Loading…

Effects of stress, dyadic communication and adaptation on prostatectomy patients' quality of life

ABSTRACT This study investigates the effects of stress, dyadic communication and dyadic adaptation of patients who received prostatectomy and their spouses on the quality of life (QOL) of patients. A descriptive design was used with 113 prostatectomy couples. Data were collected from December 2012 t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of urological nursing 2017-03, Vol.11 (1), p.13-22
Main Authors: Kim, Hae Sook, Ahn, Han Jong
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2495-6762d188220c48b0253f20f6a04ee5309a9c36676732931a5b9dcb70d58147853
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2495-6762d188220c48b0253f20f6a04ee5309a9c36676732931a5b9dcb70d58147853
container_end_page 22
container_issue 1
container_start_page 13
container_title International journal of urological nursing
container_volume 11
creator Kim, Hae Sook
Ahn, Han Jong
description ABSTRACT This study investigates the effects of stress, dyadic communication and dyadic adaptation of patients who received prostatectomy and their spouses on the quality of life (QOL) of patients. A descriptive design was used with 113 prostatectomy couples. Data were collected from December 2012 to February 2014 at a prostate cancer centre in Korea. Stress, dyadic communication, dyadic adaptation and patient QOL were measured with the perceived stress scale, communication pattern questionnaire, Revised Dyadic Adjustment Scale and Functional Assessment of Cancer Treatment‐Prostate, respectively. Emotional QOL of patients was negatively affected by stress (β = −0·624, p < 0·001) and mutual avoidance communication (β = −0·050, p = 0·001) of the patients as well as couple cohesion (β = −0·113, p = 0·015). The predictive power (F = 25·895, p < 0·001) was 41·6%. Social QOL of patients was negatively affected by patient stress (β = −0·331, p = 0·010) and positively affected by the constructive communication of the patients (β = 0·034, p = 0·006) and spouses (β = 0·029, p = 0·014) and withdrawal communication of the spouses (β = 0·035, p < 0·001), and the predictive power (F = 11·391, p < 0·001) was 29·7%. Functional QOL of patients was negatively affected by patient stress (β = −0·680, p < 0·001) and positively affected by the patients' assessment of couple cohesion n (β = 0·173, p = 0·007). The predictive power (F = 18·491, p < 0·001) was 25·2%. To improve the QOL of patients who received prostatectomy, a programme needs to be developed to reduce patient stress and improve constructive communication and couple cohesion.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/ijun.12115
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1896854728</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4312983321</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2495-6762d188220c48b0253f20f6a04ee5309a9c36676732931a5b9dcb70d58147853</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLAzEQxxdRsFYvfoKAB0VszWTz2qOUqpWiFwveQppNIGVf3ewi--1NXfHgwWFgHvxmmPknySXgOUS797u-mgMBYEfJBATNZkLAx_FvjuE0OQthhzETIGCS6KVz1nQB1Q6FrrUh3KF80Lk3yNRl2Vfe6M7XFdJVjnSum24sozdtHWIVp-tyQE3s26oL12jf68J3w2Fj4Z09T06cLoK9-InTZPO4fF88z9ZvT6vFw3pmCM3YjAtOcpCSEGyo3GLCUkew4xpTa1mKM52ZlEdKpCRLQbNtlputwDmTQIVk6TS5GffGu_a9DZ0qfTC2KHRl6z4okBmXjAoiI3r1B93VfVvF6yLFOeVcUhKp25Ey8dHQWqea1pe6HRRgdVBbHdRW32pHGEb40xd2-IdUq5fN6zjzBcfVgTs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1866466842</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of stress, dyadic communication and adaptation on prostatectomy patients' quality of life</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>Kim, Hae Sook ; Ahn, Han Jong</creator><creatorcontrib>Kim, Hae Sook ; Ahn, Han Jong</creatorcontrib><description><![CDATA[ABSTRACT This study investigates the effects of stress, dyadic communication and dyadic adaptation of patients who received prostatectomy and their spouses on the quality of life (QOL) of patients. A descriptive design was used with 113 prostatectomy couples. Data were collected from December 2012 to February 2014 at a prostate cancer centre in Korea. Stress, dyadic communication, dyadic adaptation and patient QOL were measured with the perceived stress scale, communication pattern questionnaire, Revised Dyadic Adjustment Scale and Functional Assessment of Cancer Treatment‐Prostate, respectively. Emotional QOL of patients was negatively affected by stress (β = −0·624, p < 0·001) and mutual avoidance communication (β = −0·050, p = 0·001) of the patients as well as couple cohesion (β = −0·113, p = 0·015). The predictive power (F = 25·895, p < 0·001) was 41·6%. Social QOL of patients was negatively affected by patient stress (β = −0·331, p = 0·010) and positively affected by the constructive communication of the patients (β = 0·034, p = 0·006) and spouses (β = 0·029, p = 0·014) and withdrawal communication of the spouses (β = 0·035, p < 0·001), and the predictive power (F = 11·391, p < 0·001) was 29·7%. Functional QOL of patients was negatively affected by patient stress (β = −0·680, p < 0·001) and positively affected by the patients' assessment of couple cohesion n (β = 0·173, p = 0·007). The predictive power (F = 18·491, p < 0·001) was 25·2%. To improve the QOL of patients who received prostatectomy, a programme needs to be developed to reduce patient stress and improve constructive communication and couple cohesion.]]></description><identifier>ISSN: 1749-7701</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1749-771X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ijun.12115</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Couple adaptation ; Dyadic communication ; Prostate cancer ; Prostatectomy ; Quality of life ; Stress</subject><ispartof>International journal of urological nursing, 2017-03, Vol.11 (1), p.13-22</ispartof><rights>2016 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd. and BAUN</rights><rights>2017 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd. and BAUN</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2495-6762d188220c48b0253f20f6a04ee5309a9c36676732931a5b9dcb70d58147853</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2495-6762d188220c48b0253f20f6a04ee5309a9c36676732931a5b9dcb70d58147853</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kim, Hae Sook</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahn, Han Jong</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of stress, dyadic communication and adaptation on prostatectomy patients' quality of life</title><title>International journal of urological nursing</title><description><![CDATA[ABSTRACT This study investigates the effects of stress, dyadic communication and dyadic adaptation of patients who received prostatectomy and their spouses on the quality of life (QOL) of patients. A descriptive design was used with 113 prostatectomy couples. Data were collected from December 2012 to February 2014 at a prostate cancer centre in Korea. Stress, dyadic communication, dyadic adaptation and patient QOL were measured with the perceived stress scale, communication pattern questionnaire, Revised Dyadic Adjustment Scale and Functional Assessment of Cancer Treatment‐Prostate, respectively. Emotional QOL of patients was negatively affected by stress (β = −0·624, p < 0·001) and mutual avoidance communication (β = −0·050, p = 0·001) of the patients as well as couple cohesion (β = −0·113, p = 0·015). The predictive power (F = 25·895, p < 0·001) was 41·6%. Social QOL of patients was negatively affected by patient stress (β = −0·331, p = 0·010) and positively affected by the constructive communication of the patients (β = 0·034, p = 0·006) and spouses (β = 0·029, p = 0·014) and withdrawal communication of the spouses (β = 0·035, p < 0·001), and the predictive power (F = 11·391, p < 0·001) was 29·7%. Functional QOL of patients was negatively affected by patient stress (β = −0·680, p < 0·001) and positively affected by the patients' assessment of couple cohesion n (β = 0·173, p = 0·007). The predictive power (F = 18·491, p < 0·001) was 25·2%. To improve the QOL of patients who received prostatectomy, a programme needs to be developed to reduce patient stress and improve constructive communication and couple cohesion.]]