Loading…

Evaluation of testicular toxicology: A synopsis and discussion of the recommendations proposed by the Society of Toxicologic Pathology

Background: Detection of chemically induced effects on male fertility and on testicular spermatogenesis in particular, has become of increasing concern. More stringent regulatory guidelines, introduced by ICH, EPA and OECD (Table 1) have raised the awareness of toxicologists and pathologists for the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Birth defects research. Part B. Developmental and reproductive toxicology 2003-10, Vol.68 (5), p.408-415
Main Author: Creasy, Dianne M.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4241-ecb5d5c3ce631fadb8f303bc67a7b3291808d90f466bd0a68527c69a900377c13
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4241-ecb5d5c3ce631fadb8f303bc67a7b3291808d90f466bd0a68527c69a900377c13
container_end_page 415
container_issue 5
container_start_page 408
container_title Birth defects research. Part B. Developmental and reproductive toxicology
container_volume 68
creator Creasy, Dianne M.
description Background: Detection of chemically induced effects on male fertility and on testicular spermatogenesis in particular, has become of increasing concern. More stringent regulatory guidelines, introduced by ICH, EPA and OECD (Table 1) have raised the awareness of toxicologists and pathologists for the need to conduct sensitive and careful evaluation of the male reproductive tract for potential toxic effects of administered compounds. With it has come confusion and in many cases, inappropriate procedures, often based on misunderstanding of what is required and on inadequate understanding of spermatogenesis. This article summarizes and discusses the main recommendations recently proposed by the Society of Toxicologic Pathology on recommended approaches for the evaluation of testicular and epididymal toxicity [Lanning LL, Creasy DM, Chapin RE, Mann PC, Barlow NJ, Regan KS, Goodman DG. Toxicologic Pathology 30:518–531, 2002]. The major recommendations are: Use sexually mature animals to evaluate effects on spermatogenesis. Sample left and right testes and epididymides and record organ weights. Use modified Davidson's fixative to fix testes from all species from studies of 13 wks duration and less. Examine transverse sections of the testes (including part of the rete), and longitudinal sections of the epididymides. Embed tissues in paraffin wax. For rodent studies up to 28 days, examine periodic acid‐Schiff's‐hematoxylin stained sections. For all other studies examine hematoxylin and eosin stained sections. Microscopic evaluation of the testis should be a qualitative evaluation carried out with an awareness of the spermatogenic cycle. Quantitative procedures are inappropriate for screening studies. Nomenclature and grading of findings for spermatogenic disturbances will vary on a case by case basis Birth Defects Res B 68:408–415, 2003. © 2003 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/bdrb.10041
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18888861</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>18888861</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4241-ecb5d5c3ce631fadb8f303bc67a7b3291808d90f466bd0a68527c69a900377c13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtu1TAURS0Eog-Y8AHIExhUCtixYyfM2ktbHldAoQiJieVXqEsSX3wSaH6A7ya5j3aGJz6S19nbeyP0hJIXlJD8pXHJzBOn99A-LXieVZLT-7czY3voAOB6YpmU5UO0R7nkRVWRffT39LduBt2H2OFY495DH-zQ6IT7eBNsbOKP8RU-xjB2cQUBsO4cdgHsALDbufI4eRvb1ndurQR4leIqgnfYjOv3L9EG348zfrnTDRZ_0v3V2uIRelDrBvzj7X2Ivp6dXi7eZMuP528Xx8vM8pzTzFtTuMIy6wWjtXamrBlhxgqppWF5RUtSuorUXAjjiBZlkUsrKl0RMiW3lB2i5xvd6YO_himsaqcsvml05-MAipbzETN4tAFtigDJ12qVQqvTqChRc-tqbl2tW5_gp1vVwbTe3aHbmifg2RbQYHVTJ93ZAHdckQtBKZ84uuH-hMaP_7FUJ68_n-zMs81OgN7f3O7o9FMJyWShvn04VxfLs_eLi3fflWD_AHK0q8M</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>18888861</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of testicular toxicology: A synopsis and discussion of the recommendations proposed by the Society of Toxicologic Pathology</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>Creasy, Dianne M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Creasy, Dianne M.</creatorcontrib><description>Background: Detection of chemically induced effects on male fertility and on testicular spermatogenesis in particular, has become of increasing concern. More stringent regulatory guidelines, introduced by ICH, EPA and OECD (Table 1) have raised the awareness of toxicologists and pathologists for the need to conduct sensitive and careful evaluation of the male reproductive tract for potential toxic effects of administered compounds. With it has come confusion and in many cases, inappropriate procedures, often based on misunderstanding of what is required and on inadequate understanding of spermatogenesis. This article summarizes and discusses the main recommendations recently proposed by the Society of Toxicologic Pathology on recommended approaches for the evaluation of testicular and epididymal toxicity [Lanning LL, Creasy DM, Chapin RE, Mann PC, Barlow NJ, Regan KS, Goodman DG. Toxicologic Pathology 30:518–531, 2002]. The major recommendations are: Use sexually mature animals to evaluate effects on spermatogenesis. Sample left and right testes and epididymides and record organ weights. Use modified Davidson's fixative to fix testes from all species from studies of 13 wks duration and less. Examine transverse sections of the testes (including part of the rete), and longitudinal sections of the epididymides. Embed tissues in paraffin wax. For rodent studies up to 28 days, examine periodic acid‐Schiff's‐hematoxylin stained sections. For all other studies examine hematoxylin and eosin stained sections. Microscopic evaluation of the testis should be a qualitative evaluation carried out with an awareness of the spermatogenic cycle. Quantitative procedures are inappropriate for screening studies. Nomenclature and grading of findings for spermatogenic disturbances will vary on a case by case basis Birth Defects Res B 68:408–415, 2003. © 2003 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1542-9733</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1542-9741</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/bdrb.10041</identifier><identifier>PMID: 14745990</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><subject>Animals ; Biological and medical sciences ; Epididymis - drug effects ; Epididymis - pathology ; Guidelines as Topic ; Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics ; histopathology ; Male ; Male genital diseases ; Medical sciences ; microscopic evaluation ; Non tumoral diseases ; Rats ; Reproduction - drug effects ; Research Design ; Sexual Maturation ; Societies, Scientific ; spermatogenesis ; Spermatogenesis - drug effects ; Staining and Labeling ; testes ; Testis - drug effects ; Testis - pathology ; Testis - physiopathology ; Tissue Embedding ; Tissue Fixation ; Toxicology - methods ; tubular staging</subject><ispartof>Birth defects research. Part B. Developmental and reproductive toxicology, 2003-10, Vol.68 (5), p.408-415</ispartof><rights>2003 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</rights><rights>2004 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4241-ecb5d5c3ce631fadb8f303bc67a7b3291808d90f466bd0a68527c69a900377c13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4241-ecb5d5c3ce631fadb8f303bc67a7b3291808d90f466bd0a68527c69a900377c13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=15266114$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14745990$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Creasy, Dianne M.</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of testicular toxicology: A synopsis and discussion of the recommendations proposed by the Society of Toxicologic Pathology</title><title>Birth defects research. Part B. Developmental and reproductive toxicology</title><addtitle>Birth Defects Research Part B: Developmental and Reproductive Toxicology</addtitle><description>Background: Detection of chemically induced effects on male fertility and on testicular spermatogenesis in particular, has become of increasing concern. More stringent regulatory guidelines, introduced by ICH, EPA and OECD (Table 1) have raised the awareness of toxicologists and pathologists for the need to conduct sensitive and careful evaluation of the male reproductive tract for potential toxic effects of administered compounds. With it has come confusion and in many cases, inappropriate procedures, often based on misunderstanding of what is required and on inadequate understanding of spermatogenesis. This article summarizes and discusses the main recommendations recently proposed by the Society of Toxicologic Pathology on recommended approaches for the evaluation of testicular and epididymal toxicity [Lanning LL, Creasy DM, Chapin RE, Mann PC, Barlow NJ, Regan KS, Goodman DG. Toxicologic Pathology 30:518–531, 2002]. The major recommendations are: Use sexually mature animals to evaluate effects on spermatogenesis. Sample left and right testes and epididymides and record organ weights. Use modified Davidson's fixative to fix testes from all species from studies of 13 wks duration and less. Examine transverse sections of the testes (including part of the rete), and longitudinal sections of the epididymides. Embed tissues in paraffin wax. For rodent studies up to 28 days, examine periodic acid‐Schiff's‐hematoxylin stained sections. For all other studies examine hematoxylin and eosin stained sections. Microscopic evaluation of the testis should be a qualitative evaluation carried out with an awareness of the spermatogenic cycle. Quantitative procedures are inappropriate for screening studies. Nomenclature and grading of findings for spermatogenic disturbances will vary on a case by case basis Birth Defects Res B 68:408–415, 2003. © 2003 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Epididymis - drug effects</subject><subject>Epididymis - pathology</subject><subject>Guidelines as Topic</subject><subject>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</subject><subject>histopathology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Male genital diseases</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>microscopic evaluation</subject><subject>Non tumoral diseases</subject><subject>Rats</subject><subject>Reproduction - drug effects</subject><subject>Research Design</subject><subject>Sexual Maturation</subject><subject>Societies, Scientific</subject><subject>spermatogenesis</subject><subject>Spermatogenesis - drug effects</subject><subject>Staining and Labeling</subject><subject>testes</subject><subject>Testis - drug effects</subject><subject>Testis - pathology</subject><subject>Testis - physiopathology</subject><subject>Tissue Embedding</subject><subject>Tissue Fixation</subject><subject>Toxicology - methods</subject><subject>tubular staging</subject><issn>1542-9733</issn><issn>1542-9741</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMtu1TAURS0Eog-Y8AHIExhUCtixYyfM2ktbHldAoQiJieVXqEsSX3wSaH6A7ya5j3aGJz6S19nbeyP0hJIXlJD8pXHJzBOn99A-LXieVZLT-7czY3voAOB6YpmU5UO0R7nkRVWRffT39LduBt2H2OFY495DH-zQ6IT7eBNsbOKP8RU-xjB2cQUBsO4cdgHsALDbufI4eRvb1ndurQR4leIqgnfYjOv3L9EG348zfrnTDRZ_0v3V2uIRelDrBvzj7X2Ivp6dXi7eZMuP528Xx8vM8pzTzFtTuMIy6wWjtXamrBlhxgqppWF5RUtSuorUXAjjiBZlkUsrKl0RMiW3lB2i5xvd6YO_himsaqcsvml05-MAipbzETN4tAFtigDJ12qVQqvTqChRc-tqbl2tW5_gp1vVwbTe3aHbmifg2RbQYHVTJ93ZAHdckQtBKZ84uuH-hMaP_7FUJ68_n-zMs81OgN7f3O7o9FMJyWShvn04VxfLs_eLi3fflWD_AHK0q8M</recordid><startdate>200310</startdate><enddate>200310</enddate><creator>Creasy, Dianne M.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><general>Wiley-Liss</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200310</creationdate><title>Evaluation of testicular toxicology: A synopsis and discussion of the recommendations proposed by the Society of Toxicologic Pathology</title><author>Creasy, Dianne M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4241-ecb5d5c3ce631fadb8f303bc67a7b3291808d90f466bd0a68527c69a900377c13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Epididymis - drug effects</topic><topic>Epididymis - pathology</topic><topic>Guidelines as Topic</topic><topic>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</topic><topic>histopathology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Male genital diseases</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>microscopic evaluation</topic><topic>Non tumoral diseases</topic><topic>Rats</topic><topic>Reproduction - drug effects</topic><topic>Research Design</topic><topic>Sexual Maturation</topic><topic>Societies, Scientific</topic><topic>spermatogenesis</topic><topic>Spermatogenesis - drug effects</topic><topic>Staining and Labeling</topic><topic>testes</topic><topic>Testis - drug effects</topic><topic>Testis - pathology</topic><topic>Testis - physiopathology</topic><topic>Tissue Embedding</topic><topic>Tissue Fixation</topic><topic>Toxicology - methods</topic><topic>tubular staging</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Creasy, Dianne M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Birth defects research. Part B. Developmental and reproductive toxicology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Creasy, Dianne M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of testicular toxicology: A synopsis and discussion of the recommendations proposed by the Society of Toxicologic Pathology</atitle><jtitle>Birth defects research. Part B. Developmental and reproductive toxicology</jtitle><addtitle>Birth Defects Research Part B: Developmental and Reproductive Toxicology</addtitle><date>2003-10</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>68</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>408</spage><epage>415</epage><pages>408-415</pages><issn>1542-9733</issn><eissn>1542-9741</eissn><abstract>Background: Detection of chemically induced effects on male fertility and on testicular spermatogenesis in particular, has become of increasing concern. More stringent regulatory guidelines, introduced by ICH, EPA and OECD (Table 1) have raised the awareness of toxicologists and pathologists for the need to conduct sensitive and careful evaluation of the male reproductive tract for potential toxic effects of administered compounds. With it has come confusion and in many cases, inappropriate procedures, often based on misunderstanding of what is required and on inadequate understanding of spermatogenesis. This article summarizes and discusses the main recommendations recently proposed by the Society of Toxicologic Pathology on recommended approaches for the evaluation of testicular and epididymal toxicity [Lanning LL, Creasy DM, Chapin RE, Mann PC, Barlow NJ, Regan KS, Goodman DG. Toxicologic Pathology 30:518–531, 2002]. The major recommendations are: Use sexually mature animals to evaluate effects on spermatogenesis. Sample left and right testes and epididymides and record organ weights. Use modified Davidson's fixative to fix testes from all species from studies of 13 wks duration and less. Examine transverse sections of the testes (including part of the rete), and longitudinal sections of the epididymides. Embed tissues in paraffin wax. For rodent studies up to 28 days, examine periodic acid‐Schiff's‐hematoxylin stained sections. For all other studies examine hematoxylin and eosin stained sections. Microscopic evaluation of the testis should be a qualitative evaluation carried out with an awareness of the spermatogenic cycle. Quantitative procedures are inappropriate for screening studies. Nomenclature and grading of findings for spermatogenic disturbances will vary on a case by case basis Birth Defects Res B 68:408–415, 2003. © 2003 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><pmid>14745990</pmid><doi>10.1002/bdrb.10041</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1542-9733
ispartof Birth defects research. Part B. Developmental and reproductive toxicology, 2003-10, Vol.68 (5), p.408-415
issn 1542-9733
1542-9741
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18888861
source Wiley
subjects Animals
Biological and medical sciences
Epididymis - drug effects
Epididymis - pathology
Guidelines as Topic
Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics
histopathology
Male
Male genital diseases
Medical sciences
microscopic evaluation
Non tumoral diseases
Rats
Reproduction - drug effects
Research Design
Sexual Maturation
Societies, Scientific
spermatogenesis
Spermatogenesis - drug effects
Staining and Labeling
testes
Testis - drug effects
Testis - pathology
Testis - physiopathology
Tissue Embedding
Tissue Fixation
Toxicology - methods
tubular staging
title Evaluation of testicular toxicology: A synopsis and discussion of the recommendations proposed by the Society of Toxicologic Pathology
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T17%3A24%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20testicular%20toxicology:%20A%20synopsis%20and%20discussion%20of%20the%20recommendations%20proposed%20by%20the%20Society%20of%20Toxicologic%20Pathology&rft.jtitle=Birth%20defects%20research.%20Part%20B.%20Developmental%20and%20reproductive%20toxicology&rft.au=Creasy,%20Dianne%20M.&rft.date=2003-10&rft.volume=68&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=408&rft.epage=415&rft.pages=408-415&rft.issn=1542-9733&rft.eissn=1542-9741&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/bdrb.10041&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E18888861%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4241-ecb5d5c3ce631fadb8f303bc67a7b3291808d90f466bd0a68527c69a900377c13%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=18888861&rft_id=info:pmid/14745990&rfr_iscdi=true