Loading…

Impact of the 21-gene recurrence score on outcome in patients with invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast

Purpose Invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) of the breast has unique clinicopathologic characteristics, compared to invasive ductal carcinoma. The role of the 21-gene Recurrence Score (RS) has not been clearly defined for ILC. We sought to determine the prognostic value of RS and the impact of adjuvant...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Breast cancer research and treatment 2017-10, Vol.165 (3), p.757-763
Main Authors: Kizy, Scott, Huang, Jing Li, Marmor, Schelomo, Tuttle, Todd M., Hui, Jane Yuet Ching
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-1ecc4fff94b168103933b2ccfb37d1a67011d978101b28980c0c4dba0d58bf023
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-1ecc4fff94b168103933b2ccfb37d1a67011d978101b28980c0c4dba0d58bf023
container_end_page 763
container_issue 3
container_start_page 757
container_title Breast cancer research and treatment
container_volume 165
creator Kizy, Scott
Huang, Jing Li
Marmor, Schelomo
Tuttle, Todd M.
Hui, Jane Yuet Ching
description Purpose Invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) of the breast has unique clinicopathologic characteristics, compared to invasive ductal carcinoma. The role of the 21-gene Recurrence Score (RS) has not been clearly defined for ILC. We sought to determine the prognostic value of RS and the impact of adjuvant chemotherapy on long-term survival in patients with ILC. Methods Utilizing the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database from 2004 to 2013, we identified records of women aged 18–74 years, diagnosed with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive ILC (stage I to III) with RS available. We categorized patients into risk groups based on the traditional RS cutoffs and into those of the Trial Assigning Individualized Options for Treatment (TAILORx). Five-year breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) was analyzed using the Kaplan–Meier method and Cox proportional hazards models. Results Of the 7316 women included, 21% were in the low-risk; 71%, intermediate-risk; and 8%, high-risk groups as per TAILORx RS cutoffs. The 5-year BCSS was 99% in the low-risk, 99% in the intermediate-risk, and 96% in the high-risk groups. A high-risk RS as per TAILORx cutoff was independently associated with increased mortality (hazard ratio [HR] of death 2.37, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.14–4.95) when compared to a low-risk RS. In both the high-risk and intermediate-risk groups, adjuvant chemotherapy was not significantly associated with the HR of death (high-risk, HR 1.14, 95% CI 0.55–2.38; intermediate-risk, HR 1.08, 95% CI 0.62–1.87). Conclusion For patients with ER-positive ILC, 8% were in the high-risk and 72% were in the intermediate-risk groups as per the TAILORx RS cutoffs. In the high-risk group, the RS predicted a lower 5-year BCSS. Adjuvant chemotherapy did not seem to confer a survival benefit for either the intermediate- or the high-risk cohorts.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10549-017-4355-9
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1913830907</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A504825022</galeid><sourcerecordid>A504825022</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-1ecc4fff94b168103933b2ccfb37d1a67011d978101b28980c0c4dba0d58bf023</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kl1rFTEQhoMo9lj9Ad5IQBBvts7sVzaXpfhRKHij1yGbnZyTupsck2zFf28Op9VWlFwEZp73nQx5GXuJcIYA4l1C6FpZAYqqbbquko_YBjvRVKJG8ZhtAHtR9QP0J-xZStcAIAXIp-ykHvpWSOw27Nvlstcm82B53hGvsdqSJx7JrDGSN8STCZF48Dys2YSFuPN8r7MjnxP_4fKuFG50cjfE5zCus47c6GicD4u-sx0j6ZSfsydWz4le3N6n7OuH918uPlVXnz9eXpxfVaYVkCskY1prrWxH7AeERjbNWBtjx0ZMqHsBiJMUpYNjPcgBDJh2GjVM3TBaqJtT9vbou4_h-0opq8UlQ_OsPYU1KZTYDA1IEAV9_Rd6Hdboy-sK1UiUQwv4h9rqmZTzNuSozcFUnXfQDnUH9WHs2T-ociZanAmerCv1B4I39wQ70nPepTCv2QWfHoJ4BE0MKUWyah_douNPhaAOSVDHJKiSBHVIgpJF8-p2s3VcaPqtuPv6AtRHIJWW31K8t_p_XX8BSRa7FA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1939198401</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Impact of the 21-gene recurrence score on outcome in patients with invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Kizy, Scott ; Huang, Jing Li ; Marmor, Schelomo ; Tuttle, Todd M. ; Hui, Jane Yuet Ching</creator><creatorcontrib>Kizy, Scott ; Huang, Jing Li ; Marmor, Schelomo ; Tuttle, Todd M. ; Hui, Jane Yuet Ching</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose Invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) of the breast has unique clinicopathologic characteristics, compared to invasive ductal carcinoma. The role of the 21-gene Recurrence Score (RS) has not been clearly defined for ILC. We sought to determine the prognostic value of RS and the impact of adjuvant chemotherapy on long-term survival in patients with ILC. Methods Utilizing the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database from 2004 to 2013, we identified records of women aged 18–74 years, diagnosed with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive ILC (stage I to III) with RS available. We categorized patients into risk groups based on the traditional RS cutoffs and into those of the Trial Assigning Individualized Options for Treatment (TAILORx). Five-year breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) was analyzed using the Kaplan–Meier method and Cox proportional hazards models. Results Of the 7316 women included, 21% were in the low-risk; 71%, intermediate-risk; and 8%, high-risk groups as per TAILORx RS cutoffs. The 5-year BCSS was 99% in the low-risk, 99% in the intermediate-risk, and 96% in the high-risk groups. A high-risk RS as per TAILORx cutoff was independently associated with increased mortality (hazard ratio [HR] of death 2.37, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.14–4.95) when compared to a low-risk RS. In both the high-risk and intermediate-risk groups, adjuvant chemotherapy was not significantly associated with the HR of death (high-risk, HR 1.14, 95% CI 0.55–2.38; intermediate-risk, HR 1.08, 95% CI 0.62–1.87). Conclusion For patients with ER-positive ILC, 8% were in the high-risk and 72% were in the intermediate-risk groups as per the TAILORx RS cutoffs. In the high-risk group, the RS predicted a lower 5-year BCSS. Adjuvant chemotherapy did not seem to confer a survival benefit for either the intermediate- or the high-risk cohorts.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0167-6806</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-7217</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10549-017-4355-9</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28647915</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Adjuvant treatment ; Analysis ; Breast cancer ; Brief Report ; Cancer ; Cancer research ; Chemotherapy ; Diseases ; Epidemiology ; Estrogen ; Estrogen receptors ; Genes ; Genetic aspects ; Health risk assessment ; Invasiveness ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Mortality ; Oncology ; Relapse ; Risk groups ; Survival</subject><ispartof>Breast cancer research and treatment, 2017-10, Vol.165 (3), p.757-763</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2017</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2017 Springer</rights><rights>Breast Cancer Research and Treatment is a copyright of Springer, 2017.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-1ecc4fff94b168103933b2ccfb37d1a67011d978101b28980c0c4dba0d58bf023</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-1ecc4fff94b168103933b2ccfb37d1a67011d978101b28980c0c4dba0d58bf023</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2628-0720</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28647915$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kizy, Scott</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Jing Li</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marmor, Schelomo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tuttle, Todd M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hui, Jane Yuet Ching</creatorcontrib><title>Impact of the 21-gene recurrence score on outcome in patients with invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast</title><title>Breast cancer research and treatment</title><addtitle>Breast Cancer Res Treat</addtitle><addtitle>Breast Cancer Res Treat</addtitle><description>Purpose Invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) of the breast has unique clinicopathologic characteristics, compared to invasive ductal carcinoma. The role of the 21-gene Recurrence Score (RS) has not been clearly defined for ILC. We sought to determine the prognostic value of RS and the impact of adjuvant chemotherapy on long-term survival in patients with ILC. Methods Utilizing the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database from 2004 to 2013, we identified records of women aged 18–74 years, diagnosed with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive ILC (stage I to III) with RS available. We categorized patients into risk groups based on the traditional RS cutoffs and into those of the Trial Assigning Individualized Options for Treatment (TAILORx). Five-year breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) was analyzed using the Kaplan–Meier method and Cox proportional hazards models. Results Of the 7316 women included, 21% were in the low-risk; 71%, intermediate-risk; and 8%, high-risk groups as per TAILORx RS cutoffs. The 5-year BCSS was 99% in the low-risk, 99% in the intermediate-risk, and 96% in the high-risk groups. A high-risk RS as per TAILORx cutoff was independently associated with increased mortality (hazard ratio [HR] of death 2.37, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.14–4.95) when compared to a low-risk RS. In both the high-risk and intermediate-risk groups, adjuvant chemotherapy was not significantly associated with the HR of death (high-risk, HR 1.14, 95% CI 0.55–2.38; intermediate-risk, HR 1.08, 95% CI 0.62–1.87). Conclusion For patients with ER-positive ILC, 8% were in the high-risk and 72% were in the intermediate-risk groups as per the TAILORx RS cutoffs. In the high-risk group, the RS predicted a lower 5-year BCSS. Adjuvant chemotherapy did not seem to confer a survival benefit for either the intermediate- or the high-risk cohorts.</description><subject>Adjuvant treatment</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Breast cancer</subject><subject>Brief Report</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Cancer research</subject><subject>Chemotherapy</subject><subject>Diseases</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Estrogen</subject><subject>Estrogen receptors</subject><subject>Genes</subject><subject>Genetic aspects</subject><subject>Health risk assessment</subject><subject>Invasiveness</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Relapse</subject><subject>Risk groups</subject><subject>Survival</subject><issn>0167-6806</issn><issn>1573-7217</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kl1rFTEQhoMo9lj9Ad5IQBBvts7sVzaXpfhRKHij1yGbnZyTupsck2zFf28Op9VWlFwEZp73nQx5GXuJcIYA4l1C6FpZAYqqbbquko_YBjvRVKJG8ZhtAHtR9QP0J-xZStcAIAXIp-ykHvpWSOw27Nvlstcm82B53hGvsdqSJx7JrDGSN8STCZF48Dys2YSFuPN8r7MjnxP_4fKuFG50cjfE5zCus47c6GicD4u-sx0j6ZSfsydWz4le3N6n7OuH918uPlVXnz9eXpxfVaYVkCskY1prrWxH7AeERjbNWBtjx0ZMqHsBiJMUpYNjPcgBDJh2GjVM3TBaqJtT9vbou4_h-0opq8UlQ_OsPYU1KZTYDA1IEAV9_Rd6Hdboy-sK1UiUQwv4h9rqmZTzNuSozcFUnXfQDnUH9WHs2T-ociZanAmerCv1B4I39wQ70nPepTCv2QWfHoJ4BE0MKUWyah_douNPhaAOSVDHJKiSBHVIgpJF8-p2s3VcaPqtuPv6AtRHIJWW31K8t_p_XX8BSRa7FA</recordid><startdate>20171001</startdate><enddate>20171001</enddate><creator>Kizy, Scott</creator><creator>Huang, Jing Li</creator><creator>Marmor, Schelomo</creator><creator>Tuttle, Todd M.</creator><creator>Hui, Jane Yuet Ching</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2628-0720</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20171001</creationdate><title>Impact of the 21-gene recurrence score on outcome in patients with invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast</title><author>Kizy, Scott ; Huang, Jing Li ; Marmor, Schelomo ; Tuttle, Todd M. ; Hui, Jane Yuet Ching</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-1ecc4fff94b168103933b2ccfb37d1a67011d978101b28980c0c4dba0d58bf023</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Adjuvant treatment</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Breast cancer</topic><topic>Brief Report</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Cancer research</topic><topic>Chemotherapy</topic><topic>Diseases</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Estrogen</topic><topic>Estrogen receptors</topic><topic>Genes</topic><topic>Genetic aspects</topic><topic>Health risk assessment</topic><topic>Invasiveness</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Relapse</topic><topic>Risk groups</topic><topic>Survival</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kizy, Scott</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Jing Li</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marmor, Schelomo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tuttle, Todd M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hui, Jane Yuet Ching</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Breast cancer research and treatment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kizy, Scott</au><au>Huang, Jing Li</au><au>Marmor, Schelomo</au><au>Tuttle, Todd M.</au><au>Hui, Jane Yuet Ching</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Impact of the 21-gene recurrence score on outcome in patients with invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast</atitle><jtitle>Breast cancer research and treatment</jtitle><stitle>Breast Cancer Res Treat</stitle><addtitle>Breast Cancer Res Treat</addtitle><date>2017-10-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>165</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>757</spage><epage>763</epage><pages>757-763</pages><issn>0167-6806</issn><eissn>1573-7217</eissn><abstract>Purpose Invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) of the breast has unique clinicopathologic characteristics, compared to invasive ductal carcinoma. The role of the 21-gene Recurrence Score (RS) has not been clearly defined for ILC. We sought to determine the prognostic value of RS and the impact of adjuvant chemotherapy on long-term survival in patients with ILC. Methods Utilizing the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database from 2004 to 2013, we identified records of women aged 18–74 years, diagnosed with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive ILC (stage I to III) with RS available. We categorized patients into risk groups based on the traditional RS cutoffs and into those of the Trial Assigning Individualized Options for Treatment (TAILORx). Five-year breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) was analyzed using the Kaplan–Meier method and Cox proportional hazards models. Results Of the 7316 women included, 21% were in the low-risk; 71%, intermediate-risk; and 8%, high-risk groups as per TAILORx RS cutoffs. The 5-year BCSS was 99% in the low-risk, 99% in the intermediate-risk, and 96% in the high-risk groups. A high-risk RS as per TAILORx cutoff was independently associated with increased mortality (hazard ratio [HR] of death 2.37, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.14–4.95) when compared to a low-risk RS. In both the high-risk and intermediate-risk groups, adjuvant chemotherapy was not significantly associated with the HR of death (high-risk, HR 1.14, 95% CI 0.55–2.38; intermediate-risk, HR 1.08, 95% CI 0.62–1.87). Conclusion For patients with ER-positive ILC, 8% were in the high-risk and 72% were in the intermediate-risk groups as per the TAILORx RS cutoffs. In the high-risk group, the RS predicted a lower 5-year BCSS. Adjuvant chemotherapy did not seem to confer a survival benefit for either the intermediate- or the high-risk cohorts.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>28647915</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10549-017-4355-9</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2628-0720</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0167-6806
ispartof Breast cancer research and treatment, 2017-10, Vol.165 (3), p.757-763
issn 0167-6806
1573-7217
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1913830907
source Springer Nature
subjects Adjuvant treatment
Analysis
Breast cancer
Brief Report
Cancer
Cancer research
Chemotherapy
Diseases
Epidemiology
Estrogen
Estrogen receptors
Genes
Genetic aspects
Health risk assessment
Invasiveness
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Mortality
Oncology
Relapse
Risk groups
Survival
title Impact of the 21-gene recurrence score on outcome in patients with invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T17%3A31%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Impact%20of%20the%2021-gene%20recurrence%20score%20on%20outcome%20in%20patients%20with%20invasive%20lobular%20carcinoma%20of%20the%20breast&rft.jtitle=Breast%20cancer%20research%20and%20treatment&rft.au=Kizy,%20Scott&rft.date=2017-10-01&rft.volume=165&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=757&rft.epage=763&rft.pages=757-763&rft.issn=0167-6806&rft.eissn=1573-7217&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10549-017-4355-9&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA504825022%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-1ecc4fff94b168103933b2ccfb37d1a67011d978101b28980c0c4dba0d58bf023%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1939198401&rft_id=info:pmid/28647915&rft_galeid=A504825022&rfr_iscdi=true