Comparison of 3D TOF MR angiographic accuracy in predicting Raymond grade of flow-diverted versus coiled intracranial aneurysms

Highlights • Sensitivity of 3D MRA TOF is better for coiled than for flow-diverted aneurysms. • 3D TOF MRA is inaccurate in detecting small residual necks or slow residual filling. • Contrast-enhanced studies should be considered for follow-up after flow diversion.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of clinical neuroscience 2017-08, Vol.42, p.182-185
Main Authors: Binyamin, Tamar R, Dahlin, Brian C, Waldau, Ben
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
3D MRA TOF
Accuracy
Adult
Aged
Angiography, Digital Subtraction - methods
Angiography, Digital Subtraction - standards
Cerebral Angiography - methods
Cerebral Angiography - standards
Coiling
Contrast Media
DSA
Female
Humans
Imaging, Three-Dimensional - methods
Imaging, Three-Dimensional - standards
Intracranial Aneurysm - diagnostic imaging
Magnetic Resonance Angiography - methods
Magnetic Resonance Angiography - standards
Middle Aged
Neurology
Pipeline Embolization Device
Sensitivity
Sensitivity and Specificity
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Highlights • Sensitivity of 3D MRA TOF is better for coiled than for flow-diverted aneurysms. • 3D TOF MRA is inaccurate in detecting small residual necks or slow residual filling. • Contrast-enhanced studies should be considered for follow-up after flow diversion.
ISSN:0967-5868
1532-2653
DOI:10.1016/j.jocn.2017.03.009