Loading…

Patterns of gamete incompatibility between the blue mussels Mytilus edulis and M. trossulus

Previous research on gametic incompatibility in marine invertebrates suggests that for highly dispersive marine invertebrate species, barriers to fertilization among closely related taxa are often incomplete and sometimes asymmetric. The nature of these barriers can dramatically affect the patterns...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Marine biology 2003-08, Vol.143 (2), p.317-325
Main Authors: Rawson, P. D, Slaughter, C, Yund, P. O
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c301t-3cb35b8c9c5e251caca221b6ee3a1e6e00c689d20b220815bca32d48bbc2d8d03
cites
container_end_page 325
container_issue 2
container_start_page 317
container_title Marine biology
container_volume 143
creator Rawson, P. D
Slaughter, C
Yund, P. O
description Previous research on gametic incompatibility in marine invertebrates suggests that for highly dispersive marine invertebrate species, barriers to fertilization among closely related taxa are often incomplete and sometimes asymmetric. The nature of these barriers can dramatically affect the patterns of gene flow and genetic differentiation between species, and thus speciation. Blue mussels, in the genus Mytilus, are genetically distinct in allopatry yet hybrids are present wherever any two species within the group co-occur. The present study sampled M. edulis (L.) and M. trossulus (Gould) in May and June 2001 from the East Bay section of Cobscook Bay, Maine, USA (latitude 44°56′30″N; longitude 67°07′50″W), where the two species are sympatric. Gamete incompatibility was investigated in a series of laboratory fertilizations carried out in July 2001. The proportion of fertilized eggs typically exceeded 80% at sperm concentrations of 10³–10⁴ ml⁻¹ among intraspecific matings (n=18), but was
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00227-003-1084-x
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19111821</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>18045470</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c301t-3cb35b8c9c5e251caca221b6ee3a1e6e00c689d20b220815bca32d48bbc2d8d03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU-LFDEQxYMoOK5-AE8GQW-9ViWd7vRRlvUP7KKge_IQknT1miXdPSZp3Pn2ZpgFwYunoqp-9ajHY-wlwjkC9O8ygBB9AyAbBN0294_YDlspGuwH-Zjt6lo1EjvxlD3L-Q5q3wu5Yz--2lIoLZmvE7-1MxXiYfHrvLcluBBDOXBH5TfRwstP4i5uxOctZ4qZXx9KiFvmNG4xZG6XkV-f85LWnLc6f86eTDZmevFQz9jNh8vvF5-aqy8fP1-8v2q8BCyN9E4qp_3gFQmF3norBLqOSFqkjgB8p4dRgBMCNCrnrRRjq53zYtQjyDP29qS7T-uvjXIxc8ieYrQLrVs2OCCiFvh_UEOr2v6o-Pof8G7d0lJNmPoC9LpSFcIT5I-GE01mn8Js08EgmGMo5hSKqaGYYyjmvt68eRC22ds4Jbv4kP8eKtm1SsnKvTpxk12NvU2VufkmADsABCnkIP8ArF-WKg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>208078547</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Patterns of gamete incompatibility between the blue mussels Mytilus edulis and M. trossulus</title><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Rawson, P. D ; Slaughter, C ; Yund, P. O</creator><creatorcontrib>Rawson, P. D ; Slaughter, C ; Yund, P. O</creatorcontrib><description>Previous research on gametic incompatibility in marine invertebrates suggests that for highly dispersive marine invertebrate species, barriers to fertilization among closely related taxa are often incomplete and sometimes asymmetric. The nature of these barriers can dramatically affect the patterns of gene flow and genetic differentiation between species, and thus speciation. Blue mussels, in the genus Mytilus, are genetically distinct in allopatry yet hybrids are present wherever any two species within the group co-occur. The present study sampled M. edulis (L.) and M. trossulus (Gould) in May and June 2001 from the East Bay section of Cobscook Bay, Maine, USA (latitude 44°56′30″N; longitude 67°07′50″W), where the two species are sympatric. Gamete incompatibility was investigated in a series of laboratory fertilizations carried out in July 2001. The proportion of fertilized eggs typically exceeded 80% at sperm concentrations of 10³–10⁴ ml⁻¹ among intraspecific matings (n=18), but was &lt;30% even at sperm concentrations in excess of 10⁵–10⁶ ml⁻¹ for interspecific matings (n=13). Further analysis indicated that approximately 100- to 700-fold higher sperm concentrations were required to achieve 20% fertilization in interspecific matings relative to intraspecific matings, indicating strong barriers to interspecific fertilization. The proportion of fertilized eggs did not follow this general pattern in all matings, however. The eggs from two (out of five) M. edulis females were almost as receptive to M. trossulus sperm as they were to M. edulis sperm. In contrast, the eggs from all M. trossulus females (n=3) were unreceptive to M. edulis sperm, suggesting that fertilization barriers between these species may be asymmetric. Given the experimental design employed in this study, the results are also consistent with a strong maternal or egg effect on the level of interspecific gamete compatibility in M. edulis.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0025-3162</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1793</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00227-003-1084-x</identifier><identifier>CODEN: MBIOAJ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>allopatry ; Animals ; aquatic invertebrates ; Biological and medical sciences ; Eggs ; Experimental design ; females ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; gene flow ; genetic variation ; Genetics of eukaryotes. Biological and molecular evolution ; Hybrids ; Invertebrata ; latitude ; longitude ; Marine ; Marine biology ; Marine invertebrates ; Mollusks ; mussels ; Mytilus edulis ; Mytilus trossulus ; Population genetics, reproduction patterns ; Speciation ; spermatozoa ; sympatry</subject><ispartof>Marine biology, 2003-08, Vol.143 (2), p.317-325</ispartof><rights>2004 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag 2003</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c301t-3cb35b8c9c5e251caca221b6ee3a1e6e00c689d20b220815bca32d48bbc2d8d03</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=15364553$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rawson, P. D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Slaughter, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yund, P. O</creatorcontrib><title>Patterns of gamete incompatibility between the blue mussels Mytilus edulis and M. trossulus</title><title>Marine biology</title><description>Previous research on gametic incompatibility in marine invertebrates suggests that for highly dispersive marine invertebrate species, barriers to fertilization among closely related taxa are often incomplete and sometimes asymmetric. The nature of these barriers can dramatically affect the patterns of gene flow and genetic differentiation between species, and thus speciation. Blue mussels, in the genus Mytilus, are genetically distinct in allopatry yet hybrids are present wherever any two species within the group co-occur. The present study sampled M. edulis (L.) and M. trossulus (Gould) in May and June 2001 from the East Bay section of Cobscook Bay, Maine, USA (latitude 44°56′30″N; longitude 67°07′50″W), where the two species are sympatric. Gamete incompatibility was investigated in a series of laboratory fertilizations carried out in July 2001. The proportion of fertilized eggs typically exceeded 80% at sperm concentrations of 10³–10⁴ ml⁻¹ among intraspecific matings (n=18), but was &lt;30% even at sperm concentrations in excess of 10⁵–10⁶ ml⁻¹ for interspecific matings (n=13). Further analysis indicated that approximately 100- to 700-fold higher sperm concentrations were required to achieve 20% fertilization in interspecific matings relative to intraspecific matings, indicating strong barriers to interspecific fertilization. The proportion of fertilized eggs did not follow this general pattern in all matings, however. The eggs from two (out of five) M. edulis females were almost as receptive to M. trossulus sperm as they were to M. edulis sperm. In contrast, the eggs from all M. trossulus females (n=3) were unreceptive to M. edulis sperm, suggesting that fertilization barriers between these species may be asymmetric. Given the experimental design employed in this study, the results are also consistent with a strong maternal or egg effect on the level of interspecific gamete compatibility in M. edulis.</description><subject>allopatry</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>aquatic invertebrates</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Eggs</subject><subject>Experimental design</subject><subject>females</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>gene flow</subject><subject>genetic variation</subject><subject>Genetics of eukaryotes. Biological and molecular evolution</subject><subject>Hybrids</subject><subject>Invertebrata</subject><subject>latitude</subject><subject>longitude</subject><subject>Marine</subject><subject>Marine biology</subject><subject>Marine invertebrates</subject><subject>Mollusks</subject><subject>mussels</subject><subject>Mytilus edulis</subject><subject>Mytilus trossulus</subject><subject>Population genetics, reproduction patterns</subject><subject>Speciation</subject><subject>spermatozoa</subject><subject>sympatry</subject><issn>0025-3162</issn><issn>1432-1793</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkU-LFDEQxYMoOK5-AE8GQW-9ViWd7vRRlvUP7KKge_IQknT1miXdPSZp3Pn2ZpgFwYunoqp-9ajHY-wlwjkC9O8ygBB9AyAbBN0294_YDlspGuwH-Zjt6lo1EjvxlD3L-Q5q3wu5Yz--2lIoLZmvE7-1MxXiYfHrvLcluBBDOXBH5TfRwstP4i5uxOctZ4qZXx9KiFvmNG4xZG6XkV-f85LWnLc6f86eTDZmevFQz9jNh8vvF5-aqy8fP1-8v2q8BCyN9E4qp_3gFQmF3norBLqOSFqkjgB8p4dRgBMCNCrnrRRjq53zYtQjyDP29qS7T-uvjXIxc8ieYrQLrVs2OCCiFvh_UEOr2v6o-Pof8G7d0lJNmPoC9LpSFcIT5I-GE01mn8Js08EgmGMo5hSKqaGYYyjmvt68eRC22ds4Jbv4kP8eKtm1SsnKvTpxk12NvU2VufkmADsABCnkIP8ArF-WKg</recordid><startdate>20030801</startdate><enddate>20030801</enddate><creator>Rawson, P. D</creator><creator>Slaughter, C</creator><creator>Yund, P. O</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>R05</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>H96</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20030801</creationdate><title>Patterns of gamete incompatibility between the blue mussels Mytilus edulis and M. trossulus</title><author>Rawson, P. D ; Slaughter, C ; Yund, P. O</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c301t-3cb35b8c9c5e251caca221b6ee3a1e6e00c689d20b220815bca32d48bbc2d8d03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>allopatry</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>aquatic invertebrates</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Eggs</topic><topic>Experimental design</topic><topic>females</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>gene flow</topic><topic>genetic variation</topic><topic>Genetics of eukaryotes. Biological and molecular evolution</topic><topic>Hybrids</topic><topic>Invertebrata</topic><topic>latitude</topic><topic>longitude</topic><topic>Marine</topic><topic>Marine biology</topic><topic>Marine invertebrates</topic><topic>Mollusks</topic><topic>mussels</topic><topic>Mytilus edulis</topic><topic>Mytilus trossulus</topic><topic>Population genetics, reproduction patterns</topic><topic>Speciation</topic><topic>spermatozoa</topic><topic>sympatry</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rawson, P. D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Slaughter, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yund, P. O</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest_Research Library</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>University of Michigan</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><jtitle>Marine biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rawson, P. D</au><au>Slaughter, C</au><au>Yund, P. O</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Patterns of gamete incompatibility between the blue mussels Mytilus edulis and M. trossulus</atitle><jtitle>Marine biology</jtitle><date>2003-08-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>143</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>317</spage><epage>325</epage><pages>317-325</pages><issn>0025-3162</issn><eissn>1432-1793</eissn><coden>MBIOAJ</coden><abstract>Previous research on gametic incompatibility in marine invertebrates suggests that for highly dispersive marine invertebrate species, barriers to fertilization among closely related taxa are often incomplete and sometimes asymmetric. The nature of these barriers can dramatically affect the patterns of gene flow and genetic differentiation between species, and thus speciation. Blue mussels, in the genus Mytilus, are genetically distinct in allopatry yet hybrids are present wherever any two species within the group co-occur. The present study sampled M. edulis (L.) and M. trossulus (Gould) in May and June 2001 from the East Bay section of Cobscook Bay, Maine, USA (latitude 44°56′30″N; longitude 67°07′50″W), where the two species are sympatric. Gamete incompatibility was investigated in a series of laboratory fertilizations carried out in July 2001. The proportion of fertilized eggs typically exceeded 80% at sperm concentrations of 10³–10⁴ ml⁻¹ among intraspecific matings (n=18), but was &lt;30% even at sperm concentrations in excess of 10⁵–10⁶ ml⁻¹ for interspecific matings (n=13). Further analysis indicated that approximately 100- to 700-fold higher sperm concentrations were required to achieve 20% fertilization in interspecific matings relative to intraspecific matings, indicating strong barriers to interspecific fertilization. The proportion of fertilized eggs did not follow this general pattern in all matings, however. The eggs from two (out of five) M. edulis females were almost as receptive to M. trossulus sperm as they were to M. edulis sperm. In contrast, the eggs from all M. trossulus females (n=3) were unreceptive to M. edulis sperm, suggesting that fertilization barriers between these species may be asymmetric. Given the experimental design employed in this study, the results are also consistent with a strong maternal or egg effect on the level of interspecific gamete compatibility in M. edulis.</abstract><cop>Heidelberg</cop><cop>Berlin</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><doi>10.1007/s00227-003-1084-x</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0025-3162
ispartof Marine biology, 2003-08, Vol.143 (2), p.317-325
issn 0025-3162
1432-1793
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19111821
source Springer Link
subjects allopatry
Animals
aquatic invertebrates
Biological and medical sciences
Eggs
Experimental design
females
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
gene flow
genetic variation
Genetics of eukaryotes. Biological and molecular evolution
Hybrids
Invertebrata
latitude
longitude
Marine
Marine biology
Marine invertebrates
Mollusks
mussels
Mytilus edulis
Mytilus trossulus
Population genetics, reproduction patterns
Speciation
spermatozoa
sympatry
title Patterns of gamete incompatibility between the blue mussels Mytilus edulis and M. trossulus
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T09%3A43%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Patterns%20of%20gamete%20incompatibility%20between%20the%20blue%20mussels%20Mytilus%20edulis%20and%20M.%20trossulus&rft.jtitle=Marine%20biology&rft.au=Rawson,%20P.%20D&rft.date=2003-08-01&rft.volume=143&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=317&rft.epage=325&rft.pages=317-325&rft.issn=0025-3162&rft.eissn=1432-1793&rft.coden=MBIOAJ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00227-003-1084-x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E18045470%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c301t-3cb35b8c9c5e251caca221b6ee3a1e6e00c689d20b220815bca32d48bbc2d8d03%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=208078547&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true