Loading…

Pre-pregnancy BMI, gestational weight gain and postpartum weight retention: a meta-analysis of observational studies

To determine the association of gestational weight gain (GWG) or pre-pregnancy BMI with postpartum weight retention (PPWR). Meta-analysis. PubMed, Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, EMBASE, Science Citation Index Expanded, Current Contents Connects and Biosis Previews were used to search articles....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Public health nutrition 2015-08, Vol.18 (12), p.2172-2182
Main Authors: Rong, Ke, Yu, Kai, Han, Xiaolong, Szeto, Ignatius MY, Qin, Xueying, Wang, Junkuan, Ning, Yibing, Wang, Peiyu, Ma, Defu
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c515t-9ca38dde04a0b906aaacaa6b6d3d48f24b0cb1c9878f3d2c98e48fa7859f0b993
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c515t-9ca38dde04a0b906aaacaa6b6d3d48f24b0cb1c9878f3d2c98e48fa7859f0b993
container_end_page 2182
container_issue 12
container_start_page 2172
container_title Public health nutrition
container_volume 18
creator Rong, Ke
Yu, Kai
Han, Xiaolong
Szeto, Ignatius MY
Qin, Xueying
Wang, Junkuan
Ning, Yibing
Wang, Peiyu
Ma, Defu
description To determine the association of gestational weight gain (GWG) or pre-pregnancy BMI with postpartum weight retention (PPWR). Meta-analysis. PubMed, Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, EMBASE, Science Citation Index Expanded, Current Contents Connects and Biosis Previews were used to search articles. Publications that described the influence of pre-pregnancy BMI or GWG on PPWR. Seventeen studies that satisfied the eligibility criteria were included in the analyses. Women with inadequate and excessive GWG had significantly lower mean PPWR of -2·14 kg (95 % CI -2·43, -1·85 kg) and higher PPWR of 3·21 kg (95 % CI 2·79, 3·62 kg), respectively, than women with adequate GWG. When postpartum time spans were stratified into 1-3 months, 3-6 months, 6-12 months, 12-36 months and ≥15 years, the association between inadequate GWG and PPWR faded over time and became insignificant (-1·42 kg; 95 % CI -3·08, 0·24 kg) after ≥15 years. However, PPWR in women with excess GWG exhibited a U-shaped trend; that is, a decline during the early postpartum time span (year 1) and then an increase in the following period. Meta-analysis of qualitative studies showed a significant relationship between excessive GWG and higher PPWR risk (OR=2·08; 95 % CI 1·60, 2·70). Moreover, meta-analysis of pre-pregnancy BMI on PPWR indicated that mean PPWR decreased with increasing BMI group. These findings suggest that GWG, rather than pre-pregnancy BMI, determines the shorter- or longer-term PPWR.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/S1368980014002523
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1881756458</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S1368980014002523</cupid><sourcerecordid>3776214891</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c515t-9ca38dde04a0b906aaacaa6b6d3d48f24b0cb1c9878f3d2c98e48fa7859f0b993</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUtv1TAQhS1ERR_wA9ggS2y6IHQmiWOHHVQUKrUqUss6msSTkOrmUduhuv--vuq9CFFVrDzy-c4ZjY4QbxE-IqA-ucasMKUBwBwgVWn2QhxgrlWS6lS_jHOUk42-Lw69vwUApbV-JfZTlSNqAwci_HCczI67kcZmLb9cnn-QHftAoZ9GWsl77rtfQXbUj5JGK-fJh5lcWIad5DjwuKE_SZIDB0ooGte-93Jq5VR7dr93aT4stmf_Wuy1tPL8ZvseiZ9nX29OvycXV9_OTz9fJI1CFZKyocxYy5AT1CUURNQQFXVhM5ubNs1raGpsSqNNm9k0Dhy_SRtVttFQZkfi-DF3dtPdEq-qht43vFrRyNPiKzQGtSpyZf6PFmVRGFSAEX3_D3o7LS6eFykNmTIpgooUPlKNm7x33Faz6wdy6wqh2rRXPWkvet5tk5d6YPvHsasrAtk2lIba9bbjv3Y_G_sAwP-k7A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1703582105</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Pre-pregnancy BMI, gestational weight gain and postpartum weight retention: a meta-analysis of observational studies</title><source>Cambridge University Press</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Rong, Ke ; Yu, Kai ; Han, Xiaolong ; Szeto, Ignatius MY ; Qin, Xueying ; Wang, Junkuan ; Ning, Yibing ; Wang, Peiyu ; Ma, Defu</creator><creatorcontrib>Rong, Ke ; Yu, Kai ; Han, Xiaolong ; Szeto, Ignatius MY ; Qin, Xueying ; Wang, Junkuan ; Ning, Yibing ; Wang, Peiyu ; Ma, Defu</creatorcontrib><description>To determine the association of gestational weight gain (GWG) or pre-pregnancy BMI with postpartum weight retention (PPWR). Meta-analysis. PubMed, Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, EMBASE, Science Citation Index Expanded, Current Contents Connects and Biosis Previews were used to search articles. Publications that described the influence of pre-pregnancy BMI or GWG on PPWR. Seventeen studies that satisfied the eligibility criteria were included in the analyses. Women with inadequate and excessive GWG had significantly lower mean PPWR of -2·14 kg (95 % CI -2·43, -1·85 kg) and higher PPWR of 3·21 kg (95 % CI 2·79, 3·62 kg), respectively, than women with adequate GWG. When postpartum time spans were stratified into 1-3 months, 3-6 months, 6-12 months, 12-36 months and ≥15 years, the association between inadequate GWG and PPWR faded over time and became insignificant (-1·42 kg; 95 % CI -3·08, 0·24 kg) after ≥15 years. However, PPWR in women with excess GWG exhibited a U-shaped trend; that is, a decline during the early postpartum time span (year 1) and then an increase in the following period. Meta-analysis of qualitative studies showed a significant relationship between excessive GWG and higher PPWR risk (OR=2·08; 95 % CI 1·60, 2·70). Moreover, meta-analysis of pre-pregnancy BMI on PPWR indicated that mean PPWR decreased with increasing BMI group. These findings suggest that GWG, rather than pre-pregnancy BMI, determines the shorter- or longer-term PPWR.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1368-9800</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1475-2727</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S1368980014002523</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25411780</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Body Mass Index ; Databases, Factual ; Diet ; Epidemiology ; Female ; Humans ; Meta-analysis ; Motor Activity ; Nutritional epidemiology ; Obesity ; Observational studies ; Observational Studies as Topic ; Overweight ; Postpartum Period ; Pregnancy ; Qualitative research ; Research methodology ; Retention ; Review Article ; United States ; Weight control ; Weight Gain ; Womens health</subject><ispartof>Public health nutrition, 2015-08, Vol.18 (12), p.2172-2182</ispartof><rights>Copyright © The Authors 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c515t-9ca38dde04a0b906aaacaa6b6d3d48f24b0cb1c9878f3d2c98e48fa7859f0b993</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c515t-9ca38dde04a0b906aaacaa6b6d3d48f24b0cb1c9878f3d2c98e48fa7859f0b993</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1368980014002523/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,72703</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25411780$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rong, Ke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Kai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Han, Xiaolong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Szeto, Ignatius MY</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qin, Xueying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Junkuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ning, Yibing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Peiyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ma, Defu</creatorcontrib><title>Pre-pregnancy BMI, gestational weight gain and postpartum weight retention: a meta-analysis of observational studies</title><title>Public health nutrition</title><addtitle>Public Health Nutr</addtitle><description>To determine the association of gestational weight gain (GWG) or pre-pregnancy BMI with postpartum weight retention (PPWR). Meta-analysis. PubMed, Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, EMBASE, Science Citation Index Expanded, Current Contents Connects and Biosis Previews were used to search articles. Publications that described the influence of pre-pregnancy BMI or GWG on PPWR. Seventeen studies that satisfied the eligibility criteria were included in the analyses. Women with inadequate and excessive GWG had significantly lower mean PPWR of -2·14 kg (95 % CI -2·43, -1·85 kg) and higher PPWR of 3·21 kg (95 % CI 2·79, 3·62 kg), respectively, than women with adequate GWG. When postpartum time spans were stratified into 1-3 months, 3-6 months, 6-12 months, 12-36 months and ≥15 years, the association between inadequate GWG and PPWR faded over time and became insignificant (-1·42 kg; 95 % CI -3·08, 0·24 kg) after ≥15 years. However, PPWR in women with excess GWG exhibited a U-shaped trend; that is, a decline during the early postpartum time span (year 1) and then an increase in the following period. Meta-analysis of qualitative studies showed a significant relationship between excessive GWG and higher PPWR risk (OR=2·08; 95 % CI 1·60, 2·70). Moreover, meta-analysis of pre-pregnancy BMI on PPWR indicated that mean PPWR decreased with increasing BMI group. These findings suggest that GWG, rather than pre-pregnancy BMI, determines the shorter- or longer-term PPWR.</description><subject>Body Mass Index</subject><subject>Databases, Factual</subject><subject>Diet</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Motor Activity</subject><subject>Nutritional epidemiology</subject><subject>Obesity</subject><subject>Observational studies</subject><subject>Observational Studies as Topic</subject><subject>Overweight</subject><subject>Postpartum Period</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Qualitative research</subject><subject>Research methodology</subject><subject>Retention</subject><subject>Review Article</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>Weight control</subject><subject>Weight Gain</subject><subject>Womens health</subject><issn>1368-9800</issn><issn>1475-2727</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkUtv1TAQhS1ERR_wA9ggS2y6IHQmiWOHHVQUKrUqUss6msSTkOrmUduhuv--vuq9CFFVrDzy-c4ZjY4QbxE-IqA-ucasMKUBwBwgVWn2QhxgrlWS6lS_jHOUk42-Lw69vwUApbV-JfZTlSNqAwci_HCczI67kcZmLb9cnn-QHftAoZ9GWsl77rtfQXbUj5JGK-fJh5lcWIad5DjwuKE_SZIDB0ooGte-93Jq5VR7dr93aT4stmf_Wuy1tPL8ZvseiZ9nX29OvycXV9_OTz9fJI1CFZKyocxYy5AT1CUURNQQFXVhM5ubNs1raGpsSqNNm9k0Dhy_SRtVttFQZkfi-DF3dtPdEq-qht43vFrRyNPiKzQGtSpyZf6PFmVRGFSAEX3_D3o7LS6eFykNmTIpgooUPlKNm7x33Faz6wdy6wqh2rRXPWkvet5tk5d6YPvHsasrAtk2lIba9bbjv3Y_G_sAwP-k7A</recordid><startdate>20150801</startdate><enddate>20150801</enddate><creator>Rong, Ke</creator><creator>Yu, Kai</creator><creator>Han, Xiaolong</creator><creator>Szeto, Ignatius MY</creator><creator>Qin, Xueying</creator><creator>Wang, Junkuan</creator><creator>Ning, Yibing</creator><creator>Wang, Peiyu</creator><creator>Ma, Defu</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>H94</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150801</creationdate><title>Pre-pregnancy BMI, gestational weight gain and postpartum weight retention: a meta-analysis of observational studies</title><author>Rong, Ke ; Yu, Kai ; Han, Xiaolong ; Szeto, Ignatius MY ; Qin, Xueying ; Wang, Junkuan ; Ning, Yibing ; Wang, Peiyu ; Ma, Defu</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c515t-9ca38dde04a0b906aaacaa6b6d3d48f24b0cb1c9878f3d2c98e48fa7859f0b993</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Body Mass Index</topic><topic>Databases, Factual</topic><topic>Diet</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Motor Activity</topic><topic>Nutritional epidemiology</topic><topic>Obesity</topic><topic>Observational studies</topic><topic>Observational Studies as Topic</topic><topic>Overweight</topic><topic>Postpartum Period</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Qualitative research</topic><topic>Research methodology</topic><topic>Retention</topic><topic>Review Article</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>Weight control</topic><topic>Weight Gain</topic><topic>Womens health</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rong, Ke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Kai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Han, Xiaolong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Szeto, Ignatius