Loading…

Does increased heat resistance result in higher susceptibility to predation? A test using Drosophila melanogaster selection and hardening

Heat resistance of ectotherms can be increased both by plasticity and evolution, but these effects may have trade‐offs resulting from biotic interactions. Here, we test for predation costs in Drosophila melanogaster populations with altered heat resistance produced by adult hardening and directional...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of evolutionary biology 2017-06, Vol.30 (6), p.1153-1164
Main Authors: Hangartner, S., Dworkin, I., DeNieu, M., Hoffmann, A. A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3884-c51897fdd2c0c161651145e0c70cc7abec66eb99cd5cb2e64f16632e85aa17d83
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3884-c51897fdd2c0c161651145e0c70cc7abec66eb99cd5cb2e64f16632e85aa17d83
container_end_page 1164
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1153
container_title Journal of evolutionary biology
container_volume 30
creator Hangartner, S.
Dworkin, I.
DeNieu, M.
Hoffmann, A. A.
description Heat resistance of ectotherms can be increased both by plasticity and evolution, but these effects may have trade‐offs resulting from biotic interactions. Here, we test for predation costs in Drosophila melanogaster populations with altered heat resistance produced by adult hardening and directional selection for increased heat resistance. In addition, we also tested for genetic trade‐offs by testing heat resistance in lines that have evolved under increased predation risk. We show that while 35/37 °C hardening increases heat resistance as expected, it does not increase predation risk from jumping spiders or mantids; in fact, there was an indication that survival may have increased under predation following a triple 37 °C compared to a single 35 °C hardening treatment. Flies that survived a 39 °C selection cycle showed lower survival under predation, suggesting a predation cost of exposure to a more severe heat stress. There was, however, no correlated response to selection because survival did not differ between control and selected lines after selection was relaxed for one or two generations. In addition, lines selected for increased predation risk did not differ in heat resistance. Our findings suggest independent evolutionary responses to predation and heat as measured in laboratory assays, and no costs of heat hardening on susceptibility to predation.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/jeb.13084
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1885938728</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1905652465</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3884-c51897fdd2c0c161651145e0c70cc7abec66eb99cd5cb2e64f16632e85aa17d83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc1O3DAURq0KVH7Koi-ALHVTFmF8k9hxVhVlaAEhdQMSO8tx7sx4lImD7QjNI_DWOB3aBRLe3Ls4Ov6uPkK-AjuH9GZrbM6hYLL8RA6hzFlWA4O9tDNgGRPweECOQlgzBqLk_DM5yGUhRQ3ykLzMHQZqe-NRB2zpCnWkHoMNUfcGp3XsYgLoyi5X6GkYg8Eh2sZ2Nm5pdHTw2OpoXf-DXtCIIdIx2H5J594FN6xsp-kGO927pQ5xMmCHZuKp7tOH2rfYJ_4L2V_oLuDJ2zwmD7-u7i-vs7s_v28uL-4yU0hZZoaDrKtF2-aGGRAgOEDJkZmKGVPpBo0Q2NS1ablpchTlAoQocpRca6haWRyT7zvv4N3TmOKqjU0ndSkhujEokJLXhazyCf32Dl270fcpnYKaccHzUvBEne0okw4OHhdq8Haj_VYBU1M_KvWj_vaT2NM349hssP1P_iskAbMd8Gw73H5sUrdXP3fKV_KtnAI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1905652465</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Does increased heat resistance result in higher susceptibility to predation? A test using Drosophila melanogaster selection and hardening</title><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Hangartner, S. ; Dworkin, I. ; DeNieu, M. ; Hoffmann, A. A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hangartner, S. ; Dworkin, I. ; DeNieu, M. ; Hoffmann, A. A.</creatorcontrib><description>Heat resistance of ectotherms can be increased both by plasticity and evolution, but these effects may have trade‐offs resulting from biotic interactions. Here, we test for predation costs in Drosophila melanogaster populations with altered heat resistance produced by adult hardening and directional selection for increased heat resistance. In addition, we also tested for genetic trade‐offs by testing heat resistance in lines that have evolved under increased predation risk. We show that while 35/37 °C hardening increases heat resistance as expected, it does not increase predation risk from jumping spiders or mantids; in fact, there was an indication that survival may have increased under predation following a triple 37 °C compared to a single 35 °C hardening treatment. Flies that survived a 39 °C selection cycle showed lower survival under predation, suggesting a predation cost of exposure to a more severe heat stress. There was, however, no correlated response to selection because survival did not differ between control and selected lines after selection was relaxed for one or two generations. In addition, lines selected for increased predation risk did not differ in heat resistance. Our findings suggest independent evolutionary responses to predation and heat as measured in laboratory assays, and no costs of heat hardening on susceptibility to predation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1010-061X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1420-9101</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jeb.13084</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28386918</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Animal behavior ; Animals ; Assaying ; Biological evolution ; biotic interactions ; climate change ; Correlation ; Costs ; Drosophila melanogaster ; Evolution ; Exposure ; Flies ; genetic correlations ; Hardening ; Heat resistance ; Heat stress ; Heat tolerance ; Hot Temperature ; Indication ; Insects ; phenotypic plasticity ; Plastic properties ; Plasticity ; Populations ; Predation ; Predatory Behavior ; Risk ; Selection, Genetic ; Spiders ; Stresses ; Survival ; thermal adaptation ; Thermal resistance ; Thermotolerance ; Tradeoffs ; trade‐offs</subject><ispartof>Journal of evolutionary biology, 2017-06, Vol.30 (6), p.1153-1164</ispartof><rights>2017 European Society For Evolutionary Biology. Journal of Evolutionary Biology © 2017 European Society For Evolutionary Biology</rights><rights>2017 European Society For Evolutionary Biology. Journal of Evolutionary Biology © 2017 European Society For Evolutionary Biology.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 European Society for Evolutionary Biology</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3884-c51897fdd2c0c161651145e0c70cc7abec66eb99cd5cb2e64f16632e85aa17d83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3884-c51897fdd2c0c161651145e0c70cc7abec66eb99cd5cb2e64f16632e85aa17d83</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8801-9536</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fjeb.13084$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fjeb.13084$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,1412,27905,27906,45555,45556</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28386918$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hangartner, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dworkin, I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DeNieu, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoffmann, A. A.</creatorcontrib><title>Does increased heat resistance result in higher susceptibility to predation? A test using Drosophila melanogaster selection and hardening</title><title>Journal of evolutionary biology</title><addtitle>J Evol Biol</addtitle><description>Heat resistance of ectotherms can be increased both by plasticity and evolution, but these effects may have trade‐offs resulting from biotic interactions. Here, we test for predation costs in Drosophila melanogaster populations with altered heat resistance produced by adult hardening and directional selection for increased heat resistance. In addition, we also tested for genetic trade‐offs by testing heat resistance in lines that have evolved under increased predation risk. We show that while 35/37 °C hardening increases heat resistance as expected, it does not increase predation risk from jumping spiders or mantids; in fact, there was an indication that survival may have increased under predation following a triple 37 °C compared to a single 35 °C hardening treatment. Flies that survived a 39 °C selection cycle showed lower survival under predation, suggesting a predation cost of exposure to a more severe heat stress. There was, however, no correlated response to selection because survival did not differ between control and selected lines after selection was relaxed for one or two generations. In addition, lines selected for increased predation risk did not differ in heat resistance. Our findings suggest independent evolutionary responses to predation and heat as measured in laboratory assays, and no costs of heat hardening on susceptibility to predation.</description><subject>Animal behavior</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Assaying</subject><subject>Biological evolution</subject><subject>biotic interactions</subject><subject>climate change</subject><subject>Correlation</subject><subject>Costs</subject><subject>Drosophila melanogaster</subject><subject>Evolution</subject><subject>Exposure</subject><subject>Flies</subject><subject>genetic correlations</subject><subject>Hardening</subject><subject>Heat resistance</subject><subject>Heat stress</subject><subject>Heat tolerance</subject><subject>Hot Temperature</subject><subject>Indication</subject><subject>Insects</subject><subject>phenotypic plasticity</subject><subject>Plastic properties</subject><subject>Plasticity</subject><subject>Populations</subject><subject>Predation</subject><subject>Predatory Behavior</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Selection, Genetic</subject><subject>Spiders</subject><subject>Stresses</subject><subject>Survival</subject><subject>thermal adaptation</subject><subject>Thermal resistance</subject><subject>Thermotolerance</subject><subject>Tradeoffs</subject><subject>trade‐offs</subject><issn>1010-061X</issn><issn>1420-9101</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kc1O3DAURq0KVH7Koi-ALHVTFmF8k9hxVhVlaAEhdQMSO8tx7sx4lImD7QjNI_DWOB3aBRLe3Ls4Ov6uPkK-AjuH9GZrbM6hYLL8RA6hzFlWA4O9tDNgGRPweECOQlgzBqLk_DM5yGUhRQ3ykLzMHQZqe-NRB2zpCnWkHoMNUfcGp3XsYgLoyi5X6GkYg8Eh2sZ2Nm5pdHTw2OpoXf-DXtCIIdIx2H5J594FN6xsp-kGO927pQ5xMmCHZuKp7tOH2rfYJ_4L2V_oLuDJ2zwmD7-u7i-vs7s_v28uL-4yU0hZZoaDrKtF2-aGGRAgOEDJkZmKGVPpBo0Q2NS1ablpchTlAoQocpRca6haWRyT7zvv4N3TmOKqjU0ndSkhujEokJLXhazyCf32Dl270fcpnYKaccHzUvBEne0okw4OHhdq8Haj_VYBU1M_KvWj_vaT2NM349hssP1P_iskAbMd8Gw73H5sUrdXP3fKV_KtnAI</recordid><startdate>201706</startdate><enddate>201706</enddate><creator>Hangartner, S.</creator><creator>Dworkin, I.</creator><creator>DeNieu, M.</creator><creator>Hoffmann, A. A.