Loading…

Two‐years results of small‐incision lenticule extraction and wavefront‐guided laser in situ keratomileusis for Myopia

Purpose To compare the 2‐years visual and refractive outcomes between small‐incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and wavefront‐guided laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) in eyes with myopia and myopic astigmatism. Methods Our retrospective case–control study examined 30 eyes of 30 patients with th...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Acta ophthalmologica (Oxford, England) England), 2018-03, Vol.96 (2), p.e119-e126
Main Authors: Kobashi, Hidenaga, Kamiya, Kazutaka, Igarashi, Akihito, Takahashi, Masahide, Shimizu, Kimiya
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Purpose To compare the 2‐years visual and refractive outcomes between small‐incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and wavefront‐guided laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) in eyes with myopia and myopic astigmatism. Methods Our retrospective case–control study examined 30 eyes of 30 patients with the manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE) of −3.71 ± 1.83 dioptres (D) who underwent SMILE and 30 eyes of 30 patients with MRSE of −3.81 ± 1.40 D who underwent wavefront‐guided LASIK. We assessed the 2‐years clinical outcomes. Results Logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution (LogMAR)‐corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) was −0.23 ± 0.07 in the SMILE group and −0.24 ± 0.07 in the wavefront‐guided LASIK group 2 years postoperatively (p = 0.82). Logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution‐uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) was −0.18 ± 0.09 and −0.15 ± 0.11 (p = 0.30, respectively). In the SMILE and wavefront‐guided LASIK groups 2 years postoperatively, 100% and 73% of eyes, respectively, were within 0.5 D of the prompted MRSE correction (p = 0.005). Changes in the MRSE of −0.10 ± 0.30 D and −0.23 ± 0.51 D occurred from 3 months to 2 years (p = 0.40, respectively). We found a significant correlation between myopic regression and the changes in the keratometric readings from 3 months to 2 years after wavefront‐guided LASIK (r = −0.48, p = 0.002), but not after SMILE (r = −0.004, p = 0.90). Conclusion Small‐incision lenticule extraction offers better refractive outcomes than wavefront‐guided LASIK during a 2‐years follow‐up for the correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism.
ISSN:1755-375X
1755-3768
DOI:10.1111/aos.13470