Effect of extraction methods on kinetic, chemical composition and antibacterial activities of Tunisian Thymus vulgaris. L. essential oil

The present study aims to compare two innovative extraction techniques: microwave-assisted hydrodistillation (MAHD) and solvent-free microwave extraction (SFME) through traditional extraction techniques: hydrodistillation (HD) and steam distillation (SD) for their efficiency in the extraction of the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Separation science and technology 2016-09, Vol.51 (13), p.2145-2152
Main Authors: Benmoussa, Hasnia, Elfalleh, Walid, Farhat, Asma, Bachoual, Rafik, Nasfi, Zina, Romdhane, Mehrez
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Antibacterial activity
Antibacterial properties
Efficiency
essential oil
Essential oils
Extraction
Gas chromatography
Mass spectrometry
microwave-assisted hydrodistillation
Microwaves
solvent-free microwave extraction
Steam distillation
Thymus vulgaris
Thymus vulgaris leaves
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The present study aims to compare two innovative extraction techniques: microwave-assisted hydrodistillation (MAHD) and solvent-free microwave extraction (SFME) through traditional extraction techniques: hydrodistillation (HD) and steam distillation (SD) for their efficiency in the extraction of the volatile compounds from Tunisian Thymus vulgaris leaves; the kinetic, yield, composition and antibacterial activities of the essential oil were assessed in vitro. Results show that the essential oils extracted by microwaves were quantitatively (yield) similar to those obtained through the conventional methods, but qualitatively, essential oils analysed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) presented 17, 11, 11 and 8 compounds obtained through SFME, MAHD, SD and HD, respectively, mostly consisting of carvacrol (89.24-41.17%), followed by γ-terpinene (11.37-1.37%) and para-cymene (27.95-2.05%). The essential oils were screened for antibacterial activity against 5 microorganisms. All essential oils obtained by studied extraction methods showed the same resistance against Gram (−) and Gram (+) bacteria. The SFME method gave the best results: rapid kinetic of extraction (30 min vs. 35 min for MAHD, 120 min for SD, and 180 min for HD), less energy saving and cleanest process.
ISSN:0149-6395
1520-5754
DOI:10.1080/01496395.2016.1201507