Loading…
Incorporating Prerecorded Environmental Lifecycle Assessment Modules in a Classroom Setting
AbstractAddition of sustainability-related material is becoming a point of emphasis in engineering education. Freely available modular lessons are one way to quickly effect this incorporation. This research examines the effectiveness of a class format using short prerecorded software modules on life...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of professional issues in engineering education and practice 2017-04, Vol.143 (2) |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a436t-c3601b4c0ef9308f9bf7324868cb68dee5732d2a15bbfdf61f0ec7a4ec6144673 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a436t-c3601b4c0ef9308f9bf7324868cb68dee5732d2a15bbfdf61f0ec7a4ec6144673 |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | Journal of professional issues in engineering education and practice |
container_volume | 143 |
creator | Haselbach, Liv Langfitt, Quinn |
description | AbstractAddition of sustainability-related material is becoming a point of emphasis in engineering education. Freely available modular lessons are one way to quickly effect this incorporation. This research examines the effectiveness of a class format using short prerecorded software modules on lifecycle assessment (LCA) in the classroom setting with associated discussion, primarily drawing from student perspectives in a graduate-level LCA course at Washington State University. Survey results indicated that students generally agreed that the in-class module-discussion format was an effective teaching method. Advantages included that the format was organized and complete, but still concise, allowed for review of material outside of class, and that discussion components furthered understanding and stimulated further thought about the concepts. Key disadvantages included that the modules can get boring, were sometimes too fast-paced, and that questions usually were held until the end of the presentation. Students were happy with the length of modules (about 20 min each), but many expressed a desire for additional discussion time. Recommendations for future versions of the course include taking additional breaks during modules for discussion, encouraging students to ask questions at any time, and suggesting that some students print slides to stay engaged with note taking. In the future it is anticipated that these types of narrated modules will make it easier for other instructors to provide more sustainability education in their classrooms. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000299 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1893914953</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1893914953</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a436t-c3601b4c0ef9308f9bf7324868cb68dee5732d2a15bbfdf61f0ec7a4ec6144673</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMFLwzAYxYsoOKf_Q_A0D51Jk2aNt1GqFiYK05OHkKZfpKNtZtIK--9NmexmLl_yeO-R7xdFtwQvCebkfrHe5sVdUS6JYDROU0aWOJxEiLNodtLOwx2nSUxFkl1GV97vJk9K8Sz6LHtt3d46NTT9F3pz4CAINdSo6H8aZ_sO-kG1aNMY0AfdAlp7D95PMnqx9diCR02PFMpb5b2ztkNbGKa26-jCqNbDzd-cRx-PxXv-HG9en8p8vYkVo3yINeWYVExjMILizIjKrGjCMp7pimc1QBqedaJIWlWmNpwYDHqlGGhOGOMrOo8Wx969s98j-EF2jdfQtqoHO3pJMkEFYSKlwfpwtGpnw2fByL1rOuUOkmA5EZVyIiqLUk705ERP_hENYX4Mq9Aud3Z0fVjrlPw_-AuzunwP</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1893914953</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Incorporating Prerecorded Environmental Lifecycle Assessment Modules in a Classroom Setting</title><source>ASCE library</source><creator>Haselbach, Liv ; Langfitt, Quinn</creator><creatorcontrib>Haselbach, Liv ; Langfitt, Quinn</creatorcontrib><description>AbstractAddition of sustainability-related material is becoming a point of emphasis in engineering education. Freely available modular lessons are one way to quickly effect this incorporation. This research examines the effectiveness of a class format using short prerecorded software modules on lifecycle assessment (LCA) in the classroom setting with associated discussion, primarily drawing from student perspectives in a graduate-level LCA course at Washington State University. Survey results indicated that students generally agreed that the in-class module-discussion format was an effective teaching method. Advantages included that the format was organized and complete, but still concise, allowed for review of material outside of class, and that discussion components furthered understanding and stimulated further thought about the concepts. Key disadvantages included that the modules can get boring, were sometimes too fast-paced, and that questions usually were held until the end of the presentation. Students were happy with the length of modules (about 20 min each), but many expressed a desire for additional discussion time. Recommendations for future versions of the course include taking additional breaks during modules for discussion, encouraging students to ask questions at any time, and suggesting that some students print slides to stay engaged with note taking. In the future it is anticipated that these types of narrated modules will make it easier for other instructors to provide more sustainability education in their classrooms.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1052-3928</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-5541</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000299</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>American Society of Civil Engineers</publisher><subject>Assessments ; Case Studies ; Case Study ; Classrooms ; Engineering education ; Format ; Life cycle assessment ; Modules ; Students ; Sustainability</subject><ispartof>Journal of professional issues in engineering education and practice, 2017-04, Vol.143 (2)</ispartof><rights>This work is made available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license, .</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a436t-c3601b4c0ef9308f9bf7324868cb68dee5732d2a15bbfdf61f0ec7a4ec6144673</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a436t-c3601b4c0ef9308f9bf7324868cb68dee5732d2a15bbfdf61f0ec7a4ec6144673</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttp://ascelibrary.org/doi/pdf/10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000299$$EPDF$$P50$$Gasce$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://ascelibrary.org/doi/abs/10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000299$$EHTML$$P50$$Gasce$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3252,10068,27924,27925,76191,76199</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Haselbach, Liv</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Langfitt, Quinn</creatorcontrib><title>Incorporating Prerecorded Environmental Lifecycle Assessment Modules in a Classroom Setting</title><title>Journal of professional issues in engineering education and practice</title><description>AbstractAddition of sustainability-related material is becoming a point of emphasis in engineering education. Freely available modular lessons are one way to quickly effect this incorporation. This research examines the effectiveness of a class format using short prerecorded software modules on lifecycle assessment (LCA) in the classroom setting with associated discussion, primarily drawing from student perspectives in a graduate-level LCA course at Washington State University. Survey results indicated that students generally agreed that the in-class module-discussion format was an effective teaching method. Advantages included that the format was organized and complete, but still concise, allowed for review of material outside of class, and that discussion components furthered understanding and stimulated further thought about the concepts. Key disadvantages included that the modules can get boring, were sometimes too fast-paced, and that questions usually were held until the end of the presentation. Students were happy with the length of modules (about 20 min each), but many expressed a desire for additional discussion time. Recommendations for future versions of the course include taking additional breaks during modules for discussion, encouraging students to ask questions at any time, and suggesting that some students print slides to stay engaged with note taking. In the future it is anticipated that these types of narrated modules will make it easier for other instructors to provide more sustainability education in their classrooms.</description><subject>Assessments</subject><subject>Case Studies</subject><subject>Case Study</subject><subject>Classrooms</subject><subject>Engineering education</subject><subject>Format</subject><subject>Life cycle assessment</subject><subject>Modules</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><issn>1052-3928</issn><issn>1943-5541</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kMFLwzAYxYsoOKf_Q_A0D51Jk2aNt1GqFiYK05OHkKZfpKNtZtIK--9NmexmLl_yeO-R7xdFtwQvCebkfrHe5sVdUS6JYDROU0aWOJxEiLNodtLOwx2nSUxFkl1GV97vJk9K8Sz6LHtt3d46NTT9F3pz4CAINdSo6H8aZ_sO-kG1aNMY0AfdAlp7D95PMnqx9diCR02PFMpb5b2ztkNbGKa26-jCqNbDzd-cRx-PxXv-HG9en8p8vYkVo3yINeWYVExjMILizIjKrGjCMp7pimc1QBqedaJIWlWmNpwYDHqlGGhOGOMrOo8Wx969s98j-EF2jdfQtqoHO3pJMkEFYSKlwfpwtGpnw2fByL1rOuUOkmA5EZVyIiqLUk705ERP_hENYX4Mq9Aud3Z0fVjrlPw_-AuzunwP</recordid><startdate>20170401</startdate><enddate>20170401</enddate><creator>Haselbach, Liv</creator><creator>Langfitt, Quinn</creator><general>American Society of Civil Engineers</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170401</creationdate><title>Incorporating Prerecorded Environmental Lifecycle Assessment Modules in a Classroom Setting</title><author>Haselbach, Liv ; Langfitt, Quinn</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a436t-c3601b4c0ef9308f9bf7324868cb68dee5732d2a15bbfdf61f0ec7a4ec6144673</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Assessments</topic><topic>Case Studies</topic><topic>Case Study</topic><topic>Classrooms</topic><topic>Engineering education</topic><topic>Format</topic><topic>Life cycle assessment</topic><topic>Modules</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Haselbach, Liv</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Langfitt, Quinn</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of professional issues in engineering education and practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Haselbach, Liv</au><au>Langfitt, Quinn</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Incorporating Prerecorded Environmental Lifecycle Assessment Modules in a Classroom Setting</atitle><jtitle>Journal of professional issues in engineering education and practice</jtitle><date>2017-04-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>143</volume><issue>2</issue><issn>1052-3928</issn><eissn>1943-5541</eissn><abstract>AbstractAddition of sustainability-related material is becoming a point of emphasis in engineering education. Freely available modular lessons are one way to quickly effect this incorporation. This research examines the effectiveness of a class format using short prerecorded software modules on lifecycle assessment (LCA) in the classroom setting with associated discussion, primarily drawing from student perspectives in a graduate-level LCA course at Washington State University. Survey results indicated that students generally agreed that the in-class module-discussion format was an effective teaching method. Advantages included that the format was organized and complete, but still concise, allowed for review of material outside of class, and that discussion components furthered understanding and stimulated further thought about the concepts. Key disadvantages included that the modules can get boring, were sometimes too fast-paced, and that questions usually were held until the end of the presentation. Students were happy with the length of modules (about 20 min each), but many expressed a desire for additional discussion time. Recommendations for future versions of the course include taking additional breaks during modules for discussion, encouraging students to ask questions at any time, and suggesting that some students print slides to stay engaged with note taking. In the future it is anticipated that these types of narrated modules will make it easier for other instructors to provide more sustainability education in their classrooms.</abstract><pub>American Society of Civil Engineers</pub><doi>10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000299</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1052-3928 |
ispartof | Journal of professional issues in engineering education and practice, 2017-04, Vol.143 (2) |
issn | 1052-3928 1943-5541 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1893914953 |
source | ASCE library |
subjects | Assessments Case Studies Case Study Classrooms Engineering education Format Life cycle assessment Modules Students Sustainability |
title | Incorporating Prerecorded Environmental Lifecycle Assessment Modules in a Classroom Setting |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T01%3A04%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Incorporating%20Prerecorded%20Environmental%20Lifecycle%20Assessment%20Modules%20in%20a%20Classroom%20Setting&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20professional%20issues%20in%20engineering%20education%20and%20practice&rft.au=Haselbach,%20Liv&rft.date=2017-04-01&rft.volume=143&rft.issue=2&rft.issn=1052-3928&rft.eissn=1943-5541&rft_id=info:doi/10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000299&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1893914953%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a436t-c3601b4c0ef9308f9bf7324868cb68dee5732d2a15bbfdf61f0ec7a4ec6144673%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1893914953&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |