Loading…

Renal effects of an emergency department chloride‐restrictive intravenous fluid strategy in patients admitted to hospital for more than 48 hours

Objective Patients commonly receive i.v. fluids in the ED. It is still unclear whether the choice of i.v. fluids in this setting influences renal or patient outcomes. We aimed to assess the effects of restricting i.v. chloride administration in the ED on the incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI). M...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Emergency medicine Australasia 2017-12, Vol.29 (6), p.643-649
Main Authors: Yunos, Nor'azim Mohd, Bellomo, Rinaldo, Taylor, David McD, Judkins, Simon, Kerr, Fergus, Sutcliffe, Harvey, Hegarty, Colin, Bailey, Michael
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Objective Patients commonly receive i.v. fluids in the ED. It is still unclear whether the choice of i.v. fluids in this setting influences renal or patient outcomes. We aimed to assess the effects of restricting i.v. chloride administration in the ED on the incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI). Methods We conducted a before‐and‐after trial with 5008 consecutive ED‐treated hospital admissions in the control period and 5146 consecutive admissions in the intervention period. During the control period (18 February 2008 to 17 August 2008), patients received standard i.v. fluids. During the intervention period (18 February 2009 to 17 August 2009), we restricted all chloride‐rich fluids. We used the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) staging to define AKI. Results Stage 3 of KDIGO‐defined AKI decreased from 54 (1.1%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.8–1.4) to 30 (0.6%; 95% CI 0.4–0.8) (P = 0.006). The rate of renal replacement therapy did not change, from 13 (0.3%; 95% CI 0.2–0.4) to 8 (0.2%; 95% CI 0.1–0.3) (P = 0.25). After adjustment for relevant covariates, liberal chloride therapy remained associated with a greater risk of KDIGO stage 3 (hazard ratio 1.82; 95% CI 1.13–2.95; P = 0.01). On sensitivity assessment after removing repeat admissions, KDIGO stage 3 remained significantly lower in the intervention period compared with the control period (P = 0.01). Conclusion In a before‐and‐after trial, a chloride‐restrictive strategy in an ED was associated with a significant decrease in the incidence of stage 3 of KDIGO‐defined AKI.
ISSN:1742-6731
1742-6723
DOI:10.1111/1742-6723.12821