Loading…

The posterolateral mid-forearm perforator flap: Anatomical study and clinical application

Background Defects sustained at the distal forearm are common and pedicled perforator flaps have unique advantages in resurfacing it. The purpose of this study is to reappraise the anatomy of the perforator in the posterolateral aspect of the mid‐forearm and present our clinical experience on using...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Microsurgery 2013-11, Vol.33 (8), p.638-645
Main Authors: Zhuang, Yue-Hong, Lin, Jian, Fu, Fei-Huan, Cai, Zhen-De, Huang, Hui-Mei, Zheng, He-Ping
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background Defects sustained at the distal forearm are common and pedicled perforator flaps have unique advantages in resurfacing it. The purpose of this study is to reappraise the anatomy of the perforator in the posterolateral aspect of the mid‐forearm and present our clinical experience on using perforator flaps based on it for reconstruction of defects in the distal forearm. Methods: This study was divided into anatomical study and clinical application. In the anatomical study, 30 preserved upper limbs were used. Clinically, 11 patients with defects at the forearm underwent reconstruction with the posterolateral mid‐forearm perforator flaps. The defects, ranging from 4.5 × 2.5 cm to 10.5 × 4.5 cm, were located at the dorsal aspect of the distal forearm in 6 cases and at the volar aspect of the distal forearm in 5 cases. Results Three patterns of the perforator were observed in the posterolateral aspect of the mid‐forearm, which originated from the posterior interosseous artery, the proximal segment of the radial artery or the radial recurrent artery, and the middle segment of the radial artery, respectively. The perforator was located 11.8 ± 0.2 cm to 15.8 ± 0.4 cm inferior to the lateral humeral epicondyle. Clinically, flaps in 8 cases survived uneventfully, while the other 3 cases suffered mild marginal epidermal necrosis, which was cured with continuous dress changing. Conclusion The location of the perforator at the posterolateral aspect of the mid‐forearm is consistent; the posterolateral mid‐forearm perforator flap is particularly suitable to cover defects in the distal one‐third of the forearm. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Microsurgery 33:638–645, 2013.
ISSN:0738-1085
1098-2752
DOI:10.1002/micr.22175