Loading…

Surface engineering of poly(methylmethacrylate): Effects on fluorescence immunoassay

The authors present surface engineering modifications through chemistry of poly(methylmethacrylate) (PMMA) that have dramatic effects on the result of surface-bound fluorescence immunoassays, both for specific and nonspecific signals. The authors deduce the most important effect to be clustering of...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Biointerphases 2017-06, Vol.12 (2), p.02C415-02C415
Main Authors: Akers, Peter W, Hoai Le, Nam Cao, Nelson, Andrew R J, McKenna, Milena, O'Mahony, Christy, McGillivray, Duncan J, Gubala, Vladimir, Williams, David E
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c320t-499e1e7b0a405d33c9bb0845cb4f4ca60e0aa739ef51bfdf910a2d2d58203eb33
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c320t-499e1e7b0a405d33c9bb0845cb4f4ca60e0aa739ef51bfdf910a2d2d58203eb33
container_end_page 02C415
container_issue 2
container_start_page 02C415
container_title Biointerphases
container_volume 12
creator Akers, Peter W
Hoai Le, Nam Cao
Nelson, Andrew R J
McKenna, Milena
O'Mahony, Christy
McGillivray, Duncan J
Gubala, Vladimir
Williams, David E
description The authors present surface engineering modifications through chemistry of poly(methylmethacrylate) (PMMA) that have dramatic effects on the result of surface-bound fluorescence immunoassays, both for specific and nonspecific signals. The authors deduce the most important effect to be clustering of antibodies on the surface leading to significant self-quenching. Secondary effects are attributable to the formation of sparse multilayers of antibody. The authors compare PMMA as an antibody support surface with ultraviolet-ozone oxidized PMMA and also to substrates that were, after the oxidation, surface modified by a four-unit poly(ethyleneglycol) carboxylic acid (PEG ), a branched tricarboxylic acid, and a series of carboxylic acid-terminated dendrimers, from generation 1.5 to 5.5. Fluorescence immunoassay and neutron reflectometry were used to compare the apparent antibody surface loading, antigen binding and nonspecific binding on these various surfaces using anti-human IgG as a model antibody, chemically coupled to the surface by amide formation. Simple physical adsorption of the antibody on PMMA resulted in a thick antibody multilayer with small antigen binding capacity. On the carboxylated surfaces, with chemical coupling, a simple monolayer was formed. The authors deduce that antibody clustering was driven by conformational inflexibility and high carboxylate density. The PEG -modified surface was the most conformationally flexible. The dendrimer-modified interfaces showed a collapse and densification. In fluorescence immunoassay, the optimal combination of high specific and low nonspecific fluorescence signal was found for the G3.5 dendrimer.
doi_str_mv 10.1116/1.4984010
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1907000118</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1907000118</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c320t-499e1e7b0a405d33c9bb0845cb4f4ca60e0aa739ef51bfdf910a2d2d58203eb33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kD1PwzAQQC0EoqUw8AdQRhhS7mI7idlQxZdUiYEyR45zLkFJXOxkyL8nVQvL3Q1PT6fH2DXCEhHTe1wKlQtAOGFzlFLFAiE9nW7FRZynHGbsIoRvACFlys_ZLMllnokM5mzzMXirDUXUbeuOyNfdNnI22rlmvG2p_xqb_dTGj43u6e4herKWTB8i10W2GZynYKibBHXbDp3TIejxkp1Z3QS6Ou4F-3x-2qxe4_X7y9vqcR0bnkAfC6UIKStBC5AV50aVJeRCmlJYYXQKBFpnXJGVWNrKKgSdVEkl8wQ4lZwv2O3Bu_PuZ6DQF209fdM0uiM3hAIVZACAmE_o3QE13oXgyRY7X7fajwVCsY9YYHGMOLE3R-1QtlT9k3_V-C8oNmzj</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1907000118</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Surface engineering of poly(methylmethacrylate): Effects on fluorescence immunoassay</title><source>American Institute of Physics:Jisc Collections:Transitional Journals Agreement 2021-23 (Reading list)</source><creator>Akers, Peter W ; Hoai Le, Nam Cao ; Nelson, Andrew R J ; McKenna, Milena ; O'Mahony, Christy ; McGillivray, Duncan J ; Gubala, Vladimir ; Williams, David E</creator><creatorcontrib>Akers, Peter W ; Hoai Le, Nam Cao ; Nelson, Andrew R J ; McKenna, Milena ; O'Mahony, Christy ; McGillivray, Duncan J ; Gubala, Vladimir ; Williams, David E</creatorcontrib><description>The authors present surface engineering modifications through chemistry of poly(methylmethacrylate) (PMMA) that have dramatic effects on the result of surface-bound fluorescence immunoassays, both for specific and nonspecific signals. The authors deduce the most important effect to be clustering of antibodies on the surface leading to significant self-quenching. Secondary effects are attributable to the formation of sparse multilayers of antibody. The authors compare PMMA as an antibody support surface with ultraviolet-ozone oxidized PMMA and also to substrates that were, after the oxidation, surface modified by a four-unit poly(ethyleneglycol) carboxylic acid (PEG ), a branched tricarboxylic acid, and a series of carboxylic acid-terminated dendrimers, from generation 1.5 to 5.5. Fluorescence immunoassay and neutron reflectometry were used to compare the apparent antibody surface loading, antigen binding and nonspecific binding on these various surfaces using anti-human IgG as a model antibody, chemically coupled to the surface by amide formation. Simple physical adsorption of the antibody on PMMA resulted in a thick antibody multilayer with small antigen binding capacity. On the carboxylated surfaces, with chemical coupling, a simple monolayer was formed. The authors deduce that antibody clustering was driven by conformational inflexibility and high carboxylate density. The PEG -modified surface was the most conformationally flexible. The dendrimer-modified interfaces showed a collapse and densification. In fluorescence immunoassay, the optimal combination of high specific and low nonspecific fluorescence signal was found for the G3.5 dendrimer.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1934-8630</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1559-4106</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1116/1.4984010</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28587470</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Animals ; Cattle ; Fluoroimmunoassay - methods ; Humans ; Immunoglobulin G - chemistry ; Polymethyl Methacrylate - chemistry ; Serum Albumin, Bovine - chemistry ; Surface Properties</subject><ispartof>Biointerphases, 2017-06, Vol.12 (2), p.02C415-02C415</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c320t-499e1e7b0a405d33c9bb0845cb4f4ca60e0aa739ef51bfdf910a2d2d58203eb33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c320t-499e1e7b0a405d33c9bb0845cb4f4ca60e0aa739ef51bfdf910a2d2d58203eb33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28587470$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Akers, Peter W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoai Le, Nam Cao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nelson, Andrew R J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McKenna, Milena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Mahony, Christy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McGillivray, Duncan J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gubala, Vladimir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, David E</creatorcontrib><title>Surface engineering of poly(methylmethacrylate): Effects on fluorescence immunoassay</title><title>Biointerphases</title><addtitle>Biointerphases</addtitle><description>The authors present surface engineering modifications through chemistry of poly(methylmethacrylate) (PMMA) that have dramatic effects on the result of surface-bound fluorescence immunoassays, both for specific and nonspecific signals. The authors deduce the most important effect to be clustering of antibodies on the surface leading to significant self-quenching. Secondary effects are attributable to the formation of sparse multilayers of antibody. The authors compare PMMA as an antibody support surface with ultraviolet-ozone oxidized PMMA and also to substrates that were, after the oxidation, surface modified by a four-unit poly(ethyleneglycol) carboxylic acid (PEG ), a branched tricarboxylic acid, and a series of carboxylic acid-terminated dendrimers, from generation 1.5 to 5.5. Fluorescence immunoassay and neutron reflectometry were used to compare the apparent antibody surface loading, antigen binding and nonspecific binding on these various surfaces using anti-human IgG as a model antibody, chemically coupled to the surface by amide formation. Simple physical adsorption of the antibody on PMMA resulted in a thick antibody multilayer with small antigen binding capacity. On the carboxylated surfaces, with chemical coupling, a simple monolayer was formed. The authors deduce that antibody clustering was driven by conformational inflexibility and high carboxylate density. The PEG -modified surface was the most conformationally flexible. The dendrimer-modified interfaces showed a collapse and densification. In fluorescence immunoassay, the optimal combination of high specific and low nonspecific fluorescence signal was found for the G3.5 dendrimer.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>Fluoroimmunoassay - methods</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunoglobulin G - chemistry</subject><subject>Polymethyl Methacrylate - chemistry</subject><subject>Serum Albumin, Bovine - chemistry</subject><subject>Surface Properties</subject><issn>1934-8630</issn><issn>1559-4106</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kD1PwzAQQC0EoqUw8AdQRhhS7mI7idlQxZdUiYEyR45zLkFJXOxkyL8nVQvL3Q1PT6fH2DXCEhHTe1wKlQtAOGFzlFLFAiE9nW7FRZynHGbsIoRvACFlys_ZLMllnokM5mzzMXirDUXUbeuOyNfdNnI22rlmvG2p_xqb_dTGj43u6e4herKWTB8i10W2GZynYKibBHXbDp3TIejxkp1Z3QS6Ou4F-3x-2qxe4_X7y9vqcR0bnkAfC6UIKStBC5AV50aVJeRCmlJYYXQKBFpnXJGVWNrKKgSdVEkl8wQ4lZwv2O3Bu_PuZ6DQF209fdM0uiM3hAIVZACAmE_o3QE13oXgyRY7X7fajwVCsY9YYHGMOLE3R-1QtlT9k3_V-C8oNmzj</recordid><startdate>20170601</startdate><enddate>20170601</enddate><creator>Akers, Peter W</creator><creator>Hoai Le, Nam Cao</creator><creator>Nelson, Andrew R J</creator><creator>McKenna, Milena</creator><creator>O'Mahony, Christy</creator><creator>McGillivray, Duncan J</creator><creator>Gubala, Vladimir</creator><creator>Williams, David E</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170601</creationdate><title>Surface engineering of poly(methylmethacrylate): Effects on fluorescence immunoassay</title><author>Akers, Peter W ; Hoai Le, Nam Cao ; Nelson, Andrew R J ; McKenna, Milena ; O'Mahony, Christy ; McGillivray, Duncan J ; Gubala, Vladimir ; Williams, David E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c320t-499e1e7b0a405d33c9bb0845cb4f4ca60e0aa739ef51bfdf910a2d2d58203eb33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>Fluoroimmunoassay - methods</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunoglobulin G - chemistry</topic><topic>Polymethyl Methacrylate - chemistry</topic><topic>Serum Albumin, Bovine - chemistry</topic><topic>Surface Properties</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Akers, Peter W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoai Le, Nam Cao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nelson, Andrew R J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McKenna, Milena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Mahony, Christy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McGillivray, Duncan J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gubala, Vladimir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, David E</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Biointerphases</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Akers, Peter W</au><au>Hoai Le, Nam Cao</au><au>Nelson, Andrew R J</au><au>McKenna, Milena</au><au>O'Mahony, Christy</au><au>McGillivray, Duncan J</au><au>Gubala, Vladimir</au><au>Williams, David E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Surface engineering of poly(methylmethacrylate): Effects on fluorescence immunoassay</atitle><jtitle>Biointerphases</jtitle><addtitle>Biointerphases</addtitle><date>2017-06-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>02C415</spage><epage>02C415</epage><pages>02C415-02C415</pages><issn>1934-8630</issn><eissn>1559-4106</eissn><abstract>The authors present surface engineering modifications through chemistry of poly(methylmethacrylate) (PMMA) that have dramatic effects on the result of surface-bound fluorescence immunoassays, both for specific and nonspecific signals. The authors deduce the most important effect to be clustering of antibodies on the surface leading to significant self-quenching. Secondary effects are attributable to the formation of sparse multilayers of antibody. The authors compare PMMA as an antibody support surface with ultraviolet-ozone oxidized PMMA and also to substrates that were, after the oxidation, surface modified by a four-unit poly(ethyleneglycol) carboxylic acid (PEG ), a branched tricarboxylic acid, and a series of carboxylic acid-terminated dendrimers, from generation 1.5 to 5.5. Fluorescence immunoassay and neutron reflectometry were used to compare the apparent antibody surface loading, antigen binding and nonspecific binding on these various surfaces using anti-human IgG as a model antibody, chemically coupled to the surface by amide formation. Simple physical adsorption of the antibody on PMMA resulted in a thick antibody multilayer with small antigen binding capacity. On the carboxylated surfaces, with chemical coupling, a simple monolayer was formed. The authors deduce that antibody clustering was driven by conformational inflexibility and high carboxylate density. The PEG -modified surface was the most conformationally flexible. The dendrimer-modified interfaces showed a collapse and densification. In fluorescence immunoassay, the optimal combination of high specific and low nonspecific fluorescence signal was found for the G3.5 dendrimer.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>28587470</pmid><doi>10.1116/1.4984010</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1934-8630
ispartof Biointerphases, 2017-06, Vol.12 (2), p.02C415-02C415
issn 1934-8630
1559-4106
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1907000118
source American Institute of Physics:Jisc Collections:Transitional Journals Agreement 2021-23 (Reading list)
subjects Animals
Cattle
Fluoroimmunoassay - methods
Humans
Immunoglobulin G - chemistry
Polymethyl Methacrylate - chemistry
Serum Albumin, Bovine - chemistry
Surface Properties
title Surface engineering of poly(methylmethacrylate): Effects on fluorescence immunoassay
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T18%3A02%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Surface%20engineering%20of%20poly(methylmethacrylate):%20Effects%20on%20fluorescence%20immunoassay&rft.jtitle=Biointerphases&rft.au=Akers,%20Peter%20W&rft.date=2017-06-01&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=02C415&rft.epage=02C415&rft.pages=02C415-02C415&rft.issn=1934-8630&rft.eissn=1559-4106&rft_id=info:doi/10.1116/1.4984010&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1907000118%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c320t-499e1e7b0a405d33c9bb0845cb4f4ca60e0aa739ef51bfdf910a2d2d58203eb33%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1907000118&rft_id=info:pmid/28587470&rfr_iscdi=true