Loading…

Apneic oxygenation reduces the incidence of hypoxemia during emergency intubation: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract Study objective Apneic oxygenation has been advocated for the prevention of hypoxemia during emergency endotracheal intubation. Because of conflicting results from recent trials, the efficacy of apneic oxygenation remains unclear. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to invest...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The American journal of emergency medicine 2017-08, Vol.35 (8), p.1184-1189
Main Authors: Pavlov, Ivan, MD, Medrano, Sofia, MD, Weingart, Scott, MD
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-1af6496b8a0a6ee98712be93d8593a47326732164b4b4d05ffb815f70d9ebcd93
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-1af6496b8a0a6ee98712be93d8593a47326732164b4b4d05ffb815f70d9ebcd93
container_end_page 1189
container_issue 8
container_start_page 1184
container_title The American journal of emergency medicine
container_volume 35
creator Pavlov, Ivan, MD
Medrano, Sofia, MD
Weingart, Scott, MD
description Abstract Study objective Apneic oxygenation has been advocated for the prevention of hypoxemia during emergency endotracheal intubation. Because of conflicting results from recent trials, the efficacy of apneic oxygenation remains unclear. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the effect of apneic oxygenation on the incidence of clinically significant hypoxemia during emergency endotracheal intubation. Methods MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PubMed databases were searched without language and time restrictions for studies of apneic oxygenation performed in a critical care setting. Meta-analysis was conducted with a random-effect model, and according to intention-to-treat allocation wherever applicable. Subgroup analyses were performed to ensure the robustness of findings across various clinical outcomes. Results Eight studies ( n = 1953) were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled absolute risk of clinically significant hypoxemia was 27.6% in the usual care group and 19.1% in the apneic oxygenation group, without any heterogeneity across studies (I2 = 0%; p = 0.42). Apneic oxygenation reduced the relative risk of hypoxemia by 30% (95% confidence interval 0.59 to 0.82). There was a trend toward lower mortality in the apneic oxygenation group (relative risk of death 0.77; 95% confidence interval 0.59 to 1.02). Conclusion Apneic oxygenation significantly reduces the incidence of hypoxemia during emergency endotracheal intubation. These findings support the inclusion of apneic oxygenation in everyday clinical practice.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ajem.2017.06.029
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1913832259</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0735675717304734</els_id><sourcerecordid>1924518764</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-1af6496b8a0a6ee98712be93d8593a47326732164b4b4d05ffb815f70d9ebcd93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kk2L1TAYhYMozp3RP-BCAm7ctOarSSsiXAZHhQEX6jqkyduZ1Da9Jq3e_ntT76gwCwkhBJ5zSM55EXpGSUkJla_60vQwloxQVRJZEtY8QDtacVbUVNGHaEcUrwqpKnWGzlPqCaFUVOIxOmO1FIpytUPH_SGAt3g6rjcQzOyngCO4xULC8y1gH6x3ECzgqcO362E6wugNdkv04QbDCDHL7Jq5eWl_y1_jPU5rmmHMV5vNfnj4iU1weITZFCaYYU0-PUGPOjMkeHp3XqCvV---XH4orj-9_3i5vy6s4M1cUNNJ0ci2NsRIgKZWlLXQcFdXDTdCcSbzplK0eTlSdV1b06pTxDXQWtfwC_Ty5HuI0_cF0qxHnywMgwkwLUnThvKaM1Zt6It7aD8tMb93o5ioaK2kyBQ7UTZOKUXo9CH60cRVU6K3XnSvt1701osmUudesuj5nfXSjuD-Sv4UkYE3JwByFjmxqJP1W-7OR7CzdpP_v__be3I7-OCtGb7BCunfP3RimujP22Rsg0EVJzlEwX8BLT-0qg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1924518764</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Apneic oxygenation reduces the incidence of hypoxemia during emergency intubation: A systematic review and meta-analysis</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Pavlov, Ivan, MD ; Medrano, Sofia, MD ; Weingart, Scott, MD</creator><creatorcontrib>Pavlov, Ivan, MD ; Medrano, Sofia, MD ; Weingart, Scott, MD</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Study objective Apneic oxygenation has been advocated for the prevention of hypoxemia during emergency endotracheal intubation. Because of conflicting results from recent trials, the efficacy of apneic oxygenation remains unclear. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the effect of apneic oxygenation on the incidence of clinically significant hypoxemia during emergency endotracheal intubation. Methods MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PubMed databases were searched without language and time restrictions for studies of apneic oxygenation performed in a critical care setting. Meta-analysis was conducted with a random-effect model, and according to intention-to-treat allocation wherever applicable. Subgroup analyses were performed to ensure the robustness of findings across various clinical outcomes. Results Eight studies ( n = 1953) were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled absolute risk of clinically significant hypoxemia was 27.6% in the usual care group and 19.1% in the apneic oxygenation group, without any heterogeneity across studies (I2 = 0%; p = 0.42). Apneic oxygenation reduced the relative risk of hypoxemia by 30% (95% confidence interval 0.59 to 0.82). There was a trend toward lower mortality in the apneic oxygenation group (relative risk of death 0.77; 95% confidence interval 0.59 to 1.02). Conclusion Apneic oxygenation significantly reduces the incidence of hypoxemia during emergency endotracheal intubation. These findings support the inclusion of apneic oxygenation in everyday clinical practice.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0735-6757</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-8171</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2017.06.029</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28647137</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Airway management ; Apneic oxygenation ; Bias ; Canada ; Clinical trials ; Collaboration ; Crash intubation ; Critical care ; Critical Illness - therapy ; Emergency ; Emergency medical care ; Evidence-based medicine ; Heterogeneity ; Humans ; Hypoxemia ; Hypoxia - physiopathology ; Hypoxia - prevention &amp; control ; Hypoxia - therapy ; Incidence ; Intensive care ; Intubation ; Intubation, Intratracheal - methods ; Meta-analysis ; Mortality ; Motivation ; Oxygen Inhalation Therapy - methods ; Oxygenation ; Rapid sequence intubation ; Respiration, Artificial ; Respiratory therapy ; Systematic review</subject><ispartof>The American journal of emergency medicine, 2017-08, Vol.35 (8), p.1184-1189</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2017 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-1af6496b8a0a6ee98712be93d8593a47326732164b4b4d05ffb815f70d9ebcd93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-1af6496b8a0a6ee98712be93d8593a47326732164b4b4d05ffb815f70d9ebcd93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28647137$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pavlov, Ivan, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Medrano, Sofia, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weingart, Scott, MD</creatorcontrib><title>Apneic oxygenation reduces the incidence of hypoxemia during emergency intubation: A systematic review and meta-analysis</title><title>The American journal of emergency medicine</title><addtitle>Am J Emerg Med</addtitle><description>Abstract Study objective Apneic oxygenation has been advocated for the prevention of hypoxemia during emergency endotracheal intubation. Because of conflicting results from recent trials, the efficacy of apneic oxygenation remains unclear. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the effect of apneic oxygenation on the incidence of clinically significant hypoxemia during emergency endotracheal intubation. Methods MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PubMed databases were searched without language and time restrictions for studies of apneic oxygenation performed in a critical care setting. Meta-analysis was conducted with a random-effect model, and according to intention-to-treat allocation wherever applicable. Subgroup analyses were performed to ensure the robustness of findings across various clinical outcomes. Results Eight studies ( n = 1953) were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled absolute risk of clinically significant hypoxemia was 27.6% in the usual care group and 19.1% in the apneic oxygenation group, without any heterogeneity across studies (I2 = 0%; p = 0.42). Apneic oxygenation reduced the relative risk of hypoxemia by 30% (95% confidence interval 0.59 to 0.82). There was a trend toward lower mortality in the apneic oxygenation group (relative risk of death 0.77; 95% confidence interval 0.59 to 1.02). Conclusion Apneic oxygenation significantly reduces the incidence of hypoxemia during emergency endotracheal intubation. These findings support the inclusion of apneic oxygenation in everyday clinical practice.</description><subject>Airway management</subject><subject>Apneic oxygenation</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Canada</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Collaboration</subject><subject>Crash intubation</subject><subject>Critical care</subject><subject>Critical Illness - therapy</subject><subject>Emergency</subject><subject>Emergency medical care</subject><subject>Evidence-based medicine</subject><subject>Heterogeneity</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hypoxemia</subject><subject>Hypoxia - physiopathology</subject><subject>Hypoxia - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Hypoxia - therapy</subject><subject>Incidence</subject><subject>Intensive care</subject><subject>Intubation</subject><subject>Intubation, Intratracheal - methods</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Motivation</subject><subject>Oxygen Inhalation Therapy - methods</subject><subject>Oxygenation</subject><subject>Rapid sequence intubation</subject><subject>Respiration, Artificial</subject><subject>Respiratory therapy</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><issn>0735-6757</issn><issn>1532-8171</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kk2L1TAYhYMozp3RP-BCAm7ctOarSSsiXAZHhQEX6jqkyduZ1Da9Jq3e_ntT76gwCwkhBJ5zSM55EXpGSUkJla_60vQwloxQVRJZEtY8QDtacVbUVNGHaEcUrwqpKnWGzlPqCaFUVOIxOmO1FIpytUPH_SGAt3g6rjcQzOyngCO4xULC8y1gH6x3ECzgqcO362E6wugNdkv04QbDCDHL7Jq5eWl_y1_jPU5rmmHMV5vNfnj4iU1weITZFCaYYU0-PUGPOjMkeHp3XqCvV---XH4orj-9_3i5vy6s4M1cUNNJ0ci2NsRIgKZWlLXQcFdXDTdCcSbzplK0eTlSdV1b06pTxDXQWtfwC_Ty5HuI0_cF0qxHnywMgwkwLUnThvKaM1Zt6It7aD8tMb93o5ioaK2kyBQ7UTZOKUXo9CH60cRVU6K3XnSvt1701osmUudesuj5nfXSjuD-Sv4UkYE3JwByFjmxqJP1W-7OR7CzdpP_v__be3I7-OCtGb7BCunfP3RimujP22Rsg0EVJzlEwX8BLT-0qg</recordid><startdate>20170801</startdate><enddate>20170801</enddate><creator>Pavlov, Ivan, MD</creator><creator>Medrano, Sofia, MD</creator><creator>Weingart, Scott, MD</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170801</creationdate><title>Apneic oxygenation reduces the incidence of hypoxemia during emergency intubation: A systematic review and meta-analysis</title><author>Pavlov, Ivan, MD ; Medrano, Sofia, MD ; Weingart, Scott, MD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-1af6496b8a0a6ee98712be93d8593a47326732164b4b4d05ffb815f70d9ebcd93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Airway management</topic><topic>Apneic oxygenation</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Canada</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Collaboration</topic><topic>Crash intubation</topic><topic>Critical care</topic><topic>Critical Illness - therapy</topic><topic>Emergency</topic><topic>Emergency medical care</topic><topic>Evidence-based medicine</topic><topic>Heterogeneity</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hypoxemia</topic><topic>Hypoxia - physiopathology</topic><topic>Hypoxia - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Hypoxia - therapy</topic><topic>Incidence</topic><topic>Intensive care</topic><topic>Intubation</topic><topic>Intubation, Intratracheal - methods</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Motivation</topic><topic>Oxygen Inhalation Therapy - methods</topic><topic>Oxygenation</topic><topic>Rapid sequence intubation</topic><topic>Respiration, Artificial</topic><topic>Respiratory therapy</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pavlov, Ivan, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Medrano, Sofia, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weingart, Scott, MD</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health and Medical</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The American journal of emergency medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pavlov, Ivan, MD</au><au>Medrano, Sofia, MD</au><au>Weingart, Scott, MD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Apneic oxygenation reduces the incidence of hypoxemia during emergency intubation: A systematic review and meta-analysis</atitle><jtitle>The American journal of emergency medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Emerg Med</addtitle><date>2017-08-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1184</spage><epage>1189</epage><pages>1184-1189</pages><issn>0735-6757</issn><eissn>1532-8171</eissn><abstract>Abstract Study objective Apneic oxygenation has been advocated for the prevention of hypoxemia during emergency endotracheal intubation. Because of conflicting results from recent trials, the efficacy of apneic oxygenation remains unclear. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the effect of apneic oxygenation on the incidence of clinically significant hypoxemia during emergency endotracheal intubation. Methods MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PubMed databases were searched without language and time restrictions for studies of apneic oxygenation performed in a critical care setting. Meta-analysis was conducted with a random-effect model, and according to intention-to-treat allocation wherever applicable. Subgroup analyses were performed to ensure the robustness of findings across various clinical outcomes. Results Eight studies ( n = 1953) were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled absolute risk of clinically significant hypoxemia was 27.6% in the usual care group and 19.1% in the apneic oxygenation group, without any heterogeneity across studies (I2 = 0%; p = 0.42). Apneic oxygenation reduced the relative risk of hypoxemia by 30% (95% confidence interval 0.59 to 0.82). There was a trend toward lower mortality in the apneic oxygenation group (relative risk of death 0.77; 95% confidence interval 0.59 to 1.02). Conclusion Apneic oxygenation significantly reduces the incidence of hypoxemia during emergency endotracheal intubation. These findings support the inclusion of apneic oxygenation in everyday clinical practice.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>28647137</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ajem.2017.06.029</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0735-6757
ispartof The American journal of emergency medicine, 2017-08, Vol.35 (8), p.1184-1189
issn 0735-6757
1532-8171
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1913832259
source ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Airway management
Apneic oxygenation
Bias
Canada
Clinical trials
Collaboration
Crash intubation
Critical care
Critical Illness - therapy
Emergency
Emergency medical care
Evidence-based medicine
Heterogeneity
Humans
Hypoxemia
Hypoxia - physiopathology
Hypoxia - prevention & control
Hypoxia - therapy
Incidence
Intensive care
Intubation
Intubation, Intratracheal - methods
Meta-analysis
Mortality
Motivation
Oxygen Inhalation Therapy - methods
Oxygenation
Rapid sequence intubation
Respiration, Artificial
Respiratory therapy
Systematic review
title Apneic oxygenation reduces the incidence of hypoxemia during emergency intubation: A systematic review and meta-analysis
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T01%3A53%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Apneic%20oxygenation%20reduces%20the%20incidence%20of%20hypoxemia%20during%20emergency%20intubation:%20A%20systematic%20review%20and%20meta-analysis&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20journal%20of%20emergency%20medicine&rft.au=Pavlov,%20Ivan,%20MD&rft.date=2017-08-01&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1184&rft.epage=1189&rft.pages=1184-1189&rft.issn=0735-6757&rft.eissn=1532-8171&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ajem.2017.06.029&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1924518764%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-1af6496b8a0a6ee98712be93d8593a47326732164b4b4d05ffb815f70d9ebcd93%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1924518764&rft_id=info:pmid/28647137&rfr_iscdi=true