Loading…
Introduction: Film adaptation in the post-cinematic era
In recent years, adaptation studies has emerged as a field of urgent scholarly importance and, having moved past outdated presuppositions and prejudices, has revealed adaptation as a crucial form of dialogue between and among different media, texts and social–historical contexts. The proliferation o...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of adaptation in film & performance 2014-07, Vol.7 (2), p.155-158 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 158 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 155 |
container_title | Journal of adaptation in film & performance |
container_volume | 7 |
creator | Kilbourn, Russell J. A Faubert, Patrick |
description | In recent years, adaptation studies has emerged as a field of urgent scholarly importance and, having moved past outdated presuppositions and prejudices, has revealed adaptation as a crucial form of dialogue between and among different media, texts and social–historical contexts. The proliferation of new technologies and new media, theorized as the digital post-cinematic era, but encompassing more than what Costas Constandinides calls the ‘post-celluloid’ (2010: 3), has arguably deepened this importance, implicating adaptation in previously unconsidered cultural arenas. In their common emphasis upon post-millennial cinema, all four articles in this dossier are based in the recognition that it is no longer possible to conceive of filmic adaptation as a straightforward movement from page to screen; that therefore we must turn our attention to the role new media technologies play in processes of dialogic mediation and identity formation, in the production (and elision) of inter-subjective and cultural difference, in the shaping of cultural memory, and in the very question of defining cinema in the early twenty-first century. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1386/jafp.7.2.155_7 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1888645874</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1888645874</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c197t-e20c9b8a03af3c914b8402ecc50c2a43327392f74d5d215967b5e19da227b20e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkL1PwzAUxC0EElXpypyRJan9bMcOG6ooVKrEAhKb5TgvwlW-sN2B_56UIlbeck-n-91whNwyWjCuy_XBtlOhCiiYlEZdkAVTkuel4O-Xfz-wa7KK8UDn0yDLEhZE7YYUxubokh-H-2zruz6zjZ2SPRmZH7L0gdk0xpQ7P2A_2y7DYG_IVWu7iKtfXZK37ePr5jnfvzztNg_73LFKpRyBuqrWlnLbclcxUWtBAZ2T1IEVnIPiFbRKNLIBJqtS1RJZ1VgAVQNFviR3594pjJ9HjMn0PjrsOjvgeIyGaa1LIbUSc7Q4R10YYwzYmin43oYvw6g5jWROIxllwPyMNAPrM-CHNDeiS_8R30iCac4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1888645874</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Introduction: Film adaptation in the post-cinematic era</title><source>IngentaConnect Journals</source><source>Humanities Index</source><creator>Kilbourn, Russell J. A ; Faubert, Patrick</creator><creatorcontrib>Kilbourn, Russell J. A ; Faubert, Patrick</creatorcontrib><description>In recent years, adaptation studies has emerged as a field of urgent scholarly importance and, having moved past outdated presuppositions and prejudices, has revealed adaptation as a crucial form of dialogue between and among different media, texts and social–historical contexts. The proliferation of new technologies and new media, theorized as the digital post-cinematic era, but encompassing more than what Costas Constandinides calls the ‘post-celluloid’ (2010: 3), has arguably deepened this importance, implicating adaptation in previously unconsidered cultural arenas. In their common emphasis upon post-millennial cinema, all four articles in this dossier are based in the recognition that it is no longer possible to conceive of filmic adaptation as a straightforward movement from page to screen; that therefore we must turn our attention to the role new media technologies play in processes of dialogic mediation and identity formation, in the production (and elision) of inter-subjective and cultural difference, in the shaping of cultural memory, and in the very question of defining cinema in the early twenty-first century.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1753-6421</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1753-643X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1386/jafp.7.2.155_7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Intellect</publisher><subject>digital film/video ; intermediality ; nostalgia ; post-cinematic adaptation ; remediation ; self-reflexivity ; transmediation</subject><ispartof>Journal of adaptation in film & performance, 2014-07, Vol.7 (2), p.155-158</ispartof><rights>Intellect Ltd 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,33850</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kilbourn, Russell J. A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Faubert, Patrick</creatorcontrib><title>Introduction: Film adaptation in the post-cinematic era</title><title>Journal of adaptation in film & performance</title><description>In recent years, adaptation studies has emerged as a field of urgent scholarly importance and, having moved past outdated presuppositions and prejudices, has revealed adaptation as a crucial form of dialogue between and among different media, texts and social–historical contexts. The proliferation of new technologies and new media, theorized as the digital post-cinematic era, but encompassing more than what Costas Constandinides calls the ‘post-celluloid’ (2010: 3), has arguably deepened this importance, implicating adaptation in previously unconsidered cultural arenas. In their common emphasis upon post-millennial cinema, all four articles in this dossier are based in the recognition that it is no longer possible to conceive of filmic adaptation as a straightforward movement from page to screen; that therefore we must turn our attention to the role new media technologies play in processes of dialogic mediation and identity formation, in the production (and elision) of inter-subjective and cultural difference, in the shaping of cultural memory, and in the very question of defining cinema in the early twenty-first century.</description><subject>digital film/video</subject><subject>intermediality</subject><subject>nostalgia</subject><subject>post-cinematic adaptation</subject><subject>remediation</subject><subject>self-reflexivity</subject><subject>transmediation</subject><issn>1753-6421</issn><issn>1753-643X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C18</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkL1PwzAUxC0EElXpypyRJan9bMcOG6ooVKrEAhKb5TgvwlW-sN2B_56UIlbeck-n-91whNwyWjCuy_XBtlOhCiiYlEZdkAVTkuel4O-Xfz-wa7KK8UDn0yDLEhZE7YYUxubokh-H-2zruz6zjZ2SPRmZH7L0gdk0xpQ7P2A_2y7DYG_IVWu7iKtfXZK37ePr5jnfvzztNg_73LFKpRyBuqrWlnLbclcxUWtBAZ2T1IEVnIPiFbRKNLIBJqtS1RJZ1VgAVQNFviR3594pjJ9HjMn0PjrsOjvgeIyGaa1LIbUSc7Q4R10YYwzYmin43oYvw6g5jWROIxllwPyMNAPrM-CHNDeiS_8R30iCac4</recordid><startdate>20140701</startdate><enddate>20140701</enddate><creator>Kilbourn, Russell J. A</creator><creator>Faubert, Patrick</creator><general>Intellect</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>C18</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140701</creationdate><title>Introduction: Film adaptation in the post-cinematic era</title><author>Kilbourn, Russell J. A ; Faubert, Patrick</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c197t-e20c9b8a03af3c914b8402ecc50c2a43327392f74d5d215967b5e19da227b20e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>digital film/video</topic><topic>intermediality</topic><topic>nostalgia</topic><topic>post-cinematic adaptation</topic><topic>remediation</topic><topic>self-reflexivity</topic><topic>transmediation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kilbourn, Russell J. A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Faubert, Patrick</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Humanities Index</collection><jtitle>Journal of adaptation in film & performance</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kilbourn, Russell J. A</au><au>Faubert, Patrick</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Introduction: Film adaptation in the post-cinematic era</atitle><jtitle>Journal of adaptation in film & performance</jtitle><date>2014-07-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>155</spage><epage>158</epage><pages>155-158</pages><issn>1753-6421</issn><eissn>1753-643X</eissn><abstract>In recent years, adaptation studies has emerged as a field of urgent scholarly importance and, having moved past outdated presuppositions and prejudices, has revealed adaptation as a crucial form of dialogue between and among different media, texts and social–historical contexts. The proliferation of new technologies and new media, theorized as the digital post-cinematic era, but encompassing more than what Costas Constandinides calls the ‘post-celluloid’ (2010: 3), has arguably deepened this importance, implicating adaptation in previously unconsidered cultural arenas. In their common emphasis upon post-millennial cinema, all four articles in this dossier are based in the recognition that it is no longer possible to conceive of filmic adaptation as a straightforward movement from page to screen; that therefore we must turn our attention to the role new media technologies play in processes of dialogic mediation and identity formation, in the production (and elision) of inter-subjective and cultural difference, in the shaping of cultural memory, and in the very question of defining cinema in the early twenty-first century.</abstract><pub>Intellect</pub><doi>10.1386/jafp.7.2.155_7</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1753-6421 |
ispartof | Journal of adaptation in film & performance, 2014-07, Vol.7 (2), p.155-158 |
issn | 1753-6421 1753-643X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1888645874 |
source | IngentaConnect Journals; Humanities Index |
subjects | digital film/video intermediality nostalgia post-cinematic adaptation remediation self-reflexivity transmediation |
title | Introduction: Film adaptation in the post-cinematic era |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T22%3A02%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Introduction:%20Film%20adaptation%20in%20the%20post-cinematic%20era&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20adaptation%20in%20film%20&%20performance&rft.au=Kilbourn,%20Russell%20J.%20A&rft.date=2014-07-01&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=155&rft.epage=158&rft.pages=155-158&rft.issn=1753-6421&rft.eissn=1753-643X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1386/jafp.7.2.155_7&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1888645874%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c197t-e20c9b8a03af3c914b8402ecc50c2a43327392f74d5d215967b5e19da227b20e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1888645874&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |