Loading…
Does increased heat resistance result in higher susceptibility to predation? A test using Drosophila melanogaster selection and hardening
Heat resistance of ectotherms can be increased both by plasticity and evolution, but these effects may have trade‐offs resulting from biotic interactions. Here, we test for predation costs in Drosophila melanogaster populations with altered heat resistance produced by adult hardening and directional...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of evolutionary biology 2017-06, Vol.30 (6), p.1153-1164 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3884-c51897fdd2c0c161651145e0c70cc7abec66eb99cd5cb2e64f16632e85aa17d83 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3884-c51897fdd2c0c161651145e0c70cc7abec66eb99cd5cb2e64f16632e85aa17d83 |
container_end_page | 1164 |
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 1153 |
container_title | Journal of evolutionary biology |
container_volume | 30 |
creator | Hangartner, S. Dworkin, I. DeNieu, M. Hoffmann, A. A. |
description | Heat resistance of ectotherms can be increased both by plasticity and evolution, but these effects may have trade‐offs resulting from biotic interactions. Here, we test for predation costs in Drosophila melanogaster populations with altered heat resistance produced by adult hardening and directional selection for increased heat resistance. In addition, we also tested for genetic trade‐offs by testing heat resistance in lines that have evolved under increased predation risk. We show that while 35/37 °C hardening increases heat resistance as expected, it does not increase predation risk from jumping spiders or mantids; in fact, there was an indication that survival may have increased under predation following a triple 37 °C compared to a single 35 °C hardening treatment. Flies that survived a 39 °C selection cycle showed lower survival under predation, suggesting a predation cost of exposure to a more severe heat stress. There was, however, no correlated response to selection because survival did not differ between control and selected lines after selection was relaxed for one or two generations. In addition, lines selected for increased predation risk did not differ in heat resistance. Our findings suggest independent evolutionary responses to predation and heat as measured in laboratory assays, and no costs of heat hardening on susceptibility to predation. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/jeb.13084 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1885938728</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1905652465</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3884-c51897fdd2c0c161651145e0c70cc7abec66eb99cd5cb2e64f16632e85aa17d83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc1O3DAURq0KVH7Koi-ALHVTFmF8k9hxVhVlaAEhdQMSO8tx7sx4lImD7QjNI_DWOB3aBRLe3Ls4Ov6uPkK-AjuH9GZrbM6hYLL8RA6hzFlWA4O9tDNgGRPweECOQlgzBqLk_DM5yGUhRQ3ykLzMHQZqe-NRB2zpCnWkHoMNUfcGp3XsYgLoyi5X6GkYg8Eh2sZ2Nm5pdHTw2OpoXf-DXtCIIdIx2H5J594FN6xsp-kGO927pQ5xMmCHZuKp7tOH2rfYJ_4L2V_oLuDJ2zwmD7-u7i-vs7s_v28uL-4yU0hZZoaDrKtF2-aGGRAgOEDJkZmKGVPpBo0Q2NS1ablpchTlAoQocpRca6haWRyT7zvv4N3TmOKqjU0ndSkhujEokJLXhazyCf32Dl270fcpnYKaccHzUvBEne0okw4OHhdq8Haj_VYBU1M_KvWj_vaT2NM349hssP1P_iskAbMd8Gw73H5sUrdXP3fKV_KtnAI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1905652465</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Does increased heat resistance result in higher susceptibility to predation? A test using Drosophila melanogaster selection and hardening</title><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Hangartner, S. ; Dworkin, I. ; DeNieu, M. ; Hoffmann, A. A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hangartner, S. ; Dworkin, I. ; DeNieu, M. ; Hoffmann, A. A.</creatorcontrib><description>Heat resistance of ectotherms can be increased both by plasticity and evolution, but these effects may have trade‐offs resulting from biotic interactions. Here, we test for predation costs in Drosophila melanogaster populations with altered heat resistance produced by adult hardening and directional selection for increased heat resistance. In addition, we also tested for genetic trade‐offs by testing heat resistance in lines that have evolved under increased predation risk. We show that while 35/37 °C hardening increases heat resistance as expected, it does not increase predation risk from jumping spiders or mantids; in fact, there was an indication that survival may have increased under predation following a triple 37 °C compared to a single 35 °C hardening treatment. Flies that survived a 39 °C selection cycle showed lower survival under predation, suggesting a predation cost of exposure to a more severe heat stress. There was, however, no correlated response to selection because survival did not differ between control and selected lines after selection was relaxed for one or two generations. In addition, lines selected for increased predation risk did not differ in heat resistance. Our findings suggest independent evolutionary responses to predation and heat as measured in laboratory assays, and no costs of heat hardening on susceptibility to predation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1010-061X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1420-9101</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jeb.13084</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28386918</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Animal behavior ; Animals ; Assaying ; Biological evolution ; biotic interactions ; climate change ; Correlation ; Costs ; Drosophila melanogaster ; Evolution ; Exposure ; Flies ; genetic correlations ; Hardening ; Heat resistance ; Heat stress ; Heat tolerance ; Hot Temperature ; Indication ; Insects ; phenotypic plasticity ; Plastic properties ; Plasticity ; Populations ; Predation ; Predatory Behavior ; Risk ; Selection, Genetic ; Spiders ; Stresses ; Survival ; thermal adaptation ; Thermal resistance ; Thermotolerance ; Tradeoffs ; trade‐offs</subject><ispartof>Journal of evolutionary biology, 2017-06, Vol.30 (6), p.1153-1164</ispartof><rights>2017 European Society For Evolutionary Biology. Journal of Evolutionary Biology © 2017 European Society For Evolutionary Biology</rights><rights>2017 European Society For Evolutionary Biology. Journal of Evolutionary Biology © 2017 European Society For Evolutionary Biology.