Loading…

Detoxification of synthetic and real groundwater contaminated with gasoline and diesel using Fenton, photo-Fenton, and biofilters

The treatment of groundwater contaminated with gasoline and diesel with H2O2, H2O2 + UV, Fenton, and photo-Fenton was studied. Fenton reactions provided the best results with 1mM of Fe2+ and 200mM of H2O2. High contaminant removals were achieved, in particular those of COD (Fenton: 69%, photo-Fenton...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Desalination and water treatment 2016-10, Vol.57 (50), p.23760-23769
Main Authors: Torres, Guillermo F., Ortega Méndez, J.A., Tinoco, Diana L., Marin, Enrique D., Araña, J., Herrera-Melián, J.A., Doña Rodrígez, J.M., Pérez Peña, J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c403t-d581f602d580d0c7c639a93e9ef11b62d1daa79afae12ab68571e0de75dd0e3b3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c403t-d581f602d580d0c7c639a93e9ef11b62d1daa79afae12ab68571e0de75dd0e3b3
container_end_page 23769
container_issue 50
container_start_page 23760
container_title Desalination and water treatment
container_volume 57
creator Torres, Guillermo F.
Ortega Méndez, J.A.
Tinoco, Diana L.
Marin, Enrique D.
Araña, J.
Herrera-Melián, J.A.
Doña Rodrígez, J.M.
Pérez Peña, J.
description The treatment of groundwater contaminated with gasoline and diesel with H2O2, H2O2 + UV, Fenton, and photo-Fenton was studied. Fenton reactions provided the best results with 1mM of Fe2+ and 200mM of H2O2. High contaminant removals were achieved, in particular those of COD (Fenton: 69%, photo-Fenton: 97%), Diesel Range Organics (99.9% both reactions), Gasoline Range Organics (99.9% both reactions), Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (Fenton: 83.8%, photo-Fenton: 92.5%), Total Phenols (Fenton: 67.3%, photo-Fenton: 90.4%), and toxicity toward Vibrio fischeri (100%, both reactions). The experiments have been performed with synthetic and real samples. The economic cost of the proposed method (14 USD/m3) is reduced by 60% with respect to that currently used in Ecuador.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/19443994.2016.1141710
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1904249617</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1944398624033800</els_id><sourcerecordid>1901754191</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c403t-d581f602d580d0c7c639a93e9ef11b62d1daa79afae12ab68571e0de75dd0e3b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU1rGzEQhpfSQE2SnxAQ9NJD1tHsaj90KiFt2kAgl-QsZGnWHrOWXEnb1Mf-88pxAiGXZi7zwTMvzLxFcQZ8DrznFyCFqKUU84pDOwcQ0AH_UMz287KWffvxVf2pOI1xzXM0omtENSv-fsPk_9BARifyjvmBxZ1LK0xkmHaWBdQjWwY_OfuoEwZmvEt6Qy43lj1SWrGljn4kh0-8JYw4simSW7JrdMm7c7Zd-eTLl26PLcgPNGa9eFIcDXqMePqcj4uH6-_3Vz_L27sfN1eXt6URvE6lbXoYWl7lzC03nWlrqWWNEgeARVtZsFp3Ug8aodKLtm86QG6xa6zlWC_q4-LLQXcb_K8JY1IbigbHUTv0U1QguaiEbKF7Dwr5fSAho5_foGs_BZcPUdBXleg70YhMNQfKBB9jwEFtA2102Cngam-jerFR7W1Uzzbmva-HPcyP-U0YVDSEzqClgCYp6-k_Cv8ABHik6A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1822487454</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Detoxification of synthetic and real groundwater contaminated with gasoline and diesel using Fenton, photo-Fenton, and biofilters</title><source>ScienceDirect (Online service)</source><creator>Torres, Guillermo F. ; Ortega Méndez, J.A. ; Tinoco, Diana L. ; Marin, Enrique D. ; Araña, J. ; Herrera-Melián, J.A. ; Doña Rodrígez, J.M. ; Pérez Peña, J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Torres, Guillermo F. ; Ortega Méndez, J.A. ; Tinoco, Diana L. ; Marin, Enrique D. ; Araña, J. ; Herrera-Melián, J.A. ; Doña Rodrígez, J.M. ; Pérez Peña, J.</creatorcontrib><description>The treatment of groundwater contaminated with gasoline and diesel with H2O2, H2O2 + UV, Fenton, and photo-Fenton was studied. Fenton reactions provided the best results with 1mM of Fe2+ and 200mM of H2O2. High contaminant removals were achieved, in particular those of COD (Fenton: 69%, photo-Fenton: 97%), Diesel Range Organics (99.9% both reactions), Gasoline Range Organics (99.9% both reactions), Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (Fenton: 83.8%, photo-Fenton: 92.5%), Total Phenols (Fenton: 67.3%, photo-Fenton: 90.4%), and toxicity toward Vibrio fischeri (100%, both reactions). The experiments have been performed with synthetic and real samples. The economic cost of the proposed method (14 USD/m3) is reduced by 60% with respect to that currently used in Ecuador.