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8801-9536</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201706</creationdate><title>Does increased heat resistance result in higher susceptibility to predation? A test using Drosophila melanogaster selection and hardening</title><author>Hangartner, S. ; Dworkin, I. ; DeNieu, M. ; Hoffmann, A. A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3884-c51897fdd2c0c161651145e0c70cc7abec66eb99cd5cb2e64f16632e85aa17d83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Animal behavior</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Assaying</topic><topic>Biological evolution</topic><topic>biotic interactions</topic><topic>climate change</topic><topic>Correlation</topic><topic>Costs</topic><topic>Drosophila melanogaster</topic><topic>Evolution</topic><topic>Exposure</topic><topic>Flies</topic><topic>genetic correlations</topic><topic>Hardening</topic><topic>Heat resistance</topic><topic>Heat stress</topic><topic>Heat tolerance</topic><topic>Hot Temperature</topic><topic>Indication</topic><topic>Insects</topic><topic>phenotypic plasticity</topic><topic>Plastic properties</topic><topic>Plasticity</topic><topic>Populations</topic><topic>Predation</topic><topic>Predatory Behavior</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Selection, Genetic</topic><topic>Spiders</topic><topic>Stresses</topic><topic>Survival</topic><topic>thermal adaptation</topic><topic>Thermal resistance</topic><topic>Thermotolerance</topic><topic>Tradeoffs</topic><topic>trade‐offs</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hangartner, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dworkin, I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DeNieu, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoffmann, A. A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of evolutionary biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hangartner, S.</au><au>Dworkin, I.</au><au>DeNieu, M.</au><au>Hoffmann, A. A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Does increased heat resistance result in higher susceptibility to predation? A test using Drosophila melanogaster selection and hardening</atitle><jtitle>Journal of evolutionary biology</jtitle><addtitle>J Evol Biol</addtitle><date>2017-06</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1153</spage><epage>1164</epage><pages>1153-1164</pages><issn>1010-061X</issn><eissn>1420-9101</eissn><abstract>Heat resistance of ectotherms can be increased both by plasticity and evolution, but these effects may have trade‐offs resulting from biotic interactions. Here, we test for predation costs in Drosophila melanogaster populations with altered heat resistance produced by adult hardening and directional selection for increased heat resistance. In addition, we also tested for genetic trade‐offs by testing heat resistance in lines that have evolved under increased predation risk. We show that while 35/37 °C hardening increases heat resistance as expected, it does not increase predation risk from jumping spiders or mantids; in fact, there was an indication that survival may have increased under predation following a triple 37 °C compared to a single 35 °C hardening treatment. Flies that survived a 39 °C selection cycle showed lower survival under predation, suggesting a predation cost of exposure to a more severe heat stress. There was, however, no correlated response to selection because survival did not differ between control and selected lines after selection was relaxed for one or two generations. In addition, lines selected for increased predation risk did not differ in heat resistance. Our findings suggest independent evolutionary responses to predation and heat as measured in laboratory assays, and no costs of heat hardening on susceptibility to predation.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>28386918</pmid><doi>10.1111/jeb.13084</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8801-9536</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1010-061X
ispartof Journal of evolutionary biology, 2017-06, Vol.30 (6), p.1153-1164
issn 1010-061X
1420-9101
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1885938728
source Oxford Journals Online; Wiley Online Library All Journals
subjects Animal behavior
Animals
Assaying
Biological evolution
biotic interactions
climate change
Correlation
Costs
Drosophila melanogaster
Evolution
Exposure
Flies
genetic correlations
Hardening
Heat resistance
Heat stress
Heat tolerance
Hot Temperature
Indication
Insects
phenotypic plasticity
Plastic properties
Plasticity
Populations
Predation
Predatory Behavior
Risk
Selection, Genetic
Spiders
Stresses
Survival
thermal adaptation
Thermal resistance
Thermotolerance
Tradeoffs
trade‐offs
title Does increased heat resistance result in higher susceptibility to predation? A test using Drosophila melanogaster selection and hardening
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T06%3A03%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Does%20increased%20heat%20resistance%20result%20in%20higher%20susceptibility%20to%20predation?%20A%20test%20using%20Drosophila%20melanogaster%20selection%20and%20hardening&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20evolutionary%20biology&rft.au=Hangartner,%20S.&rft.date=2017-06&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1153&rft.epage=1164&rft.pages=1153-1164&rft.issn=1010-061X&rft.eissn=1420-9101&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jeb.13084&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1905652465%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3884-c51897fdd2c0c161651145e0c70cc7abec66eb99cd5cb2e64f16632e85aa17d83%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1905652465&rft_id=info:pmid/28386918&rfr_iscdi=true