></description><subject>Couple adaptation</subject><subject>Dyadic communication</subject><subject>Prostate cancer</subject><subject>Prostatectomy</subject><subject>Quality of life</subject><subject>Stress</subject><issn>1749-7701</issn><issn>1749-771X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEtLAzEQxxdRsFYvfoKAB0VszWTz2qOUqpWiFwveQppNIGVf3ewi--1NXfHgwWFgHvxmmPknySXgOUS797u-mgMBYEfJBATNZkLAx_FvjuE0OQthhzETIGCS6KVz1nQB1Q6FrrUh3KF80Lk3yNRl2Vfe6M7XFdJVjnSum24sozdtHWIVp-tyQE3s26oL12jf68J3w2Fj4Z09T06cLoK9-InTZPO4fF88z9ZvT6vFw3pmCM3YjAtOcpCSEGyo3GLCUkew4xpTa1mKM52ZlEdKpCRLQbNtlputwDmTQIVk6TS5GffGu_a9DZ0qfTC2KHRl6z4okBmXjAoiI3r1B93VfVvF6yLFOeVcUhKp25Ey8dHQWqea1pe6HRRgdVBbHdRW32pHGEb40xd2-IdUq5fN6zjzBcfVgTs</recordid><startdate>201703</startdate><enddate>201703</enddate><creator>Kim, Hae Sook</creator><creator>Ahn, Han Jong</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201703</creationdate><title>Effects of stress, dyadic communication and adaptation on prostatectomy patients' quality of life</title><author>Kim, Hae Sook ; Ahn, Han Jong</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2495-6762d188220c48b0253f20f6a04ee5309a9c36676732931a5b9dcb70d58147853</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Couple adaptation</topic><topic>Dyadic communication</topic><topic>Prostate cancer</topic><topic>Prostatectomy</topic><topic>Quality of life</topic><topic>Stress</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kim, Hae Sook</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahn, Han Jong</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><jtitle>International journal of urological nursing</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kim, Hae Sook</au><au>Ahn, Han Jong</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of stress, dyadic communication and adaptation on prostatectomy patients' quality of life</atitle><jtitle>International journal of urological nursing</jtitle><date>2017-03</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>13</spage><epage>22</epage><pages>13-22</pages><issn>1749-7701</issn><eissn>1749-771X</eissn><abstract><![CDATA[ABSTRACT This study investigates the effects of stress, dyadic communication and dyadic adaptation of patients who received prostatectomy and their spouses on the quality of life (QOL) of patients. A descriptive design was used with 113 prostatectomy couples. Data were collected from December 2012 to February 2014 at a prostate cancer centre in Korea. Stress, dyadic communication, dyadic adaptation and patient QOL were measured with the perceived stress scale, communication pattern questionnaire, Revised Dyadic Adjustment Scale and Functional Assessment of Cancer Treatment‐Prostate, respectively. Emotional QOL of patients was negatively affected by stress (β = −0·624, p < 0·001) and mutual avoidance communication (β = −0·050, p = 0·001) of the patients as well as couple cohesion (β = −0·113, p = 0·015). The predictive power (F = 25·895, p < 0·001) was 41·6%. Social QOL of patients was negatively affected by patient stress (β = −0·331, p = 0·010) and positively affected by the constructive communication of the patients (β = 0·034, p = 0·006) and spouses (β = 0·029, p = 0·014) and withdrawal communication of the spouses (β = 0·035, p < 0·001), and the predictive power (F = 11·391, p < 0·001) was 29·7%. Functional QOL of patients was negatively affected by patient stress (β = −0·680, p < 0·001) and positively affected by the patients' assessment of couple cohesion n (β = 0·173, p = 0·007). The predictive power (F = 18·491, p < 0·001) was 25·2%. To improve the QOL of patients who received prostatectomy, a programme needs to be developed to reduce patient stress and improve constructive communication and couple cohesion.]]></abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/ijun.12115</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1749-7701
ispartof International journal of urological nursing, 2017-03, Vol.11 (1), p.13-22
issn 1749-7701
1749-771X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1896854728
source Wiley
subjects Couple adaptation
Dyadic communication
Prostate cancer
Prostatectomy
Quality of life
Stress
title Effects of stress, dyadic communication and adaptation on prostatectomy patients' quality of life
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T01%3A13%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20stress,%20dyadic%20communication%20and%20adaptation%20on%20prostatectomy%20patients'%20quality%20of%20life&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20urological%20nursing&rft.au=Kim,%20Hae%20Sook&rft.date=2017-03&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=13&rft.epage=22&rft.pages=13-22&rft.issn=1749-7701&rft.eissn=1749-771X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ijun.12115&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4312983321%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2495-6762d188220c48b0253f20f6a04ee5309a9c36676732931a5b9dcb70d58147853%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1866466842&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true