Loading…

Optimizing physician skill development for medical students: The Four-part assessment

Abstract Background Medical student performance has been poorly correlated with residency performance and warrants further investigation. We propose a novel surgical assessment tool to determine correlations with clinical aptitude. Methods Retrospective review of medical student assessments from 201...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The American journal of surgery 2017-05, Vol.213 (5), p.906-909
Main Authors: Watson, Justin J.J., MD, Kemp Bohan, Phillip M., BA, Ramsey, Katrina, MPH, Yonge, John D., MD, Connelly, Christopher R., MD, Mullins, Richard J., MD, Watters, Jennifer M., MD, Schreiber, Martin A., MD, Kiraly, Laszlo N., MD
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-126d6befd880a80078bad271552bba3ce258b13dec05961c5104e9ba00460b193
container_end_page 909
container_issue 5
container_start_page 906
container_title The American journal of surgery
container_volume 213
creator Watson, Justin J.J., MD
Kemp Bohan, Phillip M., BA
Ramsey, Katrina, MPH
Yonge, John D., MD
Connelly, Christopher R., MD
Mullins, Richard J., MD
Watters, Jennifer M., MD
Schreiber, Martin A., MD
Kiraly, Laszlo N., MD
description Abstract Background Medical student performance has been poorly correlated with residency performance and warrants further investigation. We propose a novel surgical assessment tool to determine correlations with clinical aptitude. Methods Retrospective review of medical student assessments from 2013-2015. Faculty rating of student performance was evaluated by: 1) case presentation, 2) problem definition, 3) question response and 4) use of literature and correlated to final exam assessment. A Likert scale interrater reliability was evaluated. Results Sixty student presentations were scored (4.8 assessors/presentation). A student’s case presentation, problem definition, and question response was correlated with performance (r=0.49 to 0.61, p≤.003). Moderate correlations for either question response or use of literature was demonstrated (0.3 and 0.26, p
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2017.03.026
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1886750450</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0002961016310728</els_id><sourcerecordid>1901365327</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-126d6befd880a80078bad271552bba3ce258b13dec05961c5104e9ba00460b193</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUtv1DAQgC0EokvhJ4AiceGSMGMnTsIBhKoWkCr1QHu2HGe29TYvPEml5dfX0S4g9cLJGuub1zdCvEXIEFB_3GW23_ESbjMJWGagMpD6mdhgVdYpVpV6LjYAINNaI5yIV8y7GCLm6qU4kZWqNah8I26uptn3_rcfbpPpbs_eeTskfO-7Lmnpgbpx6mmYk-0Ykp5a72yX8Ly08Y8_Jdd3lFyMS0gnG-bEMhPzir8WL7a2Y3pzfE_FzcX59dn39PLq24-zr5epi_3nFKVudUPbtqrAVgBl1dhWllgUsmmsciSLqkHVkoMiruEKhJzqxgLkGhqs1an4cKg7hfHXQjyb3rOjrrMDjQub6EGXBeQFRPT9E3QXBx_idAZrQKULJctIFQfKhZE50NZMwfc27A2CWb2bnTl6N6t3A8pE7zHv3bH60kRNf7P-iI7AlwNAUceDp2DYeRpcVBrIzaYd_X9bfH5SwXV-WA9yT3vif9sYlgbMz_X46-1RK4QyDvIIb2GrNA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1901365327</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Optimizing physician skill development for medical students: The Four-part assessment</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024</source><creator>Watson, Justin J.J., MD ; Kemp Bohan, Phillip M., BA ; Ramsey, Katrina, MPH ; Yonge, John D., MD ; Connelly, Christopher R., MD ; Mullins, Richard J., MD ; Watters, Jennifer M., MD ; Schreiber, Martin A., MD ; Kiraly, Laszlo N., MD</creator><creatorcontrib>Watson, Justin J.J., MD ; Kemp Bohan, Phillip M., BA ; Ramsey, Katrina, MPH ; Yonge, John D., MD ; Connelly, Christopher R., MD ; Mullins, Richard J., MD ; Watters, Jennifer M., MD ; Schreiber, Martin A., MD ; Kiraly, Laszlo N., MD</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background Medical student performance has been poorly correlated with residency performance and warrants further investigation. We propose a novel surgical assessment tool to determine correlations with clinical aptitude. Methods Retrospective review of medical student assessments from 2013-2015. Faculty rating of student performance was evaluated by: 1) case presentation, 2) problem definition, 3) question response and 4) use of literature and correlated to final exam assessment. A Likert scale interrater reliability was evaluated. Results Sixty student presentations were scored (4.8 assessors/presentation). A student’s case presentation, problem definition, and question response was correlated with performance (r=0.49 to 0.61, p≤.003). Moderate correlations for either question response or use of literature was demonstrated (0.3 and 0.26, p&lt;0.05). Conclusion Our four-part assessment tool identified correlations with course and examination grades for medical students. As surgical education evolves, validated performance and reliable testing measures are required.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9610</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1883</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2017.03.026</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28396034</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Aptitude ; Aptitude Tests ; Clinical Competence ; Correlation ; Education, Medical, Undergraduate ; Educational Measurement - methods ; General Surgery - education ; Humans ; Intensive care ; Medical examiners ; Medical personnel ; Medical schools ; Medical students ; Oregon ; Ratings &amp; rankings ; Reliability analysis ; Retrospective Studies ; Single-Blind Method ; Skills ; Students ; Students, Medical - psychology ; Surgeons ; Surgery ; Surgical instruments</subject><ispartof>The American journal of surgery, 2017-05, Vol.213 (5), p.906-909</ispartof><rights>2017 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited May 1, 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-126d6befd880a80078bad271552bba3ce258b13dec05961c5104e9ba00460b193</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28396034$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Watson, Justin J.J., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kemp Bohan, Phillip M., BA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramsey, Katrina, MPH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yonge, John D., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Connelly, Christopher R., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mullins, Richard J., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watters, Jennifer M., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schreiber, Martin A., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kiraly, Laszlo N., MD</creatorcontrib><title>Optimizing physician skill development for medical students: The Four-part assessment</title><title>The American journal of surgery</title><addtitle>Am J Surg</addtitle><description>Abstract Background Medical student performance has been poorly correlated with residency performance and warrants further investigation. We propose a novel surgical assessment tool to determine correlations with clinical aptitude. Methods Retrospective review of medical student assessments from 2013-2015. Faculty rating of student performance was evaluated by: 1) case presentation, 2) problem definition, 3) question response and 4) use of literature and correlated to final exam assessment. A Likert scale interrater reliability was evaluated. Results Sixty student presentations were scored (4.8 assessors/presentation). A student’s case presentation, problem definition, and question response was correlated with performance (r=0.49 to 0.61, p≤.003). Moderate correlations for either question response or use of literature was demonstrated (0.3 and 0.26, p&lt;0.05). Conclusion Our four-part assessment tool identified correlations with course and examination grades for medical students. As surgical education evolves, validated performance and reliable testing measures are required.</description><subject>Aptitude</subject><subject>Aptitude Tests</subject><subject>Clinical Competence</subject><subject>Correlation</subject><subject>Education, Medical, Undergraduate</subject><subject>Educational Measurement - methods</subject><subject>General Surgery - education</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intensive care</subject><subject>Medical examiners</subject><subject>Medical personnel</subject><subject>Medical schools</subject><subject>Medical students</subject><subject>Oregon</subject><subject>Ratings &amp; rankings</subject><subject>Reliability analysis</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Single-Blind Method</subject><subject>Skills</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Students, Medical - psychology</subject><subject>Surgeons</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surgical instruments</subject><issn>0002-9610</issn><issn>1879-1883</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkUtv1DAQgC0EokvhJ4AiceGSMGMnTsIBhKoWkCr1QHu2HGe29TYvPEml5dfX0S4g9cLJGuub1zdCvEXIEFB_3GW23_ESbjMJWGagMpD6mdhgVdYpVpV6LjYAINNaI5yIV8y7GCLm6qU4kZWqNah8I26uptn3_rcfbpPpbs_eeTskfO-7Lmnpgbpx6mmYk-0Ykp5a72yX8Ly08Y8_Jdd3lFyMS0gnG-bEMhPzir8WL7a2Y3pzfE_FzcX59dn39PLq24-zr5epi_3nFKVudUPbtqrAVgBl1dhWllgUsmmsciSLqkHVkoMiruEKhJzqxgLkGhqs1an4cKg7hfHXQjyb3rOjrrMDjQub6EGXBeQFRPT9E3QXBx_idAZrQKULJctIFQfKhZE50NZMwfc27A2CWb2bnTl6N6t3A8pE7zHv3bH60kRNf7P-iI7AlwNAUceDp2DYeRpcVBrIzaYd_X9bfH5SwXV-WA9yT3vif9sYlgbMz_X46-1RK4QyDvIIb2GrNA</recordid><startdate>20170501</startdate><enddate>20170501</enddate><creator>Watson, Justin J.J., MD</creator><creator>Kemp Bohan, Phillip M., BA</creator><creator>Ramsey, Katrina, MPH</creator><creator>Yonge, John D., MD</creator><creator>Connelly, Christopher R., MD</creator><creator>Mullins, Richard J., MD</creator><creator>Watters, Jennifer M., MD</creator><creator>Schreiber, Martin A., MD</creator><creator>Kiraly, Laszlo N., MD</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170501</creationdate><title>Optimizing physician skill development for medical students: The Four-part assessment</title><author>Watson, Justin J.J., MD ; Kemp Bohan, Phillip M., BA ; Ramsey, Katrina, MPH ; Yonge, John D., MD ; Connelly, Christopher R., MD ; Mullins, Richard J., MD ; Watters, Jennifer M., MD ; Schreiber, Martin A., MD ; Kiraly, Laszlo N., MD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-126d6befd880a80078bad271552bba3ce258b13dec05961c5104e9ba00460b193</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Aptitude</topic><topic>Aptitude Tests</topic><topic>Clinical Competence</topic><topic>Correlation</topic><topic>Education, Medical, Undergraduate</topic><topic>Educational Measurement - methods</topic><topic>General Surgery - education</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intensive care</topic><topic>Medical examiners</topic><topic>Medical personnel</topic><topic>Medical schools</topic><topic>Medical students</topic><topic>Oregon</topic><topic>Ratings &amp; rankings</topic><topic>Reliability analysis</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Single-Blind Method</topic><topic>Skills</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Students, Medical - psychology</topic><topic>Surgeons</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surgical instruments</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Watson, Justin J.J., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kemp Bohan, Phillip M., BA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramsey, Katrina, MPH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yonge, John D., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Connelly, Christopher R., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mullins, Richard J., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watters, Jennifer M., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schreiber, Martin A., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kiraly, Laszlo N., MD</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The American journal of surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Watson, Justin J.J., MD</au><au>Kemp Bohan, Phillip M., BA</au><au>Ramsey, Katrina, MPH</au><au>Yonge, John D., MD</au><au>Connelly, Christopher R., MD</au><au>Mullins, Richard J., MD</au><au>Watters, Jennifer M., MD</au><au>Schreiber, Martin A., MD</au><au>Kiraly, Laszlo N., MD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Optimizing physician skill development for medical students: The Four-part assessment</atitle><jtitle>The American journal of surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Surg</addtitle><date>2017-05-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>213</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>906</spage><epage>909</epage><pages>906-909</pages><issn>0002-9610</issn><eissn>1879-1883</eissn><abstract>Abstract Background Medical student performance has been poorly correlated with residency performance and warrants further investigation. We propose a novel surgical assessment tool to determine correlations with clinical aptitude. Methods Retrospective review of medical student assessments from 2013-2015. Faculty rating of student performance was evaluated by: 1) case presentation, 2) problem definition, 3) question response and 4) use of literature and correlated to final exam assessment. A Likert scale interrater reliability was evaluated. Results Sixty student presentations were scored (4.8 assessors/presentation). A student’s case presentation, problem definition, and question response was correlated with performance (r=0.49 to 0.61, p≤.003). Moderate correlations for either question response or use of literature was demonstrated (0.3 and 0.26, p&lt;0.05). Conclusion Our four-part assessment tool identified correlations with course and examination grades for medical students. As surgical education evolves, validated performance and reliable testing measures are required.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>28396034</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.amjsurg.2017.03.026</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-9610
ispartof The American journal of surgery, 2017-05, Vol.213 (5), p.906-909
issn 0002-9610
1879-1883
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1886750450
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024
subjects Aptitude
Aptitude Tests
Clinical Competence
Correlation
Education, Medical, Undergraduate
Educational Measurement - methods
General Surgery - education
Humans
Intensive care
Medical examiners
Medical personnel
Medical schools
Medical students
Oregon
Ratings & rankings
Reliability analysis
Retrospective Studies
Single-Blind Method
Skills
Students
Students, Medical - psychology
Surgeons
Surgery
Surgical instruments
title Optimizing physician skill development for medical students: The Four-part assessment
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T01%3A04%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Optimizing%20physician%20skill%20development%20for%20medical%20students:%20The%20Four-part%20assessment&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20journal%20of%20surgery&rft.au=Watson,%20Justin%20J.J.,%20MD&rft.date=2017-05-01&rft.volume=213&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=906&rft.epage=909&rft.pages=906-909&rft.issn=0002-9610&rft.eissn=1879-1883&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2017.03.026&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1901365327%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-126d6befd880a80078bad271552bba3ce258b13dec05961c5104e9ba00460b193%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1901365327&rft_id=info:pmid/28396034&rfr_iscdi=true