Loading…

Continental crust formation on early Earth controlled by intrusive magmatism

Modelling of two modes of continental crust formation suggests that before plate tectonics began operating, the Archean early Earth’s tectonic regime was governed by intrusive magmatism. Earth's primordial squishy lid The global geodynamic regime of early Earth, which was in operation before th...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Nature (London) 2017-05, Vol.545 (7654), p.332-335
Main Authors: Rozel, A. B., Golabek, G. J., Jain, C., Tackley, P. J., Gerya, T.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a609t-586f4b7eba204a1b143f1a1d7a1e5372a9a7a605f3741b26f3201afdd3de46df3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a609t-586f4b7eba204a1b143f1a1d7a1e5372a9a7a605f3741b26f3201afdd3de46df3
container_end_page 335
container_issue 7654
container_start_page 332
container_title Nature (London)
container_volume 545
creator Rozel, A. B.
Golabek, G. J.
Jain, C.
Tackley, P. J.
Gerya, T.
description Modelling of two modes of continental crust formation suggests that before plate tectonics began operating, the Archean early Earth’s tectonic regime was governed by intrusive magmatism. Earth's primordial squishy lid The global geodynamic regime of early Earth, which was in operation before the onset of plate tectonics during the Archaean eon over 2.5 billion years ago, remains contentious. Antoine Rozel et al. use numerical models of global thermochemical convection, including magmatic processes, to show that a tectonics regime dominated by intrusive molten rock results in warm crustal geotherms and can reproduce the observed proportions of primordial continental crust. They therefore conclude that the early Archaean Earth operated globally in a 'Plutonic squishy lid' regime in which intrusions of magma solidified into igneous rock deep below Earth's surface, rather than in an ‘Io-like’ regime dominated by extrusive volcanism. The global geodynamic regime of early Earth, which operated before the onset of plate tectonics, remains contentious. As geological and geochemical data suggest hotter Archean mantle temperature 1 , 2 and more intense juvenile magmatism than in the present-day Earth 3 , 4 , two crust–mantle interaction modes differing in melt eruption efficiency have been proposed: the Io-like heat-pipe tectonics regime dominated by volcanism 5 , 6 and the “Plutonic squishy lid” tectonics regime governed by intrusive magmatism, which is thought to apply to the dynamics of Venus 7 , 8 , 9 . Both tectonics regimes are capable of producing primordial tonalite–trondhjemite–granodiorite (TTG) continental crust 5 , 10 but lithospheric geotherms and crust production rates as well as proportions of various TTG compositions differ greatly 9 , 10 , which implies that the heat-pipe and Plutonic squishy lid hypotheses can be tested using natural data 11 . Here we investigate the creation of primordial TTG-like continental crust using self-consistent numerical models of global thermochemical convection associated with magmatic processes. We show that the volcanism-dominated heat-pipe tectonics model results in cold crustal geotherms and is not able to produce Earth-like primordial continental crust. In contrast, the Plutonic squishy lid tectonics regime dominated by intrusive magmatism results in hotter crustal geotherms and is capable of reproducing the observed proportions of various TTG rocks. Using a systematic parameter study, we show that the typical mode
doi_str_mv 10.1038/nature22042
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1896893729</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A504499604</galeid><sourcerecordid>A504499604</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a609t-586f4b7eba204a1b143f1a1d7a1e5372a9a7a605f3741b26f3201afdd3de46df3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpt0s-P1CAUB3BiNO7s6sm7afSyRrtCSws9biarbjKJiT_O5LV9VDYtzAI1zn8vk1l1xjSQEODDNwQeIS8YvWK0lO8txNljUVBePCIrxkWd81qKx2RFaSFzKsv6jJyHcEcprZjgT8lZIbksykquyGbtbDQWbYQx6_wcYqadnyAaZ7PUEfy4y27Axx9Zl6h344h91u4ykyZzMD8xm2DYHwjTM_JEwxjw-cN4Qb5_uPm2_pRvPn-8XV9vcqhpE_NK1pq3AltIdwbWMl5qBqwXwLAqRQENiCQrXQrO2qLWZUEZ6L4ve-R1r8sLcnnI3Xp3P2OIajKhw3EEi24Oismmlk1KahJ9_R-9c7O36XaKNZQxKapG_FMDjKiM1S566Pah6rqinDdNTXlS-YIa0KKH0VnUJi2f-FcLvtuae3WMrhZQaj1OpltMfXNyYP8r-CsOMIegbr9-ObVvD7bzLgSPWm29mcDvFKNqXzzqqHiSfvnwVnM7Yf_X_qmWBN4dQEhbdkB_9JgLeb8BnFTLmg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1901187597</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Continental crust formation on early Earth controlled by intrusive magmatism</title><source>Nature</source><creator>Rozel, A. B. ; Golabek, G. J. ; Jain, C. ; Tackley, P. J. ; Gerya, T.</creator><creatorcontrib>Rozel, A. B. ; Golabek, G. J. ; Jain, C. ; Tackley, P. J. ; Gerya, T.</creatorcontrib><description>Modelling of two modes of continental crust formation suggests that before plate tectonics began operating, the Archean early Earth’s tectonic regime was governed by intrusive magmatism. Earth's primordial squishy lid The global geodynamic regime of early Earth, which was in operation before the onset of plate tectonics during the Archaean eon over 2.5 billion years ago, remains contentious. Antoine Rozel et al. use numerical models of global thermochemical convection, including magmatic processes, to show that a tectonics regime dominated by intrusive molten rock results in warm crustal geotherms and can reproduce the observed proportions of primordial continental crust. They therefore conclude that the early Archaean Earth operated globally in a 'Plutonic squishy lid' regime in which intrusions of magma solidified into igneous rock deep below Earth's surface, rather than in an ‘Io-like’ regime dominated by extrusive volcanism. The global geodynamic regime of early Earth, which operated before the onset of plate tectonics, remains contentious. As geological and geochemical data suggest hotter Archean mantle temperature 1 , 2 and more intense juvenile magmatism than in the present-day Earth 3 , 4 , two crust–mantle interaction modes differing in melt eruption efficiency have been proposed: the Io-like heat-pipe tectonics regime dominated by volcanism 5 , 6 and the “Plutonic squishy lid” tectonics regime governed by intrusive magmatism, which is thought to apply to the dynamics of Venus 7 , 8 , 9 . Both tectonics regimes are capable of producing primordial tonalite–trondhjemite–granodiorite (TTG) continental crust 5 , 10 but lithospheric geotherms and crust production rates as well as proportions of various TTG compositions differ greatly 9 , 10 , which implies that the heat-pipe and Plutonic squishy lid hypotheses can be tested using natural data 11 . Here we investigate the creation of primordial TTG-like continental crust using self-consistent numerical models of global thermochemical convection associated with magmatic processes. We show that the volcanism-dominated heat-pipe tectonics model results in cold crustal geotherms and is not able to produce Earth-like primordial continental crust. In contrast, the Plutonic squishy lid tectonics regime dominated by intrusive magmatism results in hotter crustal geotherms and is capable of reproducing the observed proportions of various TTG rocks. Using a systematic parameter study, we show that the typical modern eruption efficiency of less than 40 per cent 12 leads to the production of the expected amounts of the three main primordial crustal compositions previously reported from field data 4 , 11 (low-, medium- and high-pressure TTG). Our study thus suggests that the pre-plate-tectonics Archean Earth operated globally in the Plutonic squishy lid regime rather than in an Io-like heat-pipe regime.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0028-0836</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1476-4687</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/nature22042</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28482358</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Nature Publishing Group UK</publisher><subject>704/2151/209 ; 704/2151/210 ; 704/2151/431 ; 704/445/210 ; Asthenosphere ; Brittleness ; Classification ; Continental crust ; Continents ; Convection ; Convection models ; Corona ; Crust (Geology) ; Delamination ; Earth ; Earth mantle ; Evolution ; Geochemistry ; Geodynamics ; Geology ; Geophysics ; Heat ; Heat loss ; Heat transfer ; Humanities and Social Sciences ; Hypotheses ; Instability ; letter ; Lithosphere ; Magma ; Magmatism ; Mantle (Geology) ; Mapping ; Mathematical models ; Melts ; multidisciplinary ; Natural history ; Numerical models ; Numerical simulations ; Oceans ; Plate tectonics ; Pressure ; Probes ; Radar ; Recycling ; Robustness (mathematics) ; Rocks ; Science ; Tectonics ; Temperature effects ; Temperature profiles ; Three dimensional models ; Topography ; Two dimensional models ; Upwelling</subject><ispartof>Nature (London), 2017-05, Vol.545 (7654), p.332-335</ispartof><rights>Macmillan Publishers Limited, part of Springer Nature. All rights reserved. 2017</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2017 Nature Publishing Group</rights><rights>Copyright Nature Publishing Group May 18, 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a609t-586f4b7eba204a1b143f1a1d7a1e5372a9a7a605f3741b26f3201afdd3de46df3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a609t-586f4b7eba204a1b143f1a1d7a1e5372a9a7a605f3741b26f3201afdd3de46df3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28482358$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rozel, A. B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Golabek, G. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jain, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tackley, P. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gerya, T.</creatorcontrib><title>Continental crust formation on early Earth controlled by intrusive magmatism</title><title>Nature (London)</title><addtitle>Nature</addtitle><addtitle>Nature</addtitle><description>Modelling of two modes of continental crust formation suggests that before plate tectonics began operating, the Archean early Earth’s tectonic regime was governed by intrusive magmatism. Earth's primordial squishy lid The global geodynamic regime of early Earth, which was in operation before the onset of plate tectonics during the Archaean eon over 2.5 billion years ago, remains contentious. Antoine Rozel et al. use numerical models of global thermochemical convection, including magmatic processes, to show that a tectonics regime dominated by intrusive molten rock results in warm crustal geotherms and can reproduce the observed proportions of primordial continental crust. They therefore conclude that the early Archaean Earth operated globally in a 'Plutonic squishy lid' regime in which intrusions of magma solidified into igneous rock deep below Earth's surface, rather than in an ‘Io-like’ regime dominated by extrusive volcanism. The global geodynamic regime of early Earth, which operated before the onset of plate tectonics, remains contentious. As geological and geochemical data suggest hotter Archean mantle temperature 1 , 2 and more intense juvenile magmatism than in the present-day Earth 3 , 4 , two crust–mantle interaction modes differing in melt eruption efficiency have been proposed: the Io-like heat-pipe tectonics regime dominated by volcanism 5 , 6 and the “Plutonic squishy lid” tectonics regime governed by intrusive magmatism, which is thought to apply to the dynamics of Venus 7 , 8 , 9 . Both tectonics regimes are capable of producing primordial tonalite–trondhjemite–granodiorite (TTG) continental crust 5 , 10 but lithospheric geotherms and crust production rates as well as proportions of various TTG compositions differ greatly 9 , 10 , which implies that the heat-pipe and Plutonic squishy lid hypotheses can be tested using natural data 11 . Here we investigate the creation of primordial TTG-like continental crust using self-consistent numerical models of global thermochemical convection associated with magmatic processes. We show that the volcanism-dominated heat-pipe tectonics model results in cold crustal geotherms and is not able to produce Earth-like primordial continental crust. In contrast, the Plutonic squishy lid tectonics regime dominated by intrusive magmatism results in hotter crustal geotherms and is capable of reproducing the observed proportions of various TTG rocks. Using a systematic parameter study, we show that the typical modern eruption efficiency of less than 40 per cent 12 leads to the production of the expected amounts of the three main primordial crustal compositions previously reported from field data 4 , 11 (low-, medium- and high-pressure TTG). Our study thus suggests that the pre-plate-tectonics Archean Earth operated globally in the Plutonic squishy lid regime rather than in an Io-like heat-pipe regime.</description><subject>704/2151/209</subject><subject>704/2151/210</subject><subject>704/2151/431</subject><subject>704/445/210</subject><subject>Asthenosphere</subject><subject>Brittleness</subject><subject>Classification</subject><subject>Continental crust</subject><subject>Continents</subject><subject>Convection</subject><subject>Convection models</subject><subject>Corona</subject><subject>Crust (Geology)</subject><subject>Delamination</subject><subject>Earth</subject><subject>Earth mantle</subject><subject>Evolution</subject><subject>Geochemistry</subject><subject>Geodynamics</subject><subject>Geology</subject><subject>Geophysics</subject><subject>Heat</subject><subject>Heat loss</subject><subject>Heat transfer</subject><subject>Humanities and Social Sciences</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Instability</subject><subject>letter</subject><subject>Lithosphere</subject><subject>Magma</subject><subject>Magmatism</subject><subject>Mantle (Geology)</subject><subject>Mapping</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Melts</subject><subject>multidisciplinary</subject><subject>Natural history</subject><subject>Numerical models</subject><subject>Numerical simulations</subject><subject>Oceans</subject><subject>Plate