Loading…

Comparison of the Incidences of Complications After Second-Generation Cryoballoon Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation Using Vitamin K Antagonists versus Novel Oral Anticoagulants

Abstract Data evaluating the impact of the periprocedural administration of novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) on complications in the setting of pulmonary vein (PV) isolation using cryoballoon (CB) is limited. . In the present study, our aim was to analyse procedural characteristics and incidence of...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The American journal of cardiology 2017-07, Vol.120 (2), p.223-229
Main Authors: Mugnai, Giacomo, MD PhD, de Asmundis, Carlo, MD PhD, Iacopino, Saverio, MD, Stroker, Erwin, MD, Longobardi, Massimo, MD, De Regibus, Valentina, MD, Coutino-Moreno, Hugo Enrique, MD, Takarada, Ken, MD, Choudhury, Rajin, MD, Abugattas de Torres, Juan Pablo, MD, Storti, Cesare, MD PhD, Brugada, Pedro, MD PhD, Chierchia, Gian-Battista, MD PhD
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract Data evaluating the impact of the periprocedural administration of novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) on complications in the setting of pulmonary vein (PV) isolation using cryoballoon (CB) is limited. . In the present study, our aim was to analyse procedural characteristics and incidence of complications in those patients who underwent CB ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) and the impact of NOACs on adverse events compared to vitamin K antagonists (VKA). Consecutive patients with drug resistant AF who underwent PV isolation by CB as index procedure were retrospectively included in our analysis. In group I, 290/454 (63.9%) patients received VKAs (warfarin: n=222; acenocoumarol: n=68), and in group II, 164/454 (36.1%) patients were treated with NOACs (rivaroxaban: n=71; dabigatran: n=60; and apixaban: n=33). Age was significantly higher in the group II (62.8±9.7 vs 58.6±11.3; p
ISSN:0002-9149
1879-1913
DOI:10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.04.012