and then an increase in the following period. Meta-analysis of qualitative studies showed a significant relationship between excessive GWG and higher PPWR risk (OR=2·08; 95 % CI 1·60, 2·70). Moreover, meta-analysis of pre-pregnancy BMI on PPWR indicated that mean PPWR decreased with increasing BMI group.
These findings suggest that GWG, rather than pre-pregnancy BMI, determines the shorter- or longer-term PPWR.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1368-9800</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1475-2727</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S1368980014002523</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25411780</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Body Mass Index ; Databases, Factual ; Diet ; Epidemiology ; Female ; Humans ; Meta-analysis ; Motor Activity ; Nutritional epidemiology ; Obesity ; Observational studies ; Observational Studies as Topic ; Overweight ; Postpartum Period ; Pregnancy ; Qualitative research ; Research methodology ; Retention ; Review Article ; United States ; Weight control ; Weight Gain ; Womens health</subject><ispartof>Public health nutrition, 2015-08, Vol.18 (12), p.2172-2182</ispartof><rights>Copyright © The Authors 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c515t-9ca38dde04a0b906aaacaa6b6d3d48f24b0cb1c9878f3d2c98e48fa7859f0b993</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c515t-9ca38dde04a0b906aaacaa6b6d3d48f24b0cb1c9878f3d2c98e48fa7859f0b993</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1368980014002523/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,72703</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25411780$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rong, Ke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Kai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Han, Xiaolong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Szeto, Ignatius MY</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qin, Xueying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Junkuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ning, Yibing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Peiyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ma, Defu</creatorcontrib><title>Pre-pregnancy BMI, gestational weight gain and postpartum weight retention: a meta-analysis of observational studies</title><title>Public health nutrition</title><addtitle>Public Health Nutr</addtitle><description>To determine the association of gestational weight gain (GWG) or pre-pregnancy BMI with postpartum weight retention (PPWR).
Meta-analysis.
PubMed, Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, EMBASE, Science Citation Index Expanded, Current Contents Connects and Biosis Previews were used to search articles.
Publications that described the influence of pre-pregnancy BMI or GWG on PPWR.
Seventeen studies that satisfied the eligibility criteria were included in the analyses. Women with inadequate and excessive GWG had significantly lower mean PPWR of -2·14 kg (95 % CI -2·43, -1·85 kg) and higher PPWR of 3·21 kg (95 % CI 2·79, 3·62 kg), respectively, than women with adequate GWG. When postpartum time spans were stratified into 1-3 months, 3-6 months, 6-12 months, 12-36 months and ≥15 years, the association between inadequate GWG and PPWR faded over time and became insignificant (-1·42 kg; 95 % CI -3·08, 0·24 kg) after ≥15 years. However, PPWR in women with excess GWG exhibited a U-shaped trend; that is, a decline during the early postpartum time span (year 1) and then an increase in the following period. Meta-analysis of qualitative studies showed a significant relationship between excessive GWG and higher PPWR risk (OR=2·08; 95 % CI 1·60, 2·70). Moreover, meta-analysis of pre-pregnancy BMI on PPWR indicated that mean PPWR decreased with increasing BMI group.
These findings suggest that GWG, rather than pre-pregnancy BMI, determines the shorter- or longer-term PPWR.</description><subject>Body Mass Index</subject><subject>Databases, Factual</subject><subject>Diet</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Motor Activity</subject><subject>Nutritional epidemiology</subject><subject>Obesity</subject><subject>Observational studies</subject><subject>Observational Studies as Topic</subject><subject>Overweight</subject><subject>Postpartum Period</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Qualitative research</subject><subject>Research methodology</subject><subject>Retention</subject><subject>Review Article</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>Weight control</subject><subject>Weight Gain</subject><subject>Womens health</subject><issn>1368-9800</issn><issn>1475-2727</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkUtv1TAQhS1ERR_wA9ggS2y6IHQmiWOHHVQUKrUqUss6msSTkOrmUduhuv--vuq9CFFVrDzy-c4ZjY4QbxE-IqA-ucasMKUBwBwgVWn2QhxgrlWS6lS_jHOUk42-Lw69vwUApbV-JfZTlSNqAwci_HCczI67kcZmLb9cnn-QHftAoZ9GWsl77rtfQXbUj5JGK-fJh5lcWIad5DjwuKE_SZIDB0ooGte-93Jq5VR7dr93aT4stmf_Wuy1tPL8ZvseiZ9nX29OvycXV9_OTz9fJI1CFZKyocxYy5AT1CUURNQQFXVhM5ubNs1raGpsSqNNm9k0Dhy_SRtVttFQZkfi-DF3dtPdEq-qht43vFrRyNPiKzQGtSpyZf6PFmVRGFSAEX3_D3o7LS6eFykNmTIpgooUPlKNm7x33Faz6wdy6wqh2rRXPWkvet5tk5d6YPvHsasrAtk2lIba9bbjv3Y_G_sAwP-k7A</recordid><startdate>20150801</startdate><enddate>20150801</enddate><creator>Rong, Ke</creator><creator>Yu, Kai</creator><creator>Han, Xiaolong</creator><creator>Szeto, Ignatius MY</creator><creator>Qin, Xueying</creator><creator>Wang, Junkuan</creator><creator>Ning, Yibing</creator><creator>Wang, Peiyu</creator><creator>Ma, Defu</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>H94</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150801</creationdate><title>Pre-pregnancy