Loading…

Comparison of 3D TOF MR angiographic accuracy in predicting Raymond grade of flow-diverted versus coiled intracranial aneurysms

Highlights • Sensitivity of 3D MRA TOF is better for coiled than for flow-diverted aneurysms. • 3D TOF MRA is inaccurate in detecting small residual necks or slow residual filling. • Contrast-enhanced studies should be considered for follow-up after flow diversion.

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Published in:	Journal of clinical neuroscience 2017-08, Vol.42, p.182-185
Main Authors:	Binyamin, Tamar R, Dahlin, Brian C, Waldau, Ben
Format:	Article
Language:	English
Subjects:	3D MRA TOF Accuracy Adult Aged Angiography, Digital Subtraction - methods Angiography, Digital Subtraction - standards Cerebral Angiography - methods Cerebral Angiography - standards Coiling Contrast Media DSA Female Humans Imaging, Three-Dimensional - methods Imaging, Three-Dimensional - standards Intracranial Aneurysm - diagnostic imaging Magnetic Resonance Angiography - methods Magnetic Resonance Angiography - standards Middle Aged Neurology Pipeline Embolization Device Sensitivity Sensitivity and Specificity
Citations:	Items that this one cites Items that cite this one
Online Access:	Get full text
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

cited_by	cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-51d23215dfcd2c386ddf70d896d1a8634d2c65b3435942e9aa941d289239efda3
cites	cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-51d23215dfcd2c386ddf70d896d1a8634d2c65b3435942e9aa941d289239efda3
container_end_page	185
container_issue
container_start_page	182
container_title	Journal of clinical neuroscience
container_volume	42
creator	Binyamin, Tamar R Dahlin, Brian C Waldau, Ben
description	Highlights • Sensitivity of 3D MRA TOF is better for coiled than for flow-diverted aneurysms. • 3D TOF MRA is inaccurate in detecting small residual necks or slow residual filling. • Contrast-enhanced studies should be considered for follow-up after flow diversion.
doi_str_mv	10.1016/j.jocn.2017.03.009
format	article
fullrecord	<record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1893968142</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0967586816308256</els_id><sourcerecordid>1893968142</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-51d23215dfcd2c386ddf70d896d1a8634d2c65b3435942e9aa941d289239efda3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU2L1TAUhoMoznX0D7iQLN205qPNTUAEuToqjAyM4zpkktNrapvUpB3pyr9uyh1duHB1SHjel-Q5CD2npKaEild93Ucbakbovia8JkQ9QDvaclYx0fKHaEeU2FetFPIMPcm5J4VoOHmMzphs2r0UdId-HeI4meRzDDh2mL_DN1cX-PM1NuHo4zGZ6Zu32Fi7JGNX7AOeEjhvZx-O-NqsYwwOF8zBFu-G-LNy_g7SDA6XkZeMbfRDOfkwl4pkgjdDaYclrXnMT9GjzgwZnt3Pc_T14v3N4WN1efXh0-HtZWUbSueqpY5xRlvXWccsl8K5bk-cVMJRIwVvyq1ob3nDW9UwUMaopkSkYlxB5ww_Ry9PvVOKPxbIsx59tjAM5SVxyZpKxZWQtGEFZSfUpphzgk5PyY8mrZoSvYnXvd7E6028JlwXrSX04r5_uR3B_Y38MV2A1ycAyi_vPCSdrYdgi8wEdtYu-v_3v_knbgcfvDXDd1gh93FJofjTVGemif6yrX7bPBWcSNYK_hvbpqqv</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1893968142</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of 3D TOF MR angiographic accuracy in predicting Raymond grade of flow-diverted versus coiled intracranial aneurysms</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Binyamin, Tamar R ; Dahlin, Brian C ; Waldau, Ben</creator><creatorcontrib>Binyamin, Tamar R ; Dahlin, Brian C ; Waldau, Ben</creatorcontrib><description>Highlights • Sensitivity of 3D MRA TOF is better for coiled than for flow-diverted aneurysms. • 3D TOF MRA is inaccurate in detecting small residual necks or slow residual filling. • Contrast-enhanced studies should be considered for follow-up after flow diversion.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0967-5868</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-2653</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2017.03.009</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28457861</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Scotland: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>3D MRA TOF ; Accuracy ; Adult ; Aged ; Angiography, Digital Subtraction - methods ; Angiography, Digital Subtraction - standards ; Cerebral Angiography - methods ; Cerebral Angiography - standards ; Coiling ; Contrast Media ; DSA ; Female ; Humans ; Imaging, Three-Dimensional - methods ; Imaging, Three-Dimensional - standards ; Intracranial Aneurysm - diagnostic imaging ; Magnetic Resonance Angiography - methods ; Magnetic Resonance Angiography - standards ; Middle Aged ; Neurology ; Pipeline Embolization Device ; Sensitivity ; Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical neuroscience, 2017-08, Vol.42, p.182-185</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2017 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-51d23215dfcd2c386ddf70d896d1a8634d2c65b3435942e9aa941d289239efda3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-51d23215dfcd2c386ddf70d896d1a8634d2c65b3435942e9aa941d289239efda3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28457861$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Binyamin, Tamar R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dahlin, Brian C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Waldau, Ben</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of 3D TOF MR angiographic accuracy in predicting Raymond grade of flow-diverted versus coiled intracranial aneurysms</title><title>Journal of clinical neuroscience</title><addtitle>J Clin Neurosci</addtitle><description>Highlights • Sensitivity of 3D MRA TOF is better for coiled than for flow-diverted aneurysms. • 3D TOF MRA is inaccurate in detecting small residual necks or slow residual filling. • Contrast-enhanced studies should be considered for follow-up after flow diversion.