Five ways consortia can catalyse open science

An analysis of more than 50 collaborations shows the secrets of success, write Joel Cutcher-Gershenfeld and colleagues from the Stakeholder Alignment Collaborative.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Nature (London) 2017-03, Vol.543 (7647), p.615-617
Main Authors: Cutcher-Gershenfeld, Joel, Baker, Karen S., Berente, Nicholas, Flint, Courtney, Gershenfeld, Gabriel, Grant, Brandon, Haberman, Michael, King, John Leslie, Kirkpatrick, Christine, Lawrence, Barbara, Lewis, Spenser, Lenhardt, W. Christopher, Mayernik, Matthew, McElroy, Charles, Mittleman, Barbara, Shin, Namchul, Stall, Shelley, Winter, Susan, Zaslavsky, Ilya
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
631/67
706/648/496
Access to Information
Collaboration
comment
Conferences, meetings and seminars
Consortia
Cooperative Behavior
Datasets
Fieldwork
File sharing
Forecasts and trends
Goals
Group Processes
Humanities and Social Sciences
Influence
Information Dissemination
Information sharing
Intellectual cooperation
Interdisciplinary Communication
Methods
multidisciplinary
Open access
Research - manpower
Research - organization & administration
Research Personnel - organization & administration
Research Personnel - psychology
Science
Science (multidisciplinary)
Scientists
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:An analysis of more than 50 collaborations shows the secrets of success, write Joel Cutcher-Gershenfeld and colleagues from the Stakeholder Alignment Collaborative.
ISSN:0028-0836
1476-4687
DOI:10.1038/543615a