BMI, gestational weight gain and postpartum weight retention: a meta-analysis of observational studies</title><author>Rong, Ke ; Yu, Kai ; Han, Xiaolong ; Szeto, Ignatius MY ; Qin, Xueying ; Wang, Junkuan ; Ning, Yibing ; Wang, Peiyu ; Ma, Defu</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c515t-9ca38dde04a0b906aaacaa6b6d3d48f24b0cb1c9878f3d2c98e48fa7859f0b993</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Body Mass Index</topic><topic>Databases, Factual</topic><topic>Diet</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Motor Activity</topic><topic>Nutritional epidemiology</topic><topic>Obesity</topic><topic>Observational studies</topic><topic>Observational Studies as Topic</topic><topic>Overweight</topic><topic>Postpartum Period</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Qualitative research</topic><topic>Research methodology</topic><topic>Retention</topic><topic>Review Article</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>Weight control</topic><topic>Weight Gain</topic><topic>Womens health</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rong, Ke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Kai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Han, Xiaolong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Szeto, Ignatius MY</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qin, Xueying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Junkuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ning, Yibing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Peiyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ma, Defu</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Career & Technical Education Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Public health nutrition</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rong, Ke</au><au>Yu, Kai</au><au>Han, Xiaolong</au><au>Szeto, Ignatius MY</au><au>Qin, Xueying</au><au>Wang, Junkuan</au><au>Ning, Yibing</au><au>Wang, Peiyu</au><au>Ma, Defu</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Pre-pregnancy BMI, gestational weight gain and postpartum weight retention: a meta-analysis of observational studies</atitle><jtitle>Public health nutrition</jtitle><addtitle>Public Health Nutr</addtitle><date>2015-08-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>2172</spage><epage>2182</epage><pages>2172-2182</pages><issn>1368-9800</issn><eissn>1475-2727</eissn><abstract>To determine the association of gestational weight gain (GWG) or pre-pregnancy BMI with postpartum weight retention (PPWR).
Meta-analysis.
PubMed, Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, EMBASE, Science Citation Index Expanded, Current Contents Connects and Biosis Previews were used to search articles.
Publications that described the influence of pre-pregnancy BMI or GWG on PPWR.
Seventeen studies that satisfied the eligibility criteria were included in the analyses. Women with inadequate and excessive GWG had significantly lower mean PPWR of -2·14 kg (95 % CI -2·43, -1·85 kg) and higher PPWR of 3·21 kg (95 % CI 2·79, 3·62 kg), respectively, than women with adequate GWG. When postpartum time spans were stratified into 1-3 months, 3-6 months, 6-12 months, 12-36 months and ≥15 years, the association between inadequate GWG and PPWR faded over time and became insignificant (-1·42 kg; 95 % CI -3·08, 0·24 kg) after ≥15 years. However, PPWR in women with excess GWG exhibited a U-shaped trend; that is, a decline during the early postpartum time span (year 1) and then an increase in the following period. Meta-analysis of qualitative studies showed a significant relationship between excessive GWG and higher PPWR risk (OR=2·08; 95 % CI 1·60, 2·70). Moreover, meta-analysis of pre-pregnancy BMI on PPWR indicated that mean PPWR decreased with increasing BMI group.
These findings suggest that GWG, rather than pre-pregnancy BMI, determines the shorter- or longer-term PPWR.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><pmid>25411780</pmid><doi>10.1017/S1368980014002523</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1368-9800 |
ispartof | Public health nutrition, 2015-08, Vol.18 (12), p.2172-2182 |
issn | 1368-9800 1475-2727 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1881756458 |
source | Cambridge University Press; PubMed Central |
subjects | Body Mass Index Databases, Factual Diet Epidemiology Female Humans Meta-analysis Motor Activity Nutritional epidemiology Obesity Observational studies Observational Studies as Topic Overweight Postpartum Period Pregnancy Qualitative research Research methodology Retention Review Article United States Weight control Weight Gain Womens health |
title | Pre-pregnancy BMI, gestational weight gain and postpartum weight retention: a meta-analysis of observational studies |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T05%3A08%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Pre-pregnancy%20BMI,%20gestational%20weight%20gain%20and%20postpartum%20weight%20retention:%20a%20meta-analysis%20of%20observational%20studies&rft.jtitle=Public%20health%20nutrition&rft.au=Rong,%20Ke&rft.date=2015-08-01&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=2172&rft.epage=2182&rft.pages=2172-2182&rft.issn=1368-9800&rft.eissn=1475-2727&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S1368980014002523&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3776214891%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c515t-9ca38dde04a0b906aaacaa6b6d3d48f24b0cb1c9878f3d2c98e48fa7859f0b993%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1703582105&rft_id=info:pmid/25411780&rft_cupid=10_1017_S1368980014002523&rfr_iscdi=true |