</description><subject>3D MRA TOF</subject><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Angiography, Digital Subtraction - methods</subject><subject>Angiography, Digital Subtraction - standards</subject><subject>Cerebral Angiography - methods</subject><subject>Cerebral Angiography - standards</subject><subject>Coiling</subject><subject>Contrast Media</subject><subject>DSA</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Imaging, Three-Dimensional - methods</subject><subject>Imaging, Three-Dimensional - standards</subject><subject>Intracranial Aneurysm - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Angiography - methods</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Angiography - standards</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neurology</subject><subject>Pipeline Embolization Device</subject><subject>Sensitivity</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><issn>0967-5868</issn><issn>1532-2653</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kU2L1TAUhoMoznX0D7iQLN205qPNTUAEuToqjAyM4zpkktNrapvUpB3pyr9uyh1duHB1SHjel-Q5CD2npKaEild93Ucbakbovia8JkQ9QDvaclYx0fKHaEeU2FetFPIMPcm5J4VoOHmMzphs2r0UdId-HeI4meRzDDh2mL_DN1cX-PM1NuHo4zGZ6Zu32Fi7JGNX7AOeEjhvZx-O-NqsYwwOF8zBFu-G-LNy_g7SDA6XkZeMbfRDOfkwl4pkgjdDaYclrXnMT9GjzgwZnt3Pc_T14v3N4WN1efXh0-HtZWUbSueqpY5xRlvXWccsl8K5bk-cVMJRIwVvyq1ob3nDW9UwUMaopkSkYlxB5ww_Ry9PvVOKPxbIsx59tjAM5SVxyZpKxZWQtGEFZSfUpphzgk5PyY8mrZoSvYnXvd7E6028JlwXrSX04r5_uR3B_Y38MV2A1ycAyi_vPCSdrYdgi8wEdtYu-v_3v_knbgcfvDXDd1gh93FJofjTVGemif6yrX7bPBWcSNYK_hvbpqqv</recordid><startdate>20170801</startdate><enddate>20170801</enddate><creator>Binyamin, Tamar R</creator><creator>Dahlin, Brian C</creator><creator>Waldau, Ben</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170801</creationdate><title>Comparison of 3D TOF MR angiographic accuracy in predicting Raymond grade of flow-diverted versus coiled intracranial aneurysms</title><author>Binyamin, Tamar R ; Dahlin, Brian C ; Waldau, Ben</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-51d23215dfcd2c386ddf70d896d1a8634d2c65b3435942e9aa941d289239efda3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>3D MRA TOF</topic><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Angiography, Digital Subtraction - methods</topic><topic>Angiography, Digital Subtraction - standards</topic><topic>Cerebral Angiography - methods</topic><topic>Cerebral Angiography - standards</topic><topic>Coiling</topic><topic>Contrast Media</topic><topic>DSA</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Imaging, Three-Dimensional - methods</topic><topic>Imaging, Three-Dimensional - standards</topic><topic>Intracranial Aneurysm - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Angiography - methods</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Angiography - standards</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neurology</topic><topic>Pipeline Embolization Device</topic><topic>Sensitivity</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Binyamin, Tamar R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dahlin, Brian C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Waldau, Ben</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical neuroscience</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Binyamin, Tamar R</au><au>Dahlin, Brian C</au><au>Waldau, Ben</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of 3D TOF MR angiographic accuracy in predicting Raymond grade of flow-diverted versus coiled intracranial aneurysms</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical neuroscience</jtitle><addtitle>J Clin Neurosci</addtitle><date>2017-08-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>42</volume><spage>182</spage><epage>185</epage><pages>182-185</pages><issn>0967-5868</issn><eissn>1532-2653</eissn><abstract>Highlights • Sensitivity of 3D MRA TOF is better for coiled than for flow-diverted aneurysms. • 3D TOF MRA is inaccurate in detecting small residual necks or slow residual filling. • Contrast-enhanced studies should be considered for follow-up after flow diversion.</abstract><cop>Scotland</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>28457861</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jocn.2017.03.009</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext	fulltext
identifier	ISSN: 0967-5868
ispartof	Journal of clinical neuroscience, 2017-08, Vol.42, p.182-185
issn	0967-5868 1532-2653
language	eng
recordid	cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1893968142
source	ScienceDirect Journals
subjects	3D MRA TOF Accuracy Adult Aged Angiography, Digital Subtraction - methods Angiography, Digital Subtraction - standards Cerebral Angiography - methods Cerebral Angiography - standards Coiling Contrast Media DSA Female Humans Imaging, Three-Dimensional - methods Imaging, Three-Dimensional - standards Intracranial Aneurysm - diagnostic imaging Magnetic Resonance Angiography - methods Magnetic Resonance Angiography - standards Middle Aged Neurology Pipeline Embolization Device Sensitivity Sensitivity and Specificity
title	Comparison of 3D TOF MR angiographic accuracy in predicting Raymond grade of flow-diverted versus coiled intracranial aneurysms
url	http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T13%3A35%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%203D%20TOF%20MR%20angiographic%20accuracy%20in%20predicting%20Raymond%20grade%20of%20flow-diverted%20versus%20coiled%20intracranial%20aneurysms&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20neuroscience&rft.au=Binyamin,%20Tamar%20R&rft.date=2017-08-01&rft.volume=42&rft.spage=182&rft.epage=185&rft.pages=182-185&rft.issn=0967-5868&rft.eissn=1532-2653&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jocn.2017.03.009&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1893968142%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-51d23215dfcd2c386ddf70d896d1a8634d2c65b3435942e9aa941d289239efda3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1893968142&rft_id=info:pmid/28457861&rfr_iscdi=true