Diagnostic accuracy of a two-item Drug Abuse Screening Test (DAST-2)

• Published in: Addictive behaviors 2017-11, Vol.74, p.112-117
• Main Authors: Tiet, Quyen Q, Leyva, Yani E, Moos, Rudolf H, Smith, Brandy
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Accuracy; California; Diagnostic tests; Drug abuse; Drug screening; Drug use; Drug use disorder; Female; Humans; Male; Mass Screening - methods; Mass Screening - standards; Medical diagnosis; Middle Aged; Minority & ethnic groups; Post traumatic stress disorder; Primary care; Primary Health Care - methods; Psychiatry; Psychometrics; Reproducibility of Results; Screening test; Sensitivity and Specificity; Signal detection; Substance Abuse Detection - methods; Substance Abuse Detection - standards; Substance-Related Disorders - diagnosis; Surveys and Questionnaires; Validation; Veterans - statistics & numerical data
• ISSN: 0306-4603; 1873-6327
• DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2017.06.008

Abstract Objective Drug use is prevalent and costly to society, but individuals with drug use disorders (DUDs) are under-diagnosed and under-treated, particularly in primary care (PC) settings. Drug screening instruments have been developed to identify patients with DUDs and facilitate treatment. The Drug Abuse Screening Test (DAST) is one of the most well-known drug screening instruments. However, similar to many such instruments, it is too long for routine use in busy PC settings. This study developed and validated a briefer and more practical DAST for busy PC settings. Method We recruited 1300 PC patients in two Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) clinics. Participants responded to a structured diagnostic interview. We randomly selected half of the sample to develop and the other half to validate the new instrument. We employed signal detection techniques to select the best DAST items to identify DUDs (based on the MINI) and negative consequences of drug use (measured by the Inventory of Drug Use Consequences). Performance indicators were calculated. Results The two-item DAST (DAST-2) was 97% sensitive and 91% specific for DUDs in the development sample and 95% sensitive and 89% specific in the validation sample. It was highly sensitive and specific for DUD and negative consequences of drug use in subgroups of patients, including gender, age, race/ethnicity, marital status, educational level, and posttraumatic stress disorder status. Conclusions The DAST-2 is an appropriate drug screening instrument for routine use in PC settings in the VA and may be applicable in broader range of PC clinics.