Loading…
Development of Effective Procedures for Illicit-Discharge Risk Mapping
AbstractAuthorities of municipal separate storm-sewer systems (MS4s) are required to address illicit discharges as part of the United States’ National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System’s (NPDES) stormwater program. Field reconnaissance is an effective measure to detect and identify illicit disc...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of water resources planning and management 2017-05, Vol.143 (5) |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | AbstractAuthorities of municipal separate storm-sewer systems (MS4s) are required to address illicit discharges as part of the United States’ National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System’s (NPDES) stormwater program. Field reconnaissance is an effective measure to detect and identify illicit discharges, but requires substantial staff and financial resources to conduct. While risk-analysis techniques and guidelines have been developed to facilitate MS4 prioritization of field operations, neither a standard set of indicators nor a standard operating procedure has been adopted. This study investigates the relationships among indicators of illicit-discharge potential (IDP) and the locations of illicit discharges in two Virginia MS4s. Results of the study indicate that certain risk factors are statistically more effective at predicting IDP, suggesting that a core set of factors can be used to map illicit-discharge risk. The results also show that risk-mapping tools are significantly impacted by uncertainty in model inputs. Recommendations are provided for MS4s interested in pursuing IDP risk mapping as a tool to improve cost-effectiveness and guide illicit-discharge program implementation. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0733-9496 1943-5452 |
DOI: | 10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000747 |