Loading…
Applying a third party access model for China’s gas pipeline network: an independent pipeline operator and congestion rent transfer
This paper investigates third party access regulatory issues in China’s natural gas industry. We study the development of China’s gas market-oriented reform and how third party access becomes a pressing issue in that context. This paper aims to report stakeholders’ benefit and distributional effects...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of regulatory economics 2017-02, Vol.51 (1), p.72-97 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-9e91fa3f4ec6023b5f24e541f151f2e183a9e8f47ed7bfc6cdd8bf735b8a55b63 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-9e91fa3f4ec6023b5f24e541f151f2e183a9e8f47ed7bfc6cdd8bf735b8a55b63 |
container_end_page | 97 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 72 |
container_title | Journal of regulatory economics |
container_volume | 51 |
creator | Xu, Jing Hallack, Michelle Vazquez, Miguel |
description | This paper investigates third party access regulatory issues in China’s natural gas industry. We study the development of China’s gas market-oriented reform and how third party access becomes a pressing issue in that context. This paper aims to report stakeholders’ benefit and distributional effects during a hypothetical third party access process. To that end, we apply an oligopolistic equilibrium model, based on the mixed complementarity problem, to China’s gas pipeline network. We compare two scenarios: a scenario without third party access and the other scenario where an independent pipeline operator optimizes flows. This latter scenario aims to guarantee that the maximum social benefit is achieved. In addition, the latter scenario transfers the congestion rent to former integrated gas companies to compensate their actual loss control of the pipeline operation, in order to minimize the adverse distributional effects for pipeline companies. The solution of the model indicates that operational separation is feasible with Pareto improvement in China’s context. Moreover, it merits particular attention from policy makers in China that pipeline capacity scarcity should be properly evaluated and managed. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11149-017-9316-z |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1884097461</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4320914863</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-9e91fa3f4ec6023b5f24e541f151f2e183a9e8f47ed7bfc6cdd8bf735b8a55b63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kcFqFTEUhkNR6LX6AO4C3XQzmjOTTDLdlYtVoeBGwV3IZE5u085N0mQucrty40P4ej6JudyCIrg5Z_P9P4fzEfIa2BtgTL4tAMCHhoFshg765vGErEDIrmG8V8_Iig1t2_SKfT0lL0q5Y4wNSskV-XGV0rz3YUMNXW59nmgyedlTYy2WQrdxwpm6mOn61gfz6_vPQjem0OQTzj4gDbh8i_n-kppAfZgwYR1h-QPEhNkstcCEidoYNlgWHwPNB2rJJhSH-SV57sxc8NXTPiNfrt99Xn9obj69_7i-umksB740Aw7gTOc42p613Shcy1FwcCDAtQiqMwMqxyVOcnS2t9OkRic7MSojxNh3Z-Ti2JtyfNjVS_TWF4vzbALGXdGgFGeD5D1U9Pwf9C7ucqjXVUoqJjiTolJwpGyOpWR0OmW_NXmvgemDGH0Uo6sYfRCjH2umPWZKZes_8l_N_w39BuvVlPg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1878054075</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Applying a third party access model for China’s gas pipeline network: an independent pipeline operator and congestion rent transfer</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate</source><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>EBSCOhost Econlit with Full Text</source><source>ABI/INFORM Global</source><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Xu, Jing ; Hallack, Michelle ; Vazquez, Miguel</creator><creatorcontrib>Xu, Jing ; Hallack, Michelle ; Vazquez, Miguel</creatorcontrib><description>This paper investigates third party access regulatory issues in China’s natural gas industry. We study the development of China’s gas market-oriented reform and how third party access becomes a pressing issue in that context. This paper aims to report stakeholders’ benefit and distributional effects during a hypothetical third party access process. To that end, we apply an oligopolistic equilibrium model, based on the mixed complementarity problem, to China’s gas pipeline network. We compare two scenarios: a scenario without third party access and the other scenario where an independent pipeline operator optimizes flows. This latter scenario aims to guarantee that the maximum social benefit is achieved. In addition, the latter scenario transfers the congestion rent to former integrated gas companies to compensate their actual loss control of the pipeline operation, in order to minimize the adverse distributional effects for pipeline companies. The solution of the model indicates that operational separation is feasible with Pareto