Loading…
Thromboembolic Disease in Patients with Metastatic Femoral Lesions: A Comparison Between Prophylactic Fixation and Fracture Fixation
We are not aware of any previous studies that have compared the rate of venous thromboembolic events in patients who underwent prophylactic intramedullary nailing because of an impending fracture with the rate in patients who underwent intramedullary nailing after a pathological fracture. The object...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume 2017-02, Vol.99 (4), p.315-323 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3995-f7f0f1e493233fce836596cad3f84f7e3ad409cb6d9aa415d07a61e6432c6d513 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3995-f7f0f1e493233fce836596cad3f84f7e3ad409cb6d9aa415d07a61e6432c6d513 |
container_end_page | 323 |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 315 |
container_title | Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume |
container_volume | 99 |
creator | Aneja, Arun Jiang, Jimmy J. Cohen-Rosenblum, Anna Luu, Hue L. Peabody, Terrance D. Attar, Samer Luo, T. David Haydon, Rex C. |
description | We are not aware of any previous studies that have compared the rate of venous thromboembolic events in patients who underwent prophylactic intramedullary nailing because of an impending fracture with the rate in patients who underwent intramedullary nailing after a pathological fracture. The objective of the present study was to determine if the rate of venous thromboembolic events varies between patients who are managed with prophylactic fixation and those who are managed with fixation after a pathological fracture.
We performed a retrospective comparative study in which the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database was used to identify all patients who had undergone femoral stabilization, either for a pathological femoral fracture or for prophylactic fixation of femoral metastatic lesion, over a period of 10 consecutive years (between 2002 and 2011) in the United States. Demographic data, comorbidities, venous thromboembolic event rates, and other common postoperative complications were compared between the 2 groups.
Patients who were managed with prophylactic fixation had significantly higher rates of pulmonary embolism (p < 0.001; adjusted odds ratio, 2.1) and deep-vein thrombosis (p = 0.03; adjusted odds ratio, 1.5). Patients who were managed with fixation after a pathological fracture had a significantly greater need for blood transfusion, higher rates of postoperative urinary tract infection, and a decreased likelihood of being discharged to home (p < 0.001 for all).
Patients with metastatic disease who undergo prophylactic intramedullary nailing have higher observed rates of venous thromboembolic events than those who undergo nailing for the treatment of a pathological fracture and should be actively and vigilantly managed in the postoperative period.
Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2106/JBJS.16.00023 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1888973177</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1888973177</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3995-f7f0f1e493233fce836596cad3f84f7e3ad409cb6d9aa415d07a61e6432c6d513</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkkFv1DAQhS0EotvCkSuyxIVLtnYmthNu7cJCq61AopwtrzNRXJJ4aydaeu8Px-mWHjhV1mik5-89yXom5B1ny5wzeXp5fvlzyeWSMZbDC7LgAkTGoZQvySJJPKtAiCNyHONNQoqCqdfkKC95JRnAgtxft8H3W49pOmfpZxfRRKRuoD_M6HAYI927saVXOJo4JsnSNfY-mI5uMDo_xE_0jK58vzPBRT_Qcxz3iMke_K6964x9sLg_yZpuzVDTdUjiFPBJfUNeNaaL-PZxn5Bf6y_Xq2_Z5vvXi9XZJrNQVSJrVMMajkUFOUBjsQQpKmlNDU1ZNArB1AWr7FbWlTEFFzVTRnKUBeRW1oLDCfl4yN0FfzthHHXvosWuMwP6KWpelmWlgCv1DFSmk4OaUz_8h974KQzpITpnTJZKCCYSlR0oG3yMARu9C6434U5zpucm9dyk5lI_NJn494-p07bH-on-V10CigOw992IIf7upj0G3aLpxnYOYYXMIcsZV-kbCJbNkoC_SW2o6g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2006875505</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Thromboembolic Disease in Patients with Metastatic Femoral Lesions: A Comparison Between Prophylactic Fixation and Fracture Fixation</title><source>HEAL-Link subscriptions: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</source><creator>Aneja, Arun ; Jiang, Jimmy J. ; Cohen-Rosenblum, Anna ; Luu, Hue L. ; Peabody, Terrance D. ; Attar, Samer ; Luo, T. David ; Haydon, Rex C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Aneja, Arun ; Jiang, Jimmy J. ; Cohen-Rosenblum, Anna ; Luu, Hue L. ; Peabody, Terrance D. ; Attar, Samer ; Luo, T. David ; Haydon, Rex C.</creatorcontrib><description>We are not aware of any previous studies that have compared the rate of venous thromboembolic events in patients who underwent prophylactic intramedullary nailing because of an impending fracture with the rate in patients who underwent intramedullary nailing after a pathological fracture. The objective of the present study was to determine if the rate of venous thromboembolic events varies between patients who are managed with prophylactic fixation and those who are managed with fixation after a pathological fracture.
We performed a retrospective comparative study in which the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database was used to identify all patients who had undergone femoral stabilization, either for a pathological femoral fracture or for prophylactic fixation of femoral metastatic lesion, over a period of 10 consecutive years (between 2002 and 2011) in the United States. Demographic data, comorbidities, venous thromboembolic event rates, and other common postoperative complications were compared between the 2 groups.
Patients who were managed with prophylactic fixation had significantly higher rates of pulmonary embolism (p < 0.001; adjusted odds ratio, 2.1) and deep-vein thrombosis (p = 0.03; adjusted odds ratio, 1.5). Patients who were managed with fixation after a pathological fracture had a significantly greater need for blood transfusion, higher rates of postoperative urinary tract infection, and a decreased likelihood of being discharged to home (p < 0.001 for all).
Patients with metastatic disease who undergo prophylactic intramedullary nailing have higher observed rates of venous thromboembolic events than those who undergo nailing for the treatment of a pathological fracture and should be actively and vigilantly managed in the postoperative period.
Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</description><edition>American volume</edition><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9355</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1535-1386</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.16.00023</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28196033</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Blood transfusion ; Comparative studies ; Complications ; Demographics ; Embolism ; Female ; Femoral Neoplasms - complications ; Femoral Neoplasms - secondary ; Femoral Neoplasms - surgery ; Femur ; Fixation ; Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary - adverse effects ; Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary - methods ; Health risk assessment ; Humans ; Lesions ; Male ; Metastases ; Metastasis ; Middle Aged ; Nailing ; Patients ; Postoperative Complications ; Prophylactic Surgical Procedures - methods ; Retrospective Studies ; Thromboembolism ; Thromboembolism - etiology ; Thrombosis ; Transfusion ; Urinary tract</subject><ispartof>Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume, 2017-02, Vol.99 (4), p.315-323</ispartof><rights>The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery AMERICAN VOLUME Feb 15, 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3995-f7f0f1e493233fce836596cad3f84f7e3ad409cb6d9aa415d07a61e6432c6d513</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3995-f7f0f1e493233fce836596cad3f84f7e3ad409cb6d9aa415d07a61e6432c6d513</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28196033$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Aneja, Arun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiang, Jimmy J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cohen-Rosenblum, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luu, Hue L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peabody, Terrance D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Attar, Samer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luo, T. David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haydon, Rex C.</creatorcontrib><title>Thromboembolic Disease in Patients with Metastatic Femoral Lesions: A Comparison Between Prophylactic Fixation and Fracture Fixation</title><title>Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume</title><addtitle>J Bone Joint Surg Am</addtitle><description>We are not aware of any previous studies that have compared the rate of venous thromboembolic events in patients who underwent prophylactic intramedullary nailing because of an impending fracture with the rate in patients who underwent intramedullary nailing after a pathological fracture. The objective of the present study was to determine if the rate of venous thromboembolic events varies between patients who are managed with prophylactic fixation and those who are managed with fixation after a pathological fracture.
We performed a retrospective comparative study in which the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database was used to identify all patients who had undergone femoral stabilization, either for a pathological femoral fracture or for prophylactic fixation of femoral metastatic lesion, over a period of 10 consecutive years (between 2002 and 2011) in the United States. Demographic data, comorbidities, venous thromboembolic event rates, and other common postoperative complications were compared between the 2 groups.
Patients who were managed with prophylactic fixation had significantly higher rates of pulmonary embolism (p < 0.001; adjusted odds ratio, 2.1) and deep-vein thrombosis (p = 0.03; adjusted odds ratio, 1.5). Patients who were managed with fixation after a pathological fracture had a significantly greater need for blood transfusion, higher rates of postoperative urinary tract infection, and a decreased likelihood of being discharged to home (p < 0.001 for all).
Patients with metastatic disease who undergo prophylactic intramedullary nailing have higher observed rates of venous thromboembolic events than those who undergo nailing for the treatment of a pathological fracture and should be actively and vigilantly managed in the postoperative period.
Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Blood transfusion</subject><subject>Comparative studies</subject><subject>Complications</subject><subject>Demographics</subject><subject>Embolism</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Femoral Neoplasms - complications</subject><subject>Femoral Neoplasms - secondary</subject><subject>Femoral Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Femur</subject><subject>Fixation</subject><subject>Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary - adverse effects</subject><subject>Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary - methods</subject><subject>Health risk assessment</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lesions</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Metastases</subject><subject>Metastasis</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Nailing</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications</subject><subject>Prophylactic Surgical Procedures - methods</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Thromboembolism</subject><subject>Thromboembolism - etiology</subject><subject>Thrombosis</subject><subject>Transfusion</subject><subject>Urinary tract</subject><issn>0021-9355</issn><issn>1535-1386</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkkFv1DAQhS0EotvCkSuyxIVLtnYmthNu7cJCq61AopwtrzNRXJJ4aydaeu8Px-mWHjhV1mik5-89yXom5B1ny5wzeXp5fvlzyeWSMZbDC7LgAkTGoZQvySJJPKtAiCNyHONNQoqCqdfkKC95JRnAgtxft8H3W49pOmfpZxfRRKRuoD_M6HAYI927saVXOJo4JsnSNfY-mI5uMDo_xE_0jK58vzPBRT_Qcxz3iMke_K6964x9sLg_yZpuzVDTdUjiFPBJfUNeNaaL-PZxn5Bf6y_Xq2_Z5vvXi9XZJrNQVSJrVMMajkUFOUBjsQQpKmlNDU1ZNArB1AWr7FbWlTEFFzVTRnKUBeRW1oLDCfl4yN0FfzthHHXvosWuMwP6KWpelmWlgCv1DFSmk4OaUz_8h974KQzpITpnTJZKCCYSlR0oG3yMARu9C6434U5zpucm9dyk5lI_NJn494-p07bH-on-V10CigOw992IIf7upj0G3aLpxnYOYYXMIcsZV-kbCJbNkoC_SW2o6g</recordid><startdate>20170215</startdate><enddate>20170215</enddate><creator>Aneja, Arun</creator><creator>Jiang, Jimmy J.</creator><creator>Cohen-Rosenblum, Anna</creator><creator>Luu, Hue L.</creator><creator>Peabody, Terrance D.</creator><creator>Attar, Samer</creator><creator>Luo, T. David</creator><creator>Haydon, Rex C.</creator><general>The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc</general><general>Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery AMERICAN VOLUME</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170215</creationdate><title>Thromboembolic Disease in Patients with Metastatic Femoral Lesions: A Comparison Between Prophylactic Fixation and Fracture Fixation</title><author>Aneja, Arun ; Jiang, Jimmy J. ; Cohen-Rosenblum, Anna ; Luu, Hue L. ; Peabody, Terrance D. ; Attar, Samer ; Luo, T. David ; Haydon, Rex C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3995-f7f0f1e493233fce836596cad3f84f7e3ad409cb6d9aa415d07a61e6432c6d513</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Blood transfusion</topic><topic>Comparative studies</topic><topic>Complications</topic><topic>Demographics</topic><topic>Embolism</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Femoral Neoplasms - complications</topic><topic>Femoral Neoplasms - secondary</topic><topic>Femoral Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Femur</topic><topic>Fixation</topic><topic>Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary - adverse effects</topic><topic>Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary - methods</topic><topic>Health risk assessment</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lesions</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Metastases</topic><topic>Metastasis</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Nailing</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications</topic><topic>Prophylactic Surgical Procedures - methods</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Thromboembolism</topic><topic>Thromboembolism - etiology</topic><topic>Thrombosis</topic><topic>Transfusion</topic><topic>Urinary tract</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Aneja, Arun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiang, Jimmy J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cohen-Rosenblum, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luu, Hue L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peabody, Terrance D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Attar, Samer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luo, T. David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haydon, Rex C.