MY</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qin, Xueying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Junkuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ning, Yibing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Peiyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ma, Defu</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Career &amp; Technical Education Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Public health nutrition</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rong, Ke</au><au>Yu, Kai</au><au>Han, Xiaolong</au><au>Szeto, Ignatius MY</au><au>Qin, Xueying</au><au>Wang, Junkuan</au><au>Ning, Yibing</au><au>Wang, Peiyu</au><au>Ma, Defu</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Pre-pregnancy BMI, gestational weight gain and postpartum weight retention: a meta-analysis of observational studies</atitle><jtitle>Public health nutrition</jtitle><addtitle>Public Health Nutr</addtitle><date>2015-08-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>2172</spage><epage>2182</epage><pages>2172-2182</pages><issn>1368-9800</issn><eissn>1475-2727</eissn><abstract>To determine the association of gestational weight gain (GWG) or pre-pregnancy BMI with postpartum weight retention (PPWR). Meta-analysis. PubMed, Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, EMBASE, Science Citation Index Expanded, Current Contents Connects and Biosis Previews were used to search articles. Publications that described the influence of pre-pregnancy BMI or GWG on PPWR. Seventeen studies that satisfied the eligibility criteria were included in the analyses. Women with inadequate and excessive GWG had significantly lower mean PPWR of -2·14 kg (95 % CI -2·43, -1·85 kg) and higher PPWR of 3·21 kg (95 % CI 2·79, 3·62 kg), respectively, than women with adequate GWG. When postpartum time spans were stratified into 1-3 months, 3-6 months, 6-12 months, 12-36 months and ≥15 years, the association between inadequate GWG and PPWR faded over time and became insignificant (-1·42 kg; 95 % CI -3·08, 0·24 kg) after ≥15 years. However, PPWR in women with excess GWG exhibited a U-shaped trend; that is, a decline during the early postpartum time span (year 1) and then an increase in the following period. Meta-analysis of qualitative studies showed a significant relationship between excessive GWG and higher PPWR risk (OR=2·08; 95 % CI 1·60, 2·70). Moreover, meta-analysis of pre-pregnancy BMI on PPWR indicated that mean PPWR decreased with increasing BMI group. These findings suggest that GWG, rather than pre-pregnancy BMI, determines the shorter- or longer-term PPWR.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><pmid>25411780</pmid><doi>10.1017/S1368980014002523</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1368-9800
ispartof Public health nutrition, 2015-08, Vol.18 (12), p.2172-2182
issn 1368-9800
1475-2727
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1881756458
source Cambridge University Press; PubMed Central
subjects Body Mass Index
Databases, Factual
Diet
Epidemiology
Female
Humans
Meta-analysis
Motor Activity
Nutritional epidemiology
Obesity
Observational studies
Observational Studies as Topic
Overweight
Postpartum Period
Pregnancy
Qualitative research
Research methodology
Retention
Review Article
United States
Weight control
Weight Gain
Womens health
title Pre-pregnancy BMI, gestational weight gain and postpartum weight retention: a meta-analysis of observational studies
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T05%3A08%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Pre-pregnancy%20BMI,%20gestational%20weight%20gain%20and%20postpartum%20weight%20retention:%20a%20meta-analysis%20of%20observational%20studies&rft.jtitle=Public%20health%20nutrition&rft.au=Rong,%20Ke&rft.date=2015-08-01&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=2172&rft.epage=2182&rft.pages=2172-2182&rft.issn=1368-9800&rft.eissn=1475-2727&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S1368980014002523&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3776214891%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c515t-9ca38dde04a0b906aaacaa6b6d3d48f24b0cb1c9878f3d2c98e48fa7859f0b993%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1703582105&rft_id=info:pmid/25411780&rft_cupid=10_1017_S1368980014002523&rfr_iscdi=true