Loading…

Imprisonment in Australia: The Remand Population

The use of imprisonment as a punishment continues to be a serious issue for governments and the community. The use of custody on a person who has not yet been given a sentence should be of even greater concern. Official statistics indicate that about 15 per cent of prisoners in Australia are current...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Trends and issues in crime and criminal justice 2000-10 (172), p.1
Main Authors: Carcach, Carlos, Grant, Anna
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page
container_issue 172
container_start_page 1
container_title Trends and issues in crime and criminal justice
container_volume
creator Carcach, Carlos
Grant, Anna
description The use of imprisonment as a punishment continues to be a serious issue for governments and the community. The use of custody on a person who has not yet been given a sentence should be of even greater concern. Official statistics indicate that about 15 per cent of prisoners in Australia are currently on remand and have not been sentenced. The decision to remand an accused in custody entails an assessment of whether the person could be considered a threat either to themselves or to the safety of others, usually the victims of the crime, or whether the accused person is likely to appear for trial. In addition, the wider protection of the community in general is also a legitimate reason for the detention of a person in custody. The possibility of the accused not appearing in trial and the seriousness of the charge are other factors affecting remand decisions. Remand practices may have an impact on the size of prison populations. This impact depends on the size of remand arrivals, the rate at which they flow into the correctional system, and the time they spend as remand prisoners. This study uses data from the National Prison Census to examine major trends in remand populations in Australia. The results from this study suggest that remand practices have gone through little change in Australia over the past 16 years. Remand times have generally remained stable, though there are jurisdictional differences in the time distribution of remand prisoners. Remand prisoners have increased by 75 per cent during the period from 1982 to 1998. This represents 37 per cent of the increase experienced by the total prison population over the same period, which leads to the conclusion that use of remand has had a relatively minor impact on the size of Australian prison populations. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_189467058</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1653852901</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_1894670583</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNzbsKwjAUgOEgCtbLO2RzCqRpm0Y3EUU3Kd1L0CNGcrMneX8RfACnf_ngn5CiVJVkQnA5JQVXZctUU4s5WSC-OBel2tYF4RcXR4PBO_CJGk_3GdOordE72j-BduC0v9NriNnqZIJfkdlDW4T1r0uyOR37w5nFMbwzYBqcwRtYqz2EjMN3I1veqOp_-QEl9jgP</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>189467058</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Imprisonment in Australia: The Remand Population</title><source>Criminology Collection</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection</source><creator>Carcach, Carlos ; Grant, Anna</creator><creatorcontrib>Carcach, Carlos ; Grant, Anna</creatorcontrib><description>The use of imprisonment as a punishment continues to be a serious issue for governments and the community. The use of custody on a person who has not yet been given a sentence should be of even greater concern. Official statistics indicate that about 15 per cent of prisoners in Australia are currently on remand and have not been sentenced. The decision to remand an accused in custody entails an assessment of whether the person could be considered a threat either to themselves or to the safety of others, usually the victims of the crime, or whether the accused person is likely to appear for trial. In addition, the wider protection of the community in general is also a legitimate reason for the detention of a person in custody. The possibility of the accused not appearing in trial and the seriousness of the charge are other factors affecting remand decisions. Remand practices may have an impact on the size of prison populations. This impact depends on the size of remand arrivals, the rate at which they flow into the correctional system, and the time they spend as remand prisoners. This study uses data from the National Prison Census to examine major trends in remand populations in Australia. The results from this study suggest that remand practices have gone through little change in Australia over the past 16 years. Remand times have generally remained stable, though there are jurisdictional differences in the time distribution of remand prisoners. Remand prisoners have increased by 75 per cent during the period from 1982 to 1998. This represents 37 per cent of the increase experienced by the total prison population over the same period, which leads to the conclusion that use of remand has had a relatively minor impact on the size of Australian prison populations. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><identifier>ISSN: 0817-8542</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1836-2206</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Woden: Australian Institute of Criminology</publisher><subject>Criminal justice ; Imprisonment ; Prisoners ; Prisons</subject><ispartof>Trends and issues in crime and criminal justice, 2000-10 (172), p.1</ispartof><rights>Copyright Australian Institute of Criminology Oct 2000</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/189467058?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21395,21413,33589,33747,43709,43790</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Carcach, Carlos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grant, Anna</creatorcontrib><title>Imprisonment in Australia: The Remand Population</title><title>Trends and issues in crime and criminal justice</title><description>The use of imprisonment as a punishment continues to be a serious issue for governments and the community. The use of custody on a person who has not yet been given a sentence should be of even greater concern. Official statistics indicate that about 15 per cent of prisoners in Australia are currently on remand and have not been sentenced. The decision to remand an accused in custody entails an assessment of whether the person could be considered a threat either to themselves or to the safety of others, usually the victims of the crime, or whether the accused person is likely to appear for trial. In addition, the wider protection of the community in general is also a legitimate reason for the detention of a person in custody. The possibility of the accused not appearing in trial and the seriousness of the charge are other factors affecting remand decisions. Remand practices may have an impact on the size of prison populations. This impact depends on the size of remand arrivals, the rate at which they flow into the correctional system, and the time they spend as remand prisoners. This study uses data from the National Prison Census to examine major trends in remand populations in Australia. The results from this study suggest that remand practices have gone through little change in Australia over the past 16 years. Remand times have generally remained stable, though there are jurisdictional differences in the time distribution of remand prisoners. Remand prisoners have increased by 75 per cent during the period from 1982 to 1998. This represents 37 per cent of the increase experienced by the total prison population over the same period, which leads to the conclusion that use of remand has had a relatively minor impact on the size of Australian prison populations. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><subject>Criminal justice</subject><subject>Imprisonment</subject><subject>Prisoners</subject><subject>Prisons</subject><issn>0817-8542</issn><issn>1836-2206</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>BGRYB</sourceid><sourceid>M0O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNzbsKwjAUgOEgCtbLO2RzCqRpm0Y3EUU3Kd1L0CNGcrMneX8RfACnf_ngn5CiVJVkQnA5JQVXZctUU4s5WSC-OBel2tYF4RcXR4PBO_CJGk_3GdOordE72j-BduC0v9NriNnqZIJfkdlDW4T1r0uyOR37w5nFMbwzYBqcwRtYqz2EjMN3I1veqOp_-QEl9jgP</recordid><startdate>20001001</startdate><enddate>20001001</enddate><creator>Carcach, Carlos</creator><creator>Grant, Anna</creator><general>Australian Institute of Criminology</general><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8AM</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGRYB</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>M0O</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRQQA</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20001001</creationdate><title>Imprisonment in Australia: The Remand Population</title><author>Carcach, Carlos ; Grant, Anna</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_1894670583</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Criminal justice</topic><topic>Imprisonment</topic><topic>Prisoners</topic><topic>Prisons</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Carcach, Carlos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grant, Anna</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Criminology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Trends and issues in crime and criminal justice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Carcach, Carlos</au><au>Grant, Anna</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Imprisonment in Australia: The Remand Population</atitle><jtitle>Trends and issues in crime and criminal justice</jtitle><date>2000-10-01</date><risdate>2000</risdate><issue>172</issue><spage>1</spage><pages>1-</pages><issn>0817-8542</issn><eissn>1836-2206</eissn><abstract>The use of imprisonment as a punishment continues to be a serious issue for governments and the community. The use of custody on a person who has not yet been given a sentence should be of even greater concern. Official statistics indicate that about 15 per cent of prisoners in Australia are currently on remand and have not been sentenced. The decision to remand an accused in custody entails an assessment of whether the person could be considered a threat either to themselves or to the safety of others, usually the victims of the crime, or whether the accused person is likely to appear for trial. In addition, the wider protection of the community in general is also a legitimate reason for the detention of a person in custody. The possibility of the accused not appearing in trial and the seriousness of the charge are other factors affecting remand decisions. Remand practices may have an impact on the size of prison populations. This impact depends on the size of remand arrivals, the rate at which they flow into the correctional system, and the time they spend as remand prisoners. This study uses data from the National Prison Census to examine major trends in remand populations in Australia. The results from this study suggest that remand practices have gone through little change in Australia over the past 16 years. Remand times have generally remained stable, though there are jurisdictional differences in the time distribution of remand prisoners. Remand prisoners have increased by 75 per cent during the period from 1982 to 1998. This represents 37 per cent of the increase experienced by the total prison population over the same period, which leads to the conclusion that use of remand has had a relatively minor impact on the size of Australian prison populations. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</abstract><cop>Woden</cop><pub>Australian Institute of Criminology</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0817-8542
ispartof Trends and issues in crime and criminal justice, 2000-10 (172), p.1
issn 0817-8542
1836-2206
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_189467058
source Criminology Collection; Social Science Premium Collection
subjects Criminal justice
Imprisonment
Prisoners
Prisons
title Imprisonment in Australia: The Remand Population
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-24T01%3A56%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Imprisonment%20in%20Australia:%20The%20Remand%20Population&rft.jtitle=Trends%20and%20issues%20in%20crime%20and%20criminal%20justice&rft.au=Carcach,%20Carlos&rft.date=2000-10-01&rft.issue=172&rft.spage=1&rft.pages=1-&rft.issn=0817-8542&rft.eissn=1836-2206&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E1653852901%3C/proquest%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_1894670583%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=189467058&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true