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Aneja, Arun</au><au>Jiang, Jimmy J.</au><au>Cohen-Rosenblum, Anna</au><au>Luu, Hue L.</au><au>Peabody, Terrance D.</au><au>Attar, Samer</au><au>Luo, T. David</au><au>Haydon, Rex C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Thromboembolic Disease in Patients with Metastatic Femoral Lesions: A Comparison Between Prophylactic Fixation and Fracture Fixation</atitle><jtitle>Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume</jtitle><addtitle>J Bone Joint Surg Am</addtitle><date>2017-02-15</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>99</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>315</spage><epage>323</epage><pages>315-323</pages><issn>0021-9355</issn><eissn>1535-1386</eissn><abstract>We are not aware of any previous studies that have compared the rate of venous thromboembolic events in patients who underwent prophylactic intramedullary nailing because of an impending fracture with the rate in patients who underwent intramedullary nailing after a pathological fracture. The objective of the present study was to determine if the rate of venous thromboembolic events varies between patients who are managed with prophylactic fixation and those who are managed with fixation after a pathological fracture.
We performed a retrospective comparative study in which the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database was used to identify all patients who had undergone femoral stabilization, either for a pathological femoral fracture or for prophylactic fixation of femoral metastatic lesion, over a period of 10 consecutive years (between 2002 and 2011) in the United States. Demographic data, comorbidities, venous thromboembolic event rates, and other common postoperative complications were compared between the 2 groups.
Patients who were managed with prophylactic fixation had significantly higher rates of pulmonary embolism (p < 0.001; adjusted odds ratio, 2.1) and deep-vein thrombosis (p = 0.03; adjusted odds ratio, 1.5). Patients who were managed with fixation after a pathological fracture had a significantly greater need for blood transfusion, higher rates of postoperative urinary tract infection, and a decreased likelihood of being discharged to home (p < 0.001 for all).
Patients with metastatic disease who undergo prophylactic intramedullary nailing have higher observed rates of venous thromboembolic events than those who undergo nailing for the treatment of a pathological fracture and should be actively and vigilantly managed in the postoperative period.
Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc</pub><pmid>28196033</pmid><doi>10.2106/JBJS.16.00023</doi><tpages>9</tpages><edition>American volume</edition></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0021-9355 |
ispartof | Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume, 2017-02, Vol.99 (4), p.315-323 |
issn | 0021-9355 1535-1386 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1888973177 |
source | HEAL-Link subscriptions: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
subjects | Aged Aged, 80 and over Blood transfusion Comparative studies Complications Demographics Embolism Female Femoral Neoplasms - complications Femoral Neoplasms - secondary Femoral Neoplasms - surgery Femur Fixation Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary - adverse effects Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary - methods Health risk assessment Humans Lesions Male Metastases Metastasis Middle Aged Nailing Patients Postoperative Complications Prophylactic Surgical Procedures - methods Retrospective Studies Thromboembolism Thromboembolism - etiology Thrombosis Transfusion Urinary tract |
title | Thromboembolic Disease in Patients with Metastatic Femoral Lesions: A Comparison Between Prophylactic Fixation and Fracture Fixation |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T23%3A38%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Thromboembolic%20Disease%20in%20Patients%20with%20Metastatic%20Femoral%20Lesions:%20A%20Comparison%20Between%20Prophylactic%20Fixation%20and%20Fracture%20Fixation&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20bone%20and%20joint%20surgery.%20American%20volume&rft.au=Aneja,%20Arun&rft.date=2017-02-15&rft.volume=99&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=315&rft.epage=323&rft.pages=315-323&rft.issn=0021-9355&rft.eissn=1535-1386&rft_id=info:doi/10.2106/JBJS.16.00023&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1888973177%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3995-f7f0f1e493233fce836596cad3f84f7e3ad409cb6d9aa415d07a61e6432c6d513%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2006875505&rft_id=info:pmid/28196033&rfr_iscdi=true |