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1944-3986</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1944-3994</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1944-3986</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/19443994.2016.1141710</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Abingdon: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>AOPs ; Biofilters ; Contaminants ; Contamination ; Crude oil ; Detoxification ; Diesel ; DRO ; Gasoline ; GRO ; Groundwater ; Groundwater pollution ; Hydrocarbon polluted water ; Hydrogen peroxide ; Petroleum hydrocarbons ; Phenols ; Toxicity ; Vibrio ; Vibrio fischeri</subject><ispartof>Desalination and water treatment, 2016-10, Vol.57 (50), p.23760-23769</ispartof><rights>2016 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2016 Balaban Desalination Publications. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c403t-d581f602d580d0c7c639a93e9ef11b62d1daa79afae12ab68571e0de75dd0e3b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c403t-d581f602d580d0c7c639a93e9ef11b62d1daa79afae12ab68571e0de75dd0e3b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1944398624033800$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3549,27924,27925,45780</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Torres, Guillermo F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ortega Méndez, J.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tinoco, Diana L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marin, Enrique D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Araña, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herrera-Melián, J.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doña Rodrígez, J.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pérez Peña, J.</creatorcontrib><title>Detoxification of synthetic and real groundwater contaminated with gasoline and diesel using Fenton, photo-Fenton, and biofilters</title><title>Desalination and water treatment</title><description>The treatment of groundwater contaminated with gasoline and diesel with H2O2, H2O2 + UV, Fenton, and photo-Fenton was studied. Fenton reactions provided the best results with 1mM of Fe2+ and 200mM of H2O2. High contaminant removals were achieved, in particular those of COD (Fenton: 69%, photo-Fenton: 97%), Diesel Range Organics (99.9% both reactions), Gasoline Range Organics (99.9% both reactions), Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (Fenton: 83.8%, photo-Fenton: 92.5%), Total Phenols (Fenton: 67.3%, photo-Fenton: 90.4%), and toxicity toward Vibrio fischeri (100%, both reactions). The experiments have been performed with synthetic and real samples. The economic cost of the proposed method (14 USD/m3) is reduced by 60% with respect to that currently used in Ecuador.</description><subject>AOPs</subject><subject>Biofilters</subject><subject>Contaminants</subject><subject>Contamination</subject><subject>Crude oil</subject><subject>Detoxification</subject><subject>Diesel</subject><subject>DRO</subject><subject>Gasoline</subject><subject>GRO</subject><subject>Groundwater</subject><subject>Groundwater pollution</subject><subject>Hydrocarbon polluted water</subject><subject>Hydrogen peroxide</subject><subject>Petroleum hydrocarbons</subject><subject>Phenols</subject><subject>Toxicity</subject><subject>Vibrio</subject><subject>Vibrio fischeri</subject><issn>1944-3986</issn><issn>1944-3994</issn><issn>1944-3986</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkU1rGzEQhpfSQE2SnxAQ9NJD1tHsaj90KiFt2kAgl-QsZGnWHrOWXEnb1Mf-88pxAiGXZi7zwTMvzLxFcQZ8DrznFyCFqKUU84pDOwcQ0AH_UMz287KWffvxVf2pOI1xzXM0omtENSv-fsPk_9BARifyjvmBxZ1LK0xkmHaWBdQjWwY_OfuoEwZmvEt6Qy43lj1SWrGljn4kh0-8JYw4simSW7JrdMm7c7Zd-eTLl26PLcgPNGa9eFIcDXqMePqcj4uH6-_3Vz_L27sfN1eXt6URvE6lbXoYWl7lzC03nWlrqWWNEgeARVtZsFp3Ug8aodKLtm86QG6xa6zlWC_q4-LLQXcb_K8JY1IbigbHUTv0U1QguaiEbKF7Dwr5fSAho5_foGs_BZcPUdBXleg70YhMNQfKBB9jwEFtA2102Cngam-jerFR7W1Uzzbmva-HPcyP-U0YVDSEzqClgCYp6-k_Cv8ABHik6A</recordid><startdate>20161001</startdate><enddate>20161001</enddate><creator>Torres, Guillermo F.</creator><creator>Ortega Méndez, J.A.</creator><creator>Tinoco, Diana L.</creator><creator>Marin, Enrique D.</creator><creator>Araña, J.</creator><creator>Herrera-Melián, J.A.</creator><creator>Doña Rodrígez, J.M.</creator><creator>Pérez Peña, J.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>KL.