Loading…

P2-144 An evaluation of dietary and exercise intervention for hypertensive men

IntroductionThis study evaluated the effect of a 6-month health intervention program conducted from 2003 to 2008 for hypertensive men in Japan.MethodsThe subjects, volunteers aged 50–75 years, were divided into 45 and 25 men for the intervention and control groups, respectively. We performed dietary...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of epidemiology and community health (1979) 2011-08, Vol.65 (Suppl 1), p.A260-A260
Main Authors: Kitaoka, K, Nagaoka, J, Matsuoka, T, Shigemura, C, Aoi, W, Wada, S, Asano, H, Sakane, N, Higashi, A
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:IntroductionThis study evaluated the effect of a 6-month health intervention program conducted from 2003 to 2008 for hypertensive men in Japan.MethodsThe subjects, volunteers aged 50–75 years, were divided into 45 and 25 men for the intervention and control groups, respectively. We performed dietary and exercise education five times for the intervention group and conducted two health checkups for both groups. We compared lifestyle, and physical and mental health criteria at baseline, and immediately after the intervention.ResultsDuring the 6-month intervention, the follow-up rates were 97.8% and 76.0% in the intervention and control groups, respectively. At the baseline, there were no differences in physical status or lifestyles between the intervention and control groups. After the program, no significant change was shown in the urinary excretion ratio of Na/K in the control group (3.5–3.2, p=0.768), but a significant decrease was demonstrated in the intervention group (2.6–2.2, p=0.023). The exercise habit, a walk of more than 30 min everyday, increased significantly in the intervention group. No significant change in the mean systolic or diastolic blood pressure (mm Hg) was shown in the control group (149.3–147.0, p=0.199, 89.2–87.5, p=0.171), but the intervention group showed a significant decrease (151.0–146.0, p=0.034, 93.5–88.6, p
ISSN:0143-005X
1470-2738
DOI:10.1136/jech.2011.142976i.79