improvement in China’s context. Moreover, it merits particular attention from policy makers in China that pipeline capacity scarcity should be properly evaluated and managed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0922-680X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-0468</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11149-017-9316-z</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>China ; Cooperation ; Economics ; Economics and Finance ; Electricity ; Industrial Organization ; Infrastructure ; Liberalization ; Microeconomics ; Natural gas industry ; Natural gas utilities ; Oligopoly ; Original Article ; Pipelines ; Public Finance ; Public property ; Reforms ; Studies ; Third party</subject><ispartof>Journal of regulatory economics, 2017-02, Vol.51 (1), p.72-97</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017</rights><rights>Journal of Regulatory Economics is a copyright of Springer, 2017.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-9e91fa3f4ec6023b5f24e541f151f2e183a9e8f47ed7bfc6cdd8bf735b8a55b63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-9e91fa3f4ec6023b5f24e541f151f2e183a9e8f47ed7bfc6cdd8bf735b8a55b63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1878054075/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1878054075?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,11688,12847,27924,27925,33223,33224,36060,36061,44363,74895</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Xu, Jing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hallack, Michelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vazquez, Miguel</creatorcontrib><title>Applying a third party access model for China’s gas pipeline network: an independent pipeline operator and congestion rent transfer</title><title>Journal of regulatory economics</title><addtitle>J Regul Econ</addtitle><description>This paper investigates third party access regulatory issues in China’s natural gas industry. We study the development of China’s gas market-oriented reform and how third party access becomes a pressing issue in that context. This paper aims to report stakeholders’ benefit and distributional effects during a hypothetical third party access process. To that end, we apply an oligopolistic equilibrium model, based on the mixed complementarity problem, to China’s gas pipeline network. We compare two scenarios: a scenario without third party access and the other scenario where an independent pipeline operator optimizes flows. This latter scenario aims to guarantee that the maximum social benefit is achieved. In addition, the latter scenario transfers the congestion rent to former integrated gas companies to compensate their actual loss control of the pipeline operation, in order to minimize the adverse distributional effects for pipeline companies. The solution of the model indicates that operational separation is feasible with Pareto improvement in China’s context. Moreover, it merits particular attention from policy makers in China that pipeline capacity scarcity should be properly evaluated and managed.</description><subject>China</subject><subject>Cooperation</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Economics and Finance</subject><subject>Electricity</subject><subject>Industrial Organization</subject><subject>Infrastructure</subject><subject>Liberalization</subject><subject>Microeconomics</subject><subject>Natural gas industry</subject><subject>Natural gas utilities</subject><subject>Oligopoly</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Pipelines</subject><subject>Public Finance</subject><subject>Public property</subject><subject>Reforms</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Third party</subject><issn>0922-680X</issn><issn>1573-0468</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kcFqFTEUhkNR6LX6AO4C3XQzmjOTTDLdlYtVoeBGwV3IZE5u085N0mQucrty40P4ej6JudyCIrg5Z_P9P4fzEfIa2BtgTL4tAMCHhoFshg765vGErEDIrmG8V8_Iig1t2_SKfT0lL0q5Y4wNSskV-XGV0rz3YUMNXW59nmgyedlTYy2WQrdxwpm6mOn61gfz6_vPQjem0OQTzj4gDbh8i_n-kppAfZgwYR1h-QPEhNkstcCEidoYNlgWHwPNB2rJJhSH-SV57sxc8NXTPiNfrt99Xn9obj69_7i-umksB740Aw7gTOc42p613Shcy1FwcCDAtQiqMwMqxyVOcnS2t9OkRic7MSojxNh3Z-Ti2JtyfNjVS_TWF4vzbALGXdGgFGeD5D1U9Pwf9C7ucqjXVUoqJjiTolJwpGyOpWR0OmW_NXmvgemDGH0Uo6sYfRCjH2umPWZKZes_8l_N_w39BuvVlPg</recordid><startdate>20170201</startdate><enddate>20170201</enddate><creator>Xu, Jing</creator><creator>Hallack, Michelle</creator><creator>Vazquez, Miguel</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYYUZ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170201</creationdate><title>Applying a third party access model for China’s gas pipeline network: an independent pipeline operator and congestion rent transfer</title><author>Xu, Jing ; Hallack, Michelle ; Vazquez, Miguel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-9e91fa3f4ec6023b5f24e541f151f2e183a9e8f47ed7bfc6cdd8bf735b8a55b63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>China</topic><topic>Cooperation</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Economics and Finance</topic><topic>Electricity</topic><topic>Industrial Organization</topic><topic>Infrastructure</topic><topic>Liberalization</topic><topic>Microeconomics</topic><topic>Natural gas industry</topic><topic>Natural gas utilities</topic><topic>Oligopoly</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Pipelines</topic><topic>Public Finance</topic><topic>Public property</topic><topic>Reforms</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Third party</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Xu, Jing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hallack, Michelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vazquez, Miguel</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI-INFORM Complete</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Journal of regulatory economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Xu, Jing</au><au>Hallack, Michelle</au><au>Vazquez, Miguel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Applying a third party access model for China’s gas pipeline network: an independent pipeline operator and congestion rent transfer</atitle><jtitle>Journal of regulatory economics</jtitle><stitle>J Regul Econ</stitle><date>2017-02-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>51</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>72</spage><epage>97</epage><pages>72-97</pages><issn>0922-680X</issn><eissn>1573-0468</eissn><abstract>This paper investigates third party access regulatory issues in China’s natural gas industry. We study the development of China’s gas market-oriented reform and how third party access becomes a pressing issue in that context. This paper aims to report stakeholders’ benefit and distributional effects during a hypothetical third party access process. To that end, we apply an oligopolistic equilibrium model, based on the mixed complementarity problem, to China’s gas pipeline network. We compare two scenarios: a scenario without third party access and the other scenario where an independent pipeline operator optimizes flows. This latter scenario aims to guarantee that the maximum social benefit is achieved. In addition, the latter scenario transfers the congestion rent to former integrated gas companies to compensate their actual loss control of the pipeline operation, in order to minimize the adverse distributional effects for pipeline companies. The solution of the model indicates that operational separation is feasible with Pareto improvement in China’s context. Moreover, it merits particular attention from policy makers in China that pipeline capacity scarcity should be properly evaluated and managed.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s11149-017-9316-z</doi><tpages>26</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0922-680X |
ispartof | Journal of regulatory economics, 2017-02, Vol.51 (1), p.72-97 |
issn | 0922-680X 1573-0468 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1884097461 |
source | EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate; International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); EBSCOhost Econlit with Full Text; ABI/INFORM Global; Springer Link |
subjects | China Cooperation Economics Economics and Finance Electricity Industrial Organization Infrastructure Liberalization Microeconomics Natural gas industry Natural gas utilities Oligopoly Original Article Pipelines Public Finance Public property Reforms Studies Third party |
title | Applying a third party access model for China’s gas pipeline network: an independent pipeline operator and congestion rent transfer |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T14%3A06%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Applying%20a%20third%20party%20access%20model%20for%20China%E2%80%99s%20gas%20pipeline%20network:%20an%20independent%20pipeline%20operator%20and%20congestion%20rent%20transfer&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20regulatory%20economics&rft.au=Xu,%20Jing&rft.date=2017-02-01&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=72&rft.epage=97&rft.pages=72-97&rft.issn=0922-680X&rft.eissn=1573-0468&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11149-017-9316-z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4320914863%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-9e91fa3f4ec6023b5f24e541f151f2e183a9e8f47ed7bfc6cdd8bf735b8a55b63%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1878054075&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |