Loading…
Detoxification of synthetic and real groundwater contaminated with gasoline and diesel using Fenton, photo-Fenton, and biofilters
The treatment of groundwater contaminated with gasoline and diesel with H2O2, H2O2 + UV, Fenton, and photo-Fenton was studied. Fenton reactions provided the best results with 1mM of Fe2+ and 200mM of H2O2. High contaminant removals were achieved, in particular those of COD (Fenton: 69%, photo-Fenton...
Saved in:
Published in: | Desalination and water treatment 2016-10, Vol.57 (50), p.23760-23769 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c403t-d581f602d580d0c7c639a93e9ef11b62d1daa79afae12ab68571e0de75dd0e3b3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c403t-d581f602d580d0c7c639a93e9ef11b62d1daa79afae12ab68571e0de75dd0e3b3 |
container_end_page | 23769 |
container_issue | 50 |
container_start_page | 23760 |
container_title | Desalination and water treatment |
container_volume | 57 |
creator | Torres, Guillermo F. Ortega Méndez, J.A. Tinoco, Diana L. Marin, Enrique D. Araña, J. Herrera-Melián, J.A. Doña Rodrígez, J.M. Pérez Peña, J. |
description | The treatment of groundwater contaminated with gasoline and diesel with H2O2, H2O2 + UV, Fenton, and photo-Fenton was studied. Fenton reactions provided the best results with 1mM of Fe2+ and 200mM of H2O2. High contaminant removals were achieved, in particular those of COD (Fenton: 69%, photo-Fenton: 97%), Diesel Range Organics (99.9% both reactions), Gasoline Range Organics (99.9% both reactions), Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (Fenton: 83.8%, photo-Fenton: 92.5%), Total Phenols (Fenton: 67.3%, photo-Fenton: 90.4%), and toxicity toward Vibrio fischeri (100%, both reactions). The experiments have been performed with synthetic and real samples. The economic cost of the proposed method (14 USD/m3) is reduced by 60% with respect to that currently used in Ecuador. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/19443994.2016.1141710 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1904249617</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1944398624033800</els_id><sourcerecordid>1901754191</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c403t-d581f602d580d0c7c639a93e9ef11b62d1daa79afae12ab68571e0de75dd0e3b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU1rGzEQhpfSQE2SnxAQ9NJD1tHsaj90KiFt2kAgl-QsZGnWHrOWXEnb1Mf-88pxAiGXZi7zwTMvzLxFcQZ8DrznFyCFqKUU84pDOwcQ0AH_UMz287KWffvxVf2pOI1xzXM0omtENSv-fsPk_9BARifyjvmBxZ1LK0xkmHaWBdQjWwY_OfuoEwZmvEt6Qy43lj1SWrGljn4kh0-8JYw4simSW7JrdMm7c7Zd-eTLl26PLcgPNGa9eFIcDXqMePqcj4uH6-_3Vz_L27sfN1eXt6URvE6lbXoYWl7lzC03nWlrqWWNEgeARVtZsFp3Ug8aodKLtm86QG6xa6zlWC_q4-LLQXcb_K8JY1IbigbHUTv0U1QguaiEbKF7Dwr5fSAho5_foGs_BZcPUdBXleg70YhMNQfKBB9jwEFtA2102Cngam-jerFR7W1Uzzbmva-HPcyP-U0YVDSEzqClgCYp6-k_Cv8ABHik6A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1822487454</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Detoxification of synthetic and real groundwater contaminated with gasoline and diesel using Fenton, photo-Fenton, and biofilters</title><source>ScienceDirect (Online service)</source><creator>Torres, Guillermo F. ; Ortega Méndez, J.A. ; Tinoco, Diana L. ; Marin, Enrique D. ; Araña, J. ; Herrera-Melián, J.A. ; Doña Rodrígez, J.M. ; Pérez Peña, J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Torres, Guillermo F. ; Ortega Méndez, J.A. ; Tinoco, Diana L. ; Marin, Enrique D. ; Araña, J. ; Herrera-Melián, J.A. ; Doña Rodrígez, J.M. ; Pérez Peña, J.</creatorcontrib><description>The treatment of groundwater contaminated with gasoline and diesel with H2O2, H2O2 + UV, Fenton, and photo-Fenton was studied. Fenton reactions provided the best results with 1mM of Fe2+ and 200mM of H2O2. High contaminant removals were achieved, in particular those of COD (Fenton: 69%, photo-Fenton: 97%), Diesel Range Organics (99.9% both reactions), Gasoline Range Organics (99.9% both reactions), Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (Fenton: 83.8%, photo-Fenton: 92.5%), Total Phenols (Fenton: 67.3%, photo-Fenton: 90.4%), and toxicity toward Vibrio fischeri (100%, both reactions). The experiments have been performed with synthetic and real samples. The economic cost of the proposed method (14 USD/m3) is reduced by 60% with respect to that currently used in Ecuador.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1944-3986</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1944-3994</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1944-3986</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/19443994.2016.1141710</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Abingdon: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>AOPs ; Biofilters ; Contaminants ; Contamination ; Crude oil ; Detoxification ; Diesel ; DRO ; Gasoline ; GRO ; Groundwater ; Groundwater pollution ; Hydrocarbon polluted water ; Hydrogen peroxide ; Petroleum hydrocarbons ; Phenols ; Toxicity ; Vibrio ; Vibrio fischeri</subject><ispartof>Desalination and water treatment, 2016-10, Vol.57 (50), p.23760-23769</ispartof><rights>2016 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2016 Balaban Desalination Publications. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c403t-d581f602d580d0c7c639a93e9ef11b62d1daa79afae12ab68571e0de75dd0e3b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c403t-d581f602d580d0c7c639a93e9ef11b62d1daa79afae12ab68571e0de75dd0e3b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1944398624033800$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3549,27924,27925,45780</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Torres, Guillermo F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ortega Méndez, J.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tinoco, Diana L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marin, Enrique D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Araña, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herrera-Melián, J.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doña Rodrígez, J.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pérez Peña, J.</creatorcontrib><title>Detoxification of synthetic and real groundwater contaminated with gasoline and diesel using Fenton, photo-Fenton, and biofilters</title><title>Desalination and water treatment</title><description>The treatment of groundwater contaminated with gasoline and diesel with H2O2, H2O2 + UV, Fenton, and photo-Fenton was studied. Fenton reactions provided the best results with 1mM of Fe2+ and 200mM of H2O2. High contaminant removals were achieved, in particular those of COD (Fenton: 69%, photo-Fenton: 97%), Diesel Range Organics (99.9% both reactions), Gasoline Range Organics (99.9% both reactions), Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (Fenton: 83.8%, photo-Fenton: 92.5%), Total Phenols (Fenton: 67.3%, photo-Fenton: 90.4%), and toxicity toward Vibrio fischeri (100%, both reactions). The experiments have been performed with synthetic and real samples. The economic cost of the proposed method (14 USD/m3) is reduced by 60% with respect to that currently used in Ecuador.</description><subject>AOPs</subject><subject>Biofilters</subject><subject>Contaminants</subject><subject>Contamination</subject><subject>Crude oil</subject><subject>Detoxification</subject><subject>Diesel</subject><subject>DRO</subject><subject>Gasoline</subject><subject>GRO</subject><subject>Groundwater</subject><subject>Groundwater pollution</subject><subject>Hydrocarbon polluted water</subject><subject>Hydrogen peroxide</subject><subject>Petroleum hydrocarbons</subject><subject>Phenols</subject><subject>Toxicity</subject><subject>Vibrio</subject><subject>Vibrio fischeri</subject><issn>1944-3986</issn><issn>1944-3994</issn><issn>1944-3986</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkU1rGzEQhpfSQE2SnxAQ9NJD1tHsaj90KiFt2kAgl-QsZGnWHrOWXEnb1Mf-88pxAiGXZi7zwTMvzLxFcQZ8DrznFyCFqKUU84pDOwcQ0AH_UMz287KWffvxVf2pOI1xzXM0omtENSv-fsPk_9BARifyjvmBxZ1LK0xkmHaWBdQjWwY_OfuoEwZmvEt6Qy43lj1SWrGljn4kh0-8JYw4simSW7JrdMm7c7Zd-eTLl26PLcgPNGa9eFIcDXqMePqcj4uH6-_3Vz_L27sfN1eXt6URvE6lbXoYWl7lzC03nWlrqWWNEgeARVtZsFp3Ug8aodKLtm86QG6xa6zlWC_q4-LLQXcb_K8JY1IbigbHUTv0U1QguaiEbKF7Dwr5fSAho5_foGs_BZcPUdBXleg70YhMNQfKBB9jwEFtA2102Cngam-jerFR7W1Uzzbmva-HPcyP-U0YVDSEzqClgCYp6-k_Cv8ABHik6A</recordid><startdate>20161001</startdate><enddate>20161001</enddate><creator>Torres, Guillermo F.</creator><creator>Ortega Méndez, J.A.</creator><creator>Tinoco, Diana L.</creator><creator>Marin, Enrique D.</creator><creator>Araña, J.</creator><creator>Herrera-Melián, J.A.</creator><creator>Doña Rodrígez, J.M.</creator><creator>Pérez Peña, J.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>KL.