</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20161001</creationdate><title>Detoxification of synthetic and real groundwater contaminated with gasoline and diesel using Fenton, photo-Fenton, and biofilters</title><author>Torres, Guillermo F. ; Ortega Méndez, J.A. ; Tinoco, Diana L. ; Marin, Enrique D. ; Araña, J. ; Herrera-Melián, J.A. ; Doña Rodrígez, J.M. ; Pérez Peña, J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c403t-d581f602d580d0c7c639a93e9ef11b62d1daa79afae12ab68571e0de75dd0e3b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>AOPs</topic><topic>Biofilters</topic><topic>Contaminants</topic><topic>Contamination</topic><topic>Crude oil</topic><topic>Detoxification</topic><topic>Diesel</topic><topic>DRO</topic><topic>Gasoline</topic><topic>GRO</topic><topic>Groundwater</topic><topic>Groundwater pollution</topic><topic>Hydrocarbon polluted water</topic><topic>Hydrogen peroxide</topic><topic>Petroleum hydrocarbons</topic><topic>Phenols</topic><topic>Toxicity</topic><topic>Vibrio</topic><topic>Vibrio fischeri</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Torres, Guillermo F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ortega Méndez, J.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tinoco, Diana L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marin, Enrique D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Araña, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herrera-Melián, J.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doña Rodrígez, J.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pérez Peña, J.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><jtitle>Desalination and water treatment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Torres, Guillermo F.</au><au>Ortega Méndez, J.A.</au><au>Tinoco, Diana L.</au><au>Marin, Enrique D.</au><au>Araña, J.</au><au>Herrera-Melián, J.A.</au><au>Doña Rodrígez, J.M.</au><au>Pérez Peña, J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Detoxification of synthetic and real groundwater contaminated with gasoline and diesel using Fenton, photo-Fenton, and biofilters</atitle><jtitle>Desalination and water treatment</jtitle><date>2016-10-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>57</volume><issue>50</issue><spage>23760</spage><epage>23769</epage><pages>23760-23769</pages><issn>1944-3986</issn><issn>1944-3994</issn><eissn>1944-3986</eissn><abstract>The treatment of groundwater contaminated with gasoline and diesel with H2O2, H2O2 + UV, Fenton, and photo-Fenton was studied. Fenton reactions provided the best results with 1mM of Fe2+ and 200mM of H2O2. High contaminant removals were achieved, in particular those of COD (Fenton: 69%, photo-Fenton: 97%), Diesel Range Organics (99.9% both reactions), Gasoline Range Organics (99.9% both reactions), Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (Fenton: 83.8%, photo-Fenton: 92.5%), Total Phenols (Fenton: 67.3%, photo-Fenton: 90.4%), and toxicity toward Vibrio fischeri (100%, both reactions). The experiments have been performed with synthetic and real samples. The economic cost of the proposed method (14 USD/m3) is reduced by 60% with respect to that currently used in Ecuador.</abstract><cop>Abingdon</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1080/19443994.2016.1141710</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1944-3986
ispartof Desalination and water treatment, 2016-10, Vol.57 (50), p.23760-23769
issn 1944-3986
1944-3994
1944-3986
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1904249617
source ScienceDirect (Online service)
subjects AOPs
Biofilters
Contaminants
Contamination
Crude oil
Detoxification
Diesel
DRO
Gasoline
GRO
Groundwater
Groundwater pollution
Hydrocarbon polluted water
Hydrogen peroxide
Petroleum hydrocarbons
Phenols
Toxicity
Vibrio
Vibrio fischeri
title Detoxification of synthetic and real groundwater contaminated with gasoline and diesel using Fenton, photo-Fenton, and biofilters
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T17%3A15%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Detoxification%20of%20synthetic%20and%20real%20groundwater%20contaminated%20with%20gasoline%20and%20diesel%20using%20Fenton,%20photo-Fenton,%20and%20biofilters&rft.jtitle=Desalination%20and%20water%20treatment&rft.au=Torres,%20Guillermo%20F.&rft.date=2016-10-01&rft.volume=57&rft.issue=50&rft.spage=23760&rft.epage=23769&rft.pages=23760-23769&rft.issn=1944-3986&rft.eissn=1944-3986&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/19443994.2016.1141710&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1901754191%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c403t-d581f602d580d0c7c639a93e9ef11b62d1daa79afae12ab68571e0de75dd0e3b3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1822487454&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true