tectonics</subject><subject>Pressure</subject><subject>Probes</subject><subject>Radar</subject><subject>Recycling</subject><subject>Robustness (mathematics)</subject><subject>Rocks</subject><subject>Science</subject><subject>Tectonics</subject><subject>Temperature effects</subject><subject>Temperature profiles</subject><subject>Three dimensional models</subject><subject>Topography</subject><subject>Two dimensional models</subject><subject>Upwelling</subject><issn>0028-0836</issn><issn>1476-4687</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpt0s-P1CAUB3BiNO7s6sm7afSyRrtCSws9biarbjKJiT_O5LV9VDYtzAI1zn8vk1l1xjSQEODDNwQeIS8YvWK0lO8txNljUVBePCIrxkWd81qKx2RFaSFzKsv6jJyHcEcprZjgT8lZIbksykquyGbtbDQWbYQx6_wcYqadnyAaZ7PUEfy4y27Axx9Zl6h344h91u4ykyZzMD8xm2DYHwjTM_JEwxjw-cN4Qb5_uPm2_pRvPn-8XV9vcqhpE_NK1pq3AltIdwbWMl5qBqwXwLAqRQENiCQrXQrO2qLWZUEZ6L4ve-R1r8sLcnnI3Xp3P2OIajKhw3EEi24Oismmlk1KahJ9_R-9c7O36XaKNZQxKapG_FMDjKiM1S566Pah6rqinDdNTXlS-YIa0KKH0VnUJi2f-FcLvtuae3WMrhZQaj1OpltMfXNyYP8r-CsOMIegbr9-ObVvD7bzLgSPWm29mcDvFKNqXzzqqHiSfvnwVnM7Yf_X_qmWBN4dQEhbdkB_9JgLeb8BnFTLmg</recordid><startdate>20170518</startdate><enddate>20170518</enddate><creator>Rozel, A. B.</creator><creator>Golabek, G. J.</creator><creator>Jain, C.</creator><creator>Tackley, P. J.</creator><creator>Gerya, T.</creator><general>Nature Publishing Group UK</general><general>Nature Publishing Group</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>R05</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170518</creationdate><title>Continental crust formation on early Earth controlled by intrusive magmatism</title><author>Rozel, A. B. ; Golabek, G. J. ; Jain, C. ; Tackley, P. J. ; Gerya, T.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a609t-586f4b7eba204a1b143f1a1d7a1e5372a9a7a605f3741b26f3201afdd3de46df3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>704/2151/209</topic><topic>704/2151/210</topic><topic>704/2151/431</topic><topic>704/445/210</topic><topic>Asthenosphere</topic><topic>Brittleness</topic><topic>Classification</topic><topic>Continental crust</topic><topic>Continents</topic><topic>Convection</topic><topic>Convection models</topic><topic>Corona</topic><topic>Crust (Geology)</topic><topic>Delamination</topic><topic>Earth</topic><topic>Earth mantle</topic><topic>Evolution</topic><topic>Geochemistry</topic><topic>Geodynamics</topic><topic>Geology</topic><topic>Geophysics</topic><topic>Heat</topic><topic>Heat loss</topic><topic>Heat transfer</topic><topic>Humanities and Social Sciences</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Instability</topic><topic>letter</topic><topic>Lithosphere</topic><topic>Magma</topic><topic>Magmatism</topic><topic>Mantle (Geology)</topic><topic>Mapping</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Melts</topic><topic>multidisciplinary</topic><topic>Natural history</topic><topic>Numerical models</topic><topic>Numerical simulations</topic><topic>Oceans</topic><topic>Plate tectonics</topic><topic>Pressure</topic><topic>Probes</topic><topic>Radar</topic><topic>Recycling</topic><topic>Robustness (mathematics)</topic><topic>Rocks</topic><topic>Science</topic><topic>Tectonics</topic><topic>Temperature effects</topic><topic>Temperature profiles</topic><topic>Three dimensional models</topic><topic>Topography</topic><topic>Two dimensional models</topic><topic>Upwelling</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rozel, A. B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Golabek, G. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jain, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tackley, P. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gerya, T.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health and Medical</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>https://resources.nclive.org/materials</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest advanced technologies &amp; aerospace journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>Materials science collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>University of Michigan</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Nature (London)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rozel, A. B.</au><au>Golabek, G. J.</au><au>Jain, C.</au><au>Tackley, P. J.</au><au>Gerya, T.