Loading…

Examining maintenance care following infliximab salvage therapy for acute severe ulcerative colitis

Data supporting the optimal maintenance drug therapy and strategy to monitor ongoing response following successful infliximab (IFX) induction, for acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC), are limited. We aimed to evaluate maintenance and monitoring strategies employed in patients post-IFX induction t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology 2018-01, Vol.33 (1), p.226-231
Main Authors: Seah, Dean, Choy, Matthew C, Gorelik, Alexandra, Connell, William R, Sparrow, Miles P, Van Langenberg, Daniel, Hebbard, Geoffrey, Moore, Gregory, De Cruz, Peter
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-7074070b5a20166ad236c194088ff48bea059d691845015ef8aaa078e95a20613
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-7074070b5a20166ad236c194088ff48bea059d691845015ef8aaa078e95a20613
container_end_page 231
container_issue 1
container_start_page 226
container_title Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology
container_volume 33
creator Seah, Dean
Choy, Matthew C
Gorelik, Alexandra
Connell, William R
Sparrow, Miles P
Van Langenberg, Daniel
Hebbard, Geoffrey
Moore, Gregory
De Cruz, Peter
description Data supporting the optimal maintenance drug therapy and strategy to monitor ongoing response following successful infliximab (IFX) induction, for acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC), are limited. We aimed to evaluate maintenance and monitoring strategies employed in patients post-IFX induction therapy. Patients in six Australian tertiary centers treated with IFX for steroid-refractory ASUC between April 2014 and May 2015 were identified via hospital IBD and pharmacy databases. Patients were followed up for 1 year with clinical data over 12 months recorded. Analysis was limited to patient outcomes beyond 3 months. Forty one patients were identified. Five of the 41 (12%) patients underwent colectomy within 3 months, and one patient was lost to follow-up. Six of 35 (17%) of the remaining patients progressed to colectomy by 12 months. Maintenance therapy: Patients maintained on thiopurine monotherapy (14/35) versus IFX/thiopurine therapy (15/35) were followed up. Two of 15 (13%) patients who received combination maintenance therapy underwent a colectomy at 12 months, compared with 1/14 (7%) patients receiving thiopurine monotherapy (P = 0.610). Monitoring during maintenance: Post-discharge, thiopurine metabolites were monitored in 15/27 (56%); fecal calprotectin in 11/32 (34%); and serum IFX levels in 4/20 (20%). Twenty of 32 (63%) patients had an endoscopic evaluation after IFX salvage with median time to first endoscopy of 109 days (interquartile range 113-230). Following IFX induction therapy for ASUC, the uptake of maintenance therapy in this cohort and strategies to monitor ongoing response were variable. These data suggest that the optimal maintenance and monitoring strategy post-IFX salvage therapy remains to be defined.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/jgh.13850
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1910794309</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1910794309</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-7074070b5a20166ad236c194088ff48bea059d691845015ef8aaa078e95a20613</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkMFO3DAQhi1UxG6BQ1-gitQLHAIziePYxwoBrYTEBc7RxDtZvHKSrZ1s4e3rhW0Pncsc5vt_jT4hviBcYZrrzfrlCktdwZFYopSQYy3VJ7EEjVVuSjQL8TnGDQBIqKsTsSi0Qg2qWAp7-0q9G9ywznpyw8QDDZYzS4GzbvR-_L0_uaHz7tX11GaR_I7WnE0vHGj7lqCQkZ0nziLvOKVmb9NlcrvUMno3uXgmjjvykc8P-1Q8390-3fzIHx7vf958f8htKfWU11Cn96CtqABUilZFqSwaCVp3ndQtE1RmpQxqWQFW3Gkiglqz2ScUlqfi4qN3G8ZfM8ep6V207D0NPM6xQYNQG1mCSei3_9DNOIchfZcojSUUlSoSdflB2TDGGLhrtiFJCG8NQrM33yTzzbv5xH49NM5tz6t_5F_V5R_nGX30</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1981302562</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Examining maintenance care following infliximab salvage therapy for acute severe ulcerative colitis</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Seah, Dean ; Choy, Matthew C ; Gorelik, Alexandra ; Connell, William R ; Sparrow, Miles P ; Van Langenberg, Daniel ; Hebbard, Geoffrey ; Moore, Gregory ; De Cruz, Peter</creator><creatorcontrib>Seah, Dean ; Choy, Matthew C ; Gorelik, Alexandra ; Connell, William R ; Sparrow, Miles P ; Van Langenberg, Daniel ; Hebbard, Geoffrey ; Moore, Gregory ; De Cruz, Peter</creatorcontrib><description>Data supporting the optimal maintenance drug therapy and strategy to monitor ongoing response following successful infliximab (IFX) induction, for acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC), are limited. We aimed to evaluate maintenance and monitoring strategies employed in patients post-IFX induction therapy. Patients in six Australian tertiary centers treated with IFX for steroid-refractory ASUC between April 2014 and May 2015 were identified via hospital IBD and pharmacy databases. Patients were followed up for 1 year with clinical data over 12 months recorded. Analysis was limited to patient outcomes beyond 3 months. Forty one patients were identified. Five of the 41 (12%) patients underwent colectomy within 3 months, and one patient was lost to follow-up. Six of 35 (17%) of the remaining patients progressed to colectomy by 12 months. Maintenance therapy: Patients maintained on thiopurine monotherapy (14/35) versus IFX/thiopurine therapy (15/35) were followed up. Two of 15 (13%) patients who received combination maintenance therapy underwent a colectomy at 12 months, compared with 1/14 (7%) patients receiving thiopurine monotherapy (P = 0.610). Monitoring during maintenance: Post-discharge, thiopurine metabolites were monitored in 15/27 (56%); fecal calprotectin in 11/32 (34%); and serum IFX levels in 4/20 (20%). Twenty of 32 (63%) patients had an endoscopic evaluation after IFX salvage with median time to first endoscopy of 109 days (interquartile range 113-230). Following IFX induction therapy for ASUC, the uptake of maintenance therapy in this cohort and strategies to monitor ongoing response were variable. These data suggest that the optimal maintenance and monitoring strategy post-IFX salvage therapy remains to be defined.