Loading…

Impact Of Diabetes Mellitus On Ischemic Events In Men And Women After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Abstract Studies have shown worse outcome for women compared with men after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in the presence of diabetes mellitus (DM). We aimed to investigate the risk of ischemic events after PCI in women versus men stratified by the presence or absence of DM. A...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The American journal of cardiology 2017-04, Vol.119 (8), p.1166-1172
Main Authors: Farhan, Serdar, MD, Baber, Usman, MD, MS, Vogel, Birgit, MD, Aquino, Melissa, MS, Chandrasekhar, Jaya, MBBS, Faggioni, Michela, MD, Giustino, Gennaro, MD, Kautzky-Willer, Alexandra, MD, Sweeny, Joesph, MD, Shah, Srushti, MD, Vijay, Pooja, MD, Barman, Nitin, MD, Moreno, Pedro, MD, Kovacic, Jason, MD, PhD, Dangas, George, MD, PhD, Kini, Annapoorna, MD, Mehran, Roxana, MD, Sharma, Samin, MD
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract Studies have shown worse outcome for women compared with men after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in the presence of diabetes mellitus (DM). We aimed to investigate the risk of ischemic events after PCI in women versus men stratified by the presence or absence of DM. A total of 17,154 consecutive patients from a single center PCI registry enrolled between January 2009 and December 2014 were categorized accordingly: female/non-DM, female/DM, male/non-DM and male/DM. Endpoints included death and myocardial infarction (MI) at 1 year. Of the overall population, 15% (n=2631) were female/non-DM, 17% (n=2891) were female/DM, 38% (n=6483) were male/non-DM and 30% (n=5149) were male/DM. Within the four study groups, female/DM had the highest risk, while female/non-DM and male/DM showed similar risks and male/non-DM showed lowest risk for death (4.64% vs. 3.08% vs. 2.93% vs. 2.31%; p-trend
ISSN:0002-9149
1879-1913
DOI:10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.12.035