Loading…

Determination of the potential implementation impact of 2016 ministry of environmental protection generic assessment criteria for potentially contaminated sites in China

The Ministry of Environmental Protection of China issued a 3rd draft edition of risk-based Generic Assessment Criteria (the MEP-GAC) in March 2016. Since these will be the first authoritative GAC in China, their implementation is likely to have a significant impact on China’s growing contaminated la...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Environmental geochemistry and health 2018-06, Vol.40 (3), p.967-985
Main Authors: Cheng, Yuanyuan, Tang, Yu-Ting, Nathanail, C. Paul
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-9eccd07683ee22d0d124332b34501ae8bba684800e9ad076fa727cbdd12745cf3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-9eccd07683ee22d0d124332b34501ae8bba684800e9ad076fa727cbdd12745cf3
container_end_page 985
container_issue 3
container_start_page 967
container_title Environmental geochemistry and health
container_volume 40
creator Cheng, Yuanyuan
Tang, Yu-Ting
Nathanail, C. Paul
description The Ministry of Environmental Protection of China issued a 3rd draft edition of risk-based Generic Assessment Criteria (the MEP-GAC) in March 2016. Since these will be the first authoritative GAC in China, their implementation is likely to have a significant impact on China’s growing contaminated land management sector. This study aims to determine the potential implementation impact of the MEP-GAC through an in-depth analysis of the management context, land use scenarios, health criteria values adopted and exposure pathways considered. The MEP-GAC have been proposed for two broad categories of land use scenarios for contaminated land risk assessment, and these two categories of land use scenarios need to be further delved, and a MEP-GAC for Chinese cultivated land scenario ought to be developed, to ensure human health protection of Chinese farmers. The MEP-GAC have adopted 10 −6 as the acceptable lifetime cancer risk, given the widespread extent and severe level of land contamination in China, consideration should be given to the decision on excess lifetime cancer risk of 10 −5 . During risk assessment process in practice, it is better to review the 20% TDI against local circumstances to determine their suitability before adopting it. The MEP-GAC are based on a SOM value of 1%, for regions with particularly high SOM, it might be necessary to develop regional GAC, due to SOM’s significant impact on the GAC developed. An authoritative risk assessment model developed based on HJ25.3-2014 would help facilitate the DQRA process in practice. The MEP-GAC could better reflect the likely exposures of China’s citizens due to vapour inhalation by using characteristics of Chinese exposure scenarios, including China-generic building stock, as inputs into the Johnson and Ettinger model as opposed to adoption of the US EPA parameters. The MEP-GAC once implemented will set the trajectory for the development of the investigation, assessment and remediation of land contamination for years.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10653-017-9953-2
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1887414431</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2042026142</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-9eccd07683ee22d0d124332b34501ae8bba684800e9ad076fa727cbdd12745cf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU1v1DAQhi0EokvhB3BBlrhwCfgrsXNEW76kSlzgbDnOpHWV2IvtRdqfxL9ksilUQuJkz8zzztjzEvKSs7ecMf2ucNa1smFcN32PF_GI7Hir8dIb-ZjsmOj6RjElLsizUu4YY71W5im5EEaxVpt2R35dQYW8hOhqSJGmidZboIdUIdbgZhqWwwwLBlsdQ-frignGO4q6UGo-rQmIP0NO8czO9JCxhT9rbiBCDp66UqCUtU59Djg1ODql_DBsPlGfUH1-DYy0IFRoiHR_i5nn5Mnk5gIv7s9L8v3jh2_7z831109f9u-vGy-1qE0P3o9Md0YCCDGykQslpRikahl3YIbBdUYZxqB3Kzc5LbQfRuS0av0kL8mbrS9-4ccRSrVLKB7m2UVIx2K5MVpxpSRH9PU_6F065oivswK3juvnSiDFN8rnVEqGyR5yWFw-Wc7s6qPdfLToo119tKvm1X3n47DA-FfxxzgExAYULMUbyA-j_9_1N-ZIrEc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2042026142</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Determination of the potential implementation impact of 2016 ministry of environmental protection generic assessment criteria for potentially contaminated sites in China</title><source>Springer Nature:Jisc Collections:Springer Nature Read and Publish 2023-2025: Springer Reading List</source><creator>Cheng, Yuanyuan ; Tang, Yu-Ting ; Nathanail, C. Paul</creator><creatorcontrib>Cheng, Yuanyuan ; Tang, Yu-Ting ; Nathanail, C. Paul</creatorcontrib><description>The Ministry of Environmental Protection of China issued a 3rd draft edition of risk-based Generic Assessment Criteria (the MEP-GAC) in March 2016. Since these will be the first authoritative GAC in China, their implementation