Loading…
The posterolateral mid-forearm perforator flap: Anatomical study and clinical application
Background Defects sustained at the distal forearm are common and pedicled perforator flaps have unique advantages in resurfacing it. The purpose of this study is to reappraise the anatomy of the perforator in the posterolateral aspect of the mid‐forearm and present our clinical experience on using...
Saved in:
Published in: | Microsurgery 2013-11, Vol.33 (8), p.638-645 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Background
Defects sustained at the distal forearm are common and pedicled perforator flaps have unique advantages in resurfacing it. The purpose of this study is to reappraise the anatomy of the perforator in the posterolateral aspect of the mid‐forearm and present our clinical experience on using perforator flaps based on it for reconstruction of defects in the distal forearm. Methods: This study was divided into anatomical study and clinical application. In the anatomical study, 30 preserved upper limbs were used. Clinically, 11 patients with defects at the forearm underwent reconstruction with the posterolateral mid‐forearm perforator flaps. The defects, ranging from 4.5 × 2.5 cm to 10.5 × 4.5 cm, were located at the dorsal aspect of the distal forearm in 6 cases and at the volar aspect of the distal forearm in 5 cases.
Results
Three patterns of the perforator were observed in the posterolateral aspect of the mid‐forearm, which originated from the posterior interosseous artery, the proximal segment of the radial artery or the radial recurrent artery, and the middle segment of the radial artery, respectively. The perforator was located 11.8 ± 0.2 cm to 15.8 ± 0.4 cm inferior to the lateral humeral epicondyle. Clinically, flaps in 8 cases survived uneventfully, while the other 3 cases suffered mild marginal epidermal necrosis, which was cured with continuous dress changing.
Conclusion
The location of the perforator at the posterolateral aspect of the mid‐forearm is consistent; the posterolateral mid‐forearm perforator flap is particularly suitable to cover defects in the distal one‐third of the forearm. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Microsurgery 33:638–645, 2013. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0738-1085 1098-2752 |
DOI: | 10.1002/micr.22175 |