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 European Society for Evolutionary Biology</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3884-c51897fdd2c0c161651145e0c70cc7abec66eb99cd5cb2e64f16632e85aa17d83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3884-c51897fdd2c0c161651145e0c70cc7abec66eb99cd5cb2e64f16632e85aa17d83</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8801-9536</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fjeb.13084$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fjeb.13084$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,1412,27905,27906,45555,45556</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28386918$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hangartner, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dworkin, I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DeNieu, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoffmann, A. A.</creatorcontrib><title>Does increased heat resistance result in higher susceptibility to predation? A test using Drosophila melanogaster selection and hardening</title><title>Journal of evolutionary biology</title><addtitle>J Evol Biol</addtitle><description>Heat resistance of ectotherms can be increased both by plasticity and evolution, but these effects may have trade‐offs resulting from biotic interactions. Here, we test for predation costs in Drosophila melanogaster populations with altered heat resistance produced by adult hardening and directional selection for increased heat resistance. In addition, we also tested for genetic trade‐offs by testing heat resistance in lines that have evolved under increased predation risk. We show that while 35/37 °C hardening increases heat resistance as expected, it does not increase predation risk from jumping spiders or mantids; in fact, there was an indication that survival may have increased under predation following a triple 37 °C compared to a single 35 °C hardening treatment. Flies that survived a 39 °C selection cycle showed lower survival under predation, suggesting a predation cost of exposure to a more severe heat stress. There was, however, no correlated response to selection because survival did not differ between control and selected lines after selection was relaxed for one or two generations. In addition, lines selected for increased predation risk did not differ in heat resistance. Our findings suggest independent evolutionary responses to predation and heat as measured in laboratory assays, and no costs of heat hardening on susceptibility to predation.</description><subject>Animal behavior</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Assaying</subject><subject>Biological evolution</subject><subject>biotic interactions</subject><subject>climate change</subject><subject>Correlation</subject><subject>Costs</subject><subject>Drosophila melanogaster</subject><subject>Evolution</subject><subject>Exposure</subject><subject>Flies</subject><subject>genetic correlations</subject><subject>Hardening</subject><subject>Heat resistance</subject><subject>Heat stress</subject><subject>Heat tolerance</subject><subject>Hot Temperature</subject><subject>Indication</subject><subject>Insects</subject><subject>phenotypic plasticity</subject><subject>Plastic properties</subject><subject>Plasticity</subject><subject>Populations</subject><subject>Predation</subject><subject>Predatory Behavior</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Selection, Genetic</subject><subject>Spiders</subject><subject>Stresses</subject><subject>Survival</subject><subject>thermal adaptation</subject><subject>Thermal resistance</subject><subject>Thermotolerance</subject><subject>Tradeoffs</subject><subject>trade‐offs</subject><issn>1010-061X</issn><issn>1420-9101</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kc1O3DAURq0KVH7Koi-ALHVTFmF8k9hxVhVlaAEhdQMSO8tx7sx4lImD7QjNI_DWOB3aBRLe3Ls4Ov6uPkK-AjuH9GZrbM6hYLL8RA6hzFlWA4O9tDNgGRPweECOQlgzBqLk_DM5yGUhRQ3ykLzMHQZqe-NRB2zpCnWkHoMNUfcGp3XsYgLoyi5X6GkYg8Eh2sZ2Nm5pdHTw2OpoXf-DXtCIIdIx2H5J594FN6xsp-kGO927pQ5xMmCHZuKp7tOH2rfYJ_4L2V_oLuDJ2zwmD7-u7i-vs7s_v28uL-4yU0hZZoaDrKtF2-aGGRAgOEDJkZmKGVPpBo0Q2NS1ablpchTlAoQocpRca6haWRyT7zvv4N3TmOKqjU0ndSkhujEokJLXhazyCf32Dl270fcpnYKaccHzUvBEne0okw4OHhdq8Haj_VYBU1M_KvWj_vaT2NM349hssP1P_iskAbMd8Gw73H5sUrdXP3fKV_KtnAI</recordid><startdate>201706</startdate><enddate>201706</enddate><creator>Hangartner, S.</creator><creator>Dworkin, I.</creator><creator>DeNieu, M.</creator><creator>Hoffmann, A. A.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8801-9536</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201706</creationdate><title>Does increased heat resistance result in higher susceptibility to predation? A test using Drosophila melanogaster selection and hardening</title><author>Hangartner, S. ; Dworkin, I. ; DeNieu, M. ; Hoffmann, A. A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3884-c51897fdd2c0c161651145e0c70cc7abec66eb99cd5cb2e64f16632e85aa17d83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Animal behavior</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Assaying</topic><topic>Biological evolution</topic><topic>biotic interactions</topic><topic>climate change</topic><topic>Correlation</topic><topic>Costs</topic><topic>Drosophila melanogaster</topic><topic>Evolution</topic><topic>Exposure</topic><topic>Flies</topic><topic>genetic correlations</topic><topic>Hardening</topic><topic>Heat resistance</topic><topic>Heat stress</topic><topic>Heat tolerance</topic><topic>Hot Temperature</topic><topic>Indication</topic><topic>Insects</topic><topic>phenotypic plasticity</topic><topic>Plastic properties</topic><topic>Plasticity</topic><topic>Populations</topic><topic>Predation</topic><topic>Predatory Behavior</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Selection, Genetic</topic><topic>Spiders</topic><topic>Stresses</topic><topic>Survival</topic><topic>thermal adaptation</topic><topic>Thermal resistance</topic><topic>Thermotolerance</topic><topic>Tradeoffs</topic><topic>trade‐offs</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hangartner, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dworkin, I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DeNieu, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoffmann, A. A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of evolutionary biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hangartner, S.</au><au>Dworkin, I.</au><au>DeNieu, M.</au><au>Hoffmann, A. A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Does increased heat resistance result in higher susceptibility to predation? A test using Drosophila melanogaster selection and hardening</atitle><jtitle>Journal of evolutionary biology</jtitle><addtitle>J Evol Biol</addtitle><date>2017-06</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1153</spage><epage>1164</epage><pages>1153-1164</pages><issn>1010-061X</issn><eissn>1420-9101</eissn><abstract>Heat resistance of ectotherms can be increased both by plasticity and evolution, but these effects may have trade‐offs resulting from biotic interactions. Here, we test for predation costs in Drosophila melanogaster populations with altered heat resistance produced by adult hardening and directional selection for increased heat resistance. In addition, we also tested for genetic trade‐offs by testing heat resistance in lines that have evolved under increased predation risk. We show that while 35/37 °C hardening increases heat resistance as expected, it does not increase predation risk from jumping spiders or mantids; in fact, there was an indication that survival may have increased under predation following a triple 37 °C compared to a single 35 °C hardening treatment. Flies that survived a 39 °C selection cycle showed lower survival under predation, suggesting a predation cost of exposure to a more severe heat stress. There was, however, no correlated response to selection because survival did not differ between control and selected lines after selection was relaxed for one or two generations. In addition, lines selected for increased predation risk did not differ in heat resistance. Our findings suggest independent evolutionary responses to predation and heat as measured in laboratory assays, and no costs of heat hardening on susceptibility to predation.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>28386918</pmid><doi>10.1111/jeb.13084</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8801-9536</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1010-061X |
ispartof | Journal of evolutionary biology, 2017-06, Vol.30 (6), p.1153-1164 |
issn | 1010-061X 1420-9101 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1885938728 |
source | Oxford Journals Online; Wiley Online Library All Journals |
subjects | Animal behavior Animals Assaying Biological evolution biotic interactions climate change Correlation Costs Drosophila melanogaster Evolution Exposure Flies genetic correlations Hardening Heat resistance Heat stress Heat tolerance Hot Temperature Indication Insects phenotypic plasticity Plastic properties Plasticity Populations Predation Predatory Behavior Risk Selection, Genetic Spiders Stresses Survival thermal adaptation Thermal resistance Thermotolerance Tradeoffs trade‐offs |
title | Does increased heat resistance result in higher susceptibility to predation? A test using Drosophila melanogaster selection and hardening |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T06%3A03%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Does%20increased%20heat%20resistance%20result%20in%20higher%20susceptibility%20to%20predation?%20A%20test%20using%20Drosophila%20melanogaster%20selection%20and%20hardening&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20evolutionary%20biology&rft.au=Hangartner,%20S.&rft.date=2017-06&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1153&rft.epage=1164&rft.pages=1153-1164&rft.issn=1010-061X&rft.eissn=1420-9101&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jeb.13084&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1905652465%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3884-c51897fdd2c0c161651145e0c70cc7abec66eb99cd5cb2e64f16632e85aa17d83%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1905652465&rft_id=info:pmid/28386918&rfr_iscdi=true |