Detection of cyclopiazonic acid (CPA) in maize by immunoassay

• Published in: Mycotoxin research 2017-05, Vol.33 (2), p.157-165
• Main Authors: Maragos, C. M., Sieve, K. K., Bobell, J.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Aflatoxins; Antibodies, Monoclonal - immunology; Antibodies, Monoclonal - isolation & purification; Aspergillus flavus; Bioassays; Biomedical and Life Sciences; Chemistry/Food Science; Corn; Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay - methods; Immunoglobulins; Indoles - analysis; Indoles - immunology; Life Sciences; Liquid chromatography; Medical Microbiology; Medicine/Public Health; Metabolites; Methanol; Microbiology; Monitoring methods; Mycotoxins; Mycotoxins - analysis; Mycotoxins - immunology; Original Article; Zea mays; Zea mays - chemistry
• ISSN: 0178-7888; 1867-1632
• DOI: 10.1007/s12550-017-0275-0

Cyclopiazonic acid (α-CPA) is a tremorgenic mycotoxin that is commonly produced by certain species of the aspergilli, in particular Aspergillus flavus , which is more widely known for production of the aflatoxins. Despite the fact that α-CPA may co-occur with aflatoxins, immunoassay-based methods for monitoring for CPA have not been widely developed. We report the development and evaluation of several monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) for α-CPA. Two mAbs in particular were very sensitive, with IC 50 s of 1.1 and 1 ng/mL (clones 1418 and 1231, respectively). Tolerances to aqueous methanol or acetonitrile were good, which permitted the development of an antigen-immobilized competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (CI-ELISA) for detection of CPA in maize. Spiked or naturally contaminated maize, extracted with aqueous methanol, was diluted with buffer for analysis. The working range for the assay (IC 20 to IC 80 ) was from 5 to 28 μg/kg. Recoveries from maize spiked over the range from 2 to 50 μg/kg averaged 88.6 ± 12.6%. Twenty-eight samples of maize were tested by both the CI-ELISA and a liquid chromatography-fluorescence (LC-FLD) method. For the five samples above the limits of quantitation of both methods, CI-ELISA tended to overestimate CPA content, a difference that we speculate may be due to related metabolites or perhaps “masked” derivatives of CPA. The antibodies developed and the resulting CI-ELISA will be useful tools for further evaluation of the prevalence of this mycotoxin in maize.