</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20161001</creationdate><title>Detoxification of synthetic and real groundwater contaminated with gasoline and diesel using Fenton, photo-Fenton, and biofilters</title><author>Torres, Guillermo F. ; Ortega Méndez, J.A. ; Tinoco, Diana L. ; Marin, Enrique D. ; Araña, J. ; Herrera-Melián, J.A. ; Doña Rodrígez, J.M. ; Pérez Peña, J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c403t-d581f602d580d0c7c639a93e9ef11b62d1daa79afae12ab68571e0de75dd0e3b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>AOPs</topic><topic>Biofilters</topic><topic>Contaminants</topic><topic>Contamination</topic><topic>Crude oil</topic><topic>Detoxification</topic><topic>Diesel</topic><topic>DRO</topic><topic>Gasoline</topic><topic>GRO</topic><topic>Groundwater</topic><topic>Groundwater pollution</topic><topic>Hydrocarbon polluted water</topic><topic>Hydrogen peroxide</topic><topic>Petroleum hydrocarbons</topic><topic>Phenols</topic><topic>Toxicity</topic><topic>Vibrio</topic><topic>Vibrio fischeri</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Torres, Guillermo F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ortega Méndez, J.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tinoco, Diana L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marin, Enrique D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Araña, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herrera-Melián, J.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doña Rodrígez, J.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pérez Peña, J.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><jtitle>Desalination and water treatment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Torres, Guillermo F.</au><au>Ortega Méndez, J.A.</au><au>Tinoco, Diana L.</au><au>Marin, Enrique D.</au><au>Araña, J.</au><au>Herrera-Melián, J.A.</au><au>Doña Rodrígez, J.M.</au><au>Pérez Peña, J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Detoxification of synthetic and real groundwater contaminated with gasoline and diesel using Fenton, photo-Fenton, and biofilters</atitle><jtitle>Desalination and water treatment</jtitle><date>2016-10-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>57</volume><issue>50</issue><spage>23760</spage><epage>23769</epage><pages>23760-23769</pages><issn>1944-3986</issn><issn>1944-3994</issn><eissn>1944-3986</eissn><abstract>The treatment of groundwater contaminated with gasoline and diesel with H2O2, H2O2 + UV, Fenton, and photo-Fenton was studied. Fenton reactions provided the best results with 1mM of Fe2+ and 200mM of H2O2. High contaminant removals were achieved, in particular those of COD (Fenton: 69%, photo-Fenton: 97%), Diesel Range Organics (99.9% both reactions), Gasoline Range Organics (99.9% both reactions), Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (Fenton: 83.8%, photo-Fenton: 92.5%), Total Phenols (Fenton: 67.3%, photo-Fenton: 90.4%), and toxicity toward Vibrio fischeri (100%, both reactions). The experiments have been performed with synthetic and real samples. The economic cost of the proposed method (14 USD/m3) is reduced by 60% with respect to that currently used in Ecuador.</abstract><cop>Abingdon</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1080/19443994.2016.1141710</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1944-3986 |
ispartof | Desalination and water treatment, 2016-10, Vol.57 (50), p.23760-23769 |
issn | 1944-3986 1944-3994 1944-3986 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1904249617 |
source | ScienceDirect (Online service) |
subjects | AOPs Biofilters Contaminants Contamination Crude oil Detoxification Diesel DRO Gasoline GRO Groundwater Groundwater pollution Hydrocarbon polluted water Hydrogen peroxide Petroleum hydrocarbons Phenols Toxicity Vibrio Vibrio fischeri |
title | Detoxification of synthetic and real groundwater contaminated with gasoline and diesel using Fenton, photo-Fenton, and biofilters |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T17%3A15%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Detoxification%20of%20synthetic%20and%20real%20groundwater%20contaminated%20with%20gasoline%20and%20diesel%20using%20Fenton,%20photo-Fenton,%20and%20biofilters&rft.jtitle=Desalination%20and%20water%20treatment&rft.au=Torres,%20Guillermo%20F.&rft.date=2016-10-01&rft.volume=57&rft.issue=50&rft.spage=23760&rft.epage=23769&rft.pages=23760-23769&rft.issn=1944-3986&rft.eissn=1944-3986&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/19443994.2016.1141710&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1901754191%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c403t-d581f602d580d0c7c639a93e9ef11b62d1daa79afae12ab68571e0de75dd0e3b3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1822487454&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |