Loading…

Example-based illustrations of design, conduct, analysis and result interpretation of multi-regional clinical trials

Abstract Extensive research has been conducted in the Multi-Regional Clinical Trial (MRCT) area. To effectively apply an appropriate approach to a MRCT, we need to synthesize and understand the features of different approaches. In this paper, examples are used to illustrate considerations regarding...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Contemporary clinical trials 2017-07, Vol.58, p.13-22
Main Authors: Quan, Hui, Mao, Xuezhou, Tanaka, Yoko, Binkowitz, Bruce, Li, Gang, Chen, Josh, Zhang, Ji, Zhao, Peng-Liang, Ouyang, Soo Peter, Chang, Mark
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-f991dbd5ef39e413ea612cc1dd1fe4098f07a4fa42f9f5a83a907f7b52f73d103
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-f991dbd5ef39e413ea612cc1dd1fe4098f07a4fa42f9f5a83a907f7b52f73d103
container_end_page 22
container_issue
container_start_page 13
container_title Contemporary clinical trials
container_volume 58
creator Quan, Hui
Mao, Xuezhou
Tanaka, Yoko
Binkowitz, Bruce
Li, Gang
Chen, Josh
Zhang, Ji
Zhao, Peng-Liang
Ouyang, Soo Peter
Chang, Mark
description Abstract Extensive research has been conducted in the Multi-Regional Clinical Trial (MRCT) area. To effectively apply an appropriate approach to a MRCT, we need to synthesize and understand the features of different approaches. In this paper, examples are used to illustrate considerations regarding design, conduct, analysis and interpretation of result of MRCTs. We start with a brief discussion of region definitions and the scenarios where different regions have differing requirements for a MRCT. We then compare different designs and models as well as the corresponding interpretation of the results. We highlight the importance of paying special attention to trial monitoring and conduct to prevent potential issues associated with the final trial results. Besides evaluating the overall treatment effect for the entire MRCT, we also consider other key analyses including quantification of regional treatment effects within a MRCT, and assessment of consistency of these regional treatment effects.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.cct.2017.04.009
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1893549679</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S1551714417300599</els_id><sourcerecordid>1893549679</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-f991dbd5ef39e413ea612cc1dd1fe4098f07a4fa42f9f5a83a907f7b52f73d103</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU9v1DAQxS1ERUvhA3BBOXJowji247WQkFBV_kiVegDOltceV16cZLEd1P32dbotBw6c5tl670nzG0LeUOgo0OH9rrO2dD1Q2QHvANQzckaFUG0PDJ4_aNpKyvkpeZnzDoANYhAvyGm_4UL0jJ2RcnVnxn3EdmsyuibEuOSSTAnzlJvZNw5zuJ0uGjtPbrHlojGTiYccchWuSZiXWJowFUz7hOUht8bG-h3ahLf1bWJjY5iCraKkYGJ-RU58Hfj6cZ6Tn5-vflx-ba9vvny7_HTdWi55ab1S1G2dQM8UcsrQDLS3ljpHPXJQGw_ScG9475UXZsOMAunlVvReMkeBnZN3x959mn8vmIseQ7YYo5lwXrKmG8UEV4NU1UqPVpvmnBN6vU9hNOmgKegVtt7pCluvsDVwXWHXzNvH-mU7ovubeKJbDR-OBqxL_gmYdLYBJ4suJKxlbg7_rf_4T_oJ4y88YN7NS6ps6xY69xr09_Xa67GpZABCKXYPFFynDA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1893549679</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Example-based illustrations of design, conduct, analysis and result interpretation of multi-regional clinical trials</title><source>Elsevier</source><creator>Quan, Hui ; Mao, Xuezhou ; Tanaka, Yoko ; Binkowitz, Bruce ; Li, Gang ; Chen, Josh ; Zhang, Ji ; Zhao, Peng-Liang ; Ouyang, Soo Peter ; Chang, Mark</creator><creatorcontrib>Quan, Hui ; Mao, Xuezhou ; Tanaka, Yoko ; Binkowitz, Bruce ; Li, Gang ; Chen, Josh ; Zhang, Ji ; Zhao, Peng-Liang ; Ouyang, Soo Peter ; Chang, Mark</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Extensive research has been conducted in the Multi-Regional Clinical Trial (MRCT) area. To effectively apply an appropriate approach to a MRCT, we need to synthesize and understand the features of different approaches. In this paper, examples are used to illustrate considerations regarding design, conduct, analysis and interpretation of result of MRCTs. We start with a brief discussion of region definitions and the scenarios where different regions have differing requirements for a MRCT. We then compare different designs and models as well as the corresponding interpretation of the results. We highlight the importance of paying special attention to trial monitoring and conduct to prevent potential issues associated with the final trial results. Besides evaluating the overall treatment effect for the entire MRCT, we also consider other key analyses including quantification of regional treatment effects within a MRCT, and assessment of consistency of these regional treatment effects.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1551-7144</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1559-2030</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2017.04.009</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28455233</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Between-region variability ; Cardiovascular ; Clinical Studies as Topic - methods ; Clinical Studies as Topic - standards ; Consistency of treatment effects ; Continental Population Groups ; Equivalence Trials as Topic ; Fixed and random effects models ; Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine ; Humans ; Models, Statistical ; Multicenter Studies as Topic - methods ; Multicenter Studies as Topic - standards ; Practice Patterns, Physicians ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic - methods ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic - standards ; Reproducibility of Results ; Residence Characteristics - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Sample size ; Shrinkage estimate ; Time Factors</subject><ispartof>Contemporary clinical trials, 2017-07, Vol.58, p.13-22</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2017 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-f991dbd5ef39e413ea612cc1dd1fe4098f07a4fa42f9f5a83a907f7b52f73d103</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-f991dbd5ef39e413ea612cc1dd1fe4098f07a4fa42f9f5a83a907f7b52f73d103</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28455233$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Quan, Hui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mao, Xuezhou</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tanaka, Yoko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Binkowitz, Bruce</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Gang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Josh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Ji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Peng-Liang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ouyang, Soo Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, Mark</creatorcontrib><title>Example-based illustrations of design, conduct, analysis and result interpretation of multi-regional clinical trials</title><title>Contemporary clinical trials</title><addtitle>Contemp Clin Trials</addtitle><description>Abstract Extensive research has been conducted in the Multi-Regional Clinical Trial (MRCT) area. To effectively apply an appropriate approach to a MRCT, we need to synthesize and understand the features of different approaches. In this paper, examples are used to illustrate considerations regarding design, conduct, analysis and interpretation of result of MRCTs. We start with a brief discussion of region definitions and the scenarios where different regions have differing requirements for a MRCT. We then compare different designs and models as well as the corresponding interpretation of the results. We highlight the importance of paying special attention to trial monitoring and conduct to prevent potential issues associated with the final trial results. Besides evaluating the overall treatment effect for the entire MRCT, we also consider other key analyses including quantification of regional treatment effects within a MRCT, and assessment of consistency of these regional treatment effects.</description><subject>Between-region variability</subject><subject>Cardiovascular</subject><subject>Clinical Studies as Topic - methods</subject><subject>Clinical Studies as Topic - standards</subject><subject>Consistency of treatment effects</subject><subject>Continental Population Groups</subject><subject>Equivalence Trials as Topic</subject><subject>Fixed and random effects models</subject><subject>Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Models, Statistical</subject><subject>Multicenter Studies as Topic - methods</subject><subject>Multicenter Studies as Topic - standards</subject><subject>Practice Patterns, Physicians</subject><subject>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic - methods</subject><subject>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic - standards</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Residence Characteristics - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Sample size</subject><subject>Shrinkage estimate</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><issn>1551-7144</issn><issn>1559-2030</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kU9v1DAQxS1ERUvhA3BBOXJowji247WQkFBV_kiVegDOltceV16cZLEd1P32dbotBw6c5tl670nzG0LeUOgo0OH9rrO2dD1Q2QHvANQzckaFUG0PDJ4_aNpKyvkpeZnzDoANYhAvyGm_4UL0jJ2RcnVnxn3EdmsyuibEuOSSTAnzlJvZNw5zuJ0uGjtPbrHlojGTiYccchWuSZiXWJowFUz7hOUht8bG-h3ahLf1bWJjY5iCraKkYGJ-RU58Hfj6cZ6Tn5-vflx-ba9vvny7_HTdWi55ab1S1G2dQM8UcsrQDLS3ljpHPXJQGw_ScG9475UXZsOMAunlVvReMkeBnZN3x959mn8vmIseQ7YYo5lwXrKmG8UEV4NU1UqPVpvmnBN6vU9hNOmgKegVtt7pCluvsDVwXWHXzNvH-mU7ovubeKJbDR-OBqxL_gmYdLYBJ4suJKxlbg7_rf_4T_oJ4y88YN7NS6ps6xY69xr09_Xa67GpZABCKXYPFFynDA</recordid><startdate>20170701</startdate><enddate>20170701</enddate><creator>Quan, Hui</creator><creator>Mao, Xuezhou</creator><creator>Tanaka, Yoko</creator><creator>Binkowitz, Bruce</creator><creator>Li, Gang</creator><creator>Chen, Josh</creator><creator>Zhang, Ji</creator><creator>Zhao, Peng-Liang</creator><creator>Ouyang, Soo Peter</creator><creator>Chang, Mark</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170701</creationdate><title>Example-based illustrations of design, conduct, analysis and result interpretation of multi-regional clinical trials</title><author>Quan, Hui ; Mao, Xuezhou ; Tanaka, Yoko ; Binkowitz, Bruce ; Li, Gang ; Chen, Josh ; Zhang, Ji ; Zhao, Peng-Liang ; Ouyang, Soo Peter ; Chang, Mark</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-f991dbd5ef39e413ea612cc1dd1fe4098f07a4fa42f9f5a83a907f7b52f73d103</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Between-region variability</topic><topic>Cardiovascular</topic><topic>Clinical Studies as Topic - methods</topic><topic>Clinical Studies as Topic - standards</topic><topic>Consistency of treatment effects</topic><topic>Continental Population Groups</topic><topic>Equivalence Trials as Topic</topic><topic>Fixed and random effects models</topic><topic>Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Models, Statistical</topic><topic>Multicenter Studies as Topic - methods</topic><topic>Multicenter Studies as Topic - standards</topic><topic>Practice Patterns, Physicians</topic><topic>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic - methods</topic><topic>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic - standards</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Residence Characteristics - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Sample size</topic><topic>Shrinkage estimate</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Quan, Hui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mao, Xuezhou</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tanaka, Yoko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Binkowitz, Bruce</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Gang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Josh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Ji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Peng-Liang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ouyang, Soo Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, Mark</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Contemporary clinical trials</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Quan, Hui</au><au>Mao, Xuezhou</au><au>Tanaka, Yoko</au><au>Binkowitz, Bruce</au><au>Li, Gang</au><au>Chen, Josh</au><au>Zhang, Ji</au><au>Zhao, Peng-Liang</au><au>Ouyang, Soo Peter</au><au>Chang, Mark</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Example-based illustrations of design, conduct, analysis and result interpretation of multi-regional clinical trials</atitle><jtitle>Contemporary clinical trials</jtitle><addtitle>Contemp Clin Trials</addtitle><date>2017-07-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>58</volume><spage>13</spage><epage>22</epage><pages>13-22</pages><issn>1551-7144</issn><eissn>1559-2030</eissn><abstract>Abstract Extensive research has been conducted in the Multi-Regional Clinical Trial (MRCT) area. To effectively apply an appropriate approach to a MRCT, we need to synthesize and understand the features of different approaches. In this paper, examples are used to illustrate considerations regarding design, conduct, analysis and interpretation of result of MRCTs. We start with a brief discussion of region definitions and the scenarios where different regions have differing requirements for a MRCT. We then compare different designs and models as well as the corresponding interpretation of the results. We highlight the importance of paying special attention to trial monitoring and conduct to prevent potential issues associated with the final trial results. Besides evaluating the overall treatment effect for the entire MRCT, we also consider other key analyses including quantification of regional treatment effects within a MRCT, and assessment of consistency of these regional treatment effects.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>28455233</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.cct.2017.04.009</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1551-7144
ispartof Contemporary clinical trials, 2017-07, Vol.58, p.13-22
issn 1551-7144
1559-2030
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1893549679
source Elsevier
subjects Between-region variability
Cardiovascular
Clinical Studies as Topic - methods
Clinical Studies as Topic - standards
Consistency of treatment effects
Continental Population Groups
Equivalence Trials as Topic
Fixed and random effects models
Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine
Humans
Models, Statistical
Multicenter Studies as Topic - methods
Multicenter Studies as Topic - standards
Practice Patterns, Physicians
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic - methods
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic - standards
Reproducibility of Results
Residence Characteristics - statistics & numerical data
Sample size
Shrinkage estimate
Time Factors
title Example-based illustrations of design, conduct, analysis and result interpretation of multi-regional clinical trials
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T21%3A26%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Example-based%20illustrations%20of%20design,%20conduct,%20analysis%20and%20result%20interpretation%20of%20multi-regional%20clinical%20trials&rft.jtitle=Contemporary%20clinical%20trials&rft.au=Quan,%20Hui&rft.date=2017-07-01&rft.volume=58&rft.spage=13&rft.epage=22&rft.pages=13-22&rft.issn=1551-7144&rft.eissn=1559-2030&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.cct.2017.04.009&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1893549679%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-f991dbd5ef39e413ea612cc1dd1fe4098f07a4fa42f9f5a83a907f7b52f73d103%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1893549679&rft_id=info:pmid/28455233&rfr_iscdi=true