is likely to have a significant impact on China’s growing contaminated land management sector. This study aims to determine the potential implementation impact of the MEP-GAC through an in-depth analysis of the management context, land use scenarios, health criteria values adopted and exposure pathways considered. The MEP-GAC have been proposed for two broad categories of land use scenarios for contaminated land risk assessment, and these two categories of land use scenarios need to be further delved, and a MEP-GAC for Chinese cultivated land scenario ought to be developed, to ensure human health protection of Chinese farmers. The MEP-GAC have adopted 10 −6 as the acceptable lifetime cancer risk, given the widespread extent and severe level of land contamination in China, consideration should be given to the decision on excess lifetime cancer risk of 10 −5 . During risk assessment process in practice, it is better to review the 20% TDI against local circumstances to determine their suitability before adopting it. The MEP-GAC are based on a SOM value of 1%, for regions with particularly high SOM, it might be necessary to develop regional GAC, due to SOM’s significant impact on the GAC developed. An authoritative risk assessment model developed based on HJ25.3-2014 would help facilitate the DQRA process in practice. The MEP-GAC could better reflect the likely exposures of China’s citizens due to vapour inhalation by using characteristics of Chinese exposure scenarios, including China-generic building stock, as inputs into the Johnson and Ettinger model as opposed to adoption of the US EPA parameters. The MEP-GAC once implemented will set the trajectory for the development of the investigation, assessment and remediation of land contamination for years.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0269-4042</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-2983</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10653-017-9953-2</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28405785</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Cancer ; Chemical industry ; Contaminated land ; Contamination ; Criteria ; Cultivated lands ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Ecological risk assessment ; Environment ; Environmental Chemistry ; Environmental Health ; Environmental impact ; Environmental protection ; Exposure ; Geochemistry ; Health risks ; Inhalation ; Land management ; Land pollution ; Land use ; Land use management ; Original Paper ; Protection ; Public Health ; Regional development ; Respiration ; Risk assessment ; Soil Science &amp; Conservation ; Stock assessment ; Terrestrial Pollution ; Trajectory analysis</subject><ispartof>Environmental geochemistry and health, 2018-06, Vol.40 (3), p.967-985</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2017</rights><rights>Environmental Geochemistry and Health is a copyright of Springer, (2017). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-9eccd07683ee22d0d124332b34501ae8bba684800e9ad076fa727cbdd12745cf3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-9eccd07683ee22d0d124332b34501ae8bba684800e9ad076fa727cbdd12745cf3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9060-3857</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28405785$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cheng, Yuanyuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tang, Yu-Ting</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nathanail, C. Paul</creatorcontrib><title>Determination of the potential implementation impact of 2016 ministry of environmental protection generic assessment criteria for potentially contaminated sites in China</title><title>Environmental geochemistry and health</title><addtitle>Environ Geochem Health</addtitle><addtitle>Environ Geochem Health</addtitle><description>The Ministry of Environmental Protection of China issued a 3rd draft edition of risk-based Generic Assessment Criteria (the MEP-GAC) in March 2016. Since these will be the first authoritative GAC in China, their implementation is likely to have a significant impact on China’s growing contaminated land management sector. This study aims to determine the potential implementation impact of the MEP-GAC through an in-depth analysis of the management context, land use scenarios, health criteria values adopted and exposure pathways considered. The MEP-GAC have been proposed for two broad categories of land use scenarios for contaminated land risk assessment, and these two categories of land use scenarios need to be further delved, and a MEP-GAC for Chinese cultivated land scenario ought to be developed, to ensure human health protection of Chinese farmers. The MEP-GAC have adopted 10 −6 as the acceptable lifetime cancer risk, given the widespread extent and severe level of land contamination in China, consideration should be given to the decision on excess lifetime cancer risk of 10 −5 . During risk assessment process in practice, it is better to review the 20% TDI against local circumstances to determine their suitability before adopting it. The MEP-GAC are based on a SOM value of 1%, for regions with particularly high SOM, it might be necessary to develop regional GAC, due to SOM’s significant impact on the GAC developed. An authoritative risk assessment model developed based on HJ25.3-2014 would help facilitate the DQRA process in practice. The MEP-GAC could better reflect the likely exposures of China’s citizens due to vapour inhalation by using characteristics of Chinese exposure scenarios, including China-generic building stock, as inputs into the Johnson and Ettinger model as opposed to adoption of the US EPA parameters. The MEP-GAC once implemented will set the trajectory for the development of the investigation, assessment and remediation of land contamination for years.</description><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Chemical industry</subject><subject>Contaminated land</subject><subject>Contamination</subject><subject>Criteria</subject><subject>Cultivated lands</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Ecological risk assessment</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Environmental Chemistry</subject><subject>Environmental Health</subject><subject>Environmental impact</subject><subject>Environmental protection</subject><subject>Exposure</subject><subject>Geochemistry</subject><subject>Health risks</subject><subject>Inhalation</subject><subject>Land management</subject><subject>Land pollution</subject><subject>Land use</subject><subject>Land use management</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Protection</subject><subject>Public Health</subject><subject>Regional development</subject><subject>Respiration</subject><subject>Risk assessment</subject><subject>Soil Science &amp; Conservation</subject><subject>Stock assessment</subject><subject>Terrestrial Pollution</subject><subject>Trajectory analysis</subject><issn>0269-4042</issn><issn>1573-2983</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kU1v1DAQhi0EokvhB3BBlrhwCfgrsXNEW76kSlzgbDnOpHWV2IvtRdqfxL9ksilUQuJkz8zzztjzEvKSs7ecMf2ucNa1smFcN32PF_GI7Hir8dIb-ZjsmOj6RjElLsizUu4YY71W5im5EEaxVpt2R35dQYW8hOhqSJGmidZboIdUIdbgZhqWwwwLBlsdQ-frignGO4q6UGo-rQmIP0NO8czO9JCxhT9rbiBCDp66UqCUtU59Djg1ODql_DBsPlGfUH1-DYy0IFRoiHR_i5nn5Mnk5gIv7s9L8v3jh2_7z831109f9u-vGy-1qE0P3o9Md0YCCDGykQslpRikahl3YIbBdUYZxqB3Kzc5LbQfRuS0av0kL8mbrS9-4ccRSrVLKB7m2UVIx2K5MVpxpSRH9PU_6F065oivswK3juvnSiDFN8rnVEqGyR5yWFw-Wc7s6qPdfLToo119tKvm1X3n47DA-FfxxzgExAYULMUbyA-j_9_1N-ZIrEc</recordid><startdate>20180601</startdate><enddate>20180601</enddate><creator>Cheng, Yuanyuan</creator><creator>Tang, Yu-Ting</creator><creator>Nathanail, C. Paul</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9060-3857</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180601</creationdate><title>Determination of the potential implementation impact of 2016 ministry of environmental protection generic assessment criteria for potentially contaminated sites in China</title><author>Cheng, Yuanyuan ; Tang, Yu-Ting ; Nathanail, C. Paul</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-9eccd07683ee22d0d124332b34501ae8bba684800e9ad076fa727cbdd12745cf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Chemical industry</topic><topic>Contaminated land</topic><topic>Contamination</topic><topic>Criteria</topic><topic>Cultivated lands</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Ecological risk assessment</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Environmental Chemistry</topic><topic>Environmental Health</topic><topic>Environmental impact</topic><topic>Environmental protection</topic><topic>Exposure</topic><topic>Geochemistry</topic><topic>Health risks</topic><topic>Inhalation</topic><topic>Land management</topic><topic>Land pollution</topic><topic>Land use</topic><topic>Land use management</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Protection</topic><topic>Public Health</topic><topic>Regional development</topic><topic>Respiration</topic><topic>Risk assessment</topic><topic>Soil Science &amp; Conservation</topic><topic>Stock assessment</topic><topic>Terrestrial Pollution</topic><topic>Trajectory analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cheng, Yuanyuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tang, Yu-Ting</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nathanail, C. Paul</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Environmental geochemistry and