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Continental crust formation on early Earth controlled by intrusive magmatism</atitle><jtitle>Nature (London)</jtitle><stitle>Nature</stitle><addtitle>Nature</addtitle><date>2017-05-18</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>545</volume><issue>7654</issue><spage>332</spage><epage>335</epage><pages>332-335</pages><issn>0028-0836</issn><eissn>1476-4687</eissn><abstract>Modelling of two modes of continental crust formation suggests that before plate tectonics began operating, the Archean early Earth’s tectonic regime was governed by intrusive magmatism. Earth's primordial squishy lid The global geodynamic regime of early Earth, which was in operation before the onset of plate tectonics during the Archaean eon over 2.5 billion years ago, remains contentious. Antoine Rozel et al. use numerical models of global thermochemical convection, including magmatic processes, to show that a tectonics regime dominated by intrusive molten rock results in warm crustal geotherms and can reproduce the observed proportions of primordial continental crust. They therefore conclude that the early Archaean Earth operated globally in a 'Plutonic squishy lid' regime in which intrusions of magma solidified into igneous rock deep below Earth's surface, rather than in an ‘Io-like’ regime dominated by extrusive volcanism. The global geodynamic regime of early Earth, which operated before the onset of plate tectonics, remains contentious. As geological and geochemical data suggest hotter Archean mantle temperature 1 , 2 and more intense juvenile magmatism than in the present-day Earth 3 , 4 , two crust–mantle interaction modes differing in melt eruption efficiency have been proposed: the Io-like heat-pipe tectonics regime dominated by volcanism 5 , 6 and the “Plutonic squishy lid” tectonics regime governed by intrusive magmatism, which is thought to apply to the dynamics of Venus 7 , 8 , 9 . Both tectonics regimes are capable of producing primordial tonalite–trondhjemite–granodiorite (TTG) continental crust 5 , 10 but lithospheric geotherms and crust production rates as well as proportions of various TTG compositions differ greatly 9 , 10 , which implies that the heat-pipe and Plutonic squishy lid hypotheses can be tested using natural data 11 . Here we investigate the creation of primordial TTG-like continental crust using self-consistent numerical models of global thermochemical convection associated with magmatic processes. We show that the volcanism-dominated heat-pipe tectonics model results in cold crustal geotherms and is not able to produce Earth-like primordial continental crust. In contrast, the Plutonic squishy lid tectonics regime dominated by intrusive magmatism results in hotter crustal geotherms and is capable of reproducing the observed proportions of various TTG rocks. Using a systematic parameter study, we show that the typical modern eruption efficiency of less than 40 per cent 12 leads to the production of the expected amounts of the three main primordial crustal compositions previously reported from field data 4 , 11 (low-, medium- and high-pressure TTG). Our study thus suggests that the pre-plate-tectonics Archean Earth operated globally in the Plutonic squishy lid regime rather than in an Io-like heat-pipe regime.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Nature Publishing Group UK</pub><pmid>28482358</pmid><doi>10.1038/nature22042</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0028-0836
ispartof Nature (London), 2017-05, Vol.545 (7654), p.332-335
issn 0028-0836
1476-4687
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1896893729
source Nature
subjects 704/2151/209
704/2151/210
704/2151/431
704/445/210
Asthenosphere
Brittleness
Classification
Continental crust
Continents
Convection
Convection models
Corona
Crust (Geology)
Delamination
Earth
Earth mantle
Evolution
Geochemistry
Geodynamics
Geology
Geophysics
Heat
Heat loss
Heat transfer
Humanities and Social Sciences
Hypotheses
Instability
letter
Lithosphere
Magma
Magmatism
Mantle (Geology)
Mapping
Mathematical models
Melts
multidisciplinary
Natural history
Numerical models
Numerical simulations
Oceans
Plate tectonics
Pressure
Probes
Radar
Recycling
Robustness (mathematics)
Rocks
Science
Tectonics
Temperature effects
Temperature profiles
Three dimensional models
Topography
Two dimensional models
Upwelling
title Continental crust formation on early Earth controlled by intrusive magmatism
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T14%3A14%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Continental%20crust%20formation%20on%20early%20Earth%20controlled%20by%20intrusive%20magmatism&rft.jtitle=Nature%20(London)&rft.au=Rozel,%20A.%20B.&rft.date=2017-05-18&rft.volume=545&rft.issue=7654&rft.spage=332&rft.epage=335&rft.pages=332-335&rft.issn=0028-0836&rft.eissn=1476-4687&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/nature22042&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA504499604%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a609t-586f4b7eba204a1b143f1a1d7a1e5372a9a7a605f3741b26f3201afdd3de46df3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1901187597&rft_id=info:pmid/28482358&rft_galeid=A504499604&rfr_iscdi=true