Loading…

On dealing with censored largest observations under weighted least squares

When observations are subject to right censoring, weighted least squares with appropriate weights (to adjust for censoring) is sometimes used for parameter estimation. With Stute's weighted least squares method, when the largest observation is censored ( ), it is natural to apply the redistribu...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of statistical computation and simulation 2016-12, Vol.86 (18), p.3758-3776
Main Authors: Khan, Md Hasinur Rahaman, Shaw, J. Ewart H.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:When observations are subject to right censoring, weighted least squares with appropriate weights (to adjust for censoring) is sometimes used for parameter estimation. With Stute's weighted least squares method, when the largest observation is censored ( ), it is natural to apply the redistribution to the right algorithm of Efron [The two sample problem with censored data. Proceedings of the Fifth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, vol. 4. New York: Prentice Hall; 1967. p. 831-853]. However, Efron's redistribution algorithm can lead to bias and inefficiency in estimation. This study explains the issues clearly and proposes some alternative ways of treating . The first four proposed approaches are based on the well known Buckley-James [Linear regression with censored data. Biometrika 1979;66:429-436] method of imputation with the Efron's tail correction and the last approach is indirectly based on a general mean imputation technique in literature. All the new schemes use penalized weighted least squares optimized by quadratic programming implemented with the accelerated failure time models. Furthermore, two novel additional imputation approaches are proposed to impute the tail tied censored observations that are often found in survival analysis with heavy censoring. Several simulation studies and real data analysis demonstrate that the proposed approaches generally outperform Efron's redistribution approach and lead to considerably smaller mean squared error and bias estimates.
ISSN:0094-9655
1563-5163
DOI:10.1080/00949655.2016.1185794