health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cheng, Yuanyuan</au><au>Tang, Yu-Ting</au><au>Nathanail, C. Paul</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Determination of the potential implementation impact of 2016 ministry of environmental protection generic assessment criteria for potentially contaminated sites in China</atitle><jtitle>Environmental geochemistry and health</jtitle><stitle>Environ Geochem Health</stitle><addtitle>Environ Geochem Health</addtitle><date>2018-06-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>967</spage><epage>985</epage><pages>967-985</pages><issn>0269-4042</issn><eissn>1573-2983</eissn><abstract>The Ministry of Environmental Protection of China issued a 3rd draft edition of risk-based Generic Assessment Criteria (the MEP-GAC) in March 2016. Since these will be the first authoritative GAC in China, their implementation is likely to have a significant impact on China’s growing contaminated land management sector. This study aims to determine the potential implementation impact of the MEP-GAC through an in-depth analysis of the management context, land use scenarios, health criteria values adopted and exposure pathways considered. The MEP-GAC have been proposed for two broad categories of land use scenarios for contaminated land risk assessment, and these two categories of land use scenarios need to be further delved, and a MEP-GAC for Chinese cultivated land scenario ought to be developed, to ensure human health protection of Chinese farmers. The MEP-GAC have adopted 10 −6 as the acceptable lifetime cancer risk, given the widespread extent and severe level of land contamination in China, consideration should be given to the decision on excess lifetime cancer risk of 10 −5 . During risk assessment process in practice, it is better to review the 20% TDI against local circumstances to determine their suitability before adopting it. The MEP-GAC are based on a SOM value of 1%, for regions with particularly high SOM, it might be necessary to develop regional GAC, due to SOM’s significant impact on the GAC developed. An authoritative risk assessment model developed based on HJ25.3-2014 would help facilitate the DQRA process in practice. The MEP-GAC could better reflect the likely exposures of China’s citizens due to vapour inhalation by using characteristics of Chinese exposure scenarios, including China-generic building stock, as inputs into the Johnson and Ettinger model as opposed to adoption of the US EPA parameters. The MEP-GAC once implemented will set the trajectory for the development of the investigation, assessment and remediation of land contamination for years.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><pmid>28405785</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10653-017-9953-2</doi><tpages>19</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9060-3857</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0269-4042
ispartof Environmental geochemistry and health, 2018-06, Vol.40 (3), p.967-985
issn 0269-4042
1573-2983
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1887414431
source Springer Nature:Jisc Collections:Springer Nature Read and Publish 2023-2025: Springer Reading List
subjects Cancer
Chemical industry
Contaminated land
Contamination
Criteria
Cultivated lands
Earth and Environmental Science
Ecological risk assessment
Environment
Environmental Chemistry
Environmental Health
Environmental impact
Environmental protection
Exposure
Geochemistry
Health risks
Inhalation
Land management
Land pollution
Land use
Land use management
Original Paper
Protection
Public Health
Regional development
Respiration
Risk assessment
Soil Science & Conservation
Stock assessment
Terrestrial Pollution
Trajectory analysis
title Determination of the potential implementation impact of 2016 ministry of environmental protection generic assessment criteria for potentially contaminated sites in China
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T23%3A56%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Determination%20of%20the%20potential%20implementation%20impact%20of%202016%20ministry%20of%20environmental%20protection%20generic%20assessment%20criteria%20for%20potentially%20contaminated%20sites%20in%20China&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20geochemistry%20and%20health&rft.au=Cheng,%20Yuanyuan&rft.date=2018-06-01&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=967&rft.epage=985&rft.pages=967-985&rft.issn=0269-4042&rft.eissn=1573-2983&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10653-017-9953-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2042026142%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-9eccd07683ee22d0d124332b34501ae8bba684800e9ad076fa727cbdd12745cf3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2042026142&rft_id=info:pmid/28405785&rfr_iscdi=true