Loading…

A comparison of lidar and echosounder measurements of fish schools in the Gulf of Mexico

In December 2000 the US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's Fish Lidar (Light Detection And Ranging) system was operated from an airplane off the west coast of Florida. Schools of fish were located and their volume-backscattering coefficients, rβ(π), measured at the lidar waveleng...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:ICES journal of marine science 2003-02, Vol.60 (1), p.147-154
Main Authors: Churnside, James H., Demer, David A., Mahmoudi, Behzad
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-c306c207f8ce85ffcc939cce9e7e999c2073c02ae9cd825b024c8c00d5eca79b3
cites
container_end_page 154
container_issue 1
container_start_page 147
container_title ICES journal of marine science
container_volume 60
creator Churnside, James H.
Demer, David A.
Mahmoudi, Behzad
description In December 2000 the US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's Fish Lidar (Light Detection And Ranging) system was operated from an airplane off the west coast of Florida. Schools of fish were located and their volume-backscattering coefficients, rβ(π), measured at the lidar wavelength of 532 nm. Concurrently, a 208 kHz echosounder was deployed from a small boat to measure the acoustic volume-backscattering coefficients, sv, of the same schools. Seven schools were characterized with both the lidar and the echosounder. The correlation between these seven pairs of rβ(π) and sv measurements was 0.994. A linear regression of rβ(π) versus sv had a negative y-intercept, which supports aerial observations of some degree of avoidance reaction of fish to the passing survey boat. The slope was slightly greater than unity, in agreement with previous calculations that the acoustic backscatter of similar fish is slightly greater than the lidar backscatter. The results of this study indicate that lidar is a suitable tool for surveying rapidly the distributions and abundances of epipelagic fish stocks in the shallow waters off the west coast of Florida. Aerial lidar surveys do not have the biases of fish-avoidance reaction potentially affecting acoustic and trawl surveys.
doi_str_mv 10.1006/jmsc.2002.1327
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18921741</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1006/jmsc.2002.1327</oup_id><sourcerecordid>18921741</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-c306c207f8ce85ffcc939cce9e7e999c2073c02ae9cd825b024c8c00d5eca79b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEFLw0AQRoMoWKtXz3sSPKTO7iZN9liLtUKLF0XxsqyTCU1NsnUnAf33NlS8epkZ-N43hxdFlxImEmB6s20YJwpATaRW2VE0kmDS2KjcHA93msRaanManTFvASBLpjCKXmcCfbNzoWLfCl-KuipcEK4tBOHGs-_bgoJoyHEfqKG244EqK94I3gO-ZlG1otuQuO_rcsjW9FWhP49OSlczXfzucfS8uHuaL-PV4_3DfLaKUSfQ7SdMUUFW5kh5WpaIRhtEMpSRMWaINIJyZLDIVfoOKsEcAYqU0GXmXY-jq8PfXfCfPXFnm4qR6tq15Hu2MjdKZoncg5MDiMEzByrtLlSNC99Wgh0E2kGgHQTaQeC-cH0o-H73Pxsf2Io7-vqjXfiw00xnqV2-vtmFzo25fVnbtf4BVBGBSg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>18921741</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A comparison of lidar and echosounder measurements of fish schools in the Gulf of Mexico</title><source>Oxford Journals Open Access Collection</source><creator>Churnside, James H. ; Demer, David A. ; Mahmoudi, Behzad</creator><creatorcontrib>Churnside, James H. ; Demer, David A. ; Mahmoudi, Behzad</creatorcontrib><description>In December 2000 the US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's Fish Lidar (Light Detection And Ranging) system was operated from an airplane off the west coast of Florida. Schools of fish were located and their volume-backscattering coefficients, rβ(π), measured at the lidar wavelength of 532 nm. Concurrently, a 208 kHz echosounder was deployed from a small boat to measure the acoustic volume-backscattering coefficients, sv, of the same schools. Seven schools were characterized with both the lidar and the echosounder. The correlation between these seven pairs of rβ(π) and sv measurements was 0.994. A linear regression of rβ(π) versus sv had a negative y-intercept, which supports aerial observations of some degree of avoidance reaction of fish to the passing survey boat. The slope was slightly greater than unity, in agreement with previous calculations that the acoustic backscatter of similar fish is slightly greater than the lidar backscatter. The results of this study indicate that lidar is a suitable tool for surveying rapidly the distributions and abundances of epipelagic fish stocks in the shallow waters off the west coast of Florida. Aerial lidar surveys do not have the biases of fish-avoidance reaction potentially affecting acoustic and trawl surveys.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1054-3139</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-9289</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1006/jmsc.2002.1327</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>echosounder ; fish ; lidar ; Marine ; survey ; volume backscatter coefficient</subject><ispartof>ICES journal of marine science, 2003-02, Vol.60 (1), p.147-154</ispartof><rights>2003 International Council for the Exploration of the Sea 2003</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-c306c207f8ce85ffcc939cce9e7e999c2073c02ae9cd825b024c8c00d5eca79b3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Churnside, James H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Demer, David A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahmoudi, Behzad</creatorcontrib><title>A comparison of lidar and echosounder measurements of fish schools in the Gulf of Mexico</title><title>ICES journal of marine science</title><description>In December 2000 the US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's Fish Lidar (Light Detection And Ranging) system was operated from an airplane off the west coast of Florida. Schools of fish were located and their volume-backscattering coefficients, rβ(π), measured at the lidar wavelength of 532 nm. Concurrently, a 208 kHz echosounder was deployed from a small boat to measure the acoustic volume-backscattering coefficients, sv, of the same schools. Seven schools were characterized with both the lidar and the echosounder. The correlation between these seven pairs of rβ(π) and sv measurements was 0.994. A linear regression of rβ(π) versus sv had a negative y-intercept, which supports aerial observations of some degree of avoidance reaction of fish to the passing survey boat. The slope was slightly greater than unity, in agreement with previous calculations that the acoustic backscatter of similar fish is slightly greater than the lidar backscatter. The results of this study indicate that lidar is a suitable tool for surveying rapidly the distributions and abundances of epipelagic fish stocks in the shallow waters off the west coast of Florida. Aerial lidar surveys do not have the biases of fish-avoidance reaction potentially affecting acoustic and trawl surveys.</description><subject>echosounder</subject><subject>fish</subject><subject>lidar</subject><subject>Marine</subject><subject>survey</subject><subject>volume backscatter coefficient</subject><issn>1054-3139</issn><issn>1095-9289</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkEFLw0AQRoMoWKtXz3sSPKTO7iZN9liLtUKLF0XxsqyTCU1NsnUnAf33NlS8epkZ-N43hxdFlxImEmB6s20YJwpATaRW2VE0kmDS2KjcHA93msRaanManTFvASBLpjCKXmcCfbNzoWLfCl-KuipcEK4tBOHGs-_bgoJoyHEfqKG244EqK94I3gO-ZlG1otuQuO_rcsjW9FWhP49OSlczXfzucfS8uHuaL-PV4_3DfLaKUSfQ7SdMUUFW5kh5WpaIRhtEMpSRMWaINIJyZLDIVfoOKsEcAYqU0GXmXY-jq8PfXfCfPXFnm4qR6tq15Hu2MjdKZoncg5MDiMEzByrtLlSNC99Wgh0E2kGgHQTaQeC-cH0o-H73Pxsf2Io7-vqjXfiw00xnqV2-vtmFzo25fVnbtf4BVBGBSg</recordid><startdate>20030201</startdate><enddate>20030201</enddate><creator>Churnside, James H.</creator><creator>Demer, David A.</creator><creator>Mahmoudi, Behzad</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20030201</creationdate><title>A comparison of lidar and echosounder measurements of fish schools in the Gulf of Mexico</title><author>Churnside, James H. ; Demer, David A. ; Mahmoudi, Behzad</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-c306c207f8ce85ffcc939cce9e7e999c2073c02ae9cd825b024c8c00d5eca79b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>echosounder</topic><topic>fish</topic><topic>lidar</topic><topic>Marine</topic><topic>survey</topic><topic>volume backscatter coefficient</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Churnside, James H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Demer, David A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahmoudi, Behzad</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>ICES journal of marine science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Churnside, James H.</au><au>Demer, David A.</au><au>Mahmoudi, Behzad</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A comparison of lidar and echosounder measurements of fish schools in the Gulf of Mexico</atitle><jtitle>ICES journal of marine science</jtitle><date>2003-02-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>60</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>147</spage><epage>154</epage><pages>147-154</pages><issn>1054-3139</issn><eissn>1095-9289</eissn><abstract>In December 2000 the US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's Fish Lidar (Light Detection And Ranging) system was operated from an airplane off the west coast of Florida. Schools of fish were located and their volume-backscattering coefficients, rβ(π), measured at the lidar wavelength of 532 nm. Concurrently, a 208 kHz echosounder was deployed from a small boat to measure the acoustic volume-backscattering coefficients, sv, of the same schools. Seven schools were characterized with both the lidar and the echosounder. The correlation between these seven pairs of rβ(π) and sv measurements was 0.994. A linear regression of rβ(π) versus sv had a negative y-intercept, which supports aerial observations of some degree of avoidance reaction of fish to the passing survey boat. The slope was slightly greater than unity, in agreement with previous calculations that the acoustic backscatter of similar fish is slightly greater than the lidar backscatter. The results of this study indicate that lidar is a suitable tool for surveying rapidly the distributions and abundances of epipelagic fish stocks in the shallow waters off the west coast of Florida. Aerial lidar surveys do not have the biases of fish-avoidance reaction potentially affecting acoustic and trawl surveys.</abstract><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1006/jmsc.2002.1327</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1054-3139
ispartof ICES journal of marine science, 2003-02, Vol.60 (1), p.147-154
issn 1054-3139
1095-9289
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18921741
source Oxford Journals Open Access Collection
subjects echosounder
fish
lidar
Marine
survey
volume backscatter coefficient
title A comparison of lidar and echosounder measurements of fish schools in the Gulf of Mexico
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T10%3A16%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20comparison%20of%20lidar%20and%20echosounder%20measurements%20of%20fish%20schools%20in%20the%20Gulf%20of%20Mexico&rft.jtitle=ICES%20journal%20of%20marine%20science&rft.au=Churnside,%20James%20H.&rft.date=2003-02-01&rft.volume=60&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=147&rft.epage=154&rft.pages=147-154&rft.issn=1054-3139&rft.eissn=1095-9289&rft_id=info:doi/10.1006/jmsc.2002.1327&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E18921741%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-c306c207f8ce85ffcc939cce9e7e999c2073c02ae9cd825b024c8c00d5eca79b3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=18921741&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_oup_id=10.1006/jmsc.2002.1327&rfr_iscdi=true