Loading…
FAR Compliance is NOT OPTIONAL
Most of the people involved in government contracting today never experienced a pre-Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) world, and are clearly better off with the FAR system in place. The FAR brings order and simplicity to government contracting, and procurement without structure would be chaos. Ho...
Saved in:
Published in: | Contract management 2017-03, Vol.57 (3), p.36 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Magazinearticle |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 36 |
container_title | Contract management |
container_volume | 57 |
creator | Nichols, J Scott |
description | Most of the people involved in government contracting today never experienced a pre-Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) world, and are clearly better off with the FAR system in place. The FAR brings order and simplicity to government contracting, and procurement without structure would be chaos. However, despite the many benefits the FAR brings to the contracting world, it is still challenging to fully understand and to comply with. Companies that do business with the federal government must comply with all applicable provisions of the FAR. There are many factors that drive the various requirements identified in a specific FAR clause or provision: 1. contract type, 2. applicability, 3. dollar threshold (both for the prime and subcontractor), 4. subcontractor flowdowns, and 5. frequency. Contract professionals, regardless of their level of competency, need a tool to help them better understand the intent of the FAR clauses/provisions they are working with, all the while tracking the company's performance obligations and compliance with the applicable FAR requirements-regardless of contract type, dollar threshold, or frequency. |
format | magazinearticle |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1898950427</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1898950427</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_18989504273</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYeA0MLQ00DU2MDPmYOAqLs4yMDA0NjEy42SQc3MMUnDOzy3IyUzMS05VyCxW8PMPUfAPCPH093P04WFgTUvMKU7lhdLcDBpuriHOHroFRfmFpanFJfG5mcXJqTk5iXmp-aXF8YYWlhaWpgYmRubGJCgFAFN9Lgg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>magazinearticle</recordtype><pqid>1898950427</pqid></control><display><type>magazinearticle</type><title>FAR Compliance is NOT OPTIONAL</title><source>ABI/INFORM global</source><creator>Nichols, J Scott</creator><creatorcontrib>Nichols, J Scott</creatorcontrib><description>Most of the people involved in government contracting today never experienced a pre-Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) world, and are clearly better off with the FAR system in place. The FAR brings order and simplicity to government contracting, and procurement without structure would be chaos. However, despite the many benefits the FAR brings to the contracting world, it is still challenging to fully understand and to comply with. Companies that do business with the federal government must comply with all applicable provisions of the FAR. There are many factors that drive the various requirements identified in a specific FAR clause or provision: 1. contract type, 2. applicability, 3. dollar threshold (both for the prime and subcontractor), 4. subcontractor flowdowns, and 5. frequency. Contract professionals, regardless of their level of competency, need a tool to help them better understand the intent of the FAR clauses/provisions they are working with, all the while tracking the company's performance obligations and compliance with the applicable FAR requirements-regardless of contract type, dollar threshold, or frequency.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0190-3063</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>McLean: National Contract Management Association</publisher><subject>Compliance ; Contract management ; Federal government ; Government purchasing ; Subcontractors</subject><ispartof>Contract management, 2017-03, Vol.57 (3), p.36</ispartof><rights>Copyright National Contract Management Association Mar 2017</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1898950427?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>780,784,13503,36061,44363</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nichols, J Scott</creatorcontrib><title>FAR Compliance is NOT OPTIONAL</title><title>Contract management</title><description>Most of the people involved in government contracting today never experienced a pre-Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) world, and are clearly better off with the FAR system in place. The FAR brings order and simplicity to government contracting, and procurement without structure would be chaos. However, despite the many benefits the FAR brings to the contracting world, it is still challenging to fully understand and to comply with. Companies that do business with the federal government must comply with all applicable provisions of the FAR. There are many factors that drive the various requirements identified in a specific FAR clause or provision: 1. contract type, 2. applicability, 3. dollar threshold (both for the prime and subcontractor), 4. subcontractor flowdowns, and 5. frequency. Contract professionals, regardless of their level of competency, need a tool to help them better understand the intent of the FAR clauses/provisions they are working with, all the while tracking the company's performance obligations and compliance with the applicable FAR requirements-regardless of contract type, dollar threshold, or frequency.</description><subject>Compliance</subject><subject>Contract management</subject><subject>Federal government</subject><subject>Government purchasing</subject><subject>Subcontractors</subject><issn>0190-3063</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>magazinearticle</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>magazinearticle</recordtype><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><recordid>eNpjYeA0MLQ00DU2MDPmYOAqLs4yMDA0NjEy42SQc3MMUnDOzy3IyUzMS05VyCxW8PMPUfAPCPH093P04WFgTUvMKU7lhdLcDBpuriHOHroFRfmFpanFJfG5mcXJqTk5iXmp-aXF8YYWlhaWpgYmRubGJCgFAFN9Lgg</recordid><startdate>20170301</startdate><enddate>20170301</enddate><creator>Nichols, J Scott</creator><general>National Contract Management Association</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>883</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0F</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYYUZ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>U9A</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170301</creationdate><title>FAR Compliance is NOT OPTIONAL</title><author>Nichols, J Scott</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_18989504273</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>magazinearticle</rsrctype><prefilter>magazinearticle</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Compliance</topic><topic>Contract management</topic><topic>Federal government</topic><topic>Government purchasing</topic><topic>Subcontractors</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nichols, J Scott</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Career & Technical Education Database</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Trade & Industry (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM global</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM trade & industry</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Contract management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nichols, J Scott</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>FAR Compliance is NOT OPTIONAL</atitle><jtitle>Contract management</jtitle><date>2017-03-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>57</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>36</spage><pages>36-</pages><issn>0190-3063</issn><abstract>Most of the people involved in government contracting today never experienced a pre-Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) world, and are clearly better off with the FAR system in place. The FAR brings order and simplicity to government contracting, and procurement without structure would be chaos. However, despite the many benefits the FAR brings to the contracting world, it is still challenging to fully understand and to comply with. Companies that do business with the federal government must comply with all applicable provisions of the FAR. There are many factors that drive the various requirements identified in a specific FAR clause or provision: 1. contract type, 2. applicability, 3. dollar threshold (both for the prime and subcontractor), 4. subcontractor flowdowns, and 5. frequency. Contract professionals, regardless of their level of competency, need a tool to help them better understand the intent of the FAR clauses/provisions they are working with, all the while tracking the company's performance obligations and compliance with the applicable FAR requirements-regardless of contract type, dollar threshold, or frequency.</abstract><cop>McLean</cop><pub>National Contract Management Association</pub></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0190-3063 |
ispartof | Contract management, 2017-03, Vol.57 (3), p.36 |
issn | 0190-3063 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1898950427 |
source | ABI/INFORM global |
subjects | Compliance Contract management Federal government Government purchasing Subcontractors |
title | FAR Compliance is NOT OPTIONAL |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T22%3A41%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=FAR%20Compliance%20is%20NOT%20OPTIONAL&rft.jtitle=Contract%20management&rft.au=Nichols,%20J%20Scott&rft.date=2017-03-01&rft.volume=57&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=36&rft.pages=36-&rft.issn=0190-3063&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E1898950427%3C/proquest%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_18989504273%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1898950427&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |