Loading…

Comparison of preterm and term equivalent age MRI for the evaluation of preterm brain injury

Objective: To compare information obtained from preterm magnetic resonance imaging (MRI; 31–34 weeks) brain scan to that done at term equivalent age. Study design: Prospective observational study of premature infants with evidence or suspicion of parenchymal brain injury on cranial ultrasound. Brain...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of perinatology 2017-07, Vol.37 (7), p.864-868
Main Authors: Malhotra, A, Fahey, M C, Davies-Tuck, M, Wong, F, Carse, E, Whiteley, G, Ditchfield, M
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Objective: To compare information obtained from preterm magnetic resonance imaging (MRI; 31–34 weeks) brain scan to that done at term equivalent age. Study design: Prospective observational study of premature infants with evidence or suspicion of parenchymal brain injury on cranial ultrasound. Brain injury on two scans scored using a scoring system and analyzed. Results: Fourteen infants with a median (range) gestation at birth of 28 (25–29) weeks and birth weight of 1254 (680–1557) grams were studied. There was a strong correlation between the brain injury scores for the two scans (Spearman ρ =0.87, P =0.001) with excellent agreement between two radiologists (interclass correlation coefficient 0.9–0.94). There was also a high level of agreement between the preterm and term MRI two scores (Intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.79 (0.53–0.94)). Conclusions: Preterm MRI is a feasible option for the assessment of preterm brain injury and analysis of data obtained from scan at preterm age is comparable to that obtained at term equivalent age.
ISSN:0743-8346
1476-5543
DOI:10.1038/jp.2017.39