Loading…
Added value from IPCC approval sessions
Flexible, creative author teams are critical Approval sessions of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) generate broadly shared ownership of scientific knowledge on climate change—a key contribution to the influence of IPCC reports ( 1 , 2 ). Yet several recent essays have highlighted...
Saved in:
| Published in: | Science (American Association for the Advancement of Science) 2015-10, Vol.350 (6256), p.36-36 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Subjects: | |
| Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c302t-4369da9f23fcd483235b078751a33f94e6ec4f5cdfd30655bd852ae0046632ce3 |
|---|---|
| cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c302t-4369da9f23fcd483235b078751a33f94e6ec4f5cdfd30655bd852ae0046632ce3 |
| container_end_page | 36 |
| container_issue | 6256 |
| container_start_page | 36 |
| container_title | Science (American Association for the Advancement of Science) |
| container_volume | 350 |
| creator | Field, Christopher B Barros, Vicente R |
| description | Flexible, creative author teams are critical
Approval sessions of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) generate broadly shared ownership of scientific knowledge on climate change—a key contribution to the influence of IPCC reports (
1
,
2
). Yet several recent essays have highlighted weaknesses of the approval process (
3
,
4
). We draw on our experience cochairing Working Group II to provide some balance and to characterize important strengths. Although the governmental approval process can be cumbersome, sleep-depriving, and tinged with risk of political influence (
5
), successful approval sessions sharpen policy-relevant findings to make them more clear and useful (
6
). |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1126/science.aaa8976 |
| format | article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1904223502</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1904223502</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c302t-4369da9f23fcd483235b078751a33f94e6ec4f5cdfd30655bd852ae0046632ce3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkE1LAzEQhoMoWKtnrwse9LLtJJNkN8ey-FEo6EHPIU0msGW7W5Ou4L93xZ48Dbzz8M7wMHbLYcG50MvsW-o9LZxztan0GZtxMKo0AvCczQBQlzVU6pJd5bwDmHYGZ-x-FQKF4st1IxUxDfti_dY0hTsc0jCFRaac26HP1-wiui7TzWnO2cfT43vzUm5en9fNalN6BHEsJWoTnIkCow-yRoFqC1VdKe4Qo5GkycuofIgBQSu1DbUSjgCk1ig84Zw9_PVO9z9Hyke7b7OnrnM9DWO23IAUUyuICb37h-6GMfXTd5ZXvMYKJceJWv5RPg05J4r2kNq9S9-Wg_0VZ0_i7Ekc_gCGFGC5</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1718373413</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Added value from IPCC approval sessions</title><source>American Association for the Advancement of Science</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Field, Christopher B ; Barros, Vicente R</creator><creatorcontrib>Field, Christopher B ; Barros, Vicente R</creatorcontrib><description>Flexible, creative author teams are critical
Approval sessions of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) generate broadly shared ownership of scientific knowledge on climate change—a key contribution to the influence of IPCC reports (
1
,
2
). Yet several recent essays have highlighted weaknesses of the approval process (
3
,
4
). We draw on our experience cochairing Working Group II to provide some balance and to characterize important strengths. Although the governmental approval process can be cumbersome, sleep-depriving, and tinged with risk of political influence (
5
), successful approval sessions sharpen policy-relevant findings to make them more clear and useful (
6
).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0036-8075</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-9203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1126/science.aaa8976</identifier><identifier>CODEN: SCIEAS</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: The American Association for the Advancement of Science</publisher><subject>Added value ; Climate ; Climate change ; Essays ; Ownership ; Panels ; Political factors ; Politics ; Risk</subject><ispartof>Science (American Association for the Advancement of Science), 2015-10, Vol.350 (6256), p.36-36</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2015, American Association for the Advancement of Science</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c302t-4369da9f23fcd483235b078751a33f94e6ec4f5cdfd30655bd852ae0046632ce3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c302t-4369da9f23fcd483235b078751a33f94e6ec4f5cdfd30655bd852ae0046632ce3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,2883,2884,27923,27924</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Field, Christopher B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barros, Vicente R</creatorcontrib><title>Added value from IPCC approval sessions</title><title>Science (American Association for the Advancement of Science)</title><description>Flexible, creative author teams are critical
Approval sessions of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) generate broadly shared ownership of scientific knowledge on climate change—a key contribution to the influence of IPCC reports (
1
,
2
). Yet several recent essays have highlighted weaknesses of the approval process (
3
,
4
). We draw on our experience cochairing Working Group II to provide some balance and to characterize important strengths. Although the governmental approval process can be cumbersome, sleep-depriving, and tinged with risk of political influence (
5
), successful approval sessions sharpen policy-relevant findings to make them more clear and useful (
6
).</description><subject>Added value</subject><subject>Climate</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Essays</subject><subject>Ownership</subject><subject>Panels</subject><subject>Political factors</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Risk</subject><issn>0036-8075</issn><issn>1095-9203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkE1LAzEQhoMoWKtnrwse9LLtJJNkN8ey-FEo6EHPIU0msGW7W5Ou4L93xZ48Dbzz8M7wMHbLYcG50MvsW-o9LZxztan0GZtxMKo0AvCczQBQlzVU6pJd5bwDmHYGZ-x-FQKF4st1IxUxDfti_dY0hTsc0jCFRaac26HP1-wiui7TzWnO2cfT43vzUm5en9fNalN6BHEsJWoTnIkCow-yRoFqC1VdKe4Qo5GkycuofIgBQSu1DbUSjgCk1ig84Zw9_PVO9z9Hyke7b7OnrnM9DWO23IAUUyuICb37h-6GMfXTd5ZXvMYKJceJWv5RPg05J4r2kNq9S9-Wg_0VZ0_i7Ekc_gCGFGC5</recordid><startdate>20151002</startdate><enddate>20151002</enddate><creator>Field, Christopher B</creator><creator>Barros, Vicente R</creator><general>The American Association for the Advancement of Science</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H8G</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20151002</creationdate><title>Added value from IPCC approval sessions</title><author>Field, Christopher B ; Barros, Vicente R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c302t-4369da9f23fcd483235b078751a33f94e6ec4f5cdfd30655bd852ae0046632ce3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Added value</topic><topic>Climate</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Essays</topic><topic>Ownership</topic><topic>Panels</topic><topic>Political factors</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Risk</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Field, Christopher B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barros, Vicente R</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Copper Technical Reference Library</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Science (American Association for the Advancement of Science)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Field, Christopher B</au><au>Barros, Vicente R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Added value from IPCC approval sessions</atitle><jtitle>Science (American Association for the Advancement of Science)</jtitle><date>2015-10-02</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>350</volume><issue>6256</issue><spage>36</spage><epage>36</epage><pages>36-36</pages><issn>0036-8075</issn><eissn>1095-9203</eissn><coden>SCIEAS</coden><abstract>Flexible, creative author teams are critical
Approval sessions of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) generate broadly shared ownership of scientific knowledge on climate change—a key contribution to the influence of IPCC reports (
1
,
2
). Yet several recent essays have highlighted weaknesses of the approval process (
3
,
4
). We draw on our experience cochairing Working Group II to provide some balance and to characterize important strengths. Although the governmental approval process can be cumbersome, sleep-depriving, and tinged with risk of political influence (
5
), successful approval sessions sharpen policy-relevant findings to make them more clear and useful (
6
).</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>The American Association for the Advancement of Science</pub><doi>10.1126/science.aaa8976</doi><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0036-8075 |
| ispartof | Science (American Association for the Advancement of Science), 2015-10, Vol.350 (6256), p.36-36 |
| issn | 0036-8075 1095-9203 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1904223502 |
| source | American Association for the Advancement of Science; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
| subjects | Added value Climate Climate change Essays Ownership Panels Political factors Politics Risk |
| title | Added value from IPCC approval sessions |
| url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T16%3A49%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Added%20value%20from%20IPCC%20approval%20sessions&rft.jtitle=Science%20(American%20Association%20for%20the%20Advancement%20of%20Science)&rft.au=Field,%20Christopher%20B&rft.date=2015-10-02&rft.volume=350&rft.issue=6256&rft.spage=36&rft.epage=36&rft.pages=36-36&rft.issn=0036-8075&rft.eissn=1095-9203&rft.coden=SCIEAS&rft_id=info:doi/10.1126/science.aaa8976&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1904223502%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c302t-4369da9f23fcd483235b078751a33f94e6ec4f5cdfd30655bd852ae0046632ce3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1718373413&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |