Meta-Synthesis of Qualitative Research on Facilitators and Barriers of Return to Work After Stroke

• Published in: Journal of occupational rehabilitation 2018-03, Vol.28 (1), p.28-44
• Main Authors: Schwarz, Betje, Claros-Salinas, Dolores, Streibelt, Marco
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adaptation; Adaptation, Psychological; Adaptiveness; Analysis; Clinical Psychology; Disability management; Employee motivation; Environmental Health; Ethnography; Health Psychology; Humans; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Motivation; Occupational health; Occupational Medicine/Industrial Medicine; Orthopedics; Qualitative Research; Quality assessment; Rehabilitation; Resilience, Psychological; Return to Work - psychology; Review; Social interactions; Stroke; Stroke - psychology; Stroke patients; Studies; Survivors - psychology; Synthesis; Systematic review; Work capacity; Workplace - organization & administration; Workplace - psychology
• ISSN: 1053-0487; 1573-3688; 1573-3688
• DOI: 10.1007/s10926-017-9713-2

Purpose Despite existing rehabilitation services, return to work (RTW) rates among stroke survivors are quite low. An increased number of qualitative studies have been conducted to identify facilitators and barriers to RTW after stroke and to derive recommendations for future interventions. The aim of our study was to carry out a meta-synthesis of those studies and thus strengthen evidence in the field. Methods To identify relevant studies (qualitative studies focusing on RTW after stroke, published in English or German between 2000 and 2015), we conducted a systematic literature search in PubMed, OVID, and Web of Science. After assessing the quality of eligible studies, we synthesized their findings according to meta-ethnographic methodology. Results Fourteen out of 553 studies—three of very high, seven of high, three of medium, and one of low quality—met the inclusion criteria. After the extraction of all first-order concepts and their translation into 64 second-order interpretations, we synthesized the findings by developing a model of RTW factors after stroke. It contains factors related to the person (impairments, coping/adaptation, significance of work/RTW motivation), workplace (job demands/work adaptations, disability management, work climate/social support), and rehabilitation services (availability, accessibility, appropriateness), as well as relevant factors in the interaction of these three stakeholders (work capacity, performance and capability, and initial RTW experiences). Three basic principles—adaptiveness, purposefulness, and cooperativeness—complete the model and led us to its name: the APC model. Conclusions Successful RTW after stroke depends on diverse factors and stakeholders. Rehabilitation strategies have to consider this; otherwise they become RTW barriers themselves.