A targeted noise reduction observational study for reducing noise in a neonatal intensive unit

• Published in: Journal of perinatology 2017-09, Vol.37 (9), p.1060-1064
• Main Authors: Chawla, S, Barach, P, Dwaihy, M, Kamat, D, Shankaran, S, Panaitescu, B, Wang, B, Natarajan, G
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: 692/700/1720/3186; 692/700/784; Academic Medical Centers; Acoustics; Alarm systems; Background noise; Customization; Environmental aspects; Family; Feedback; Female; Health care facilities; Health Personnel; Hospitals; Humans; Infant; Infant development; Infant, Extremely Low Birth Weight; Infant, Premature; Infants; Intensive care units; Intensive Care Units, Neonatal - organization & administration; Intensive Care Units, Neonatal - standards; Intervention; Male; Management; Measurement methods; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Methods; Neonatal intensive care units; Neonates; Newborn babies; Noise control; Noise levels; Noise reduction; Noise, Occupational - adverse effects; Noise, Occupational - prevention & control; Observational studies; Pediatric Surgery; Pediatrics; Physiological aspects; Quality control; Quality Improvement; quality-improvement-article; Safety and security measures; Surveys and Questionnaires
• ISSN: 0743-8346; 1476-5543
• DOI: 10.1038/jp.2017.93

Background: Excessive noise in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) can interfere with infants’ growth, development and healing. Local problem: Sound levels in our NICUs exceeded the recommended levels by the World Health Organization. Methods: We implemented a noise reduction strategy in an urban, tertiary academic medical center NICU that included baseline noise measurements. We conducted a survey involving staff and visitors regarding their opinions and perceptions of noise levels in the NICU. Ongoing feedback to staff after each measurement cycle was provided to improve awareness, engagement and adherence with noise reduction strategies. After widespread discussion with active clinician involvement, consensus building and iterative testing, changes were implemented including: lowering of equipment alarm sounds, designated ‘quiet times’ and implementing a customized education program for staff. Interventions: A multiphase noise reduction quality improvement (QI) intervention to reduce ambient sound levels in a patient care room in our NICUs by 3 dB (20%) over 18 months. Results: The noise in the NICU was reduced by 3 dB from baseline. Mean (s.d.) baseline, phase 2 , 3 and 4 noise levels in the two NICUs were: LAeq: 57.0 (0.84), 56.8 (1.6), 55.3 (1.9) and 54.5 (2.6) dB, respectively ( P 90%. Conclusions: Implementing a multipronged QI initiative resulted in significant noise level reduction in two multipod NICUs. It is feasible to reduce noise levels if QI interventions are coupled with active engagement of the clinical staff and following continuous process of improvement methods, measurements and protocols.