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0815-9319</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1440-1746</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jgh.13850</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28618062</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Australia: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Endoscopy ; Immunotherapy ; Induction therapy ; Inflammatory bowel disease ; Infliximab ; Metabolites ; Monoclonal antibodies ; Patients ; Tumor necrosis factor-α ; Ulcerative colitis</subject><ispartof>Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology, 2018-01, Vol.33 (1), p.226-231</ispartof><rights>2017 Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Foundation and John Wiley &amp; Sons Australia, Ltd.</rights><rights>2018 Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Foundation and John Wiley &amp; Sons Australia, Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-7074070b5a20166ad236c194088ff48bea059d691845015ef8aaa078e95a20613</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-7074070b5a20166ad236c194088ff48bea059d691845015ef8aaa078e95a20613</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5206-0097 ; 0000-0003-3662-6307</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28618062$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Seah, Dean</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choy, Matthew C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gorelik, Alexandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Connell, William R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sparrow, Miles P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Langenberg, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hebbard, Geoffrey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moore, Gregory</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Cruz, Peter</creatorcontrib><title>Examining maintenance care following infliximab salvage therapy for acute severe ulcerative colitis</title><title>Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology</title><addtitle>J Gastroenterol Hepatol</addtitle><description>Data supporting the optimal maintenance drug therapy and strategy to monitor ongoing response following successful infliximab (IFX) induction, for acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC), are limited. We aimed to evaluate maintenance and monitoring strategies employed in patients post-IFX induction therapy. Patients in six Australian tertiary centers treated with IFX for steroid-refractory ASUC between April 2014 and May 2015 were identified via hospital IBD and pharmacy databases. Patients were followed up for 1 year with clinical data over 12 months recorded. Analysis was limited to patient outcomes beyond 3 months. Forty one patients were identified. Five of the 41 (12%) patients underwent colectomy within 3 months, and one patient was lost to follow-up. Six of 35 (17%) of the remaining patients progressed to colectomy by 12 months. Maintenance therapy: Patients maintained on thiopurine monotherapy (14/35) versus IFX/thiopurine therapy (15/35) were followed up. Two of 15 (13%) patients who received combination maintenance therapy underwent a colectomy at 12 months, compared with 1/14 (7%) patients receiving thiopurine monotherapy (P = 0.610). Monitoring during maintenance: Post-discharge, thiopurine metabolites were monitored in 15/27 (56%); fecal calprotectin in 11/32 (34%); and serum IFX levels in 4/20 (20%). Twenty of 32 (63%) patients had an endoscopic evaluation after IFX salvage with median time to first endoscopy of 109 days (interquartile range 113-230). Following IFX induction therapy for ASUC, the uptake of maintenance therapy in this cohort and strategies to monitor ongoing response were variable. These data suggest that the optimal maintenance and monitoring strategy post-IFX salvage therapy remains to be defined.</description><subject>Endoscopy</subject><subject>Immunotherapy</subject><subject>Induction therapy</subject><subject>Inflammatory bowel disease</subject><subject>Infliximab</subject><subject>Metabolites</subject><subject>Monoclonal antibodies</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Tumor necrosis factor-α</subject><subject>Ulcerative colitis</subject><issn>0815-9319</issn><issn>1440-1746</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkMFO3DAQhi1UxG6BQ1-gitQLHAIziePYxwoBrYTEBc7RxDtZvHKSrZ1s4e3rhW0Pncsc5vt_jT4hviBcYZrrzfrlCktdwZFYopSQYy3VJ7EEjVVuSjQL8TnGDQBIqKsTsSi0Qg2qWAp7-0q9G9ywznpyw8QDDZYzS4GzbvR-_L0_uaHz7tX11GaR_I7WnE0vHGj7lqCQkZ0nziLvOKVmb9NlcrvUMno3uXgmjjvykc8P-1Q8390-3fzIHx7vf958f8htKfWU11Cn96CtqABUilZFqSwaCVp3ndQtE1RmpQxqWQFW3Gkiglqz2ScUlqfi4qN3G8ZfM8ep6V207D0NPM6xQYNQG1mCSei3_9DNOIchfZcojSUUlSoSdflB2TDGGLhrtiFJCG8NQrM33yTzzbv5xH49NM5tz6t_5F_V5R_nGX30</recordid><startdate>201801</startdate><enddate>201801</enddate><creator>Seah, Dean</creator><creator>Choy, Matthew C</creator><creator>Gorelik, Alexandra</creator><creator>Connell, William R</creator><creator>Sparrow, Miles P</creator><creator>Van Langenberg, Daniel</creator><creator>Hebbard, Geoffrey</creator><creator>Moore, Gregory</creator><creator>De Cruz, Peter</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5206-0097</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3662-6307</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201801</creationdate><title>Examining maintenance care following infliximab salvage therapy for acute severe ulcerative colitis</title><author>Seah, Dean ; Choy, Matthew C ; Gorelik, Alexandra ; Connell, William R ; Sparrow, Miles P ; Van Langenberg, Daniel ; Hebbard, Geoffrey ; Moore, Gregory ; De Cruz, Peter</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-7074070b5a20166ad236c194088ff48bea059d691845015ef8aaa078e95a20613</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Endoscopy</topic><topic>Immunotherapy</topic><topic>Induction therapy</topic><topic>Inflammatory bowel disease</topic><topic>Infliximab</topic><topic>Metabolites</topic><topic>Monoclonal antibodies</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Tumor necrosis factor-α</topic><topic>Ulcerative colitis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Seah, Dean</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choy, Matthew C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gorelik, Alexandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Connell, William R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sparrow, Miles P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Langenberg, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hebbard, Geoffrey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moore, Gregory</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Cruz, Peter</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Seah, Dean</au><au>Choy, Matthew C</au><au>Gorelik, Alexandra</au><au>Connell, William R</au><au>Sparrow, Miles P</au><au>Van Langenberg, Daniel</au><au>Hebbard, Geoffrey</au><au>Moore, Gregory</au><au>De Cruz, Peter</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Examining maintenance care following infliximab salvage therapy for acute severe ulcerative colitis</atitle><jtitle>Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology</jtitle><addtitle>J Gastroenterol Hepatol</addtitle><date>2018-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>226</spage><epage>231</epage><pages>226-231</pages><issn>0815-9319</issn><eissn>1440-1746</eissn><abstract>Data supporting the optimal maintenance drug therapy and strategy to monitor ongoing response following successful infliximab (IFX) induction, for acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC), are limited. We aimed to evaluate maintenance and monitoring strategies employed in patients post-IFX induction therapy. Patients in six Australian tertiary centers treated with IFX for steroid-refractory ASUC between April 2014 and May 2015 were identified via hospital IBD and pharmacy databases. Patients were followed up for 1 year with clinical data over 12 months recorded. Analysis was limited to patient outcomes beyond 3 months. Forty one patients were identified. Five of the 41 (12%) patients underwent colectomy within 3 months, and one patient was lost to follow-up. Six of 35 (17%) of the remaining patients progressed to colectomy by 12 months. Maintenance therapy: Patients maintained on thiopurine monotherapy (14/35) versus IFX/thiopurine therapy (15/35) were followed up. Two of 15 (13%) patients who received combination maintenance therapy underwent a colectomy at 12 months, compared with 1/14 (7%) patients receiving thiopurine monotherapy (P = 0.610). Monitoring during maintenance: Post-discharge, thiopurine metabolites were monitored in 15/27 (56%); fecal calprotectin in 11/32 (34%); and serum IFX levels in 4/20 (20%). Twenty of 32 (63%) patients had an endoscopic evaluation after IFX salvage with median time to first endoscopy of 109 days (interquartile range 113-230). Following IFX induction therapy for ASUC, the uptake of maintenance therapy in this cohort and strategies to monitor ongoing response were variable. These data suggest that the optimal maintenance and monitoring strategy post-IFX salvage therapy remains to be defined.</abstract><cop>Australia</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>28618062</pmid><doi>10.1111/jgh.13850</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5206-0097</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3662-6307</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0815-9319
ispartof Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology, 2018-01, Vol.33 (1), p.226-231
issn 0815-9319
1440-1746
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1910794309
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects Endoscopy
Immunotherapy
Induction therapy
Inflammatory bowel disease
Infliximab
Metabolites
Monoclonal antibodies
Patients
Tumor necrosis factor-α
Ulcerative colitis
title Examining maintenance care following infliximab salvage therapy for acute severe ulcerative colitis
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T08%3A23%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Examining%20maintenance%20care%20following%20infliximab%20salvage%20therapy%20for%20acute%20severe%20ulcerative%20colitis&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20gastroenterology%20and%20hepatology&rft.au=Seah,%20Dean&rft.date=2018-01&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=226&rft.epage=231&rft.pages=226-231&rft.issn=0815-9319&rft.eissn=1440-1746&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jgh.13850&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1910794309%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-7074070b5a20166ad236c194088ff48bea059d691845015ef8aaa078e95a20613%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1981302562&rft_id=info:pmid/28618062&rfr_iscdi=true